Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Altcoin Discussion => Topic started by: Deprived on December 09, 2012, 09:45:21 PM



Title: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on December 09, 2012, 09:45:21 PM
STATUS

Will be selling bonds into correctly priced bids up to around 180 BTC worth.

Bond Face Value : 0.01 BTC
Bonds available for sale (including those already sold) : 2000 (Total Face Value of 20 BTC)
Bonds Outstanding : 16477 (Total Face Value of 164.77 BTC)
Current Dividend Rate (per week) : 0.6%


INTRODUCTION

The contract for this bond can be found in the second post of this thread.
Further information about this bond can be found in the asset listing on LTC Global  https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF.B1 (https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF.B1)

This security is a bond issued by LTC-ATF - a small trading fund listed on LTC Global.  Further information about LTC-ATF can be found at the following links:

Listing : https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF (https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF)
BTC forum thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112876.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112876.0)
LTC forum thread : http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,657.0.html (http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,657.0.html)

This bond has a face value denominated in BTC but is transacted in LTC.  A fixed rate of interest is paid each weekend - calculated based on face value then converted into LTC for actual payment.  The current rate paid will be displayed near the top of this post.  The rate may be increased at any time by the issuer but may not be decreased.  Any change applies to ALL bonds - and a seperate post will be made announcing any increase.

Because the bond has a face-value in BTC but is transacted in LTC it is not possible for the issuer to maintain constant bid or ask walls.  Offers on both sides of the book will be placed whenever the exchange rate is fairly stable and issuer is online - and issuer will also fill any asks at an appropriate price when online (subject to a daily maximum of the higher of 1 BTC worth or 10% of outstanding bonds).  A direct redemption method is also available for quantities of 100 or more bonds.

Steps are being taken and safe-guards established to reduce as far as possible any exposure bond-holders have against exchange-rate changes and/or trading losses making LTC-ATF unable to honour bonds.  The former (exchange-rate changes) is pretty much eliminated as a risk, the latter (trading losses) very heavily mitigated by sensible restrictions on exposure to single points of failure.  As always, there does remain some element of risk.

One risk IS explicitly passed on to bond-holders : the failure (or loss through security compromise or similar) of an exchange platform on which LTC-ATF operates.  Losses incurred in this manner are distributed equitably across LTC-ATF unit holders and LTC-ATF.B1 bond holders with a mechanism in place to restore bond face value from subsequent profits.

The full detail of all aspects of the bond summarised above can be found in the contract in the second post.


TARGET MARKET

The market for this bond broadly falls into three groups of investors.  These are now addressed in INCREASING order of importance :

1.  Unsophisticated investors (mouthbreathers).  These invest in anything which pays dividends.  They probably don't read contracts in full and definitely don't do any analysis to determine whether an investment is likely to be profitable.  If they see this bond's price rise they'll assume it means LTC-ATF doing well, if they see it falling they'll assume LTC-ATF is doing badly (price of this bond is actually set 100% by exchange-rate and entirely unrelated to LTC-ATF's performance).  If you're reading this you probably aren't in this category.

2.  Speculators.  This bond provides a useful way to bet against LTC in the medium term (short-term the admin fees wipe out gain, long-term you probably shouldn't even be using this exchange).  Speculators can also pick off orders that aren't updated to reflect changes in the exchange-rate to make a fast profit.

3.  More sophisticated investors.  It's important at this point to consider WHY people invest in specific securites.  There are intangible reasons (want to support community, think it's interesting etc) but one very tangible one which applies to a lot of investors - to make profit.

But what does "profit" actually mean - and, more relevantly, how is it calculated?  Is an investor interested in increasing the number of LTC they own?  The number of BTC they can purchase?  The purchasing power of their assets if converted to fiat?

A more sophisticated investor may well opt not to put all their eggs in one basket (for example investing/holding solely assets whose profitability is determined in LTC).  This is where these bonds fill a useful niche in the market - they allow investors to effectively convert part of their LTC holdings into BTC AND earn growth on them.  That allows them to hedge against a total collapse
of LTC vs BTC.  And they can do it without ever having to move any funds off of LTC Global or use an exchange.

There's also two classes of investors for whom this bond is absolutely NOT suitable:

1.  Ones who want to go "all-in" on LTC increasing in value faster than BTC in the short to medium term (if they only want to gamble like that long-term than the bond MAY make sense for them in the medium term).

2.  Ones who want to hedge their investment portfolio against the devaluation of BTC/LTC against fiat.  This bond provides no such protection.


CONCLUSION

LTC-ATF.B1 offers a realistic rate of interest backed by an operating business which demonstrably generates profits sufficient to support the bonds.  Whilst fine detail of LTC-ATF's holdings/trades is not published, sufficient information is provided to allow verification that the reported results are at least in the correct ball-park.

