|
Title: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: BC Systems on September 07, 2012, 10:03:59 PM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: N12 on September 07, 2012, 10:07:01 PM Congratulations, Atlas.
Also: http://www.trendonshavers.com/ I think bitlane registered that. Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: DonShrents on September 07, 2012, 10:40:05 PM Couldn't the above post be considered pure speculation and off topic ?
~DonShrents Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: finkleshnorts on September 07, 2012, 10:41:19 PM Thanks for following up on coincomm's hard work.
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Chang Hum on September 07, 2012, 11:27:33 PM Has he got criminal charges against him yet?
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Fluttershy on September 08, 2012, 12:55:06 AM Bad news.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust#Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: myrkul on September 08, 2012, 12:58:01 AM Needs a little editing, is all. Just replace forum posts links with links to Bitcoin Magazine, and we're set.
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: sadpandatech on September 08, 2012, 01:02:34 AM Couldn't the above post be considered pure speculation and off topic ? ~DonShrents sure could, since they obviously did not so much as even check a whois on it.. ;p Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: stochastic on September 08, 2012, 01:07:55 AM Bad news. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust#Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust It is ok, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-yield_investment_program#Other_HYIPs Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Cluster2k on September 08, 2012, 01:22:44 AM Bad news. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust#Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust The truth hurts. Some are still trying to deny it. Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Qoheleth on September 08, 2012, 02:02:12 AM Bad news. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust#Bitcoin_Savings_and_Trust The truth hurts. Some are still trying to deny it. Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Fluttershy on September 08, 2012, 02:20:55 AM Did the article get smaller? ???
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: BC Systems on September 08, 2012, 02:42:09 AM Welp, we tried. Maybe some other time.
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: BinaryMage on September 08, 2012, 07:04:00 AM Did the article get smaller? ??? I think they cut the factual parts and evidence. Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Fluttershy on September 08, 2012, 07:09:29 AM Did the article get smaller? ??? I think they cut the factual parts and evidence. Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Bitcoin Oz on September 08, 2012, 08:05:48 AM Did the article get smaller? ??? I think they cut the factual parts and evidence. Theres a whole deletionist movement on wikipedia. Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: misterbigg on September 29, 2012, 07:15:43 PM The article page has been deleted, FYI.
Title: Re: Bitcoin Savings and Trust Wikipedia Article Has Been Approved Post by: Ilikeham on October 01, 2012, 10:00:30 PM Wikipedia is almost the most useless information tool on the internet. Only one forum that's totally full of trolls is more useless.
|