Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Hardware wallets => Topic started by: cafucafucafu on August 01, 2015, 05:45:05 PM



Title: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: cafucafucafu on August 01, 2015, 05:45:05 PM
At 4 mins:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXwVqvrkm4g


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: WhatsBitcoin on August 01, 2015, 05:57:19 PM
Interesting problem. As we mainstream, as more services and devices are available, the more resistant to change the protocol will become.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: unamis76 on August 01, 2015, 06:09:38 PM
What's going to change in BIP32?


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Scamalert on August 01, 2015, 06:13:29 PM
First of, sorry to bitch, it would be nice if you could quote from the video so you don't have to watch the video to know what this is all about.

Kinda obvious, if you change the bitcoin protocol so it is not backwards compatible, then will you have a problem with old wallets.

I guess keeping bitcoin protocal unchange to the end of time is wishful thinking, but I think eventually USB will be obsolete anyway, so computer tech development will eventually kill Trezor 1.0.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: ransomer on August 01, 2015, 06:15:00 PM
Having bitcoins in a hardware wallet is a scary proposition. At least if the idea is to put it in and forget it for 10 years or so... Because with the speed of software changes - it is likely that in 10 years it will be very difficult if not almost impossible to access such an ancient system with much more modern software.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: manselr on August 01, 2015, 06:35:47 PM
Thats what i've always said, ironically, there's nothing better than paper to store Bitcoins long term. Nothing better than plastic wrapped encrypted paper wallet which is possible since BIP38 was implemented. I don't really see the point for hardware wallets which are prone to failure and deprecation through software updates. A paper wallet as far as I know, will always remain functional forever.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: ransomer on August 01, 2015, 07:09:00 PM
Thats what i've always said, ironically, there's nothing better than paper to store Bitcoins long term. Nothing better than plastic wrapped encrypted paper wallet which is possible since BIP38 was implemented. I don't really see the point for hardware wallets which are prone to failure and deprecation through software updates. A paper wallet as far as I know, will always remain functional forever.

I tend to agree. Of course it might seem scary that if this feature could be implemented...maybe it could be de-plemented.... and everyone given a 1 year warning to "transfer to the new system". Sadly... everyone being busy with other projects and only checking up on bitcoins every blue moon.. or every 5 years... too bad - so sad.

I think many will want a storage of wealth that they can store and forget about for 10 or more years.. and currently there a some pitfalls with bitcoin...


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Hopalong on August 01, 2015, 07:11:12 PM
Having bitcoins in a hardware wallet is a scary proposition. At least if the idea is to put it in and forget it for 10 years or so... Because with the speed of software changes - it is likely that in 10 years it will be very difficult if not almost impossible to access such an ancient system with much more modern software.

All software or hardware wallets will be impossible to access in just a few years. Already software from pre vista times are failing unless it is wery well written. I have a lot of floppy disks, 3.5 disk, HDs, CDs and USB devices that are failing and many terrabytes of informaton is gone.



Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: cafucafucafu on August 01, 2015, 08:08:14 PM
Having bitcoins in a hardware wallet is a scary proposition. At least if the idea is to put it in and forget it for 10 years or so... Because with the speed of software changes - it is likely that in 10 years it will be very difficult if not almost impossible to access such an ancient system with much more modern software.

All software or hardware wallets will be impossible to access in just a few years. Already software from pre vista times are failing unless it is wery well written. I have a lot of floppy disks, 3.5 disk, HDs, CDs and USB devices that are failing and many terrabytes of informaton is gone.



If it uses BIP32 it shouldn't matter which wallet you use.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Mickeyb on August 01, 2015, 08:38:08 PM
At 4 mins:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXwVqvrkm4g

So what does this means exactly, that I can throw my Trezor away after this? Can't they just write a new update or software for the Trezor?

And second question, are our bitcoins on Trezor in danger after this happens?

Thanks guys.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Meuh6879 on August 01, 2015, 08:50:37 PM
Having bitcoins in a hardware wallet is a scary proposition. At least if the idea is to put it in and forget it for 10 years or so...

that why, in cold storage (for 10 years), you have only 2 solutions really secure :
- store wallet.dat from a bitcoin core
- use a paper wallet ( https://www.bitaddress.org )

i don't understand why tresor is not a paper wallet (algorythm) ... :-\ update is very simple in this way.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Hopalong on August 01, 2015, 08:53:36 PM
Having bitcoins in a hardware wallet is a scary proposition. At least if the idea is to put it in and forget it for 10 years or so... Because with the speed of software changes - it is likely that in 10 years it will be very difficult if not almost impossible to access such an ancient system with much more modern software.

All software or hardware wallets will be impossible to access in just a few years. Already software from pre vista times are failing unless it is wery well written. I have a lot of floppy disks, 3.5 disk, HDs, CDs and USB devices that are failing and many terrabytes of informaton is gone.



If it uses BIP32 it shouldn't matter which wallet you use.

Even when you cant get the wallet software to run?


