|
Title: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? OKCoin Ceo News! Post by: eligigi400 on July 10, 2015, 06:22:29 PM Someone saw MetaTrader4 Signals?
look here: malware link removed hope this is true! Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: pereira4 on July 10, 2015, 07:10:15 PM Someone saw MetaTrader4 Signals? look here: [Suspicious link removed] hope this is true! BTC will go through several bubble and burst cycles each ATH being higer than the later. Now, LTC.. it's another history. The market is too small, the innovation is not there, the merchant adoption is not there... LTC seems like something that would follow BTC movements but prone to being dumped at any second. If BTC is a gamble, LTC is a blindfolded gamble. Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: Amph on July 10, 2015, 07:18:13 PM better to not go overboard with the enthusiasm, it look nice for the moment, but remember that 300 is nothing special, i remember a identical pump that happened 2-3 months ago, then we have fallen back to 220-250 range
Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: MF Doom on July 11, 2015, 11:29:41 AM better to not go overboard with the enthusiasm, it look nice for the moment, but remember that 300 is nothing special, i remember a identical pump that happened 2-3 months ago, then we have fallen back to 220-250 range Exactly, if support can't hold then everyone is getting excited for nothing. Right now there is a flurry of excitement about Greece, but China is a much bigger concern. Also the us/Russian war rhetoric. This could trigger bigger problems for worldwide economies Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: UnDerDoG81 on July 11, 2015, 01:28:35 PM I wonder why the Chinese do not jump on BTC again after the ongoing stock crash? We would see the moon so fast if they would.
Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: tolikkk on July 11, 2015, 01:37:37 PM may be possible get busy costing from itself forks...?
Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: BadAss.Sx on July 11, 2015, 01:41:38 PM The chinese are in BTC and with a bigger volume then the rest of the world, but there are less bots playing with the price like in 2013 (Mt.Gox). Also the book is much thicker then in 2013 so it takes a lot of money to push up the price. The more BTC gets adopted, the more thicker the book will become, the less strange pump and dumps we get.
As for now the price is relatively stable and with a bigger buy support the chart is more bullish. I think it is going to be a hot winter in 2015 and the price could go easily to 500USD, certainly because the block halvation in 2016. Its a good time to step in BTC now...a lot of companies are coming with their BTC feature which have been funded last year. But 1200USD? Nah, that is going to take a few more years before we get that stable position. Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: doublemore on July 11, 2015, 01:43:17 PM But 1200USD? Nah, that is going to take a few more years before we get that stable position. Cant see us getting past the next block halving and not be over $1200 with bitcoin myself. Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? Post by: eligigi400 on July 11, 2015, 03:56:46 PM it will happen some millionries are buying!
Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? OKCoin Ceo News! Post by: kingaltcoins on July 11, 2015, 05:20:09 PM With BTC - Everything is possible
Yeah, especially if you look at the current prices from beginning of the last 2 years perspective Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? OKCoin Ceo News! Post by: Wexlike on July 11, 2015, 06:01:47 PM That means litecoin would be a much better investment. Btc has to peak at 2800$ for proportional gains.
Title: Re: Bitcoin to 1200$? And LTC to 40$? OKCoin Ceo News! Post by: gentlemand on July 11, 2015, 06:04:39 PM That means litecoin would be a much better investment. Btc has to peak at 2800$ for proportional gains. Its gains kicked the pants off BTC in 2013 too. It depends on one's appetite for risk and timing outrageous pumpage correctly. It moves considerably quicker in either direction. |