Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 12:05:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 [201] 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 880232 times)
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 04:23:31 AM
 #4001

So.. we are starting to get some power numbers:
https://hashfast.com/second-tests/

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH. 
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

So essentially roughly the same power efficiency as KNC, shipped late and at higher cost.

So KNC wins, and will make much more money if there is ever a round #2 match...
Let's see if Cointerra gives HF an ass kicking at half the cost, they might even deliver by the end of the year

1713960338
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713960338

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713960338
Reply with quote  #2

1713960338
Report to moderator
1713960338
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713960338

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713960338
Reply with quote  #2

1713960338
Report to moderator
1713960338
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713960338

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713960338
Reply with quote  #2

1713960338
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713960338
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713960338

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713960338
Reply with quote  #2

1713960338
Report to moderator
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 04:33:16 AM
 #4002

can you cook pizza with that thing?


If you make a pizza that needs a few minute 150C soak followed by a spike to 230C and it doesn't have any water in it, then it will cook it just fine.


1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 04:34:06 AM
 #4003

So.. we are starting to get some power numbers:
https://hashfast.com/second-tests/

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH.  
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

Is that just the power consumption at die level? If so, complete system power consumption is going to be significantly higher.

Buy & Hold
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 255



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 04:46:43 AM
 #4004

So.. we are starting to get some power numbers:
https://hashfast.com/second-tests/

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH. 
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

So essentially roughly the same power efficiency as KNC, shipped late and at higher cost.

That is what I was thinking as well... KnC doesn't have MPP... but KnC also shipped when they said they were going to START shipping (well roughly).  C'est la vie. Sometimes you eat the bear... sometime the bear eats you.
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 255



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 04:53:35 AM
 #4005

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH.  
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

Is that just the power consumption at die level? If so, complete system power consumption is going to be significantly higher.

I am assuming that this full consumption. chip is probably pulling 200 of that 300.
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 05:37:47 AM
 #4006

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH.  
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

Is that just the power consumption at die level? If so, complete system power consumption is going to be significantly higher.

I am assuming that this full consumption. chip is probably pulling 200 of that 300.
400W is getting to be a significant amount of power, to the point where I start to wonder what kind of temperature rise we'll see with a single 120mm radiator and a CLC system. Die temps @ 700MHz with all four active are going to be interesting.

I have to say it's more than a little disconcerting that some of those boards are missing the ASICs and all of them are missing the microcontroller or whatever that chip is they had the AVR32 board wired into. That doesn't seem like volume production to me.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 05:49:02 AM
 #4007

How's the difficulty been these last two months we missed mining due to late delivery and how much will that impact us do you guys think?

From 1 Nov to 1 JAN a 400 GH/s rig would generate ~17.6 BTC based on historical difficulty and the next projected difficulty change on Dec 22nd.    

Now that assumes delivery on 1 January delivery. At the end of December, a 400 GH/s rig will generate ~0.2 BTC per day so feel free to adjust that +/- 0.2 BTC per day based on when delivery actually occurs.
defcon23
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 06:54:47 AM
 #4008

So.. we are starting to get some power numbers:
https://hashfast.com/second-tests/

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH. 
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

So essentially roughly the same power efficiency as KNC, shipped late and at higher cost.

So KNC wins, and will make much more money if there is ever a round #2 match...
Let's see if Cointerra gives HF an ass kicking at half the cost, they might even deliver by the end of the year

+1   let's see Wink
defcon23
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 06:56:24 AM
 #4009

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH.  
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

Is that just the power consumption at die level? If so, complete system power consumption is going to be significantly higher.

I am assuming that this full consumption. chip is probably pulling 200 of that 300.
400W is getting to be a significant amount of power, to the point where I start to wonder what kind of temperature rise we'll see with a single 120mm radiator and a CLC system. Die temps @ 700MHz with all four active are going to be interesting.

I have to say it's more than a little disconcerting that some of those boards are missing the ASICs and all of them are missing the microcontroller or whatever that chip is they had the AVR32 board wired into. That doesn't seem like volume production to me.
that is good sense.
Witness
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 07:04:43 AM
 #4010

The boards on the right hand side. I can see two boards with the dies painted green, any reason for that?
Over cooked or they forgot the plastic protector on.

_HashFast Technologies_28 nm mining
Producer of High Performance ASICS  (IT'S A SCAM)
BabyJets & Sierras On Sale today!
aerobatic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 702
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 07:04:56 AM
 #4011

Quote
“We’ve got two dies up on this. Right now we are clocking it at 700mhz and .84v core voltage. It’s doing 248Gh/s on only 2 dies! Half a Golden Nonce.

Consumption is around 300 watts total and 78C die temp.

So... we are looking at ~600W total for around ~500GH? Obviously the 25% extra hashrate is nice, but I thought we were expecting the total power to be under 1J/GH.  
I guess that isn't going to happen unless we underclock.

Is that just the power consumption at die level? If so, complete system power consumption is going to be significantly higher.

I am assuming that this full consumption. chip is probably pulling 200 of that 300.
400W is getting to be a significant amount of power, to the point where I start to wonder what kind of temperature rise we'll see with a single 120mm radiator and a CLC system. Die temps @ 700MHz with all four active are going to be interesting.

I have to say it's more than a little disconcerting that some of those boards are missing the ASICs and all of them are missing the microcontroller or whatever that chip is they had the AVR32 board wired into. That doesn't seem like volume production to me.
that is good sense.

if it consumes 300 watts for half the dies, then its not likely to simply double it as it goes beyond the chip's thermal envelope... and beyond the cooling capacity of the cooling system...

so.. the voltage will have to be reduced to make it consume less power... which may affect performance.

joshv06
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 991
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 07:05:22 AM
 #4012

Code:
HashFast Twitter:   HALF A TERRA-HASH - Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip in the World!

