Bitcoin Forum

Cachecoin [CACH]


http://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin
http://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin

http://windsor.cach.co:8337/
http://cach.beeeeer.org/

http://cach.co/api/peers.txt
http://cach.co/api/info.json

http://explorer.cach.co/
http://faucet.cach.co/

http://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/154
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=427059

INFO
 

• Scrypt-Jane coin
• No ASIC miners
• Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake Mining
• Block Reward: Inversely proportional to the difficulty
• Difficulty adjustment every block.
• Difficulty Adjustment algorithm: Logarithmic
• Target of 15 minute block generation.
• Maximum of ~4 Million coins.
• Block Maturity: 520 Confirms
• Transaction Maturity: 6 Confirmations
• Coin age to Stake: 7 Days
• RPCPort: 2224
• Network Port: 2225

---

Background
As the most of you guys might know I was before deeply involved in the Darkcoin project and left Darkcoin behind due to a major conflict how Darkcoin is centralized to a single entity.

So you now might ask why CACH?
The answer is quite simple: I want to share my experiences to with the community and build something new together . CACH is one of the few coins which was here for quite a long time and had it's up during the price push which was caused from the ASIC project. It proofed it is stability over the last 12+ months, when the nethash was low and the number of nodes also was limited. So I reached out to some buddies to hear their opinion about getting CACH up2date and beyond. The result was that there still is interest in a community-driven and stable coin  which can be enchanced with some nice new features. (Warning, spoilers ahead!)



What has been done
After a healthcheck of Cachecoin we decided that we have to clean the backyard before we  move on so and have a solid and clean foundation for future developements .
We cleaned the repository, compiled and released new clients for Windows, Mac and Linux with current nodes and bugfixes added.
Pools, Blockexplorer and Richlist were upgraded and miner instructions for scrypt-chacha written.

PoW adjustment: Block reward logarithm invers proportional to difficulty, PoW ends with Block 100K.

PoS adjustment: 5% per annum, min stake time 7 days, max stake time 30 days.

What will be done
This is the fun part as there are many feature to be added or enchanced.
Just one note for the P&D Groups, this will not be your coin, no masternode or decentralized market cloning! There are enough coins out you can play with.


PoN
PoN and PoS work Hand in Hand starting with Block 100K.
Each Node has to have it is own IP to be able to mine and create Blocks. The Algorithm below show you the Concept, we will publish a Whitepaper and also a Proof of Concept soon.
seconds = ((first 4 bytes of as integer) sha256([node IP] [last blockhash])) * difficulty / (2 ^ 32) * (15 * 60).
This way, difficulty will adjust to about the number of nodes.
When the time has elapsed, the Node created a Block and send it to the Networks. Each node will confirm this Block by connection to the Block Creator Node.
(if not already within his Peers) - just to confirm the Block Hash.
PoN and PoS Blocks are altering, only the last PoN Block is verified by IP (as IP's might already be gone)


Community integration and decentralization
We thought a lot about how the community could be integrated and we think it is absolutely most important to get the community deeply involved, that means that we will open this coin up to the dev level to the community. That does not necessarily mean that you have to be a coder to participate, it means that you can influence the development process with your suggestions. Cachecoin protocol changes can be submitted on github pull requests and will be discussed by any developer or community member and will only be accepted on broad consensus. Proven contributors can gain write access to the repositories. More complex changes can be implemented via blockchain voting (compare Bitcoin BIP0034 and BIP0066). Implementing BIPs for Cachecoin is possible if the demand is there. Request BIP numbers on github submitting a proposal.

There will be monthly community meetings to decide which resources should be used to move forward. There will be no centralized structures like a foundation or a single-point-of-failure-developer.

Community backing
Some of you already decided to be a backer of this project and either gave CACH to the bounty pool or you gave BTC to the community pool.

The community pool is where funds are stored until they are allocated to tasks. If we cannot find a developer via the initial bounty pool or the bounty pool is depleted, we can use the funds which came throught the community as a donation to align tasks. The funds will be used to finance the development according to the roadmap. Since the community pool is filled with bitcoin, we can use bountysource.com to crowdsource technological progress. The funding address is: 3Fr2ExH2Z6dTnTv8MZMkAbwPY92o4hhXHh

The bounty pool can be refilled with CACH via: CcxCHNpoPZmnfu37vfJjFPcNKAvMLJYTej

Open and completed bounties:

Block explorer 5k *claimed*
http://explorer.cach.co/tx/e9907f4be58ba41d025c9b11a497d1aea7567c5332bce9855df82aec67fa3daa

Website 5k *claimed*
http://explorer.cach.co/tx/9011026e004d07627a45e0802bb138401c34b4c0105c024c57a3e42cad483238

First P2Pool 5k *claimed*
http://explorer.cach.co/tx/4fbc026b840e05e10464aeacdf0151ab17b120b94829a7397dbdce4b87260aeb

Revise Logo 5k *claimed*
http://explorer.cach.co/tx/9ad8a5df6e0db0acfd33bb295a06b0b6988a6eda140aec41cc772a5b97b3b63f

Debug P2Pool 5k *claimed*
http://explorer.cach.co/tx/3bbdaf7f8784ff2cb875b5f4f8b8886fb2c48caec49a4623da43f4107c8844c0

New ANN graphics 5k *pending*


Roadmap
The next big thing is moving CACH to a Bitcoin 0.11 fork to ensure we have a solid codebase for future developments. This is the most useful milestone. The old wallet is.. yes: old and based on a 3 years old bitcoin/peercoin/novacoin/yacoin branch.

Implementing PoN which will kick in @ Block 100k (stay tuned for the whitepaper).

---

Links

Source Code & Packages
https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin
ArchLinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cachecoin-git/

Binaries Windows & Mac & Linux
Linux x86
cachecoin-qt (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/32/cachecoin-qt?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/32/cachecoin-qt.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/32/cachecoin-qt.asc?raw=true)]
cachecoind (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/32/cachecoind?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/32/cachecoind.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/32/cachecoind.asc?raw=true)]

Linux x64
cachecoin-qt (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/64/cachecoin-qt?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/64/cachecoin-qt.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/64/cachecoin-qt.asc?raw=true)]
cachecoind (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/64/cachecoind?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/64/cachecoind.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/linux/64/cachecoind.asc?raw=true)]

Windows x86
cachecoin-0.7.5.9-setup.exe (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoin-0.7.5.9-win32-setup.exe?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoin-0.7.5.9-win32-setup.exe.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoin-0.7.5.9-win32-setup.exe.asc?raw=true)]
cachecoin-qt.exe (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoin-qt.exe?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoin-qt.exe.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoin-qt.exe.asc?raw=true)]
cachecoind.exe (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoind.exe?raw=true) [CHECKSUM (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoind.exe.sha256.txt?raw=true)][SIGNATURE (https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/windows/32/cachecoind.exe.asc?raw=true)]

Config & Addnodes
http://cach.co/api/peers.txt
rpcuser=<username>
rpcpassword=<password>
rpcallowip=192.168.*.*
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=2224
port=2225
server=1
listen=1
discover=1
maxconnections=32
addnode=78.46.66.139
addnode=188.40.57.201
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=5.9.86.18

Pools
BEEEEE5R: http://cach.beeeeer.org/
MPOS: http://pool.cachecoin.net/
MPOS: https://cache.suprnova.cc/
MPOS: http://cach.catcoin.cz/
P2Pool: http://cach.happymining.de:8336/
P2Pool: http://mehrangarh.cach.co:8336/
P2Pool: http://windsor.cach.co:8336/

P2Pool
https://github.com/vertoe/p2pool-cach
https://github.com/vertoe/p2pool-scanner
Scanner: http://windsor.cach.co:8337/

Miner
CPU: https://github.com/vertoe/cpuminer-cach
./minerd --algo=scrypt-jane -o mehrangarh.cach.co:8336 -u CLME1SkD7MLJe1se6fYJa2MyXq6sBJg3vY -p 0
./minerd --algo=scrypt-jane -o 46.101.173.108:8336 -u CLME1SkD7MLJe1se6fYJa2MyXq6sBJg3vY -p 0
GPU: yacminer
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475569.0
GPU: cudaminer
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
Scrypt-Chacha (N,1,1): --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388949883

Exchanges
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/154
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=427059

IRC (Freenode)
#cachecoin
#cachecoin-bots
bot: .cach .diff .solo .ticker .conv .p2pool

Forum
http://coinforums.org/cachecoin-forum/
http://www.reddit.com/r/cachecoin
http://wiki.cachecoin.net/

Slack
Invite https://crypto.typeform.com/to/ahJtmF
Chan https://cryptocommunity.slack.com/messages/cachecoin/

Rentingrigs
https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/scryptjane

Block Explorer
http://explorer.cach.co/
https://bchain.info/CACH/rich/
https://bchain.info/CACH/bootstrap.dat
https://bchain.info/CACH/tools/calculator

Faucet
http://faucet.cach.co

Coinmarketcap API
http://cach.co/api/info.json
http://coinmarketcap.com/all/views/all/
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cachecoin/

Testnet
./cachecoind -testnet -daemon -server -addnode=78.46.66.139 -addnode=188.40.57.201

---

Scrypt-Chacha
Scrypt(N, 1, 1)
N-Factor: 16
N: 131072
N-Start: 1388949883
N-Min: 4
N-Max: 30
N-Factor-Dates:

For solomining you have to add gen=1 to the cachecoin.conf file. You can also enable solomining in a wallet by going into the debug console and entering setgenerate true or issuing that command via a RPC connection.
Due to the coin's current difficulty solomining is not recommended. You will earn more coins by contributing your computer's hash power to a pool.

