Bitcoin Forum

Other => Off-topic => Topic started by: Bit_Happy on April 11, 2015, 08:20:06 PM



Title: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Bit_Happy on April 11, 2015, 08:20:06 PM
'Satoshi' could be a highly educated American woman, a tripped-out Oriental female (pictured below), or perhaps a sexless alien from a distant planet.
Did the subject ever come up in his early posts?
Edit: "Satoshi" is usually a male name, but that could just be part of the cover.
Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?


http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/640x360/p0216d3q.jpg


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: sniveling on April 11, 2015, 08:22:50 PM
No, there are some ridiculous conspiracy theorists that think Satoshi is a front for a secret NSA project, but everyone knows Satoshi is really a front for a secret CIA project.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: gentlemand on April 11, 2015, 08:29:17 PM
My guess is that it was perhaps a group with one person in charge of interacting with the outside world to keep up the consistency of grammar, time zones etc. That person might also have been directing it and farming out the odd task.

I've no idea about gender. Boys rather than girls are more into computing and cryptography - ergo it was a group of bouncing baby boys, with maybe the odd feminoid chucked in too.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: neurotypical on April 11, 2015, 08:31:09 PM
'Satoshi' could be a highly educated American woman, a tripped-out Oriental female (pictured below), or perhaps a sexless alien from a distant planet.
Did the subject ever come up in his early posts?
Edit: "Satoshi" is usually a male name, but that could just be part of the cover.
Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?


http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/640x360/p0216d3q.jpg
My guess is it's a male because the demographics for electronic-software stuff is male, simply based on raw statistics.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: gentlemand on April 11, 2015, 08:44:27 PM
No i think Satoshi is the superior gender of all.... meaning bisexual.


Shouldn't we be hoping for a hermaphrodite? That would be the wisest of them all, or the most pissed off and clueless about either gender. I'm not sure.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Bit_Happy on April 11, 2015, 08:45:04 PM
No i think Satoshi is the superior gender of all.... meaning bisexual.


Seriously, seriouscoin?
Well-placed observers have noticed "Satoshi" is quietly making large donations to bisexual marriage lobby groups in at least 25 American states. Keeping substantial donations quiet is pretty hard these days.  


My guess is that it was perhaps a group with one person in charge of interacting with the outside world to keep up the consistency of grammar, time zones etc. That person might also have been directing it and farming out the odd task.

I've no idea about gender. Boys rather than girls are more into computing and cryptography - ergo it was a group of bouncing baby boys, with maybe the odd feminoid chucked in too.

Just a code name for the project? It is pretty complete, almost error-free code for a single person to have done.*
*Part of Bitcoin is based on older projects.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: gentlemand on April 11, 2015, 08:49:56 PM
No i think Satoshi is the superior gender of all.... meaning bisexual.


Shouldn't we be hoping for a hermaphrodite? That would be the wisest of them all, or the most pissed off and clueless about either gender. I'm not sure.

Darwin even said that himself, the most superior species would be one with no gender (hence bisexual).

He also believes god is one himself.


I know a couple of bisexuals. They seemed just as gendery as anyone else to me. I would be more impressed and maybe less surprised if Satoshi turned out to be an ant colony.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Ibelievetruly on April 11, 2015, 09:14:19 PM
No i think Satoshi is the superior gender of all.... meaning bisexual.


Shouldn't we be hoping for a hermaphrodite? That would be the wisest of them all, or the most pissed off and clueless about either gender. I'm not sure.

Darwin even said that himself, the most superior species would be one with no gender (hence bisexual).

He also believes god is one himself.


I know a couple of bisexuals. They seemed just as gendery as anyone else to me. I would be more impressed and maybe less surprised if Satoshi turned out to be an ant colony.

Truly, there is no such thing as a 100% straight person as there is no 100% ever in life(Everything is subjective, nothing can ever be completely certain), everyone is bisexual to some degree, no matter how small or insignificant.

Also, there's definitive proof that there is no god.

And finally, Satoshi Nakamoto is a common male Japanese name. Therefore, the person/s behind nakamoto are much more likely to be male.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Professor James Moriarty on April 11, 2015, 09:19:27 PM
No, there are some ridiculous conspiracy theorists that think Satoshi is a front for a secret NSA project, but everyone knows Satoshi is really a front for a secret CIA project.

No no no, the NSA is a front for a secret CIA project which is a front for a secrete Satoshi project which is a front for an alien invasion.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Lethn on April 11, 2015, 09:25:11 PM
The best theory I think is him being an alien, but honestly, with this kind of technology you keep your identity secret for sure.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: ً؛قو on April 12, 2015, 08:19:22 AM
he wont keep his identity a secret  for ever


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: NyeFe on April 12, 2015, 09:20:30 AM
You can't assume satoshi was a male. He is a male. I've check out some of his various social profiles, including the first decentralised Bitcoin post, explaining the break-through


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: DLCseller on April 12, 2015, 10:35:57 AM
Satoshi sounds like a guy's name to me.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: btcfinans on April 12, 2015, 10:38:31 AM
Edison, Einstein, Tesla and many more... Yes he is male  ;)


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: bandana on April 12, 2015, 12:53:37 PM
ofcourse yes.....how can u even think like that lol


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: ndnh on April 12, 2015, 01:06:55 PM
He was a guy, 28 yo, the public face of the organization.  8)


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: 2btc on April 12, 2015, 01:51:09 PM
Of course he was a male. We all know there are no females on this message board, or even the internet for that matter  ;D. Seriously though, I think it's safe to say satoshi was a male or at least a group of males, though I suppose a woman could have been among them. I guess we'll never know.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: planetroving on April 13, 2015, 07:16:47 AM
I have always assumed Satoshi was a male because of all the news and stories I've read, and most of them depict him as a male. Also, it's a male name. But now, I think of 'Satoshi Nakamoto' is a group of people, mostly built up of males. That is what I now assume.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: jerol31 on April 13, 2015, 10:14:28 AM
Yes, I suppose Satoshi was a male.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: KBH on April 13, 2015, 12:33:26 PM
this could come only to the male, definitely - he's a male !


