Hash Rate / CPU Comparison Table
racerx:
Compiled this as I thought it may be of interest to someone... just some averages from hardware I'm running at the moment.
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 350 @ 2.27GHz
cores : 2
cpu MHz : 2266.000
hashespersec : 1486742
model name : Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5400 @ 2.70GHz
cores : 2
cpu MHz : 2700.000
hashespersec : 2271696
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7300 @ 2.66GHz
cores : 2
cpu MHz : 2667.000
hashespersec : 2518728
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240e Processor
cores : 2
cpu MHz : 2812.699
hashespersec : 2706358
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz
cores : 4
cpu MHz : 2265.620
hashespersec : 6502822
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5530 @ 2.40GHz
cores : 4
cpu MHz : 2395.000
hashespersec : 7138070
model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor
cores : 6
cpu MHz : 2819.765
hashespersec : 15840454
FlyingMoose:
What OS are you using? I'm running on a 6-core, faster Xeon, and my rate is way below yours (OSX). Are you using SSE or a GPU to get these rates?
FlyingMoose:
I'm getting about 6,000Khash/sec with a 6-core, 3.33GHz Xeon Mac Pro. I tried the -4way switch but it didn't seem to help.
Stephen Gornick:
Just want to make sure I understand this correctly.
The next hash that the Bitcoin client running on my old single-core laptop has just as much chance of solving the block as does the next hash performed by a miner running on the most souped up GPU-aided hardware out there, right?
The only difference is that the number of attempts by the miner is an order of magnitude or greater than the number of attempts by me.
Is my understanding of this correct?
ribuck:
Your understanding is correct.
But the difference in number of attempts between your laptop and a souped-up GPU is enormous...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page