Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: TECSHARE on August 05, 2015, 12:00:16 AM



Title: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 05, 2015, 12:00:16 AM
Discuss.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: panju1 on August 05, 2015, 12:51:25 AM
Discuss.

I doubt if there are any pros apart from these foods being cheaper.
Not worth it, in my opinion.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 05, 2015, 01:02:30 AM
Discuss.

I doubt if there are any pros apart from these foods being cheaper.
Not worth it, in my opinion.

Care to elaborate why exactly?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: panju1 on August 05, 2015, 01:12:40 AM
Discuss.

I doubt if there are any pros apart from these foods being cheaper.
Not worth it, in my opinion.

Care to elaborate why exactly?

Right now, there is a huge debate going on in India about GMO foods.
GMO foods are banned in India. The only crop which is genetically modified is cotton, which is not a food crop.
There is a big push from large corporations to start field trials of BT-Brinjal (as genetically modified brinjal is called here), but the government has been resisting efforts until now.
Questions about safety of GM crops, monopoly by corporations, etc. have been raised.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: MakingMoneyHoney on August 05, 2015, 01:58:46 AM
I think they're making us sick....

Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025, Warns Senior Research Scientist at MIT (http://www.anh-usa.org/half-of-all-children-will-be-autistic-by-2025-warns-senior-research-scientist-at-mit/)

"....At a conference last Thursday, in a special panel discussion about GMOs, she took the audience by surprise when she declared, “At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.” She noted that the side effects of autism closely mimic those of glyphosate toxicity, and presented data showing a remarkably consistent correlation between the use of Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop seeds) with rising rates of autism. Children with autism have biomarkers indicative of excessive glyphosate, including zinc and iron deficiency, low serum sulfate, seizures, and mitochondrial disorder...."

Older post of mine...

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are rampant in the US. We're supposed to be getting healthier with all the new vitamins and healthy foods, etc. So why is infertility down and why are diseases rising?

Even if you're not in the US, it would be wise to pay attention, as it may affect you in the future.

Organic seed banks popping up:

"On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group." Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic (http://www.globalresearch.ca/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-2/23503)

Link between GMOs and gluten allergies  (http://frankenfoodfacts.blogspot.com/2013/09/link-between-gmos-and-gluten-allergies.html)

Genetically Modified Salmon Can Breed with Wild Fish and Pass On Genes (https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/gm-salmon-can-breed-wild-fish-and-pass-genes)

"Will humans who eat GM salmon produce growth hormones year round?
Tampering with the genes of a popular fish to make it twice as large is sick and demented. Plus, GM salmon can breed with other fish and pass on the messed up genes. (http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_27667.cfm) Did you hear about GM tilapia too? Here's some recent research: "Tilapia fish engineered for transgenic expression of growth hormone had deformed heads and backs, atrophied gonads, and lower mineral content" (http://natureinstitute.org/nontarget/reports/tilapia_001.php).

People are already frustrated and overwhelmed with food choices, and some people still think "farm raised" fish means some "pond" farmer took good care of them, but it's just the opposite, they are feeding them hormones and pumping the lake full of antibiotics to kill the disease that spreads from population and fish feces overload. This is like breeding CANCER and auto-immune disorder on purpose! "

Genetic pollution: When GMO salmon escape into the oceans, there will be no boycotting Franken-fish (http://www.naturalnews.com/040807_GM_salmon_franken-fish_genetic_pollution.html)

"Are GMO Foods Safe?

Industry and health leaders cite hundreds of studies to support the safety of GMOs. That includes 20 years of studies in animals that have eaten modified food.

But experts like Krimsky say nearly two dozen studies show bad effects, like harm to the kidneys, liver, heart, and other organs. He says they should carry more weight as people judge the pros and cons." GMOs: What You Need to Know (http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/truth-about-gmos?page=2)

10 Reasons to Avoid GMOs (http://www.responsibletechnology.org/10-Reasons-to-Avoid-GMOs)

"Is it possible that the foods you eat are actually affecting your fertility and inhibiting your chances of getting pregnant? The answer is a resounding, “Yes,” according to dozens of research groups worldwide who have been studying the effects of Genetically Modified Organisms found in many of today’s most common foods." Research Indicates That GMO Could Be a Cause of Infertility (http://natural-fertility-info.com/gmo-infertility.html)

"Corn is in everything from take-away coffee cups to Vitamin E supplements
Experts say that natural cross-pollination from genetically modified crops to organic crops means there is no such thing as GMO-free corn anymore" Is GMO CORN making you sick? How one woman was told that the popular ingredient was the cause of her insomnia, headaches and chronic nausea  (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2380985/Is-GMO-CORN-making-sick-How-woman-discovered-widely-used-ingredient-caused-insomnia-chronic-nausea-headaches.html)

"See that apple on your desk? Or what about that Naked Juice or Odwalla bar you will use as a meal replacement after the gym? They look healthy and one even says it’s GMO free on the back, so they must be good for you, right? Wrong. Would you believe me if I told you that these every day foods you and I consume are packed full of GMO, toxic ingredients, that over time will result in us becoming sicker and our own government richer?" GMO Foods Are Killing Us (http://elitedaily.com/life/gmos-are-killing-us/)



If these GMO foods are causing our illnesses and making us sicker, why do we continue to buy them and eat them? And if they aren't, why are there organic seed banks popping up everywhere?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 05, 2015, 02:06:54 AM
My gf is working on her ph.d in biotoxicology right now.
I talked to her several weeks ago about gmos:

We are already eating gmos en masse, it is just not crops but every other thing we buy.
In germany the association for food and food law says approximately 60-80% of food in german stores was in some kind genetically modified.

