|
Title: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: Hyena on April 07, 2015, 12:14:36 PM http://s21.postimg.org/gs6m2snpz/btc.png
false alarm, just a software bug Title: Re: Holy ****! What's with the spread?! 245 <--> 285 Post by: ensurance982 on April 07, 2015, 12:21:09 PM Well, bitcoinity's depth charts have a track record of going slightly awry at times. I don't really know if someone has found out a reason for this, but the charts on Bitcoinwisdom seem to be a tad more reliable!
Title: Re: Holy ****! What's with the spread?! 245 <--> 285 Post by: Hyena on April 07, 2015, 12:26:37 PM Well, bitcoinity's depth charts have a track record of going slightly awry at times. I don't really know if someone has found out a reason for this, but the charts on Bitcoinwisdom seem to be a tad more reliable! Good point. Stamp's direct order book looks very different. Title: Re: Holy ****! What's with the spread?! 245 <--> 285 Post by: Q7 on April 07, 2015, 12:28:48 PM Did I miss something over here? It looks to me that the bid and ask price is almost very close at 253 and 255. Or any particular period of time that you were seeing such a large bid/ask spread? Usually it's quite rare but most of the time it is due to low trading volume happening only at certain exchangers.
Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: uki on April 07, 2015, 01:10:33 PM Looks like a glitch to me. Happens sometime to some exchanges, nothing to make big story about.
Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: 1Referee on April 07, 2015, 02:44:23 PM I was using bitcoinity for quite some time, but not anymore as I prefer to use bitcoinwisdom as they seem to be more accurate and have less issues.
Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: damiano on April 07, 2015, 02:45:55 PM I was using bitcoinity for quite some time, but not anymore as I prefer to use bitcoinwisdom as they seem to be more accurate and have less issues. Bitcoinity was never really that great. I only liked it for the visualization of walls moving around and it lagged. Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: ensurance982 on April 07, 2015, 04:29:11 PM I was using bitcoinity for quite some time, but not anymore as I prefer to use bitcoinwisdom as they seem to be more accurate and have less issues. Bitcoinity was never really that great. I only liked it for the visualization of walls moving around and it lagged. I guess it isn't so bad for people just getting into the game. Bitcoinity looks much easier and may very well be simpler to comprehend. Bitcoinwisdom looked pretty complicated in the first place, but I now prefer it, it just offers so much more and is better. Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: Hyena on April 07, 2015, 04:32:08 PM I was using bitcoinity for quite some time, but not anymore as I prefer to use bitcoinwisdom as they seem to be more accurate and have less issues. Bitcoinity was never really that great. I only liked it for the visualization of walls moving around and it lagged. I guess it isn't so bad for people just getting into the game. Bitcoinity looks much easier and may very well be simpler to comprehend. Bitcoinwisdom looked pretty complicated in the first place, but I now prefer it, it just offers so much more and is better. I don't like bitcoinwisdom because it's irritatingly slow in comparison to bitcoinity. Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: ensurance982 on April 07, 2015, 05:40:07 PM I was using bitcoinity for quite some time, but not anymore as I prefer to use bitcoinwisdom as they seem to be more accurate and have less issues. Bitcoinity was never really that great. I only liked it for the visualization of walls moving around and it lagged. I guess it isn't so bad for people just getting into the game. Bitcoinity looks much easier and may very well be simpler to comprehend. Bitcoinwisdom looked pretty complicated in the first place, but I now prefer it, it just offers so much more and is better. I don't like bitcoinwisdom because it's irritatingly slow in comparison to bitcoinity. Is it really slow or are you just surprised not to see some trades at all? It's a feature that they do filter small trades below a certain value or combine them into one "trade" when reporting them. Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: Hyena on April 07, 2015, 07:21:45 PM Is it really slow or are you just surprised not to see some trades at all? It's a feature that they do filter small trades below a certain value or combine them into one "trade" when reporting them. They're using HTML5 canvas which is kind of laggy. It's usable but perhaps their FPS limit should be higher or something. Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: ensurance982 on April 07, 2015, 08:08:21 PM Is it really slow or are you just surprised not to see some trades at all? It's a feature that they do filter small trades below a certain value or combine them into one "trade" when reporting them. They're using HTML5 canvas which is kind of laggy. It's usable but perhaps their FPS limit should be higher or something. Well for me it works pretty well. Not dragging down the CPU performance or anything, There just isn't happening as much as on Bitcoinwisdom and others. Also, their last price position needs to update quicker on timeframe-changes. Title: Re: Bitcoinity's wild spread: 245 <--> 285 (software bug) Post by: SirChiko on April 08, 2015, 03:07:20 PM Is it really slow or are you just surprised not to see some trades at all? It's a feature that they do filter small trades below a certain value or combine them into one "trade" when reporting them. They're using HTML5 canvas which is kind of laggy. It's usable but perhaps their FPS limit should be higher or something. Well for me it works pretty well. Not dragging down the CPU performance or anything, There just isn't happening as much as on Bitcoinwisdom and others. Also, their last price position needs to update quicker on timeframe-changes. |
