Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Press => Topic started by: julz on November 16, 2012, 11:27:04 AM



Title: 2012-11-15 bloomberg.com - Hard Power Rising Means Less for U.S. or China: Cutti
Post by: julz on November 16, 2012, 11:27:04 AM
#ECB

Quote
Hard Power Rising Means Less for U.S. or China: Cutting Research


Simon Kennedy
2012-11-16

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-16/hard-power-rising-means-less-for-u-s-or-china-cutting-research.html

“Hard power” -- military and economic might -- is dispersed across more countries than at any period since 1815, curbing the dominance of the U.S. and China and throwing up challenges for economic stability, according to a study by SLJ Macro Partners LLP, a London-based hedge fund.
...

As if central banks don’t have enough to worry about, along come “virtual currencies.”
Technological developments and the increased use of the Internet have spawned digital communities in which consumers can transact using money peculiar to those worlds. Examples include Bitcoin, which can be used to trade goods and services on some websites, and Linden Dollars, which feature in the online game Second Life.
While these currencies provide no unit of account or physical manifestation with legal tender status, the European Central Bank says the increased use of them bears monitoring by policy makers.



Title: Re: 2012-11-15 bloomberg.com - Hard Power Rising Means Less for U.S. or China: Cutti
Post by: BladeMcCool on November 16, 2012, 04:57:11 PM
Hrm I forget who it was that said it but it was someone important and the thing they said was that bitcoin didnt matter unless bloomberg was reporting on it. Perhaps it was some forex market or something. Well that sounds like, in a small way, from that article you linked, that bloomberg is reporting on Bitcoin.


Title: Re: 2012-11-15 bloomberg.com - Hard Power Rising Means Less for U.S. or China: Cutti
Post by: Spekulatius on November 17, 2012, 02:01:08 AM
Hrm I forget who it was that said it but it was someone important and the thing they said was that bitcoin didnt matter unless bloomberg was reporting on it. Perhaps it was some forex market or something. Well that sounds like, in a small way, from that article you linked, that bloomberg is reporting on Bitcoin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=123600.0

Press Ctrl+F and enter "bloomberg"