---

Proof-Of-Stake
Cachecoin utilizes Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mining that generates more coins when you retain your coins for 7 days. When the coins from a particular transaction become 7 days old, they will be used by your wallet to perform Proof-of-Stake mining that will generate new coins if you solve the block.
Just like a normal Proof-of-Work block, these PoS blocks require 520 confirmations. Once the PoS block has reached 520 confirmations, your staked coins and the reward will be available again in your wallet. These coins require to age another 7 days before they can be used in POS mining. The PoS is not CPU intense and there's no need to set anything in order to mine PoS. It's done automatically.

It is important to note that when your coins are staked (having reached 7 days of age and are used for a PoS block), these coins will be owned by you but unavailable to transfer until they are fully confirmed.

For those who want to exclude a certain amount of coins from Proof-of-Stake mining, you can run the client with the -reservebalance argument. This argument allows you to specify a certain amount of coins to withhold from using as a stake.

PoS - Getting started
By default the wallet will submit coins for staking ( see above). If you opt to encrypt your wallet (this is strongly advised) staking will stop - as encrypting the wallet means no coins can be sent without entering a passphrase. If you opt not to encrypt your wallet  then staking will work fine with no extra configuration needed.

"Unlocking" the wallet allows coins to be sent and received for the purpose of staking. Unlocking the wallet is not the same as decrypting the wallet - as the wallet passphrase must still be entered to send coins to another wallet (as per normal if you encrypt any cryptocoin wallet). Unlocking the wallet allows coins to stake whilst keeping your coins safe.

To unlock your wallet, enter this command in the QT wallet client debug console located under help menu:


Replace "thisismypassphrase" with your encrypted wallet passphrase. This will unlock your CACH wallet for staking for 1157 days (99999999 seconds = 1157 days). Upon restarting your client you will need to re-enter this command, as it is not saved. By entering this command and having your wallet encrypted, you will be able to stake your coins whilst having a properly encrypted wallet.

---

Fair release, no premine. Old thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.0

holy shit, what´s that, rebirth of cach :o

Vertoe, you and Cachecoin have my support.  I'm honored to invest in a developer of your caliber.

It's happening. Now the project is confirmed and it's the best time to buy.

@vertoe

i love you PoN!

thanks for restarting cache!

Looking forward to the whitepaper!!

@vertoe:  was ending PoW always planned at 100k? or is that new..?  is there room for discussion to continue it longer?  how will it change the final amount of coins in circulation?

Actually a whitepaper doesn't need at all for a dev of vertoe's caliber.

In vertoe we trust !

Nice work, vertoe.

I am also very interested in the white paper.

Ending PoW at 100k?

What?  We're already around 2 million I think.

Way to go! I'm very happy about my decision of buying CACH.

Invest in the dev, not the coin.

Ending @ Block 100k

Now we are @ 86114

The final max coin will be 4mil.

Right now we have

PoW will end at block 100k. After that only PoS and PoN. PoN is not masternode clone, PoNs mechanism could be used to mine block alone, so CACHE will be more advantage than DASH, which still required PoW to confirm block. That's what I understand after reading the ANN. Anyone corrects me?

2M is not alot of coins... and since they are targeted at 15min, there are only 2880 blocks per month..... shouldn't PoW go longer then 100k?

edit:  I guess I should wait for the whitepaper to find out what PoN  (Proof of Node)?  is like and how it will add to the circulation.

Oh wow, so they just killed the inflation and dilution dead in its tracks.

Somebody knows Econ 101.  Haha, shocking how such few devs get basic value of money principles.

This next run should be good...

First correction
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/CACH_BTC

Hodl your CACHE, people  ;)

is that a good coin to start with? i'm quite new to this.

do it, vertoe is a great dev. Still waiting for news  8)

Reading 101

PoN
PoN and PoS work Hand in Hand starting with Block 100K.
Each Node has to have it is own IP to be able to mine and create Blocks. The Algorithm below show you the Concept, we will publish a Whitepaper and also a Proof of Concept soon.
seconds = ((first 4 bytes of as integer) sha256([node IP] [last blockhash])) * difficulty / (2 ^ 32) * (15 * 60).
This way, difficulty will adjust to about the number of nodes.
When the time has elapsed, the Node created a Block and send it to the Networks. Each node will confirm this Block by connection to the Block Creator Node.
(if not already within his Peers) - just to confirm the Block Hash.
PoN and PoS Blocks are altering, only the last PoN Block is verified by IP (as IP's might already be gone)

Last chance for cheap cach  :D

@vertoe:

Have you (or will you) consider making PoN rely on some other element, such as transaction data or some signing with the generating address private key, instead of IP addresses? IIRC, both Spreadcoin and Ziftrcoin use similar schemes to promote decentralization (more nodes), and I can see all sorts of potential hazards of using IP addresses.

Finally, will PoN operation have any balance requirements at all? (node must hold at least X amount of coins to generate blocks)

Cheers

@Vertoe

A couple of feature ideas:

* If you are going to take on anonymous transactions, ie take on Darkcoin / DASH / XMR / Zerocash, name change would be necessary, IMO.

* Having spent some time looking at torrent & crypto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=932096.msg10231367#msg10231367) projects, this area looks like it has great potential to drive mainstream adoption and could also use a good anon currency alongside it, but the development work needs a good dev team to attack it professionally (e.g cache team).

http://i60.tinypic.com/209pmdz.png

Whatever the future brings, I'll hodl on to my stack and provide any support requested.

Good question. It would be nice if the community could choose the number of CACHE for one node ;)

I'd also love to know if the PON will require collateral and if so, how much.

Thanks Vertoe.

Original wallet has an error that the transaction was rejected.  Do I need to import the old wallet with the link provided on the OP?

-- Update --

After downloading and syncing the new wallet, the rejected test transactions from above show valid but after 3 confirms they are still not showing up on cryptsy.  I sent a new test from the new wallet and that one is not showing up either.

Less than 4 hours to sync this new wallet which was pretty fast but transactions are extremely slow.

I did some business with Vertoe and her Dark nodes back in the day.  She was professional and honest.  I'm in.

Wallet shows that my 3 test transactions have 21 confirms but they are still not showing up at cryptsy.  

I think it is a problem on craptsy's side. Try to contact their support.

@myagui The PoN blocks will be generated by IP only. These blocks will of cause also contain coinbase transactions.

As PoN and PoS are alternating the next block will be PoS and here the PoN block is required - and verified again by the network. The node IP's are public anyway (P2P network!), I see no problem with using them to mine.

@MyFarm PoN requires no collateral except that your node must be running. There is no need for having a balance at stake for PoN to work.

A couple of problems I had in mind, just the high level description, are that:
 - by embedding the IP address of the mining node, any node with significant mining power becomes a well advertised target, for however long it maintains the same IP. I don't think we'd be exposing any information that was not previously available in other altcoin designs, but in effect, the blockchain itself becomes a resilient archive of past miner locations (IPs).
 - as the latest PoN block verification requires a connection to the node that generated the block, network resiliency can be easily impacted, or otherwise cause disturbances to nodes running on domestic (aka, crappy) internet connections, which are many times limited to a very small number of active connections. When Node A mines a PoN block, it will be spammed with connections from every other network participant (who is trying to validate the block).

I'm not saying that the current approach is good or bad, just that - to me - it introduces some concerns since this is an entirely new feature, and with any new feature, there's a good chunk of unknown stuff (performance, security, scalability, etc...).

Cheers

I'm not sure about the details, but without collateral this could become a candy for botnet owners, this approach might be undesirable. I would prefer nodes to require collateral, it also ensures certain level of quality.

Of course it's going down :)
Nice to see you around Sy! All good?

The new client from vertoe caused a fork. The p2pool is on the wrong chain right now. I guess that's the reason of the dump.

Oh wow, was that 5% of all CACHE in a single dump? Fork it...

17:58:45

getblockhash 86296


17:58:48

d090c60aa5266935a081810e0a7b6ac924c5334a8c9549efd272964750204c91

You're in the right chain (with cryptsy, singula's pool and almost everyone).

I don't know when the fork started ( I'm trying to find it now), but I'm pretty sure that block 86172 with new client is in wrong chain.
getblockhash 86172
Wrong chain with new client:
0000001742d7304253947edaf9dc2db1a257cacb20a363c2d7a9eaf18fd4fb09

Right chain:
00000004143e947a7be78e14b0723ff4ad921094f1778de7e9092f609c5d5e02

vertoe where are you now ??