I hope it is not unhealthy else we will have a huge problem.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 05, 2015, 02:08:09 AM
My gf is working on her ph.d in biotoxicology right now.
I talked to her several weeks ago about gmos:

We are already eating gmos en masse, it is just not crops but every other thing we buy.
In germany the departmen for food and food law says approximately 60-80% of food in german stores was in some kind genetically modified.

I hope it is not unhealthy else we will have a huge problem.

Shouldn't this kind of thing be determined before it enters the food supply, not after?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: MakingMoneyHoney on August 05, 2015, 02:25:32 AM
My gf is working on her ph.d in biotoxicology right now.
I talked to her several weeks ago about gmos:

We are already eating gmos en masse, it is just not crops but every other thing we buy.
In germany the association for food and food law says approximately 60-80% of food in german stores was in some kind genetically modified.

I hope it is not unhealthy else we will have a huge problem.

And now the US house passed a bill so they don't have to put labels on our food so the US people can't choose what they want to eat.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/248974-house-passes-gmo-labeling-reform-bill

"The House on Thursday passed hotly contested legislation that would keep states from issuing mandatory labeling laws for foods that contain genetically modified organisms, often called GMOs.

The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015, which passed 275-150, would instead create a federal standard for the voluntary labeling of foods with GMO ingredients.

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), who authored the bill, called mandatory labeling laws — which have already passed in Vermont, Connecticut and Maine — unnecessarily costly given that GMOs have been deemed safe by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“Precisely zero pieces of credible evidence have been presented that foods produced with biotechnology pose any risk to our health and safety,” Pompeo said. “We should not raise prices on consumers based on the wishes of a handful of activists.”

Opponents have pushed back against the legislation, saying it will keep consumers from knowing what’s in their food and stop FDA from crafting a national GMO-labeling solution.

Consumer groups, backed by Democrats including Reps. Peter DeFazio (Ore.) and Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), are instead calling the bill the Denying Americans the Right to Know Act.

“American families deserve to know what they are eating and feeding to their children,” DeLauro told reporters Wednesday. “The FDA already requires clear labeling of over 3,000 ingredients, additives and food processes. GMOs should be no different.”...."


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 05, 2015, 02:52:50 AM
My gf is working on her ph.d in biotoxicology right now.
I talked to her several weeks ago about gmos:

We are already eating gmos en masse, it is just not crops but every other thing we buy.
In germany the departmen for food and food law says approximately 60-80% of food in german stores was in some kind genetically modified.

I hope it is not unhealthy else we will have a huge problem.

Shouldn't this kind of thing be determined before it enters the food supply, not after?

Well it is, it just doesnt need to be declared.
For example gmos are used to feed animals that we later eat but there is no need to declare that on the meat.
Same with micro bacteria and so on which is used in food processing/preparation etc.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 05, 2015, 03:38:35 AM
My gf is working on her ph.d in biotoxicology right now.
I talked to her several weeks ago about gmos:

We are already eating gmos en masse, it is just not crops but every other thing we buy.
In germany the departmen for food and food law says approximately 60-80% of food in german stores was in some kind genetically modified.

I hope it is not unhealthy else we will have a huge problem.

Shouldn't this kind of thing be determined before it enters the food supply, not after?

Well it is, it just doesnt need to be declared.
For example gmos are used to feed animals that we later eat but there is no need to declare that on the meat.
Same with micro bacteria and so on which is used in food processing/preparation etc.

On what basis do you claim that they are safe?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 05, 2015, 06:10:30 AM
My gf is working on her ph.d in biotoxicology right now.
I talked to her several weeks ago about gmos:

We are already eating gmos en masse, it is just not crops but every other thing we buy.
In germany the departmen for food and food law says approximately 60-80% of food in german stores was in some kind genetically modified.

I hope it is not unhealthy else we will have a huge problem.

Shouldn't this kind of thing be determined before it enters the food supply, not after?

Well it is, it just doesnt need to be declared.
For example gmos are used to feed animals that we later eat but there is no need to declare that on the meat.
Same with micro bacteria and so on which is used in food processing/preparation etc.

On what basis do you claim that they are safe?

I said i hope they are safe because else we have a huge problem.
As far as i know there is no concrete scientific studies about long term effects on these types of gmo ( animal food and micro bacteria)
The studies taht exist though dont point for bad effects but they are not long term

*edit
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81rp%C3%A1d_Pusztai


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: ObscureBean on August 05, 2015, 12:16:23 PM
Hmm nope not for me thanks, I'll pass  ::)  I saw LA Beast eat a 'Cheeseburger in a Can', I nearly puked my brains out and that wasn't even genetically modified. I calculate GMO foods to be roughly 10.2 billion times as gross so no I don't even wanna know what the pros are :D


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: MakingMoneyHoney on August 05, 2015, 12:38:29 PM
Hmm nope not for me thanks, I'll pass  ::)  I saw LA Beast eat a 'Cheeseburger in a Can', I nearly puked my brains out and that wasn't even genetically modified. I calculate GMO foods to be roughly 10.2 billion times as gross so no I don't even wanna know what the pros are :D

Where do you live? In many places, it is already quite difficult to NOT eat GMOs.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: Mayer Amschel on August 05, 2015, 12:42:25 PM
Corps will not consider anything you guys are saying (even though im 100% agreeing), why? because it will cut profits. Simple, 1-2-3


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 05, 2015, 01:40:04 PM
Corps will not consider anything you guys are saying (even though im 100% agreeing), why? because it will cut profits. Simple, 1-2-3

Indeed. The truth is gmos are way superior in effiency.
Gm crops for example can grow during winter and are immune against pests and illnesses.