By offering bonds that are valued in BTC but transacted in LTC, LTC-ATF.B1 allows investors to balance or hedge their investment portfolios across BTC/LTC - without having to use any exchange other than LTC-GLOBAL or ever hold any currency other than LTC.

Whilst significant effort is being taken to reduce risk, it cannot be totally eliminated.  One specific risk (failure of a trading platform) is not mitigated and is passed through proportionately to bond-holders.  This is because bond holders already accepted the risk of such failure prior to investing and there is no way, in any event, to mitigate it whilst offering a competitive rate.


PRICING

As the face value (in LTC) varies with exchange-rate, this section explains how to calculate the price the fund will buy and sell bonds at.  First a table showing prices for various exchange-rates.

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/8769/bondprice.gif

The first column is Exchange-rate (LTC/BTC).  Second column is the price the fund will put bids at (to buy back bonds) at that exchange-rate.  Third column is the face value at that exchange-rate.   Fourth column is the price the fund will put Asks at (to sell bonds) at that exchange-rate.

That table assumes a zero-spread market - which isn't actually the case, so the table is only useful to give a general idea of where prices will lie.  The fund sells bonds based on the rate at which is can sell LTC and buys them back based on the rate at which is can buy LTC.  To work out the exact prices the fund will trade at, you need to to do the following:

The fund's Bid price (to buy back bonds) is calculated by dividing 0.01 (face value in BTC of a bond) by the lowest non-trivial (i.e. ignore tiny orders) Ask on BTC-E.  Then multiply the result by 0.99 for the 1% admin fee (which covers transfer costs, 0.2% transaction fee and allows for a small movement in rate between place of order and execution).

The fund's Ask price (to sell bonds) is calculated by dividing 0.01 by the highestest non-trivial Bid on BTC-E.  Then multiply the result by 1.01 for the 1% admin fee.

The face value of bonds would be calculated by dividing 0.01 by the mid-point between the two rates used for calculating Bid/Ask.

As an exmple right now highest bid for LTC on BTC-E is at .00599 and lowest ask at .00603.

So face value would be 0.01 divided by average of those two (.00601) = 1.6639
Fund's Ask would be at 1.01*(0.01/.00599) = 1.6861
Fund's Bid (or price I'd buy back from Asks at) would be at .99*(.01/.00603) = 1.6418

In practice Asks will often be spred over a range - reflecting volume at different price points.  So if there's 1 BTC worth of bids on BTC-E at .00603 then there'd only be 1 BTC worth of bonds up for sale at 1.6861 with rest at a price corresponding to next highest bid.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on December 09, 2012, 09:45:52 PM
[[COPY OF CONTRACT]]

DEFINITIONS

(The) Issuer / The fund trading with the ticker LTC-ATF on the Litecoin Global
Exchange.

(The) Manager : The individual controlling the user account
with the name "Deprived" on The bitcointalk forums.

The Bond : The security offered on Litecoin Global Exchange using the ticker
LTC-ATF.B1


OVERVIEW

LTC-ATF.B1 is a bond issued by the LTC-ATF.  It is a sort of hybrid lieing
somewhere between a regular bond and a 'perpetual' bond.  LTC-ATF is issuing
this bond rather than raising new capital via sale of additional units for two
primary reasons:

1.  To allow LTC-ATF to trade in BTC-denominated securities without massive
exposure to the LTC/BTC exchange-rate.
2.  To reduce the portion of future profits distributed to new investors - and
hence increase the profit retained by early investors.  This increase in
retained profits comes with an associated increase in accepted risk (by existing
LTC-ATF investors, not bond holders).

The bond is primarily transacted in Litecoins (LTC) but has a face-value
denominated in BTC.  Dividends are paid based upon this face-value.  This means
that bond-holders are effectively making a BTC-denominated investment - with
transactions just happening to occur in LTC.  This has advantages and
disadvantages for both investor and issuer - which should be carefully
considered before investing.

The bond pays a fixed-rate of interest weekly.  This rate may be increased
without notice by the issuer but may not be reduced once increased.  Bonds will
initially be offered paying a 0.6% per week dividend - then the rate will be
gradually increased as necessary until demand meets supply.  Any such increases
apply to ALL outstanding bonds, not just to new ones sold after the date such
increase is announced.


FACE VALUE

Each bond will begin with a face value of 0.01 BTC.  All Asks and Bids placed by
the issuer will be at approximately this face-value less (or plus in the case of
Asks) a 1% administration fee.  The exchange-rate used by the issuer when
placing such orders will be the rate available for immediate conversion (i.e.
buying or selling into existing orders) on the BTC-E exchange.