@AizenSou:

I have the new client from Vertoe, and going by the block hashes you posted, I am on the right chain. Also, I don't see that any of the updates that Vertoe did to the standard client would be prone to cause a fork. Not that I understand much about this though...

I think the problem is strictly related with P2Pool, which had not been working until Vertoe picked it up. P2Pool had some issue before, of which I do not know the details. Looks as though the fixes to bring P2Pool back online, either had some gremlin planted, or there is additional fixing to be done...

Hey myagui.

Thank for your report. Actually vertoe changed a lot of things in the code which could cause a hard fork like setting the max coin and stopping the PoW after block 100k. Another friend of mine used the new client and he's on the wrong chain too. It's not the fault of the p2pool IMHO. It's very strange.

@AizenSou:

Update: while for block 86172 I was on the right chain, I checked a more recent block just now, and I found that I am on the wrong chain now (I'm taking the official block explorer as the reference, as it appears to be on the right chain). That said, I'm changing my #1 on the suspect list, to be the updated client.  ::)

I'd expect that we are well isolated from all of the hardfork stuff, as there should be a simple conditional statement ( if block height < 100.000 ) that keeps us going on the same codebase as before, up until block 100K. But I understand issues happen, and it might be a lot more complicated than what I was making it out to be  :-\

  

There's an issue somewhere.  My test transactions from this new wallet still hadn't posted to craptsy.  Just checked the explorer and they are not showing up on there.


Status: 93 confirmations
Date: 5/27/2015 23:14
To: Craptsy CKhvXVjqEDQgnhoLUpKWhxnV6YzjU4cBZV
Debit: -0.001 CACH
Transaction fee: -0.01 CACH
Net amount: -0.011 CACH
Transaction ID: 4ee261022ac653966da8019f2d2903b34991f602969e5940ae7ecd5d910ab511

Status: 93 confirmations
Date: 5/27/2015 21:25
To: Craptsy CKhvXVjqEDQgnhoLUpKWhxnV6YzjU4cBZV
Debit: -0.01 CACH
Transaction fee: -0.01 CACH
Net amount: -0.02 CACH
Transaction ID: 46531b186022ac7b86c21e41caaa97895a81478fef9bc9d444a5b09a4c6d4dce

Status: 93 confirmations
Date: 5/27/2015 21:25
To: Craptsy CKhvXVjqEDQgnhoLUpKWhxnV6YzjU4cBZV
Debit: -0.001 CACH
Transaction fee: -0.01 CACH
Net amount: -0.011 CACH
Transaction ID: ff7deb0c551015c44678b31c741e75aeef23cc9a1acb209823d84f71e3125727


Wallet is on block 86302 as of May 29, 2015, 02:35:59 AM (time posted on the forum header)

Yes you are on the wrong chain. That's the problem we talked about. The new client caused a fork and we don't know the reason yet.

While we wait for Vertoe to speak up re: the forking issues, I just wanted to express that I also would prefer that there is some collateral requirement in order to generate PoN blocks. A small'ish figure would be fine, perhaps something between 5K ~ 10K CACH (as opposed to some ridiculously high number with the sole purpose of inflating prices).

Also, by design, one of the neat incentives with PoS, in that by holding more you get a greater reward. But PoS does lack in that many times people just run their wallets for the short period needed to get a stake, then close them up again, and so these are not providing a long lasting, reliable node service.

The idea is that PoN with a collateral requirement promotes the concept of a miner-holder, in contrast with the usual miner-dumper, and so I think this is the ideal approach.

@Vertoe: Would much appreciate if you would start organizing the schedule/venue for community meetings. Obviously, the ongoing fork needs urgent attention, but once that settles, it would be great if we could all start engaging feature/future discussions more interactively.

I agree about needing a collateral for PoN.  HOWEVER, 5 or 10k is NOT a smallish amount  at 10K you will limit the number of PoN in the entire system to less then 250!!!

"moneysupply" : 2476086.41995300

I confess that I didn't do that math specifically, was only going by the ATH exchange values from the last couple of weeks, and working out a reasonable "cost" in fiat terms. Plenty of nodes is definitely the desired goal, so perhaps within the lower boundary, around 5K?

At current mining rates (and mining will continue for a good while), there are enough new coins generated per day for such a node.
In other words, if mining returns remain relatively stable, and assuming a collateral of 5K coins, we'd be talking about a theoretical maximum number of about 500 PoN nodes today, with the potential for a new one to be added with each passing day.

More reasonable?

Also, let's remember that not all nodes need to be mining PoN. Regular (traditional) clients running a PoS node are also participating in the backbone of the network. Actually, we should also first clarify if PoN would prevent (or strongly discourage) pool mining for PoN blocks. With pools, we're back at the starting point, with new & fancy terminology, but in practice, the mining process would remain largely centralized.

I guess this is where we need to wait for the whitepaper  ;)

From cryptsy:


vertoe could you have a look at this problem? We have multiforks right now.

Can we get some sort of confirmation on whether cach.catcoin.cz is on the new wallet, old wallet, right fork or wrong fork?

cach.catcoin.cz should be on the right fork.

The Explorer (http://explorer.cach.co) can you take to compare. The should also be right

Yes on the whitepaper...

We still dont know what the benefits of running for PoN.  Having unique IP for each can be some work...  How is it different then just regular staking, doesn't that mean your running a node?

is having the PoN subnet preparation for a mixing service? if so, there should be a cost to run one.  Can we have PoW against a staked wallet? SPoW.... so many questions...


on the fork issue, anyone reading this that is not on the same fork as http://explorer.cach.co/ should shut down, reindex with addnodes pointed to nodes on the proper fork.. possibly revert back to the older client.

my info:

my getpeerinfo:

just sent pm to vertoe

edit

https://i.imgur.com/envHRW5.jpg

https://www.cryptsy.com/pages/status

I hope you know that it is VERY HARD to get hold of vertoe?

Everyone should just run the older version and addnodes to nodes that have the right chain..

such confidence inspiring!

ok ^ this right chain or now ?

http://s1.jpeghost.ru/i2/000/216/i216421av.jpg

Config

rpcuser=moon
rpcpassword=moon
rpcallowip=192.168.*.*
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
server=1
listen=1
discover=1
maxconnections=32
addnode=78.46.66.139
addnode=188.40.57.201
addnode=207.30.158.106
addnode=204.11.237.235
addnode=207.30.158.106
addnode=178.249.125.94
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=5.9.86.18


getpeerinfo
 
{
"addr" : "78.46.66.139:2225",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1432973987,
"lastrecv" : 1432974646,
"conntime" : 1432973987,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 4
},
{
"addr" : "188.40.57.201:2225",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1432973988,
"lastrecv" : 1432974646,
"conntime" : 1432973988,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 4
},
{
"addr" : "5.9.39.9:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979715,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432976839,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86609,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "37.205.9.209:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979900,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432977668,
"version" : 90000,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "5.9.86.18:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979375,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432977754,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "82.6.255.43:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979905,
"lastrecv" : 1432979832,
"conntime" : 1432977769,
"version" : 90000,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "24.112.247.7:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979888,
"lastrecv" : 1432979905,
"conntime" : 1432978008,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.90.149.57:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979888,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432979146,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86614,
"banscore" : 0
}


and http://explorer.cach.co/rich/ - not correctly display the balance wallet ^ just me ?

bookmarked  8)

Has the dev team left the project because of the fork? I see no reply's concerning the current fork?

Maybe this was a pump and dump and the dump just happened.  Cause we had a huge drop in price a couple days ago on a massive dump.

I hope not - Vertoe seemed like a legit dev with a plan. 

that would not be vertoe's style, he has shown to be a man of integrity in the past...

The network forked days ago now, and no word from any dev? It's like a big fuck you to the community. I don't hold any cache, just amazed by the incompetence vertoe has shown.

It seems like Vertoe comes here once a month to make some announcement for P&D and goes out. Many people critisized Evan Duffield for his job and deified Vertoe. These people now can get pleasure. ;D

Now, the main thing do not panic, we wait vertoe  ::)

P.s. the track of weekend
Have you heard ‘Rich (Edit) (Ft. Anndreyah Vargas)’ by Cosmo Sheldrake  - https://soundcloud.com/cosmosheldrake/rich

P.s.1 and yes, split chains began after the announcement new ANN ^ before the announcement all was well between version - "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha" and version - "0.7.5.9-toe" ^ under identical configs

P.s.2 who then replaced the configuration of nodes from new list http://cach.co/api/peers.txt ?

The main blame to DASH was it depends on one person. ;)

this needs more hype, dev should hire marketing people

R.I.P ?

dump now ;D

Lol, the same story again and again. Takeover and pump&dump. Before this pump started I owned almost 10% of all Cache. I was buying it just in case someone pump it. I was buying it when everyone dumped it. I sold it during first days of pump. I even did not know someone is preparing this scam when I sold it. I am really surprised people are still buying into coins that pumped 100x in few days. All those takeovers, news, big ideas are scams. Why do you think someone will give you money? Why do you think someone will come, let you buy cheap and give you option to earn money based on his work? The pattern is always the same. Scammers buy cheapest deadest coin as much as they can and then create big news, pump it with small money price skyrocket and people get crazy and buy into that crap. I could dump later, I could earn much more, but I don't care. I earned 12+ BTC on those scammers. They had to buy my 10% pretty expensive. And for a single second I did no regret I sold it cheap. There is more than 99% probability coin will dump after such big pump, so not selling is stupid and buying into it is far more stupid.