The problem is only that we dont know for sure if it is healthy or not.

Most scientist also say there is no way to not use gmo for the future, because we just need to produce more food for the increasing world population.



Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 05, 2015, 09:09:38 PM
Corps will not consider anything you guys are saying (even though im 100% agreeing), why? because it will cut profits. Simple, 1-2-3

Indeed. The truth is gmos are way superior in effiency.
Gm crops for example can grow during winter and are immune against pests and illnesses.

The problem is only that we dont know for sure if it is healthy or not.

Most scientist also say there is no way to not use gmo for the future, because we just need to produce more food for the increasing world population.



As far as I know there are no factual basis for these claims. Care to support these arguments with evidence?
I have never heard of these supposed GMO winter crops, but I know for a fact that the supposedly immune BT products lead directly to resistance to pesticides and create pests that are almost completely uncontrollable even by standard methods using insecticide, so this is far from a fact.

As far as GMOs being required in order to meet food demand, this is also another talking point they like to claim that has no basis in reality. I will also give you two reasons why this is patently false. Number one, GMO seeds are EXPENSIVE, more expensive than natural seeds, meaning the worlds poor can't afford them to begin with.

Number 2, most of their GMO seeds are what are known as "Terminator" seeds, where they are completely sterile and can not be used to replant because they are designed so that farmers have to buy seed stock from them EVERY YEAR. This is again another factor that increases dependance on Monsanto and raises the cost of growing food.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: MakingMoneyHoney on August 06, 2015, 01:07:27 AM
Monsanto sued over PCB contamination of Spokane River in Washington state  (http://www.rt.com/usa/311504-monsanto-lawsuit-spokane-river/)

Quote
Struggling with the pollution of the Spokane River, a town in the state of Washington is taking agrochemical giant Monsanto to court for selling chemicals that endanger human health and the environment, despite it allegedly having known of the hazard for decades.

The lawsuit, filed in a US District Court in Spokane, Washington, holds Monsanto accountable for pollutants flowing into the 111 miles (179 km) long Spokane River that stretches from northern Idaho to eastern Washington.

“Spokane filed a lawsuit to hold Monsanto Company responsible for PCB contamination that finds its way into the City’s stormwater that flows into the Spokane River,” Environmental Law Firms Baron & Budd and Gomez Trial Attorneys, representing Spokane said in a press release.

The city seeks “compensatory damages,” lawyer’s fees, interest and any other relief the court deems appropriate. The suit doesn’t specify the actual sum of damages being sought from the Iowa-based company.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) chemical compounds were developed and made by Monsanto from the 1930s until 1979, when Congress banned them over danger they pose to humans and the environment.

Over the decades, PCBs were used in a number of Monsanto’s products that were incorporated into electrical equipment, paints, caulks, and other building materials.

“Monsanto knew then that PCBs were toxic and could not be contained as they readily escaped into the environment finding their way into bays, oceans, lakes, rivers, streams, soil, and air,” the legal team says.

Despite allegedly knowing the risk posed, Monsanto increased the production of PCBs and concealed this information to make profit, the law firm says. Because of such ill practice PCBs became a common environmental contaminant that affected all forms of life and are capable of wiping out entire fish habitats. In humans, PCB exposure is associated with a number of sicknesses, with cancer posing the worst threat.

The city of Spokane will now spend $300 million to keep PCBs from entering the river in coming years, Marlene Feist, the city’s utilities spokeswoman, told The Spokesman-Review. She said the suit is “long-term litigation.”

Feist noted that the Spokane River has elevated levels of PCBs, that has also been found in fish and wildlife. The city is currently trying to meet a 2017 federal deadline to stop pollution from entering the river.

In order to proceed with the clean-up, the Washington State Department of Ecology already began reducing PCBs at their sources in the watershed, and adding more levels of treatment at its water treatment plant.

“No company should be allowed to contaminate the environment and rely upon taxpayers to clean up the mess,” Attorney Scott Summy, a shareholder at Baron & Budd, P.C., one of two firms representing Spokane in the lawsuit said. “Monsanto, one of the most sophisticated chemical companies in the world, knew decades ago that PCBs were a significant contamination threat. And yet the company was concerned more with continuing profits than with protecting the public.”

“The City will incur significant costs to remove PCBs from stormwater and wastewater effluent flowing into the Spokane River, costs that should not be borne by the City or by its taxpayers but by the company that knew its product would cause this contamination,” Summy’s co-counsel, Attorney John Fiske, of Gomez Trial Attorneys, agreed.

READ MORE: San Diego sues Monsanto for bay pollution & persistent contamination

Monsanto replied in a statement, saying that they are reviewing the lawsuit and its allegations.

