Bitcoin Forum

Is 400 satoshi minimum reward per 30 minutes good reward ?

Faucetrank.com

I would say it's acceptable but i wouldn't use a faucet with that reward...anyway it also depends on the other rewards and the % of getting them.

It's an okay reward.

You need to be able to justify whatever payout you decide to put on your site after other expenses like fees, operational costs, and your profit/salary, but if you could do 500 per 30 minutes, I think it would draw a lot more traffic for you.

I personally, wouldn't visit your site for 400 per 30 minutes, simply because i have other sites that I visit with higher rewards. But I'm sure a lot of rotators will add your faucet at that payout. Of course, there will always be people that will say "raise your payout", but personally, I don't visit faucets that pay less than 1000/hour.

400 satoshi for 30 minute can is a good rewards, but i like more 800 every hour, more satoshi and less captcha to add. for now i use only hours faucet with 750 or more

If i were you i will choose a faucet that pays per hour but its only based from my opinion since i used to get faucets before. And theres a numerous sites that pays over 1000 satoshi per hour.

Now reward has changed it's 500 satoshi per 30 minutes  :) will you still don't liketo visit my faucet ? or I should give 1000 per hour instead 30 minutes ?

I personally prefer 1,000 per hour, but 500 per 30 minutes is definitely acceptable, as well.

Not a bad reward. It would be average in my view. I would use it in combination with many other faucets.

At the first i didn't get that it was your faucet since i saw for first the list so maybe you should make it a bit more visible.

Also if we use btc address we will get the payment directly after we reach a min payout? Share thing is for each claim or only once?
(some info are missing or if i missed them then they aren't really user friendly)

I just visited your faucet.

Allow me to clarify two major flaws with it so far.

1000 bits = 100,000 Satoshi
600 bits = 60,000 Satoshi
500 bits = 50,000 Satoshi

You need to change all the instance of where you say "bits" to "Satoshis", unless you really are giving away 1000, 600, and 500 bits.

The second problem? The share-gate. I, personally, will not visit your site if it requires me to HAVE to share your site in order to make a claim. If I find a site that I like, I will grab my referral link, and share it with my followers. The moment you force me to do it, two things happen:

1. I share your content to unlock the claim button, immediately delete the post from my twitter/facebook, and most likely will not return to your faucet no matter how high the rewards. or
2. I will return to your faucet, but will use an anti-antibot form submitter to bypass your stupid share-gate next time.

I don't know why faucet owners feel the need to do all these tricks and antibot and social sharing bullshit shenanigans... In the end, the user experience is the most important thing, even more than the rewards. Even if you have a high reward, when you have all the anti-bot links and REQUIRE them to share before they can claim, eventually, they will replace your faucet in their rotation with another faucet that pays the same or more that doesn't include all the bullshit. It's like you're killing your faucet slowly from the get-go.

Just please don't do it.

Sorry but I also mentioned it that sharing is no more bullshit because I added referral link in sharing so if you share it you'll get  50% referral bonus which is not a bad deal at all.

the bit word I used because you are getting 5 bit but that's really confusing then I'll correct it .

Joe, I really like the way you write - I'm going to PM you with a proposition.

500 satoshi every 30 minutes for the reward i think it's quite fair and also i like for 50% bonus referral link

My opinion that is better higher reward and longer time. in that manner your faucet will have beside "classical faucet user" and visitor who claim only on high reward.  I'm not sure, but i think that for adsense not negligible unique IP visitors statistics