PS: I am sure, this was not last Cache pump. There is limited amount of coins on Cryptsy and scammers need to scam again and again. Sooner or later they will scam on Cache again.

Is block explorer working?

network right now on 2 chain  :(

Whoever is still mining on P2Pool is just wasting their hashes. Catcoin.cz is rather obviously the correct chain.

FWIW, I deleted the cachecoin data folder (backing up the wallet), loaded up the old client (found in the original cachecoin release ann), and quickly resync'ed, since remaining on the right chain. In any case, moving funds around is not advisable at a time that the network is forked.

Trolls are as quick to show up as were the pumpers (in earlier circumstances).
I'm confident in Vertoe's leadership for this project, though we're not off to the best start, that's for sure....

Did a bit investigation on the fork.
First forked-off block seems to be at height 86210, in the forked-off chain that is:
01af49a8938cc262fb665f10d30a50c4af22ea69c62f0cfb83c9a4d1fde692b5

And .... the commit that seems to be causing the fork is:
f6f40eb18e0d83ca8b322446b5e13a7315786378

Part of that change is:

(MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT is defined to CENT, ie. 0.01 CACH)

In the offending block, there are two transactions with output value of 0.001 (less than previously allowed minimum), one of them is:

This TX seems to be invalid according to the old code, but valid according to the new code.

The fix could be putting back that check, or making it conditional (turn it off after block 100K / 200K based on the roadmap)

Nicely done...  is it possible for you to submit a change to the git? , although I suppose we are still waiting on the whitepaper from vertoe?

Wasn't that white paper supposed to come a long time ago? 

How many more weeks or months until we reach terminal mining?  Maybe that's when we'll finally get something good.

maybe or maybe not...anyway, i've sold mine..

Very nice singula! BTW: in light of your cache pool history & all, it would be awesome to get you to be a contributor to the new cache repository. I think one of the important points of Vertoe's ann, was that she should not be the sole code author or owner, rather, known community contributors could/should also push code whenever needed or appropriate. Now would be one such time.
I hope things get moving sooner rather than later ^^

Again, great work, and thank you.

Where in the world is vertoe?

That's the million CACH question.

I think this is a proof of community integration test  :P

such confidence inspiring

I'd be glad to contribute.

I personally also have some ideas that could improve the coin, some of them thought out and waiting to be implemented, tested on testnet and then perhaps added to the main code (like better difficulty retargeting function, aiming to adapt more quickly to hashrate changes, making the coin more resistant against multipools harvesting), some of them ideas that may be nice, but will need to be examined for feasibility and designed before implementing them.

One of them is an idea that core parameters like txfees, difficulty and pos/pow rewards could be controlled by sort of AI calculated within the blockchain (something relatively simple, like reasonably sized Artificial Neural Network or SVM ....). The blockchain provides enough randomness for such algorithm to be deterministic (every node ends up with same results), but not predictable - if some unpredictability is desired. There are still some open questions with that idea - what aspect would the AI try to maximize (coin usage, amount of transactions, hashrate stability?) and whether it would be resilient against abuse (people trying to manipulate the AI for profit, possibly damaging the coin for others)

Some of them may conflict a bit with vertoe's roadmap, though ....

As for the fork fix:
I've updated my fork at github and added the fix in 0.7 branch there:
https://github.com/singula/CACHeCoin.git

I tested the client - with that last fix commit applied, the client synces to the correct fork.
It is compatible with old Kalgecin's client, at least for blocks below 100K, but we are only at block 87427 now, so don't worry :)

ha ha ha  ;D

 are not so bad 

Fix being looked into

https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin/commit/e67d13b6c5d3fcb8e42465c8fdc6000b2ca476d6

If you know Darkcoin, you would know if Vertoe is a he or a she.

lol

Remember right now Cachcoin is more or less a one-girl-business, and vertoe actually HAS a life and family.
Sometimes a vacation and some quality time with your family is more important than anything else.

The same would have happened with Darkcoin during vacation time some 15 months ago...fortunately Darkcoin/Dash isn't a one-man-show any more, today there's a team of talented (and did I already mention, good looking) developers to support it.
I'm pretty sure that with the help of the community Cachecoin will get there.

And don't get me wrong, I don't own a single Cachecoin, and when vertoe would show up at my doorstep I'd be the first one to slap her precious ass because of the way HOW she left Darkcoin...but that's the past. Better look into the future!

cryptsy wallet returned online  ::)

Look like someone scam us

And with your vast crypto currency experience you say this because someone with a family and children didn't come and hold our hand while the chain forked?

How exactly have you or anyone been ....'the S word'  ed.

Accumulate an almost dead coin, announce a takeover, put a buy wall, announce improvements, launch a new ANN thread with innovation and promise a whitepaper, less than 24 hours later it forks, no updates, no fix, someone from the community finds a fix and yet no replies, don't say a thing for 2 weeks and counting ... (not even a simple "I'm busy") ...

To me, if there was intention, there is scam. So, option A, if vertoe never comes back, she is physically or mentally unable or there was intention (ergo scam), option B, if vertoe comes back, she has a real excuse (it's going to be difficult to explain this) or she gives us a lie (ergo scam).

I want to believe there is an explanation, but it looks fishy.

My thoughts, fwiw - school holidays have just happened. Also, bills need to be paid. So there is likely to be some overlap between family life, doing other things to pay bills and being busy updating cache / producing a white paper.

Vertoe was silent during the first few weeks of announcing to take on cache, then there was a big release.

S/he didn't notice the fork, but a fix was pushed to the git and somehow merged with Vertoe's repo. So, S/he is still around and so I'd expect some update, when its ready. That's the 1m cache question. 1 day, 1 week, 1 month or 1 year 2 months.  I'd guess, a few weeks to a month or so.

If you want to contribute, read the OP. Looks like github is the place you should be placing ideas, requests, etc. If you have some cach and you're on the right fork, I'd guess Vertoe would say you are the community, go get a git account if you haven't already got one.

Just my take, again, fwiw.

It is amazing the things you say when you are invested in something, how you start coming up with silly justifications for things that in real life no one would tolerate. Vertoe's behavior here is completely unacceptable, he is a guy and lives in Germany, there is internet everywhere there, there are no excuses. 

He had no need to come out and relaunch this coin and get a lot of people involved based on the reputation he had accumulated. Then dissapear and leave everyone hanging and a forked coin.  What are Vertoe's merits afterall, all he did for DRK was upstream changes, he was a good maintainer but with no original work of his own at the protocol level.

People like you are a disgrace hyping this coin, trying to "win time" minimizing the clusterfuck this has been. A few pages back you were all hyping and saying how this was the best thing since Jesus, and now, you are giving open time frames and justifying all this bullshit. Reality is, you weren't expecting this so stop justifying.

Truth is, Vertoe is just not that good, he is an average developer who had a few lucky trades LTC and DRK, made a little money. So what, that does not mean he can lead a project. He has proven to be very unprofessional, quick to criticize others but then completely unable to deliver himself.

you have a very good point...but why did you find the need to make a newb account to make a post?...

I gave my view, for what its worth.

Is that hyping? Can you point me to something that is hyping this coin? Show me evidence.

Otherwise, you're just a coward hiding behind a new account. In which case, your opinion to me matters this much:

it has to be noted that XiangLei is trolling the spreadcoin thread, just for your information, in regard to newbie account....

'XiangLei' gave some great, substantive points. The fact that you are trying to discredit him as a person/user instead of addressing his content... proves his point, just sayin.

Chaositec was simply pointing out that somebody has felt the need to create a new acccount to launch personal attacks against a number of devs on different projects, the only link between the targets is that they are either current or past contributors to the Darkcoin/Dash project.  It is simply a statement of fact that he felt is relevant. 

[hype]

Who is Singula?

https://github.com/singula

[/hype]

Will be down to 300 sat soon.

i offer you 1000sat :)

Il offer 1200sat! il buy 5btc in CACH!

My wallet if get out of sync frequentely
any good nodes that i can use ?

regards

addnode=78.46.66.139
addnode=188.40.57.201
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=5.9.86.18
addnode=37.205.9.209
addnode=37.205.9.104

thanks

but im still stuck at block 89441


and getpeerinfo sees many nodes whit diferent  block counts mostly on block 88383

Any other nodes please?

I have setup 2 full  nodes to run fulltime

but the three are stuck at block 89441


i wil maintain this the public nodes runing to help the network and make it reliable


fell free to use ti

addnode=193.136.97.30
addnode=193.136.96.30

my nodes are now on the right track

if any one has problems sync feel free to use it

Regards

[hype]

Quick back of an envelope calculation.

Roughly at block 89457

Block 89359 was 12 hours ago, according to cach explorer.

Roughly 196 blocks every 24hrs.

So time to reach block 100,000 will be 50-60 days.