“Monsanto is not responsible for the costs alleged in this matter,” Charla Lord, a spokeswoman with the company told The Spokesman-Review.

“PCBs sold at the time were a lawful and useful product that was then incorporated by third parties into other useful products,” Lord said. “If improper disposal or other improper uses created the necessity for clean-up costs, then these other third parties would bear responsibility for these costs.”

In the past PCB pollution cases had been opened against Monsanto in San Diego and San Jose, California, and Westport, Massachusetts


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 06, 2015, 04:24:16 AM
Corps will not consider anything you guys are saying (even though im 100% agreeing), why? because it will cut profits. Simple, 1-2-3

Indeed. The truth is gmos are way superior in effiency.
Gm crops for example can grow during winter and are immune against pests and illnesses.

The problem is only that we dont know for sure if it is healthy or not.

Most scientist also say there is no way to not use gmo for the future, because we just need to produce more food for the increasing world population.



As far as I know there are no factual basis for these claims. Care to support these arguments with evidence?
I have never heard of these supposed GMO winter crops, but I know for a fact that the supposedly immune BT products lead directly to resistance to pesticides and create pests that are almost completely uncontrollable even by standard methods using insecticide, so this is far from a fact.

As far as GMOs being required in order to meet food demand, this is also another talking point they like to claim that has no basis in reality. I will also give you two reasons why this is patently false. Number one, GMO seeds are EXPENSIVE, more expensive than natural seeds, meaning the worlds poor can't afford them to begin with.

Number 2, most of their GMO seeds are what are known as "Terminator" seeds, where they are completely sterile and can not be used to replant because they are designed so that farmers have to buy seed stock from them EVERY YEAR. This is again another factor that increases dependance on Monsanto and raises the cost of growing food.

@wintercrops
I read about winter oilseed rape (wtf name in german it is called raps) which they try to modify to get high(er) immunity against pest and herbizide and more yields.

There sadly already exist an example of what you are talking about:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025736

Imho with more research this should be solved somewhen in the future.

@food for the world

I think the main problem is how the Patents work atleast i know that for Monsanto.
http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/pages/why-does-monsanto-sue-farmers-who-save-seeds.aspx

Here is their official statement.
It is just about money. They could give it to the 3rd world farmers for free if they wanted too.

*edit
I checked terminator seeds, good lord they seem not to be commercial available yet?
If these genes go rampage in the wild then we really will destroy our world.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 06, 2015, 08:11:00 AM
I can't say for sure GMOs are the cause but, the smell from the anti-inflammatory cream the doctors make everybody rub into their assholes these days is really grossing me out. I can smell it a block away sometimes.   :-X


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 06, 2015, 09:22:17 AM
I can't say for sure GMOs are the cause but, the smell from the anti-inflammatory cream the doctors make everybody rub into their assholes these days is really grossing me out. I can smell it a block away sometimes.   :-X

should show the people this here, funny how the majority of ppl dont even think about it.

http://medical-diagonosis.wonderhowto.com/how-to/health-alert-youre-taking-crap-wrong-is-you-poop-properly-0139696/

http://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2013/12/16/toilets-of-the-future-and-the-art-of-squatting/

*edit

it is quite interesting but what is the link to gmos?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 06, 2015, 09:47:59 AM
I can't say for sure GMOs are the cause but, the smell from the anti-inflammatory cream the doctors make everybody rub into their assholes these days is really grossing me out. I can smell it a block away sometimes.   :-X

should show the people this here, funny how the majority of ppl dont even think about it.

http://medical-diagonosis.wonderhowto.com/how-to/health-alert-youre-taking-crap-wrong-is-you-poop-properly-0139696/

I'm sure people have been shitting "the wrong" way since John Crapper's invention revolutionized the bathroom ages ago. The epidemic of inflamed assholes seems to be a more recent trend however. I suspect GMOs are the cause as GMOs being forced down everybody's ass is also a recent trend. I also recall reading studies stating that GMOs cause increased inflammation.

EDIT:

https://i.imgur.com/HCNWnPa.jpg

Here's the first Bing response to the search "GMO inflammation":

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/05/18/gmo-foods-inflammation.aspx
Quote
Large Pig Study Reveals Significant Inflammatory Response to Genetically Engineered Foods

...
"The two main things he was seeing was an increase in intestinal problems in pigs fed GM feed, particularly an increase in stomach inflammation. He was also seeing things such as a thinning of intestinal walls, and hemorrhagic bowel disease, where a pig can... bleed out from its bowel within 15 or so minutes.


The other thing he was seeing was a reduced ability to conceive in the sows (female pigs) and higher rates of miscarriage in female pigs fed GM crops. [In] communities in the United States that still use boars to inseminate their sows... he was also seeing a reduction in the number of piglets born."

...


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 06, 2015, 02:07:27 PM
Corps will not consider anything you guys are saying (even though im 100% agreeing), why? because it will cut profits. Simple, 1-2-3

Indeed. The truth is gmos are way superior in effiency.
Gm crops for example can grow during winter and are immune against pests and illnesses.

The problem is only that we dont know for sure if it is healthy or not.

Most scientist also say there is no way to not use gmo for the future, because we just need to produce more food for the increasing world population.



As far as I know there are no factual basis for these claims. Care to support these arguments with evidence?
I have never heard of these supposed GMO winter crops, but I know for a fact that the supposedly immune BT products lead directly to resistance to pesticides and create pests that are almost completely uncontrollable even by standard methods using insecticide, so this is far from a fact.