In general the face value of bonds will not change.  The exception to this is if
a platform on which LTC-ATF operates defaults, is hacked or otherwise loses
assets rightfully belonging to LTC-ATF.  This is dealt with in more detail in a
later section of this contract.


REDEMPTION OF BONDS

The bonds have no expiry date - that is they are perpetual in nature.  However
provision is made to allow redemption at any time (subject to certain
provisions) by holders.

Issuer undertakes to attempt to redeem at least 10% (or 1 BTC worth - whichever
is higher) of outstanding bonds on any calendar day on demand.  This will be
conducted through two primary mechanisms:

1.  Issuer will regularly check the LTC Global market for any Asks which are
priced at 99% of face value or less.  Any such orders will be filled.
2.  Any bond holder may directly redeem bonds provided at least 100 bonds are
redeemed in a batch.  This is done by transferring the bonds to the manager
(DeprivedAsset).  When manager notices such a transfer he will sell an amount of
BTC on BTC-E equivalent to the face value of the transferred bonds then transfer
99% of received funds (in LTC) to the holder.

Unfortunately, due to the bonds being valued in BTC but transacted in LTC it is
not possible for issuer to leave standing bids up on LTC Global in the manner
that is used to provide liquidity for LTC-ATF.

At his discretion manager may agree to redeem bonds by means of a transfer of
BTC on the BTC.CO exchange.  Where this occurs, such redemption will be made at
99% of face value (with no exchange-rate relevant).  This would need to be
arranged in advance and it established beyond doubt that the nominated BTC.CO
receiving account is indeed controlled by the same indivual as transferred the
bonds on LTC Global.

Manager may at his discretion sell bonds at below face value to existing bids on
the market.  This would only be done if there were a specific very profitable
(and with short-term availability) opportunity available.


DIVIDENDS

Dividend payments are due at a nominal time of 23:59:59 GMT each Saturday.  In
practice the dividend payment will be made at some time on either Saturday or
Sunday - typically just before weekly results for LTC-ATF are published.  It is
not possible to schedule dividends in advance as the amount of the dividend (in
LTC) cannot be calculated without knowing the exact exchange-rate available at
the time of payment.

Dividend will be a fixed percentage each week.  This percentage will be set at
0.6% per week when the bond is first placed for sale.  Thereafter the rate may
be increased at any time without ntoice by the issuer.  The rate may never be
decreased by the issuer whilst there are any outstanding bonds.  Changes to the
interest rate will be published in the official threads for this security and in
the LTC-ATF threads.  Any increases in interest rate apply to all oustanding
bonds, not just to ones sold after such increases.

When a dividend is paid the following procedure will be used to calculate the
amount to be dividended:

1.  The BTC value of the dividend will be calculated - the number of outstanding
bonds multiplied by their individual face value multiplied by the current
interest rate paid.
2.  a)  If the issuer does NOT need to convert BTC into LTC to pay the dividend
then the exchange-rate used to calculate the LTC to pay will be the mid-point
between highest bid and lowest ask on the BTC-E LTC/BTC trade list.
    b) If the issuer DOES need to convert BTC into LTC to pay the dividend then
an amount of BTC equal to the due dividend will be used to purchase LTC on
BTC-E.  The LTC received from this transaction(s) will be the amount dividended.
3.  The full amount of LTC calculated (or obtained) will then be dividended out.
 No admin fees or transfer fees will be deducted from it.


MANAGEMENT FEE

No management fee is taken for maintaining operation of these bonds.  The
manager expects to gain his reward from increased profitsfrom his personal
LTC-ATF units and his 10% fee on LTC-ATF earnings.

The admin fees charged on purchases and sales are to cover (or reduce) the
various transfer and exchange-use fees necessary to conduct such actions.


RISK EXPOSURE AND MITIGATION

In general bond holders have senior claim against all assets of LTC-ATF (up to
face value of the bond).  Most risks associated with LTC-ATF's operations are
carried by LTC-ATF rather than this bond.  There is one specific risk which is
shared with bond-holders - the full or partial default of a platform (e.g.
exchange) on which LTC-ATF holds funds.  This particular risk is share with
bond-holders for two reasons:

1.  There is nothing LTC-ATF can practically do to mitigate this risk.
2.  Bond-holders already accepted this risk when they deposited funds to LTC
Global to invest.

In the event that a platform on which LTC-ATF trades (or holds funds) loses (or
ceases to make available for use) assets belonging to the fund then the face
value of bonds shall (at the discretion of manager) be reduced by a percentage
equal to the percentage of asset value controlled by LTC-ATF lost (or made
unusable).

So if (for example) BTC-E vanished with all our funds on there, and those funds
amounted to 10% of the total assets managed by LTC-ATF then the face value of
all bonds would be reduced by 10% to 0.009 BTC.