[/hype]

Unless Vertoe changed the target block time, that should not continue - with the target block time of 15 minutes, the difficulty should adjust to give us ~96-100 blocks per day

Vertoe did not change the difficulty adjustment parameters.
However, the difficulty retarget system needs a major overhaul (IIRC, Singula rightfully hinted at that the other day). What happens these days, very shortly, is that block times slowly increase to the point where they are well over the coin specs, until a difficulty brake kicks in, and abruptly lowers the difficulty.

Some miners (such as myself), jump on and off at certain times to optimize returns.

There's a pattern very familiar for anyone that mined cache for long periods of time:
For the past 2 days or so, block times were miniscule.
Over the next week or so, block times will be way higher.

My wallet is showing I am at block 88,389 (and synced).

Looking above it seems I am stuck behind.

@antonio8:
You're on a (bad) fork. A quick fix, is to delete your blockchain data, and run the old client (not the one with updates from Vertoe). You'll forcibly resync to the proper chain. Always do a wallet backup, etc, etc  :)  

Damn, was afraid of that.

Thanks

That makes sense.

Another check against block 88235 and 89487 which are 7 days apart, still gives a target time of between 55-65 days.

So we have 2 more months of this silent treatment?

Let's get real, 95% of all the coins are mined, consolidation should be complete by now, let's get this going!

old client new clint
allways the same tproblem


3 wallets stuck at block   89577

;(

you are not right - now supply 2.6 ml ^ max supply coin 4 ml

Yeah. And what Vertoe had put forward, was a new mining logic, however one would call it, it would produce new coins just as PoW does today.
Picking up an abandoned coin for peanuts on exchanges, then taking over to drastically and immediately cut the total supply, would be a rather obvious scam... (I don't think that is the intention here, but what do I know...  ::))

Is Vertoe OK?

No reply for weeks.. No OoO message..nothing..

I hope she's fine, just busy (family, coding, etc..) maybe?

Nah, just off being a piece of shit, as per usual.

Seriously, what a slimy scumbag.

Guess I should have expected nothing less.

W/e, to the greylist this goes.

Hopes Die Last, ladies and gentlemen 

Maybe something happened to her? :(

I would like to know if she and her family is OK also. 

if anyone has heard anything.. let us know please.

Interesting to see the hardcore Vertoe-believers are losing ground, Cache started a new decline on cryptsy. When Vertoe only makes 1 positiv remark here, price will more than double again.

ye, i just pulled my buys, this could go double digits if it takes to long.
I don't think that Vertoe has abundant this project.

But her absence for so long is kind of strange. I don't know exactly how her behaviour was during the Darkcoin-period.

Hey, Vertoe

Yep, there are people still here  ;D

Keen to see the white paper on proof of node.

singula's pool has been strange for days. The whole today doesn't show any transaction at all.

He has been online, but no word yet..

https://i.imgur.com/SXIxfve.jpg

There are currently two issues with the pool:

There is slight problem with the stratum, as it loses connection to the coin daemon from time to time. Not sure why exactly it is doing that (it has not done that before in the past year or so) - I have to dig in the source and investigate it further, but for now I have found out how to detect that and restart the stratum as necessary.

Second problem is payouts - due to the fork and storm of orphans near block 90566 (there is fork of two branches - on one the "emergency" difficulty dropdown has happened, in the second it has not) the pool slightly screwed up and the cronjob detected a double payout (I guess the payment went to both the "good" and the "bad" branch during the fork storm).

I will resume payouts once I check the database and correct it (should be in about hour or two), although I will turn off the 'early payment' feature for a day or two until the tail of the blockchain (the block where the payouts are done) stabilizes.

Good thing is the blocks are now appearing in the wallet, so once fixed, the payments will resume and coins will flow again.

Looks like Cachecoin needs a new developer. Sad as I bought quite a few.

I'm still expecting Vertoe to speak up and move cache forward. If there is a real community of people interested (as opposed to a handful of casual speculators), one can easily regroup.
The only negative impression I have with Vertoe (before going MIA), was that her creative/brainstorming process was not as inclusive as it could/should have been. Other than that, she looks to be a solid coder, and intentions were well laid out when taking over.

The fork that followed the takeover, actually shows neat resilience of the people around here. Big kudos to Singula for the code analysis and pushing the fix to github. There are clearly people around with ideas and the capability of improving cache. I do hope Vertoe is around to participate in that effort, but if not, the community will surely figure out a way to work things out.

@Vertoe: As you look to be still around (your BCT profile shows recent presence), how about stopping by the IRC channel for a chat? Your ANN proposed community meetings, and I doubt you'd like to have everything on your shoulders. Some coordination is probably all that is needed right now...

Looking back at the new ANN, the main effort Vertoe is working on falls mainly to updating to Bitcoin core and a white paper for PON.

Updating from Bitcoin core, given the starting point, is a non-trivial effort. He has shown he can make the update having done it for Darkcoin.

Block 100k is the stated target time frame. 

The fork(s) is the concern.

Vertoe account hacked?

Quoted for preservation.

I have no doubt that Vertoe is still working on this and everything will work out just fine  8)

Sorry but I had another feeling :(
I just wish it won't happen.

Verote,

I have been involved in crypto for few years. I've been in some shit coins, lost some, and won some. As I gained experience I realized it was better to bet on a good developer rather than some novice, which is why I invested in Cach. It wasn't until you showed up that I decided to do so.

As I was reading messages on IRC I got the feeling that you've become discouraged by the trolls and investors rushing you. I can understand how you feel, but you have to consider the rest of your coin holders who gave you trust and invested only because of you!
Being a dev or leader of certain business is tough, but you can NOT let your personal feelings play apart in your investors portfolio.
I hope you can overcome your discouragement and continue to work on this coin.

ty for reading :)

Hi,

I used always this script with my 750ti:

cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:YAC -H 2 -L 8 -i 0 -l t64x1 -b 4096 -m 1 -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u xxx -p xxx


but for several days it does not work anymore... something changed?

Thank you in advance  :'(

@mik57:

Nothing changed recently that would affect your mining settings, but you are not selecting the CACHE parameters, you are selecting YAC instead. If they are not exactly on the same nfactor schedule, that would be enough reason.

If the problem relates to the nfactor selection, this one should work:
cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:16 -H 2 -L 8 -i 0 -l t64x1 -b 4096 -m 1 -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u xxx -p xxx

THK U myagui !!  ;)

+101

Vertoe knows how much trolling was thrown around Darkcoin, and that it can be dealt with by the community.

Vertoe Github account hacked

https://github.com/vertoe/bitcointalk

Vertoe, to validate that post. Please sign with your PGP key.

-----BEGIN LTC SIGNED MESSAGE-----
i'm vertoe and no longer able to access my bitcointalk account - verify this message with the litecoin address found in this post ?topic=441215.msg4847316 - the last post written by me is ?topic=400389.msg11381772 - yes, i never wanted cachecoin 2.0 and allowed the extended cachecoin team to use my account - i couldn't stand the pressure of investors sending me daily half a dozen pms on all channels - screw the altcoin scene - i'm out anyways - and kal, sorry for breaking your coin while trying to rescue it. farewell.
-----END LTC SIGNED MESSAGE-----

So a hacked BTC account is signing a message by reference to a hacked BTC account message?

His github message is signed by an LTC address that is linked in a bitcointalk quote. Since the quote itself can't be modified by the current holder of the vertoe account, it is reasonable proof of her identity. In short: the message was posted by someone that holds control of: vertoe's github account + vertoe's prior known LTC keys.

If the statement holds true and represents vertoe's take on CACHE going forward, I am thoroughly surprised by the total lack of character/morals. Oh well, just another day in Altcoin land I suppose.  :(

saved

CACH falls on cryptsy !! 1050 sato in this time...

why???

Can't find those messages.

I'd like to see a signed pgp message.

@Coins101:

Actually, the LTC reference address is not in a quote, it is a direct link to a post (which has so far not been modified though).
Edit: I confirmed the address and contents of the linked post, and it is an exact copy of an identical post on Litecointalk.

For future reference, this is the claimed signer LTC address:

This is the message:

And this is the signature:

That address does appear here:


Accessed via mirror

This:
- verify this message with the litecoin address found in this post ?topic=441215.msg4847316

Links to:
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441215.msg4847316

Where you find the address I posted above.
I am getting validation failure for the message signature, so, no clue. I posted a comment on git.

I trust the edit watermark from litecointalk that doesn't seem to have been edited since Sept 2014

https://i.imgur.com/LwLamub.jpg

The Vertoe post does contain that LTC address @ 2014.

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=14422.0

Lets see if this is Vertoe, who went to the trouble of signing the initial fork bin:

Signed by vertoe. PGP-key block below.

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=EJp4
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin

https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/vertoe-key.pgp

If Vertoe has gone for good, that is still not 100%, then I'd like to know if Cache would still be interested on working towards a P2P exchange for alts.

https://i.imgur.com/F7A5SgN.jpg

It is something I very briefly exchanged thoughts about with Vertoe around a few days after he started working on Cache. He was open to looking into the idea, after getting something tangible going for Cache.

