Title: Spooky Quantum Action Might Hold the Universe Together Post by: BADecker on May 11, 2015, 10:12:35 PM From http://www.wired.com/2015/05/spooky-quantum-action-might-hold-universe-together/:
Quote Swingle is one of a growing number of physicists who see the value in adapting tensor networks to cosmology. Among other benefits, it could help resolve an ongoing debate about the nature of space-time itself. According to John Preskill, the Richard P. Feynman professor of theoretical physics at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, many physicists have suspected a deep connection between quantum entanglement—the “spooky action at a distance” that so vexed Albert Einstein—and space-time geometry at the smallest scales since the physicist John Wheeler first described the latter as a bubbly, frothy foam six decades ago. “If you probe geometry at scales comparable to the Planck scale” — the shortest possible distance—“it looks less and less like space-time,” said Preskill. “It’s not really geometry anymore. It’s something else, an emergent thing [that arises] from something more fundamental.” Read more at http://www.wired.com/2015/05/spooky-quantum-action-might-hold-universe-together/ :) Title: Re: Spooky Quantum Action Might Hold the Universe Together Post by: BADecker on May 11, 2015, 10:49:24 PM When you read the article, keep in mind that our mentality - the mentality of those people who are doing the research - is using a third set of holographic activity. Mentality studying Spooky Quantum Action in this way is like a "next stage" hologram, beyond the holographic activity that space-time is like.
We are bordering on finding the way that we can control things with our mind. Here is a comparison. Quantum mechanics suggests that anything might be true. We use quantum math in many ways, and then work with the ways that match what we see in nature. Quantum math, however, might work in other ways. If we believe that we have clearly found proof through QM that something exists, even though the thing does not really exist until we have found the proof for it, it just might come into being like it had always been there. Is this dangerous? What if the common, everyday person were given a tool to "visualize" "quantumly." :) |