As far as GMOs being required in order to meet food demand, this is also another talking point they like to claim that has no basis in reality. I will also give you two reasons why this is patently false. Number one, GMO seeds are EXPENSIVE, more expensive than natural seeds, meaning the worlds poor can't afford them to begin with.

Number 2, most of their GMO seeds are what are known as "Terminator" seeds, where they are completely sterile and can not be used to replant because they are designed so that farmers have to buy seed stock from them EVERY YEAR. This is again another factor that increases dependance on Monsanto and raises the cost of growing food.

@wintercrops
I read about winter oilseed rape (wtf name in german it is called raps) which they try to modify to get high(er) immunity against pest and herbizide and more yields.

There sadly already exist an example of what you are talking about:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025736

Imho with more research this should be solved somewhen in the future.

@food for the world

I think the main problem is how the Patents work atleast i know that for Monsanto.
http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/pages/why-does-monsanto-sue-farmers-who-save-seeds.aspx

Here is their official statement.
It is just about money. They could give it to the 3rd world farmers for free if they wanted too.

*edit
I checked terminator seeds, good lord they seem not to be commercial available yet?
If these genes go rampage in the wild then we really will destroy our world.

I misspoke earlier. I was using the wrong terminology. Terminator seeds seem to be banned by international convention. What I was thinking of and meant to say is most GMO seeds are HYBRIDS that will not produce the same results from saved seed if they are viable at all.

"When two dissimilar varieties are crossed, the result is a hybrid which will often be bigger, brighter, faster-growing or higher-yielding than either of its parents, which makes for a great selling point. But it’s a one-hit wonder. Subsequent generations don’t have the same vigour or uniformity, and the idea is that you don’t save seed from it, you just throw it away and buy some more. This is bad for the plants, bad for the garden and bad for you, but the seed companies make a packet out of it and gain increasing control of what we buy and grow."

http://daughterofthesoil.blogspot.com/2008/02/commercial-f1-hybrids.html

As far as the oilseed rape, apparently this isn't even a food crop, it is used mostly as a bio-fuel and as a soil restorer in crop rotation. Also as far as I can tell varieties which can be grown in winter are already available by nature. In conclusion I don't think any GMO varieties of oilseed rape qualify feeding the world any better than it already is.


Here are some more related sources:

https://www.organic-center.org/hot-science/gmo-crops-continue-to-foster-development-of-super-bugs/

Field-evolved resistance by western corn rootworm to multiple Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in transgenic maize http://www.pnas.org/content/111/14/5141.abstract

http://grist.org/article/the-chemical-treadmill-breaks-down-and-the-superweeds-did-it/

Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338670

What You Eat Affects Your Genes: RNA from Rice Can Survive Digestion and Alter Gene Expression
http://www.nature.com/cr/journal/v22/n1/full/cr2011158a.html

failure to yield Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops
http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/legacy/assets/documents/food_and_agriculture/failure-to-yield.pdf

http://web.mit.edu/demoscience/Monsanto/players.html

Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human Blood
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069805

A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed acombined genetically modified (GM) soy andGM maize diet
http://www.organic-systems.org/journal/81/8106.pdf

Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14730317

Spread of herbicide-resistance from genetically modified creeping bentgrass into the wild.  
http://natureinstitute.org/nontarget/reports/bentgrass_001.php

The Fate of Transgenes in the Human Gut
http://www.mindfully.org/GE/2004/Transgenes-Human-Gut1feb04.htm

Regulators Discover a Hidden Viral Gene in Commercial GMO Crops
http://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/regulators-discover-a-hidden-viral-gene-in-commercial-gmo-crops/

Monsanto's RoundupReady and Bt technologies lead to resistant weeds and insects that can make farming harder and reduce sustainability.
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/our-failing-food-system/genetic-engineering/promoting-resistant-pests.html

Even ISIS is against GMOS!
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Why_GMOs_Can_Never_be_Safe.php




Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: roadbits on August 06, 2015, 07:38:30 PM
I would avoid eating it. Unfortunately since everything we eat has been modified at some point or another then I am afraid I will continue eating it with the rest of the world.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: TECSHARE on August 06, 2015, 09:10:20 PM
I would avoid eating it. Unfortunately since everything we eat has been modified at some point or another then I am afraid I will continue eating it with the rest of the world.

Its not like you have a choice since the federal government banned the states from making mandatory GMO food labeling laws.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: darkangel11 on August 06, 2015, 09:35:38 PM
nature is already adapting. They made crops immune to some diseases and the diseases are slowly starting to affect the modified crops.
The main problem with GMO's is that they replace the natural plants there's no going back. You won't be able to remove the modified gene and start over.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: jeannemadrigal2 on August 06, 2015, 09:46:29 PM
I would avoid eating it. Unfortunately since everything we eat has been modified at some point or another then I am afraid I will continue eating it with the rest of the world.

Its not like you have a choice since the federal government banned the states from making mandatory GMO food labeling laws.

Gee,  I wonder why they would do that?  I am sure it has nothing to do with lobbying.

I try to get everything organic.  It is more to avoid pesticides than gmo.  Maybe it is different elsewhere, but in the usa it is really hard to avoid gmo and pesticides unless you have a very restrictive diet, or you are rich enough to shop at whole foods.  That store is really expensive. 