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: gentlemand on August 01, 2015, 09:09:18 PM
When I were a nipper in the deep mists of time there was much excitement when this was launched

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Domesday_Project

And it was pretty darned cool. An interactive overview of the whole country with maps and virtual tours made by thousands of people on a type of laser disc.

It's also a well known case of obsolescence. The whole project was nearly rendered unreadable within 15 or so years and was only rescued and converted by some tech trickery.

I'll be sticking with paper myself. Even if your hardware stands up there's a risk of software adapting into uselessness or a new bug popping up from nowhere.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: unamis76 on August 01, 2015, 09:10:05 PM
So what does this means exactly, that I can throw my Trezor away after this? Can't they just write a new update or software for the Trezor?

And second question, are our bitcoins on Trezor in danger after this happens?

Thanks guys.

This means that you can carry on using your Trezor and when a BIP is released and implement to replace BIP32 you change device. Simple as that.

Your Trezor or another hardware wallet will keep on working, but as said before in this thread, with old software.


I still don't know what's the deal :D Things change, tech evolves and we change with it. I keep my question, what's going to change in BIP32? We all know the answer. Just change device when a new BIP comes.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: btchip on August 01, 2015, 09:38:07 PM
It's a non issue if the software is designed properly. People have been issuing delta patches (even over SMS) to embedded hardware for decades.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Mickeyb on August 02, 2015, 08:41:21 AM
So what does this means exactly, that I can throw my Trezor away after this? Can't they just write a new update or software for the Trezor?

And second question, are our bitcoins on Trezor in danger after this happens?

Thanks guys.

This means that you can carry on using your Trezor and when a BIP is released and implement to replace BIP32 you change device. Simple as that.

Your Trezor or another hardware wallet will keep on working, but as said before in this thread, with old software.


I still don't know what's the deal :D Things change, tech evolves and we change with it. I keep my question, what's going to change in BIP32? We all know the answer. Just change device when a new BIP comes.

So call me stupid or whatever, but I don't understand. After BIP changes, I will have to change my Trezor for a completely new device??

Why not just a software upgrade? Weren't the Trezor people thinking about this before they have designed their product?


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Kprawn on August 02, 2015, 09:08:35 AM
This is nonsense... Why can I still play ZX Spectrum games on emulators, without the physical hardware? The hardware goes obsolete but the possibility to access it, is just

changed or adapted.

Do you think Trezor are not looking into matters like these? There will be widespread announcements, if this happens and they will have some sort of solution in place, if it does.

If you have any questions about this, send them a email and ask them what the plan B would be in such an event.  ;)

You would be a fool, to keep all your coins in a hardware wallet anyway.  ::)


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Mickeyb on August 02, 2015, 11:44:10 AM
This is nonsense... Why can I still play ZX Spectrum games on emulators, without the physical hardware? The hardware goes obsolete but the possibility to access it, is just

changed or adapted.

Do you think Trezor are not looking into matters like these? There will be widespread announcements, if this happens and they will have some sort of solution in place, if it does.

If you have any questions about this, send them a email and ask them what the plan B would be in such an event.  ;)

You would be a fool, to keep all your coins in a hardware wallet anyway.  ::)

Exactly my opinion, I think they are too serious not to think and anticipate things like this. I mean people are dealing and escrowing thousands of bitcoins daily by using Trezor and just to think about an event like this, sounds impossible to me.

Anyways, I have written in their thread and pointed back to this thread. Maybe they will respond and give their opinion, lets hope.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: harrymmmm on August 02, 2015, 01:18:48 PM
This whole thread is pretty much just FUD.
Any relevant change to protocols will be implemented as a firmware update to Trezor devices.

Trezors are not 'subject to failure' as far as I know.
Paper is hardly more secure or long-lasting.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: dasource on August 02, 2015, 01:26:16 PM
I fail to see how this is an issue? regardless of it being Trezor or any other "BIP39" complaint hardware wallet.

So long as you remember your BIP39 mnemonic words you can recover your private keys and move funds even if there are changes OR your hardware wallet dies. There is half a dozen websites providing client side tools i.e. a single file (html + js) that you can keep on a USB (if you are paranoid that it wont be available in the future) that will derive your private keys from your BIP39 mnemonic (all done from the comfort of a old PC without a internet connection)

Need less of this scaremongering around here.

EDIT : Personally I use multiple hardware wallets with multisig ... get the best of both worlds + best security possible.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: Mickeyb on August 02, 2015, 01:38:13 PM
I fail to see how this is an issue? regardless of it being Trezor or any other "BIP39" complaint hardware wallet.

So long as you remember your BIP39 mnemonic words you can recover your private keys and move funds even if there are changes OR your hardware wallet dies. There is half a dozen websites providing client side tools i.e. a single file (html + js) that you can keep on a USB (if you are paranoid that it wont be available in the future) that will derive your private keys from your BIP39 mnemonic (all done from the comfort of a old PC without a internet connection)

Need less of this scaremongering around here.

