|
Title: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It - Admin Review Requested Post by: BitcoinEXpress on June 29, 2015, 01:46:10 AM I have never had an issue with Mprep that I know of, I think he has a tough job and does it fairly well.
However Mprep has been and was long before he was moderator, A DGC Fanboy under an alt. The founding dev Baritus burned the community for over $35K and left. His return to the community is NOT a minor announcement in light of the DGC soliciting and collecting funds to rebuild DGC based on the promise that he would never return. This is major news to the DGC community and deserves it its own thread for discussion. I am requesting the the thread below be restored for open discussion. On its face it appears to be censorship to help bury bad news for DGC. ~BCX~ Title: Re: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It Post by: koshgel on June 29, 2015, 02:12:36 AM There seems to be a lot of grey area in terms of altcoin moderation. I don't frequent the section often but in this specific case, if a dev took off with funds and is coming back to the community for round 2, then there should definitely be open discussion.
Would be nice to see mprep's reasoning for removing the post due to "minor announcement" if the 35k scam is true. Title: Re: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It Post by: BitcoinEXpress on June 29, 2015, 02:18:48 AM There seems to be a lot of grey area in terms of altcoin moderation. I don't frequent the section often but in this specific case, if a dev took off with funds and is coming back to the community for round 2, then there should definitely be open discussion. Would be nice to see mprep's reasoning for removing the post due to "minor announcement" if the 35k scam is true. This isn't the forum to discuss or debate if it is true but I would invite you to search for a couple threads in Altcoins that do discuss it. ~BCX~ Title: Re: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It - Admin Review Requested Post by: mrbodz on June 29, 2015, 02:52:08 AM +1 BCX.
all i can say. Although it would be interesting to find out who mprep's alt is. Wish i knew. Ahmed Title: Re: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It - Admin Review Requested Post by: BitcoinEXpress on June 29, 2015, 03:00:17 AM +1 BCX. all i can say. Although it would be interesting to find out who mprep's alt is. Wish i knew. Ahmed No need to start anything with Mprep. To date I have never had an issue with his moderation. This however is protectionism. I'll wait and see what the powers that be rule on this. ~BCX~ Title: Re: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It - Admin Review Requested Post by: mprep on June 29, 2015, 08:46:14 AM I have never had an issue with Mprep that I know of, I think he has a tough job and does it fairly well. However Mprep has been and was long before he was moderator, A DGC Fanboy under an alt. The founding dev Baritus burned the community for over $35K and left. His return to the community is NOT a minor announcement in light of the DGC soliciting and collecting funds to rebuild DGC based on the promise that he would never return. This is major news to the DGC community and deserves it its own thread for discussion. I am requesting the the thread below be restored for open discussion. On its face it appears to be censorship to help bury bad news for DGC. ~BCX~ Quote I have never had an issue with Mprep that I know of, I think he has a tough job and does it fairly well. Thanks.Quote However Mprep has been and was long before he was moderator, A DGC Fanboy under an alt. This is my only active account. I made one some time ago as a backup, while already having this one, but not sure what the password is now. I also don't own DGC, nor have a slightest passing interest in said coin.Quote His return to the community is NOT a minor announcement in light of the DGC soliciting and collecting funds to rebuild DGC based on the promise that he would never return. As I am not part of the DGC community, I took the thread as a minor "welcome back to the team ex dev" thread and thus trashed it for being too coin specific.This is major news to the DGC community and deserves it its own thread for discussion. Quote I am requesting the the thread below be restored for open discussion. As the thread falls out of my jurisdicition (trashcan and thread not by a newbie), I've reported it to have it moved back. Sorry for the inconvenience.Quote On its face it appears to be censorship to help bury bad news for DGC. Don't assume the worst and listen before you accuse.Edit: Thread is now restored: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102081.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102081.0) Title: Re: Moderator Censorship - Seems Like It - Admin Review Requested Post by: BitcoinEXpress on June 30, 2015, 01:03:44 AM I have never had an issue with Mprep that I know of, I think he has a tough job and does it fairly well. However Mprep has been and was long before he was moderator, A DGC Fanboy under an alt. The founding dev Baritus burned the community for over $35K and left. His return to the community is NOT a minor announcement in light of the DGC soliciting and collecting funds to rebuild DGC based on the promise that he would never return. This is major news to the DGC community and deserves it its own thread for discussion. I am requesting the the thread below be restored for open discussion. On its face it appears to be censorship to help bury bad news for DGC. ~BCX~ Quote I have never had an issue with Mprep that I know of, I think he has a tough job and does it fairly well. Thanks.Quote However Mprep has been and was long before he was moderator, A DGC Fanboy under an alt. This is my only active account. I made one some time ago as a backup, while already having this one, but not sure what the password is now. I also don't own DGC, nor have a slightest passing interest in said coin.Quote His return to the community is NOT a minor announcement in light of the DGC soliciting and collecting funds to rebuild DGC based on the promise that he would never return. As I am not part of the DGC community, I took the thread as a minor "welcome back to the team ex dev" thread and thus trashed it for being too coin specific.This is major news to the DGC community and deserves it its own thread for discussion. Quote I am requesting the the thread below be restored for open discussion. As the thread falls out of my jurisdicition (trashcan and thread not by a newbie), I've reported it to have it moved back. Sorry for the inconvenience.Quote On its face it appears to be censorship to help bury bad news for DGC. Don't assume the worst and listen before you accuse.Edit: Thread is now restored: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102081.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102081.0) I appreciate you reconsidering your decision and I regret my hasty accusation. After further research I no longer believe my initial determination that Mprep is tied to DGC is true. Again I have no issues with you and do not foresee any in the future. Keep up the good work. ~BCX~ Added: Locked due to resolution as requested. |