I think that we already let the big companies do too much damage, they already own the politicians.  We can only vote with our wallets at this point, and if a non gmo alternative is offered, we should buy it.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: criptix on August 07, 2015, 06:15:28 AM
Corps will not consider anything you guys are saying (even though im 100% agreeing), why? because it will cut profits. Simple, 1-2-3

Indeed. The truth is gmos are way superior in effiency.
Gm crops for example can grow during winter and are immune against pests and illnesses.

The problem is only that we dont know for sure if it is healthy or not.

Most scientist also say there is no way to not use gmo for the future, because we just need to produce more food for the increasing world population.



As far as I know there are no factual basis for these claims. Care to support these arguments with evidence?
I have never heard of these supposed GMO winter crops, but I know for a fact that the supposedly immune BT products lead directly to resistance to pesticides and create pests that are almost completely uncontrollable even by standard methods using insecticide, so this is far from a fact.

As far as GMOs being required in order to meet food demand, this is also another talking point they like to claim that has no basis in reality. I will also give you two reasons why this is patently false. Number one, GMO seeds are EXPENSIVE, more expensive than natural seeds, meaning the worlds poor can't afford them to begin with.

Number 2, most of their GMO seeds are what are known as "Terminator" seeds, where they are completely sterile and can not be used to replant because they are designed so that farmers have to buy seed stock from them EVERY YEAR. This is again another factor that increases dependance on Monsanto and raises the cost of growing food.

@wintercrops
I read about winter oilseed rape (wtf name in german it is called raps) which they try to modify to get high(er) immunity against pest and herbizide and more yields.

There sadly already exist an example of what you are talking about:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025736

Imho with more research this should be solved somewhen in the future.

@food for the world

I think the main problem is how the Patents work atleast i know that for Monsanto.
http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/pages/why-does-monsanto-sue-farmers-who-save-seeds.aspx

Here is their official statement.
It is just about money. They could give it to the 3rd world farmers for free if they wanted too.

*edit
I checked terminator seeds, good lord they seem not to be commercial available yet?
If these genes go rampage in the wild then we really will destroy our world.

I misspoke earlier. I was using the wrong terminology. Terminator seeds seem to be banned by international convention. What I was thinking of and meant to say is most GMO seeds are HYBRIDS that will not produce the same results from saved seed if they are viable at all.

"When two dissimilar varieties are crossed, the result is a hybrid which will often be bigger, brighter, faster-growing or higher-yielding than either of its parents, which makes for a great selling point. But it’s a one-hit wonder. Subsequent generations don’t have the same vigour or uniformity, and the idea is that you don’t save seed from it, you just throw it away and buy some more. This is bad for the plants, bad for the garden and bad for you, but the seed companies make a packet out of it and gain increasing control of what we buy and grow."

http://daughterofthesoil.blogspot.com/2008/02/commercial-f1-hybrids.html

As far as the oilseed rape, apparently this isn't even a food crop, it is used mostly as a bio-fuel and as a soil restorer in crop rotation. Also as far as I can tell varieties which can be grown in winter are already available by nature. In conclusion I don't think any GMO varieties of oilseed rape qualify feeding the world any better than it already is.


It took me a while to read all that stuff, but first:

I think we have to differ first between the techniques to modify the plants.

1. Natural pollination

2. Hybrids, which are actually selected/directed breeding between plant relatives - think about all the nice dogs, cats and animals we have today. Usually they dont crossbreed non relatives because the fertility of such crossbreeds is very low, although there exist exceptions. (Mendel and co)

3. Gmo, which is the artificial modification of the gene code of the target plant with completely new genes (usually genes from completely different organisms).


The thing is now hybrids exist in nature through natural pollination too, it just doesnt happen to often and is random.
Hybrids are crossbreeds between relatives and the f1(first child generation) are like you said extremely efficient (yields,immunity) but the drawback is that the f2 generations usually lacks everything of it.
The problem of course: farmers have to buy f1 seeds over and over.

Now this works actually pretty good in the western/first world nations regarding cost and effiency (there are alot of studies and charts about it) but was pretty much doom for the 3rd world/poor countries because farmers there are dependent on seeds they save from this years yield to plant next year.
They just couldnt afford to buy f1 seeds every time.

Gmos are a whole different league then the last two mentioned, they do not exist in nature.

About the winter oilseed rape, maybe you know it better as Canola?
It is true that before the 80's it wasnt widely used because it was actually unhealthy/not edible.
But with the upcoming hybrids and gmo canolas (00-, 0-,0plus-canola) that changed.
It is now used mainly for food processing (frying oil etc), as animal food and as biofuel.
If you look at the oilseed production of the world, then canola is only nr 2 behind soya.
With the upcoming of the gmo canola this are the yields per ha for germany since 1992 to 2009 of winter canola:  2.6 t per ha to 4.2 t per ha.

You are correct that the winter canola grows naturally, but hybrids and gmo increased the yields and also made it better useable as food and biofuel. (Of course with their drawbacks)

But you see through gmo we could now take out the genes which make the winter canola grow in winter and put in other crops for example. There are pretty much infinite possibilities (of franken crops).