EDIT : Personally I use multiple hardware wallets with multisig ... get the best of both worlds + best security possible.

This whole thread is pretty much just FUD.
Any relevant change to protocols will be implemented as a firmware update to Trezor devices.

Trezors are not 'subject to failure' as far as I know.
Paper is hardly more secure or long-lasting.

Thank you guys, now I can sleep tighter! :)


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: cafucafucafu on August 02, 2015, 04:56:12 PM
This whole thread is pretty much just FUD.
Any relevant change to protocols will be implemented as a firmware update to Trezor devices.

Trezors are not 'subject to failure' as far as I know.
Paper is hardly more secure or long-lasting.
Well I am no expert. I was just looking at what Andreas said.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: cypherdoc on August 02, 2015, 09:24:57 PM
Having bitcoins in a hardware wallet is a scary proposition. At least if the idea is to put it in and forget it for 10 years or so... Because with the speed of software changes - it is likely that in 10 years it will be very difficult if not almost impossible to access such an ancient system with much more modern software.

All software or hardware wallets will be impossible to access in just a few years. Already software from pre vista times are failing unless it is wery well written. I have a lot of floppy disks, 3.5 disk, HDs, CDs and USB devices that are failing and many terrabytes of informaton is gone.



If it uses BIP32 it shouldn't matter which wallet you use.

Even when you cant get the wallet software to run?

there will always be today's version of software available on github; forever.  so even if software updates and becomes backwards incompatible, all previous versions are available to access your current wallets.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: harrymmmm on August 03, 2015, 09:08:44 PM
This whole thread is pretty much just FUD.
Any relevant change to protocols will be implemented as a firmware update to Trezor devices.

Trezors are not 'subject to failure' as far as I know.
Paper is hardly more secure or long-lasting.
Well I am no expert. I was just looking at what Andreas said.

The issue he's talking about is that it gets harder to change a protocol when it starts to become embedded.
It's not that the protocol changes can't be released as an upgrade, it's more that there are many devices that will never get upgraded for various reasons. Think about stuff like home routers, for example, that never get an upgrade.
If the network stops completely, people would either learn how to do it, pay someone to do it, or buy another router

Bitcoin involves their money, so I'd think the incentive is there to get the upgrade particularly if they can no longer access their money. Upgrades that just add features will likely not get done.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: ransomer on August 03, 2015, 09:21:36 PM
This whole thread is pretty much just FUD.
Any relevant change to protocols will be implemented as a firmware update to Trezor devices.

Trezors are not 'subject to failure' as far as I know.
Paper is hardly more secure or long-lasting.
Well I am no expert. I was just looking at what Andreas said.

The issue he's talking about is that it gets harder to change a protocol when it starts to become embedded.
It's not that the protocol changes can't be released as an upgrade, it's more that there are many devices that will never get upgraded for various reasons. Think about stuff like home routers, for example, that never get an upgrade.
If the network stops completely, people would either learn how to do it, pay someone to do it, or buy another router

Bitcoin involves their money, so I'd think the incentive is there to get the upgrade particularly if they can no longer access their money. Upgrades that just add features will likely not get done.


Even if there is are many reasons to upgrade they will not get done if people leave the hardware wallet in a bank vault for x years. Many people want wealth they can treat like that.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: errornone on August 03, 2015, 09:29:51 PM
that is why i think BREADWALLET is the best wallet and cold storage out there.

iOS is super secure and you can always update everything to the newest versions.

It relies on BIP32+BIP39, so every private-key you actually have can be stored in your brain (or wherever you want). It is genius.


Title: Re: Change in BIP32 will make Trezor 1.0 useless?
Post by: harrymmmm on August 05, 2015, 01:42:00 AM
This whole thread is pretty much just FUD.
Any relevant change to protocols will be implemented as a firmware update to Trezor devices.

Trezors are not 'subject to failure' as far as I know.
Paper is hardly more secure or long-lasting.
Well I am no expert. I was just looking at what Andreas said.

The issue he's talking about is that it gets harder to change a protocol when it starts to become embedded.
It's not that the protocol changes can't be released as an upgrade, it's more that there are many devices that will never get upgraded for various reasons. Think about stuff like home routers, for example, that never get an upgrade.
If the network stops completely, people would either learn how to do it, pay someone to do it, or buy another router

Bitcoin involves their money, so I'd think the incentive is there to get the upgrade particularly if they can no longer access their money. Upgrades that just add features will likely not get done.


Even if there is are many reasons to upgrade they will not get done if people leave the hardware wallet in a bank vault for x years. Many people want wealth they can treat like that.

No problem there. The bitcoin is on the blockchain and safe. The hardware device holds a copy of the keys, but they can be kept elsewhere as well for use with any kind of wallet in future.
I would have trouble believing that in 10 years time there would be no software around that could restore those keys given a current hd seed even if the protocol was changed. Maybe a minor speed bump to get someone to find the software and do it for you, I guess.