This is the overview of the project I put together in May:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/19djUkzO04BhgKrh4VURFC55bI8zvo8qspSmWhJPuXrY/edit#slide=id.g9d55834ca_0_45

There are some things in there that might not work, but its an outline that was intended to serve as a starting point.

Vertoe's account wasn't hacked, he put it up for sale, and from Vertoe's Github entry I guess it's been sold now.  Start at coins101's post about donschoe.

And you know this, because?  ::)

Because I've done some checking.  donschoe=Vertoe.

For posterity:

Be back on the approach to block 100,000

Thanks coins101 for your effort. But I think vertoe has scammed us, even with pre-planning thoughts. Sorry for anyone who lost money in this scam. We are on the same boat.

Hi everyone!

I think that the "vertoe" will come back here when he's ready. I'm staying here and I will support community than I can.

I have some of ideas what is really going on, to many questions have answers in the new OP from "vertoe".


All of good!

You're kind of dreaming... Someone else may come in and fix/implement all the stuff, but this coin is going to be seriously fubar unless someone takes a serious look at fixing it before block 100,000....

perhaps vertoe will miraculously recover his hacked account and come back to sell you fools his coins again :)

I hope so. At a certain point, the people who get scammed aren't victims of someone else, but victims of themselves.

@Thirtybird,

To keep the chain/coin on life support, it would suffice to have all clients/nodes/pools/exchanges, revert back to the pre-takeover codebase last published by Kalgecin, right? I'm not saying that's good or bad, just wondering if that would be enough to at least prevent an abrupt end to cache.

I have no stake here. I do have some fondness over the original coin specifications and it was one of the first coins I ever mined, so for whatever reason, I still keep an eye on it. If the community wants to keep it alive, I'll be available to help on a legitimate and transparent takeover effort.

I would encourage any stakeholders to speak up ... right ... about ... now!  :D

he NEVER scammed anybody !
he made very clear from the beginning that he will look into this but will and can NOT promise (long term) anything !
so he is out , but that has nothing to do with a scam !
(not that i am involved in this, i just want to make clear that vertoe always was stand up guy and had whatever reasons to move on)

found this on github
https://github.com/vertoe/bitcointalk/blob/master/README.md
thats why i stopped by here

Good to know he/she still has people trying to defend him
simple fact is Vertoe used what reputation he/she had to unload the bag of cache coin he/she was holding thats all!
i dont call ppl scammers and post on BCT with red letters but maybe i should this time
So many ways Vertoe could have contacted or communicated with   investors in this coin
the way he/she got the word out by "my account hacked...." it simply show what kind of morals  this person has and its very disappointing

Vertoe's reputation is forever tainted and next coin he/she works on will show what people think

https://github.com/vertoe/bitcointalk/commit/e2e9b34db88b0bca6cb1ba1d9f18e9c2225a4136#diff-04c6e90faac2675aa89e2176d2eec7d8

 ::)

All this history, steeper than the the second season, "true detective".  ::) ::) ::)

Stocks of popcorn filled up  ;D ;D ;D

In theory, that should suffice. 

Interesting indeed.  Something that always peeked my interest was vertoe's comment...

"...Just one note for the P&D Groups, this will not be your coin"

There was a prophetic tone to that comment that made me pay attention.  I am watching this very closely....

Reverse psychology?

+1

yes ^ yes ^ yes

This comment is very interesting, I immediately drew attention.

uumff da fuk happened man?

Its interesting that  Kalgecin - the creator of CACHE coin and now vertoe - the redeemer of CACHE coin
both lost their bitcointalk accounts in a similar fashion - when most of the other people seems to be fine with their accounts here.

There is definitely something wrong with this coin :)

Anybody know how much longer until the PoW phase is over?  We should be just weeks away from that.

If Vertoe is coming back that will be when she's gonna do it.  Thx.

I still believe in cach !

i think ~ 2 month and max PoW coin 3.000.000 ^ now 2.766.545


in any case 100k block nearly , this critical moment is coming

show must go on



and me !!!! im full support coin ^ and buy all road of announce [CACH]


P.s. noticed a trend when Vlad2Vlad posts here, the price is also moving  UP on cryptsy ^ coincidence - I do not think

No news ???  ???

Excellent observation skills!    ;)

Check out NAUT, I think BK is about to back it by gold in the next few weeks.  It already had a big run but that thing could go up another 10-20 fold from here in under 30 days.

Good luck!

Accumulation before block 100,000.  Hopefully in the next few weeks the fun will start.  Not many coins out so we should see a massive run in price if Vertoe delivers and I really think she will.

what are you smoking bro, vertoe is gone for good, this coin can't be resurrected three times

Maybe it can if it`s a fenix :)

no news and CACH decline in cryptsy...  ::)

jon snow is dead  ;D

I remember this coin pumped hard on Vertoe taking over.

Now its dead.

dead.

Vertoe taking over ... cool.
Vertoe over dumpting ... not cool.

BUT

the spec/tech has not changed ... this coin still POS mints like a charm and is an alt algo with rare/slow speed.

I still like.

Anybody have a real actual date of when terminal mining is reached?  Thx!

Already there. POW mining is over, CACH is a POS only coin now.

Congrats for the first phase of distribution completed and still going!

Cheers!

So we reached block 100,000?  And Vertoe still MIA?

Not a good sign, maybe this was a pump and dump. 

maybe? ... this was most definitely a P&D retirement fund for user Vertoe. Doesn't mean the coin is dead (he/she did just pick up an abandoned project after all), but we're back in the toilet until further notice

I hate crypto :(

Is there a current reddit for Cachecoin?

The explorer isn't working - does anyone have one that does?  I wanna see if we did indeed reach block 100,000.

Thanks!

I doubt it, I've never seen one.  And if there is I doubt anyone posts.  It seems most people got burned and bailed on CACHE.

I [still] believe in you, Vertoe!  Show Cryptoworld that women aren't the scammers men have proved to be.

Yes, I am playing that sex card [all day long].  Hahaha!

From what I've read this entire thread isn't even from the real vertoe?! On Github she said the last post she ever made was this: ?topic=400389.msg11381772 then someone took over her account. Isn't this even linked in here a few pages back? https://github.com/vertoe/bitcointalk

What?  Get outta here.  I thought her account was hacked but not that she wasn't the one who started this thread.

Hahaha, then this coin is going to ZERO!!!

Can anyone confirm this?  Why doesn't she come on here and put matters to rest then?  UNREAL!!!


Edit:  Ok, she wrote that hacked message on July 3rd.  Nearly 2 months after she started this thread.  So there is that.

ride dead horse or what  ;D create your on coin, a mine it solo, it's equal to cachecoin. this coin is dead like so many other.

Why not invest in the coin chachecoin was cloned from to begin with? With YACoin, CPU mining is profitable, and PoS is gaining a higher and higher percentage of new coins generated every day... Oh and there are no scams!

Who wants higher inflation?

Sadly, Scams like this are where the big money is made in the world of crypto [just like on Wall Street].  You just gotta find "legit" scams and time them just right [which is very difficult to do if you're an honest investor trying to make money the honest way].

What I said has nothing to do with higher inflation. Please do not comment on things when you have no basic understanding of the English language. Thanks! :)

For everyone else... You can monitor YACoin 'inflation' and trends very easily: http://explore.grokonet.com/?inflation=1

Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension skills.

How about this for proper English:  YAcoin is a total ShitCoin, peddle your ShitCoin elsewhere, troll.

GameOver ?

network stuck at 100050 block

jep

Wtf it was going pretty good with vertoe, and why she fled?

Still not proper English...

Considering your reputation, I think your strange behavior towards me and YACoin is a positive indicator.

Well that someone FIX and alive network in POS ?

vertoe last message: on: May 28, 2015, 04:29:20 PM
Is she buying?
I dont like takeover, always are scam, if you have a good project... launch a new coin

Guys get over with this. Vertoe has scammed many of us, and he gone already. Let's this coin die peacefully. Twice scam attempts for 1 coin, it's not more than enough ?

network alive "blocks" : 100059,  ::) ::) ::) yeah

Is there a working explorer somewhere?

Vertoe set up a block explor

Still don't care about this 'incident'.

Why?  Because it is an orginal and working POS/POW Jane.  
What has changed?  Yes pump'd / dump'd ... so what?
Even if Vert was to be an honest legit committed dev the price increase was all too steep to deal with market reality.

At worst a Vertoe Dash (anon platform) potential did not workout.  Still would have be nice to have competed with Dash as Cach.

Fundamentals are the same.  Network seems resilient.

I'm not sure. But wallet and network work fine

http://s2.jpeghost.ru/i2/000/223/i223404qy.jpg

getinfo

{
"version" : "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha",
"protocolversion" : 90001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0,
"blocks" : 100064,
"moneysupply" : 2985740.15653800,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "0",
"difficulty" : 0.00278987,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1395625765,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.10000000,
"unlocked_until" : 1539302142,
"errors" : ""
}

So we're at 3 million coins [PoW finished] with maximum supply of 4 million.  What happens then?  I thought PoS stage was gonna keep going.  Is this not the case?  I love low inflation - low dilution coins but I doubt the max supply is hard coded to 4 million including PoS.