My opinion is this:
We shouldnt close the doors for gmos, but we need:

1. Way more reasearch, mainly human and ecological long term studies
2. Much safer and stricter regulations on how to grow gmos in the open
3. Proper labeling of gmos
4. A way to distribute it to the poor that is socially and economically tolerated

*edit typos


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: panju1 on August 07, 2015, 04:03:29 PM
Some people feel GMO is just giving evolution a leg up. I do not agree.
https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/NBR_H3Bn3EXgnGlTtCfcB2bywcU=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2357408/artificial-natural-watermelon1.0.png

This article gives an excellent summary of dominance of GMO in America.
http://www.vox.com/2014/8/12/5995087/genetically-modified-crops-rise-charts


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: misterycoins on August 07, 2015, 06:37:11 PM
GMOs will help with many problems we as humans have created. I think they are overall a good idea and the will do more help than harm


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: panju1 on August 08, 2015, 08:01:03 AM
GMOs will help with many problems we as humans have created. I think they are overall a good idea and the will do more help than harm

What problems are you talking about? What help will GMO do? If anything, GMOs will increase the problems that humans have created.
When will we learn to stop messing with nature?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 08, 2015, 08:16:00 AM
GMOs will help with many problems we as humans have created. I think they are overall a good idea and the will do more help than harm

What problems are you talking about? What help will GMO do? If anything, GMOs will increase the problems that humans have created.
When will we learn to stop messing with nature?

Terminator rapeseed and non-browning apples are going to save the world yo!


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: MakingMoneyHoney on August 08, 2015, 11:53:29 AM
It still irks me that Bill Gates owns shares in the Monsanto company at the same time that he's hiding his original seeds away like a squirrel. It certainly makes me think he's not eating what the rest of us are.

"Bill Gates believes the density of the population in poor areas is too big, and with his depopulation plans he can ‘solve’ that problem. Consider his huge buyout of Monsanto stock – he owns millions of shares of Monsanto and Cargill stock, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation keep scooping it up. He owns more than $23 million worth, or 500,000 Monsanto shares." (link (http://naturalsociety.com/big-owner-monsanto-shares-bill-gates-depopulation-agenda-exposed/))

"Bill Gates is spending $30 million in a remote place called Svalbard, a barren rock near the Barents Sea about 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole to build a seed bank." (link (http://www.nationofchange.org/bill-gates-and-gmo-cronies-plan-30-million-seed-vault-while-poisoning-planet-1373119522))


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: bryant.coleman on August 09, 2015, 11:53:43 AM
GMOs will help with many problems we as humans have created. I think they are overall a good idea and the will do more help than harm

GMO is not a solution to any of our problems. Controlling the human population is the ultimate solution. Right now, the human population stands at 7,200 million. This is projected to rise to 11,000 million in 2100 (4,000 million out of that in Africa). Having 2 billion healthy and wealthy people is much better than having 11 billion starving people. 


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: GriffinHeart on August 09, 2015, 03:58:57 PM
GMOs are totally safe. They are essentially crops grown and bred how scientists want them to be. The same thing happens in dogs, and humans. The traits of bred male and female crops are taken aboard. Occasionally the genes of the crops are altered directly. Same thing can be done in humans, it's considered unethical as of now. You have to tie a thick book to your forehead of you are stupid enough to think the illuminati is making us sick and giving us autism.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 09, 2015, 04:06:25 PM
GMOs don't involve breeding LOL. Turing deadly nightshade into all our favorite produce via breeding is old-school illuminati.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: GriffinHeart on August 09, 2015, 05:20:58 PM
GMOs don't involve breeding LOL. Turing deadly nightshade into all our favorite produce via breeding is old-school illuminati.

Gee, sorry I have a simple understanding of biology.
Did you ever get past grade five or are you just a special snowflake?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: bryant.coleman on August 09, 2015, 05:22:31 PM
GMOs are totally safe.

According to whom? A number of research studies have been conducted on this subject (many of them were published in various scientific journals as well), and a majority of them were of the opinion that GM food damages the ecology and it causes harmful after-effects on humans. Monsanto and Cargill will do anything to gain profits. Even if that means infecting millions of human beings with cancer.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: SubversiveTech on August 09, 2015, 05:43:21 PM
GMOs will help with many problems we as humans have created. I think they are overall a good idea and the will do more help than harm

I'm sort-of surprised you're basically the only person itt who is pro gmo.


I'm by no means a scientist, but we have been genetically modifying crops on a lesser scale for a long, long time. Just look at Gregor Mendel and his punnett squares.

He was able to accurately predict the likelihood of certain traits being passed down by observing several generations of plant's traits etc.


Of course, It's understandable why people are so skeptical. Monsanto is an easy target regardless of whatever the true safety is. Agent orange, Dick Cheney, Vietnam, the Beatles: all terrifying things associated with their company. It's a knee-jerk reaction by and large.


Again, I don't know the true safety of GMO foods but you'd have to be really pessimistic to not want to explore the option of multiplying our global crop yield.   


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 09, 2015, 07:34:35 PM
GMOs don't involve breeding LOL. Turing deadly nightshade into all our favorite produce via breeding is old-school illuminati.

Gee, sorry I have a simple understanding of biology.

Keep studying, you'll pick it up eventually.
Quote
Did you ever get past grade five or are you just a special snowflake?
Special snowflake.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: GriffinHeart on August 09, 2015, 08:32:18 PM
There you damn go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WSCs78Gl9M

This explains GMOs. Watch you tin-foil hat idiots call this government... Stuff?