D A I L Y -  C R Y P T O  -  G I V E W A Y S
▬▬ ●●     Your source for daily free giveaways !    ●● ▬▬
DISCORD    -    TWITTER    -    WEBSITE
aerobatic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 702
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 07:15:34 AM
 #4013

Code:
HashFast Twitter:   HALF A TERRA-HASH - Fastest Bitcoin Mining Chip in the World!

very good news!  looking forward to hearing the volts & power stats of that speed...

joshv06
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 991
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 07:19:54 AM
 #4014

Im looking forward to actually getting my baby jets..

D A I L Y -  C R Y P T O  -  G I V E W A Y S
▬▬ ●●     Your source for daily free giveaways !    ●● ▬▬
DISCORD    -    TWITTER    -    WEBSITE
minternj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 07:39:23 AM
 #4015

https://hashfast.com/hashfast-announces-fastest-bitcoin-mining-chip-in-the-world/
"500 GH/s on a single chip, while still running underclocked.  Even prior to full throttle results – this represents a breakthrough in bitcoin mining and is several times faster than any prior generation of technology."

Apparently 500GH  is underclocked.

Warning about Nitrogensports.eu
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=709114.0
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 09:07:43 AM
 #4016

Apparently 500GH  is underclocked.

At this point, under- or overclocked doesnt really have any real meaning yet. When you under or overclock a chip, its changing the clockspeed in relation to the manufacturers default speeds. These chips are still being characterized.
Visesrion
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 314


GIF by SOCIFI


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 09:21:58 AM
 #4017


Still no word yet that they're shipping us 2x sierras with 5 modules in total each running at 500Gh/s as a result of the lies and deception?



That is not going to happen. I suggested that long time ago and the answer was a big NO. They don't care even a little about customers after they have your money



                ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄                          ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
             █████████████████                   █████████████████
         █████████████████████████           █████████████████████████
       █████████████████████████████       █████████████████████████████
     █████████████████████████████████   █████████████████████████████████
   ████████████▀           ▀██████████████████████████████████████████████
  ████████████▄▄███████████▄▄█████████▓▓▓███████████████████████████████████
 ▐██████████████▀         ▀██████████▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████
 ██████████████▄▄█████████▄▄█████████▓▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████
▐█████████████████▀      ▀██████████▓▓▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████▌
▐████████████████▄▄██████▄▄█████████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███████████████████████████████████▌
▐██████████████████      ███████████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███████████████████████████████████▌
▐██████████████████ ████ ████████████▓▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████
 ██████████████████ ████ ████████████▓▓▓▓▓███████████████    ████████████████
  █████████████████ ████ █████████████▓▓▓████████████████   █████████████   █
   ████████████████      ███████████████████████████████    ███████████
    ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████     ████████
      ███████████████████████████████     █████████████████
        ███████████████████████████         █████████████████▓
           ████████████████████                ███████████████████▓
               ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀                       ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄▄██████████████████▄▄
▄████████████████████████▄
▄████████████████████████████▄
████████████████████████████████
▓████████████████████████████████▓
███████████████████████▒░███████████
▄█████████████████▒░      ███████████▄
█████████████░░          ░████████████
█████████░              ░█████████████
██████████▓░░          ░██████████████
██████████████▓░       ███████████████
▀███████████████▒     ░██████████████▀
████████████████▒   ░███████████████
████████████████░ ░███████████████
████████████████████████████████
▀████████████████████████████▀
▀████████████████████████▀
▀▀██████████████████▀▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
.
JOIN OUR
TELEGRAM
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 09:23:25 AM
 #4018


Still no word yet that they're shipping us 2x sierras with 5 modules in total each running at 500Gh/s as a result of the lies and deception?



They have already said no.  Single unit and MPP sometime after February.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 13, 2013, 09:34:47 AM
 #4019

Idiots will still buy from them, and they are probably selling in the order of millions per week - they really don't care about compensating batch 1 convestors to have more sales; they have plenty already.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
HashFast_CL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100

HashFast Community Liaison


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2013, 09:40:28 AM
 #4020

https://hashfast.com/hashfast-announces-fastest-bitcoin-mining-chip-in-the-world/
"500 GH/s on a single chip, while still running underclocked.  Even prior to full throttle results – this represents a breakthrough in bitcoin mining and is several times faster than any prior generation of technology."

Apparently 500GH  is underclocked.

 Shocked  Wow!  Five hundred gigahashes/sec per chip.  With room to overclock.   Shocked

And more:

Quote
HALF A TERRAHASH/s (500GH/s) on a single chip.
HashFast ASIC Golden Nonce- Half a Terrahash Complete bitcoin mining system as found in the BabyJet
This result was achieved during the bringup process of HashFast’s GN chip and module. The engineering team are progressively testing the system, and have not yet reached the full speeds the system was designed for. We expect to see better results over the next few days.
This milestone represents a breakthrough in Bitcoin mining technology and is several times faster than existing Bitcoin mining chips. We are starting volume production of mining systems now.
Stay tuned for further speed results.

"Bitcoin enables ordinary people to fight back, to avoid and evade snooping governments, which enact, use and abuse laws that allow them, without due process, to investigate, tax, control and seize privately owned assets."  -   Leon Louw

“We can say without equivocation that firms like MasterCard, Visa and the TBTF banks like JPMorgan and Goldman hate the idea of ever having to compete for business again. They have grown comfortable in their corrupt world of writing laws for themselves without any regulatory oversight. They enjoy the exorbitant privilege of bilking the American economy with extortionary transaction rates. They are scared of Bitcoin. And they should be. It offers transparency, cost efficiency and anonymity.” - Max Kaiser
Pages: « 1 ... 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 [201] 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!