Title: Should we call complex transactions Bitcoin 2? Post by: cbeast on December 04, 2012, 04:15:13 AM Now that we are starting to see escrows being created and the protocol supporting message signing, invoice creation, and more; Bitcoin is no longer a simply one way transaction network. Bitcoin 2 would convey the evolution of the protocol while keeping compatability with original bitcoins.
Title: Re: Should we call complex transactions Bitcoin 2? Post by: casascius on December 04, 2012, 04:18:48 AM Let me answer with a rhetorical question: would you call writing a check to two parties, or one with two signature lines, "checking 2.0"?
I would find this more confusing than anything. I would expect it to mean a new kind of non-interchangeable coin that works like bitcoin, and is being held out as better in some way, but isn't spendable where only a bitcoin is accepted. Basically an altcoin. Title: Re: Should we call complex transactions Bitcoin 2? Post by: jimbobway on December 04, 2012, 04:30:45 AM I can see how from a marketing standpoint bitcoin 2.0 is like web 2.0
Its an upgrade from the original. Title: Re: Should we call complex transactions Bitcoin 2? Post by: cbeast on December 04, 2012, 04:33:16 AM Let me answer with a rhetorical question: would you call writing a check to two parties, or one with two signature lines, "checking 2.0"? Most people don't even know what two-party checks are. Most people don't even use checks anymore. I think of them as business checks.I would find this more confusing than anything. I would expect it to mean a new kind of non-interchangeable coin that works like bitcoin, and is being held out as better in some way, but isn't spendable where only a bitcoin is accepted. Basically an altcoin. I see where you are coming from, but I think most people would interpret it as "Bitcoin 1 compatible" instead of an alt coin. More importantly, it conveys the evolution of Bitcoin itself. Perhaps I am over-analyzing this. Really, very few people have even heard of Bitcoin yet to worry about their misgivings. I can see how from a marketing standpoint bitcoin 2.0 is like web 2.0 That was my thinking.Its an upgrade from the original. Title: Re: Should we call complex transactions Bitcoin 2? Post by: DeathAndTaxes on December 04, 2012, 04:35:59 AM We don't even have Bitcoin 1.0 yet. The death of Bitcoin 1.0 before the birth of Bitcoin 1.0 seems kinda premature.
Title: Re: Should we call complex transactions Bitcoin 2? Post by: cbeast on December 04, 2012, 04:44:54 AM We don't even have Bitcoin 1.0 yet. The death of Bitcoin 1.0 before the birth of Bitcoin 1.0 seems kinda premature. I forget sometimes that Bitcoin is still Beta. Thanks. I'll close this thread. |