I mean honestly, don't spew autism if the only people who have posted studies on this have lied about their PhD and pulled their places of work from their crusty rectum.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 09, 2015, 08:53:46 PM
There you damn go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WSCs78Gl9M

This explains GMOs. Watch you tin-foil hat idiots call this government... Stuff?

I mean honestly, don't spew autism if the only people who have posted studies on this have lied about their PhD and pulled their places of work from their crusty rectum.

But, but, I complained about inflamed assholes and linked information from a study conducted by Dr. Judy Carman. "Dr. Carman has degrees in both epidemiology and medicine"

Wanna borrow my tin-foil hat? It 'll go perfectly on top of your strawman.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: MakingMoneyHoney on August 09, 2015, 09:19:23 PM
There you damn go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WSCs78Gl9M

This explains GMOs. Watch you tin-foil hat idiots call this government... Stuff?

I mean honestly, don't spew autism if the only people who have posted studies on this have lied about their PhD and pulled their places of work from their crusty rectum.

Did you get your only information from someone who got their information from someone who told them what to think? Please get some research into the studies about how GMOs can harm people. If you can't find any that support your idea that they're all good forever and ever, then that's bad. Because there should be studies about how how GMOs can affect us longterm.....


Edit:


The video you linked to had articles...

Study reveals GMO corn to be highly toxic  (http://www.rt.com/usa/toxic-study-gmo-corn-900/)

Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases† (http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416)

New Review Points to Glyphosate’s Dangerous Health Effects (http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/new-review-points-to-glyphosates-dangerous-health-effects/)

Debate Surrounding GMO Seeds Heats Up As Supermarkets Start Labeling Ingredients (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/26/gmo-seeds-breakdown-monsanto_n_2958526.html)

Of course that last link is old, because as we all know, the government doesn't want us to know what's in our food and made it so they don't have to tell us, and obviously won't.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 10, 2015, 12:38:14 AM
While an epidemic of inflamed assholes is a definite downside one of the pros of GMOs is that they're considerably safer for pregnant women than thalidomide.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: dodgecharger on August 12, 2015, 12:15:30 AM
GMOs are typically used to grow things outside of their normal growing season, and to yield more, or was I misinformed?


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: panju1 on August 12, 2015, 12:51:56 AM
GMOs are typically used to grow things outside of their normal growing season, and to yield more, or was I misinformed?

You just haven't heard of the 'side-effects' of GMO.  :)


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 12, 2015, 12:53:17 AM
GMOs are typically used to grow things outside of their normal growing season, and to yield more, or was I misinformed?

The argument here is whether they're safe or not. A typical propaganda tactic from GMO companies is to redirect any discussion on safety away from the issue.

But, to answer your question I believe roundup-ready GMOs are the most typical type of crops and those are about requiring farmers to purchase expensive herbicides with questionable effects on human and livestock health.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: kenbytes on August 13, 2015, 06:35:41 PM
I am 'cautious' about GMOs and think that their use should be restricted unless there is a clear need.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: bitcollins85 on August 14, 2015, 04:01:27 PM
My issue with most discussions about GMO is that people tend to treat all GMOs as if they are identical. Genetic modification is a technique. If you put in a gene with a harmful effect, you will get something harmful. If you put in a gene with a beneficial effect, you will get something beneficial.


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: notbatman on August 14, 2015, 04:40:50 PM
My issue with most discussions about GMO is that people tend to treat all GMOs as if they are identical. Genetic modification is a technique. If you put in a gene with a harmful effect, you will get something harmful. If you put in a gene with a beneficial effect, you will get something beneficial.

There are a few "techniques" such as using viruses to infect cells with foreign genes. During infection portions of the viruses genes also gets transferred causing unwanted harmful effects like tumors.

This is just one example of many, you can read up on the details here: http://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/regulators-discover-a-hidden-viral-gene-in-commercial-gmo-crops/

You make it sound simple and it's not.



Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: bryant.coleman on August 16, 2015, 09:17:23 AM
While an epidemic of inflamed assholes is a definite downside one of the pros of GMOs is that they're considerably safer for pregnant women than thalidomide.

Just because Ricin is less poisonous when compared to botulinum,I don't think that you can add Ricin to your diet. Or let me take another example. Syphilis is less deadly when compared to HIV. That shouldn't mean that you should get yourself infected with Syphilis.  ;D

GMO might be less toxic when compared to Thalidomide. But that doesn't mean that it is safe for everyone. 


Title: Re: Are GMO Foods Safe? What Are The Pros and Cons?
Post by: omahapoker on August 28, 2015, 12:06:03 PM
There are many reports that they are problematic. For example childs in the US eating maze often have to fight with several diseases.

Then the cases giving gmo to cows as food. Their udders became infected and bloody and whole cowsheds died. And thinking about it. They ate plants that were immune against some viruses or so. They killed the viruses by destroying theirs cells from the inside. Now think about why the same should not happen with other cells, for example in the udders of cows.

I surely would not take them if i can avoid it.

The smart thing in the US is, these companies are mighty. They have the government and the admission boards in the pocket because they have their man sit in both. The result is that in parts of the US it is even forbidden to mark your gmo free food as gmo-free. Because they managed to get the admission boards claim that gmo food is not different from normal food. So it is a trade barrier when someone claims his food is gmo free. Not allowed.

I will never live in the US...