If Vertoe has pissed off and taken everyone for a ride (I still don't believe it), I will put a proposal forward in Sept, unless anyone else has any suggestions.

the coin now at "FULL GAS" 3.000.000 and only POS to 4.000.000

I'm even afraid to imagine this road-to-point at 4 million is a long and interesting journey





my faith to be stronger with each new found block )   ::)

No news?  ::)

Well, I guess he is out.

Vertoe put a lot of effort into Darkcoin. A lot of people benefited financially, including him to some degree, from his teamwork input into the development of Darkcoin / Dash.

The decisions that led to his exit from Darkcoin were unfortunate. A few people that were regular contributors to Darkcoin and had spent a lot of their own free time making it successful also stopped contributing, but quite a few, while unhappy, kept their coins.

I never wanted to touch Cachecoin because of Jasin Lee's involvement. He has manipulated hundreds if not thousands of people who ended up losing $millions to his LTC / Scrypt ASIC scam and other altcoin scams or more accurately alleged scams as I believe he is being pursued for some sort of legal action.  I was one of the few that avoided Jasinlee from the start and as far as I know I never got taken in by him.

https://i.imgur.com/GxOhZte.jpg

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=2702.0

I did ask Vertoe if he wanted to join the development team in Spreadcoin which we took over a few months ago when the founding dev left. He had been a contributor in the past and he seemed to considered it, but he eventually decided to work on Cache. I don't understand, mine and have never had any interest in Cache. I did want to support Vertoe, who seemed to be keen on pursuing his own project - something I couldn't fathom at the time because he is capable of starting his own project from scratch.

It would be disingenuous for me to say I didn't think I could make a return on my support for Vertoe and we did briefly discuss some joint collaboration with Spreadcoin's planned p2p exchange - but it was support for Vertoe that I somewhat reluctantly invested 18 BTC (of my own free will and decision) into something which I guessed would also potentially benefit Jasin Lee, someone I had done pretty much everything I could to steer clear of and warned others against.

Personally, I was hoping to get back my investment and would have sold up at around 1.5 or 2x my initial stake in order to get back what I put in and have some coins to be part of the new community. Jasin Lee's indirect involvement was my early exit driver. At every point, I knew I could lose the lot. I am not looking for and don't want any sympathy. I know what caveat emptor means, many do not.

I put a lot of trust into Vertoe based on having known him via this forum and the LTC forum for around 18 months. I wish him the best of luck in whatever he does next because it seems that he has decided to exit crypto. The handling on both sides of the Darkcoin fallout wasn't great, to say the least, and I guess it has also now impacted many other people outside of Darkcoin / Dash.

This seems to have been a well coordinated exit from the start.  As an intelligent German university educated man, I hope he goes back to being a trusted individual in his next professional life. I do business in Hamburg and frequently fly over, so If I come across him, I'd still buy him a beer.

If I or others make a proposal for Cache, I could only contemplate something that had some sort of relative exit out of Cache. If the original devs or others want to pursue something, please PM or email me bitcointalkcoins101 at gmail.com

Anyone having valid nodes?

cach.catcoin.cz pool is down?

Yup pow phase is over

Anyone have any issues if this project is forked?

Make it scrypt-chacha again!

I want to continue ...  8)

Im game.  Please let us what you have in mind...thanks.

Well, if the PoW will return in some form again, I can reinstate the pool (now with 0 reward mining does not make really sense), so there will be a pool again - with the early payment option turned on again if it would make sense in the new setting.

Vertoe is an active dev on Github, has anyone tried to get ahold of her?

Let me try to contact the original dev. Either way, I will draft up a proposal for this community.

Vert Toe
shat on this coin
but that might be good manure to grow on

1. lost the new website vert did and bchain pulled the explorer?  so no exploer?
2. old wallet still works
3. the vert updated wallets they work? linux/mac no?
4. did we get some seednodes out of this fiasco?
5. did we retain any of the new mining pools?


---
edit

muddafudda Vert Toe


whats? the old specs?

Is it best to just roll back to original version ... wasn't there POW support past 100k block? What's the craptsy wallet/version?

7 days min stake .... that will kill a stake coin with few miners ... 7minutes is better.  

You can bump the % per annum ... 7.77% ... but it looks like coins under 25% maintain spot price.

---
edit

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021193.0  off limits  ?


Contact
Try to reach vertoe over at bitcointalk.org
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=232215
Here is the current [ANN] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021193.0
Report issues here: https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin/issues

@vertoe , Are you developing CACHE?
Why dont post?

maybe coin need explorer ? guys ?  :P

Hi...anyone know where there is a wallet download for cache?

try download and sync this wallet http://www.filedropper.com/cachecoin-qt-win

{
"version" : "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha",
"protocolversion" : 90001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : ,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : ,
"blocks" : 107707,
"moneysupply" : 3383939.43341300,
"connections" : 5,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00043260,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1395625765,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 1550303788,
"errors" : ""
}

addnode first [offer $10 of the $50 to get one]

stakes nicely and still can withdraw from cryptsy

Florida Group Faces Fraud Charges for Alleged Altcoin 'Pump and Dump' (http://www.coindesk.com/florida-group-faces-fraud-charges-alleged-altcoin-pump-dump/)

what block  are we at now ?

I have sold all my coins and do not think to buy until we have a working block explorer and some update from DEVS

"version" : "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha",
"protocolversion" : 90001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"blocks" : 108247,
"moneysupply" : 3389491.81371900,




price SO cheap need too buy or loose, CACHE have nice stake
 

Yes mate price is cheap because all the dust over this coin.

mate, I like this coin , my buy orders are waiting for cheap coins. "POS" excellent

Yes you know for me "PoS" is excellent :)

cryptsy RIP > coin need ex.

I vote for the old specs (before vertoe).

Which means a combination of POW and POS.

It might be smart to limit scrypt-chacha to nfactor 14 or 15.
Higher nfactor will introduce cpu botnets.


So for now the easiest and fastest solution would simply be to fork to the old code again.

VOOOOOD!


craptsy just freed this coin
WITHDRAW!!!!!!!

CACHe is still a nice POS coin, despite all the BS.

who's in charge of this then?

I have a wallet that I downloaded from the github.  But how do I withdraw coin as my wallet doesn't connect to a network.  SOrry for noobie question.

yes you 100% noobbie  ;D ;D




+1 confirm



try download and sync this wallet http://ifolder.su/44657556

{
"version" : "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha",
"protocolversion" : 90001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : ,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : ,
"blocks" : 107707,
"moneysupply" : 3383939.43341300,
"connections" : 5,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00043260,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1395625765,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 1550303788,
"errors" : ""
}

Might be a good coin.. but is there a market to trade it???

hello i'm new here!
is there any CPU miner for windows x64? this file not found like : cpuminer-cach-master (WIN x64)?
thanks

I dont think any coins are worth cpu mining....  be careful what you download and run!!

Ok!
by the way, what about cashcoin? still a live?

will trade CASH for CACHe
pm

haha....I meant to say newbie.  LOL.  Ok ok...laughs at my expense are fine,  ;D.  So...how does one go about downloading cache coin to a wallet if there is no network to connect?

Is Cache completely dead? Is the chain still alive?

Cache alive  ;) but i think need more PR and BOOM ! ohhhh im losse NO Ex. its BAD

{
"version" : "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha",
"protocolversion" : 90001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : ,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : ,
"blocks" : 111329,
"moneysupply" : ,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1395625765,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}

cool! I'm stuck with 24 blocks to download, can you post some node addresses?

easy

{
"addr" : "80.86.87.204:54742",

"addr" : "204.11.237.233:34780",

"addr" : "98.254.190.73:38285",

"addr" : "115.72.229.196:65158",

"addr" : "95.130.11.147:58793",

"addr" : "91.220.151.240:2225",

"addr" : "178.249.125.94:60507",

"addr" : "171.6.248.225:64699",

"addr" : "37.205.9.209:2225",

I'd like to grab my Cache from Cryptsy...how can I send the coins to a local wallet and where do I get a working wallet from.   Thanks for any help.  I'm certainly willing to donate some mbtc for any help. 

ok

step 1 - download client from https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin_binaries / download ZIP

step 2 - 2-click unpack ZIP

step 3 - create cachecoin.conf and type ^ moove file to work system directory CACHEcoin

addnode=80.86.87.204
addnode=204.11.237.233
addnode=98.254.190.73
addnode=115.72.229.196
addnode=95.130.11.147
addnode=91.220.151.240
addnode=178.249.125.94
addnode=171.6.248.225
addnode=37.205.9.209

step 4 -  run cachecoin-qt-win.exe

step 5 - wait ~ 6h (im wait to full sync blockchain 3h)

step 6 - ProFIT )

like my tips send btc - 1DWQkREsXb5Zvdi6prcAX6nAiBreTtWbsi

CACH works like a champ

PM me to trade CACH

we is trading over the counter right now

i am willing to also swap 30 UNO coins for ltc/doge/btc and will use that to get CACH addnode/explorer
then can return the value in 90 days (so you hold UNO as collateral for 90 days)

_{edit: need some response before April 20 2016 ... else offer expires (i'm still wanting to help but this offers terms end)}

Crowdfunding

Block Explorer and Node

These funds will be used to host a block explorer on CryptoBE (http://cryptobe.com/) and a dedicated node.

