|
Title: Cointelegraph on nems technical reference Post by: kodtycoon on May 18, 2015, 05:55:48 PM http://cointelegraph.com/news/114289/nem-technical-reference-introduces-reputation-enhanced-proof-of-importance
Title: Re: Cointelegraph on nems technical reference Post by: Zer0Sum on May 18, 2015, 10:51:27 PM http://cointelegraph.com/news/114289/nem-technical-reference-introduces-reputation-enhanced-proof-of-importance The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)... But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost. Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material... It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM. Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality :( :( :( Title: Re: Cointelegraph on nems technical reference Post by: I am the guy on May 19, 2015, 04:42:23 AM http://cointelegraph.com/news/114289/nem-technical-reference-introduces-reputation-enhanced-proof-of-importance The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)... But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost. Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material... It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM. Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality :( :( :( Kinda sounds what's happening to crypto in general and not really specific to NEM. Title: Re: Cointelegraph on nems technical reference Post by: patmast3r on May 19, 2015, 08:51:30 AM http://cointelegraph.com/news/114289/nem-technical-reference-introduces-reputation-enhanced-proof-of-importance The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)... But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost. Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material... It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM. Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality :( :( :( I find it to be the least circle jerk thing i've seen in quite a bit. It just states facts instead of promising this revolution or that innovation. Anway I don't like the article much. There are clearly some missunderstandings. Makes me wonder how much technical background the editors at ct have. |