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: dulldog on April 13, 2015, 04:41:56 PM
No, there are some ridiculous conspiracy theorists that think Satoshi is a front for a secret NSA project, but everyone knows Satoshi is really a front for a secret CIA project.

lol


I never thought of Satoshi's gender, now I've gotta think for a moment :)


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: elpanosire on April 13, 2015, 04:53:42 PM
Why does it matter, all that does is we got bitcoin , all hail Satoshi ;D


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: b!z on April 13, 2015, 06:01:08 PM
Considering the fact that most bitcoin users are male, I would say it is likely.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Mikestang on April 14, 2015, 12:12:07 AM

Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?


The majority of computer programmers are male, so odds are if Satoshi is/was one singular person that they would be male.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Gyfts on April 14, 2015, 01:20:49 AM
That's an interesting idea to say, because I always considered satoshi a masculine name which led me to believe Satoshi was male. But who knows, he could quite possibly be a female. But there has been some evidence of possibilities exactly on who Satoshi is. They've led to a male "suspect".


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Philipd on April 14, 2015, 06:04:10 AM
most definitely satoshi is a male. as all. other devs


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: lumeire on April 14, 2015, 07:24:18 AM
He is Illuminati


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Lies on April 14, 2015, 09:49:45 PM
He is Illuminati

He... you think male!

Δ


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: pissedoff on April 14, 2015, 10:32:37 PM
I think satoshi could be a group rather than an individual just because how good this system was when released there were only a few major bugs.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: SureLockLoans on April 14, 2015, 10:43:43 PM
I have always thought of him as a male and have refereed to him as a male just like in this reply  :D I cant help it I just feel this is a mans project hence the amount of males to females ratio


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Daniel91 on April 15, 2015, 02:10:18 PM
I assume everything.
So, either Satoshi is male, or female, or maybe this is the name for whole organization.
Probably we will never know.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Malin Keshar on April 15, 2015, 02:19:29 PM
Satoshi is a male name, isn't?

I think people that pick male names usually are males


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Djentriser on April 16, 2015, 10:35:05 AM
of course he is male ..or group of people..there is no chance he was a woman..anf if so..than Im sure it was transgender person or lesbien. No prejudices only experience and realistic estimates :D


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: SvintuS on April 16, 2015, 12:13:43 PM
he's definitely the male, there can be no doubt


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: ndnh on April 16, 2015, 07:00:08 PM
Ok ok, guys. This is it.
I admit I am male.  ;D

Hope now everything is settled. OP may lock this thread. I just used Satoshe name as a cover.


Edit: And I ain't no Illuminati.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Bubbsandbubbs3 on April 17, 2015, 07:14:15 PM
No, there are some ridiculous conspiracy theorists that think Satoshi is a front for a secret NSA project, but everyone knows Satoshi is really a front for a secret CIA project.
actually, it's neither. He was illuminati.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Bubbsandbubbs3 on April 17, 2015, 07:14:46 PM
Ok ok, guys. This is it.
I admit I am male.  ;D

Hope now everything is settled. OP may lock this thread. I just used Satoshe name as a cover.


Edit: And I ain't no Illuminati.
lies.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Snorek on April 17, 2015, 08:13:27 PM
I believe that either Satoshi is a man or he is in reality a group of people. I don't think that there are many women capable of creating such amazing creation like bitcoin is.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Mikestang on April 17, 2015, 11:03:37 PM
I've been reading "Book of Satoshi", a collection of almost all of Satoshi's online writings.  I've come to the conclusion and am 100% convinced that Satoshi is not/was not a singular person.  When you start seeing all of the potential issues that people brought up and how Satoshi thought of everything (not literally, but come on, basically everything) then you have to wonder how one person could have done it.  You need a team of people to sit around and bounce things off each other. It doesn't need to be a big team, 3 or 5 people would probably do it, but the initial project has all the signs of a collaborative effort.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: hedgy73 on April 17, 2015, 11:40:43 PM
I've been reading "Book of Satoshi", a collection of almost all of Satoshi's online writings.  I've come to the conclusion and am 100% convinced that Satoshi is not/was not a singular person.  When you start seeing all of the potential issues that people brought up and how Satoshi thought of everything (not literally, but come on, basically everything) then you have to wonder how one person could have done it.  You need a team of people to sit around and bounce things off each other. It doesn't need to be a big team, 3 or 5 people would probably do it, but the initial project has all the signs of a collaborative effort.

I agree I don't think Satoshi was 1 person either.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: Rmcdermott927 on April 18, 2015, 04:42:22 AM
I assume Satoshi was a male because Satoshi has never once asked me to cuddle.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: KonstantinosM on April 18, 2015, 11:49:47 PM
There are no girls on the Internet.

Lock this thread.


Title: Re: Do you assume Satoshi was a Male?
Post by: ndnh on April 19, 2015, 08:29:54 AM
There are no girls on the Internet.

Lock this thread.

You are wrong.  ;D
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=784915.0