1AZ2HtHrvg1ZyfMw65iLEuGUt5KXvVMTm5

Goal: 0.185 BTC

anyone know what cache is trading at ?

"we is trading over the counter right now"

name a price, this is an OTC thread right now ;)

FUND the NETWORK
https://blockexplorer.com/address/1AZ2HtHrvg1ZyfMw65iLEuGUt5KXvVMTm5

Yeah, usually when the address is about halfway funded the other half isn't too hard.

step1
FUND the NETWORK
https://blockexplorer.com/address/1AZ2HtHrvg1ZyfMw65iLEuGUt5KXvVMTm5

step2
make a simple website

step3
get a trade listing

:)

^{*NOTE i am not a big bag hodlr, i do have a modest stack of CACH should it go to $100 Million, am here only because i am impressed with the robust nature of this coin and i'd like to see it live ... so the real bag hodlrs cough up a few bucks and make sure this coin says afloat.}

CacheƆoin [CAƆH]

I say "YES", as another small hodler

hi all ! ^

CACH added to the vote on livecoin.net , only 2 btc and CACH on exchange  ;D or vote but this way a long and thorny )

https://www.livecoin.net/voting/voting/index

where i can get source for wallet:
"version" : "v5.4....
"protocolversion" : 90001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
 ???

I would create a block Explorer for cachecoin.

im  donation only in CACHecoin (CACH) 2k

Does Cache have a working wallet?

Yes only BIN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.0



maybe here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.0

Cach add to exchange https://crypto-trade.net

http://i65.tinypic.com/20aymmf.png

thanks to the team https://crypto-trade.net  ;)

Did that dev ever come back to this coin?  I can't remember her name.

I think he's not coming back

Is this offer still active? If we have an exchange I could accept CACH, no problem. If you need a blockexplorer, send CACH to

CQTcH3KkqzqQQ4QCGWFZczhfovmjqBcotg

I will setup a Server without running costs for the community, but I need a adequate CACH donation to buy and install the machine.

yes active ,  im send you 2k CACH

Status: 3/unconfirmed, broadcast through 3 node(s)
Date: 07.09.2016 13:36
To: Exploer CQTcH3KkqzqQQ4QCGWFZczhfovmjqBcotg
Debit: -2000.00 CACH
Transaction fee: -0.01 CACH
Net amount: -2000.01 CACH
Transaction ID: f25f14d41e70beb235464a2b7948a72a02a3091e874611965d74abe665025b45

and wait blockexplorer  ;)

good luck !

ok, it is not so much but ok why not, I try my best.

Explorer (http://cerberus.ageleis.de/) :)

I like you work ^ and send you + 1.5k CACH



P.s. now we have ^

COIN SUPPLY (CACH) - 3482511.49576

Exchange - https://crypto-trade.net/ - thx ^ good team crypto-trade.net

Explorer - http://cerberus.ageleis.de/ - thx ^ MemberCount+1

Wallets Bin "Win" "Linux" "OSX" - https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin_binaries

Source code - https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin

and nice richlist

http://i68.tinypic.com/258tamx.png

Nice work on the explorer.  will send you some coin when I get to the rig with wallet.

any real devs wanting to take over ?

I think in the first step we need another exchange with more publicity like yobit for this little coin to find a real price.

maybe need start faucet , someone can host ?

P.s. I gave a request to the guys from yobit ^ but they are silent

which software do you prefer for the faucet? I can host it.

I have no preference

but im find this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=451111.0 and https://github.com/Zen00/openfaucet

Lol donations r happenings. Some of u might have been sitting on tight bags since 2015. If it ever gets on an exchange it will get delisted in a week. So its the right time for donations.

CACHECOIN is alive! http://www.cachecoin.org/ - some news will come soon!

hmmm dude  You are Old or New Dev ? ) interesting , to be continued....

Hi!
I'm not a developer. I need some CACH for minting. I have heard that new developer is coming to cachecoin project, so hope it would be popular again.

Could anybody offer me 100,000 CACH under good price?

again pump and dump  ;D as it was last time pump to 20k sat and dump to 200 sat on cryptsy. I think it's a good idea to return to the initial interest of the community, but cache needs go too more exchange for trading - yobit.net/cryptopia.co.nz/bittrex.com . Implementation "proof-of-node" will be introduced ?


What a good price for you ? I bought in the last days cryptsy 200-300 sat

Fully agree with you! Let's all work on it. You see to get the coin quick to the exchange it need paid votes. We all could pay a little bit for votes in new exchange such like as yobit. What do you think?

alt coin boom is on, where is cache ... ?

I have some free money which can invest to go to yobit  ;)



need to make a BOOM , network work my node have 7 connection )

I bought some CACH in crypto-trade.
Let's try to add it to yobit:
Premium - 0.1 btc - 4-7 business days (no guarantee in case of compilation issues)
Exclusive - 0.5 btc - 2-3 business days (no guarantee in case of compilation issues)

I think premium is enough - if everybody could invest 0,01 btc then in a week we could have it in yobit. Who is interested in this coin?

my support with You !

I will write to yobit!
https://www.coinhills.com/market/cach/crypto-trade/ :)

Not a big volume, but I have started:) Waiting some more btc to invest.

Nice to see some activities in cachecoin  :)

1NqPPn9i2UvNgqEFyCRhs94vhG5AnzN2F4

As soon as we have 0,10 btc - I could apply for adding CACH to Yobit!

Hi Aleksei,

Sure, we will consider adding Cachecoin soon.

Regards,
Bobby
www.coingecko.com

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Aleksei wrote:
Hello!


Please add CACHECOIN:

www.cachecoin.org

CacheCoin.Org
www.cachecoin.org
Cachecoin is a scrypt-based cryptocurrency project that aims to improve the altcoin ecosystem. We want to accomplish this by bringing more features to the wallet ...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072284.0

https://www.coinhills.com/market/cach-btc/crypto-trade/


Best regards,

Aleksei

Is there a link or a site to view the listing-process on yobit or a offical yobit-deposit address?

There is no link until we pay the adding cost

we have

http://i65.tinypic.com/33bicsx.png

Looks great and good luck for Yobit  :)
I add a small script to compile the command line client on linux blockexplorer -> Help to Compile (http://cerberus.ageleis.de/compile) Maybe it helps others.

Hi!

Right now will apply!

Also added to voting list
https://www.livecoin.net/voting/index?vote=Cachecoin

I create a snapshot of the blockchain. It can be downloaded from the explorer site snapshot (http://cerberus.ageleis.de/snapshot).

( thx for the donation  ;) )

I don't understand why my posts were deleted:( I have informed that I paid for adding CACHECOIN to Yobit! Waiting the confirmation from Yobit during next week!

Hi Everybody!

Until we are waiting the listing confirmation from Yobit I would kindly ask you to give your proposal and suggestion for development of the CACH:
- what would you like to see new in CACH
- what need to be developed
- what do you think about free faucets ( who could make it - there is some CACH for it)

I could discuss all these matters with real developer!

Waiting your comments.

Alex

First Thing is a App. I believe we should switch to smartphone application like a light-Client.  :)

The second thing, the faucet, this is in the pipeline but I have not so much time atm. If other Person faster than me, no Problem  :D

The app for smart phones is good idea!

I think it would be a good idea to make a new Announcements theme when all suggestion would be collected as long as Vertoe is no more with the project.

Current situation with CACHE: specification, web site, explorer, github Kalgecin, exchange sites, road map ( mobile wallet and some other ideas)

I dont hear this coin before,and can not found on the coinmarketcap.com.

It's a older coin http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cachecoin/ after cryptsy goes offline and the delisting on polo/bittrex years ago, it was inactive on coinmarketcap. But the network running over the last years and still active.

( thx for another donation   :))

this is important too but not the most important thing, first step is more stuff for cachecoin. a new  announcements produces only haters and crazy fanboys, I think a announcements on another platform would be the best.

Maybe wallet for Raspberry Pi

Hi!

I sent the questions to the developer and waiting his answer. Will post about his decision asap!

POS of CACHE is working very good: I don't think we need the PON so much, the best way is to make some updates in current wallet, add it to other platforms such as android/ios, and to develop the CACH as a payment instrument to some services.

Alex

POS working fine:
- working CACH wallet V5.3 https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin/releases
- blockchain bootstrap could be downloaded from http://cerberus.ageleis.de/snapshot

any news from yoBIT ?

Today I wrote to support and waiting reply. Strange that the week has gone and haven't listed.

I really don't understand Yobit, I have requested for adding CACHCOIN and sent 4 messages to support - no answer. Today I have check the Yobit code and it was not used by them. I have filled the adding form again and send the message to support.

Yobit reply more through social media than through Support. maybe a message over twitter ...

New thread just openned trace it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1927335.msg19128872#msg19128872

These thread was connected to Vertoe who left the project!