If such a reduction occurs and LTC-ATF continues trading (rather than closes
down) then half of all future profits made (after payment of bond dividends and
before management fee is taken) would be applied to increasing bond face value
back up towards its initial value of 0.01 BTC.

Other than the above, all risks associated with trading (prices crashing, typoed
orders that lose money, investments that turn out to be scams etc) are carried
by LTC-ATF and do not affect the face value of bonds or the dividend payments
due on them.

So there are precisely two risks bond-holders have (other than that the issuer
scams them) :

1.  Losses caused by default/theft from an exchange used,
2.  That the value of LTC-ATF assets falls to a level such that the total assets
of LTC-ATF are less than the face value of issued bonds.

Here are specific risks associated with point 2 - and how they are addressed:

Exchange-rate changes : If all of LTC-ATF's investments were in LTC-denominated
securities and LTC suddenly tanked against BTC then LTC-ATF could end up with
insufficient funds to cover the face value of outstanding bonds.  To counter
this the fund must maintain BTC-denominated assets such that outstanding bonds
amount to a liability of no more than 90% of such assets.  So if we have 90 BTC
face-value of outstanding bonds then we must hold at least 100 BTC of
BTC-denominated assets.  Funds will be exchanged between currencies as needed to
maintain this minimum ratio.  This percentage will be included in LTC-ATF's
regular reports (usually, but not always, produced weekly).

Trading Losses : It is possible for LTC-ATF to accumulate trading losses such
that it no longer holds sufficient assets to cover outstanding bonds at face
value.  This cannot be totally removed as a risk (as exchange-rate could) but is
very heavily mitigated through a few methods:

1.  Every effort is taken to spread exposure rather than allow a single point of
failure (one asset issuer) to be able to cause massive losses to LTC-ATF.  As
LTC-ATF expands back into BTC-denominated investment the range of securities we
can trade grows - and we can reduce exposure per security.  Prior to bond launch
LTC-ATF has targetted a maximum exposure of 20% of assets to a single issuer.
After significant bond sales this target will fall to 10% (until a significant
number of bnds have sold this risk is irrelevant unless every investment
collapses at once).  That's a target - not a firm commitment - but one taken
very seriously.  Exposure to a single asset issuer includes indirect as well as
direct exposure - so holdings of investment companies traded ARE taken into
account.  LTC-ATF never trades securities of investment companies that don't
disclose their holdings.

2.  A limit is placed on the number of bonds that LTC-ATF may have outstanding.
 This limit is defined as bonds with a total face value of 150% of LTC-ATF's own
NAV.  So if LTC-ATF had 100 BTC of assets without any bonds then maximum bonds
it could issue would be 150 BTC worth.  This ratio will also be included in all
regular reports of LTC-ATF.  If this ratio ever rises above 150% then manager
will promptly ensure that it is reduced below 150% by either issuing more units
of LTC-ATF and/or repurchasing bonds from the market.

In practice there is no plan to ever intentionally get close to the two limits
defined above.  However the first likely will on occasion need to be corrected
(if a few BTC investments suddenly fall heavily in value).  The second is only
likely to need adjustment if LTC falls very heavily against BTC.

Despite the above mitigating actions risk cannot be totally eliminated.  To
claim otherwise would be ignorant and/or deceitful.  Investors should always
consider potential risks before investing - that is the case here as it is
everywhere else.


BOND RECALL

The issuer has the right to forcibly recall all outstanding bonds at will.  This
must be done at 105% of face value - with the LTC payment made defined as the
LTC obtained by selling 105% of total bond face value (in BTC) on BTC-E.  No
admin fee or transfer fees may be deducted from this.

Whilst there's no intention to ever do this, this right has to be reserved in
case trading conditions become such that supporting outstanding bonds can no
longer be justified.  An example would be if BTC-denominated exchanges closed
down but LTC Global remained open - where LTC-ATF could continue but there'd be
no need or use for BTC-denominated capital.


FUND CLOSURE

In the event of LTC-ATF closing operations all outstandings bonds will be
redeemed at 100% of face value - with the LTC payment made defined as the LTC
obtained by selling the total bond face value (in BTC) on BTC-E.  No admin fee
or transfer fees may be deducted from this.

Dividends remain due every week until such time as LTC-ATF is able to make such
a final payment.

If fund closure is announced then LTC-ATF may not repurchase any units or make
any payments of settlement to LTC-ATF investors until all bonds have been fully
redeemed.  Bond holders have absolute seniority over LTC-ATF unit holders in all
claims on LTC-ATF assets in such a circumstance.


GENERAL ISSUES / FINE PRINT

In various places this contract refers to BTC-E when discussing currency
exchange.  Whilst at the time of making this contract that is the exchange used,
such use is not intended to restrict issuer from using other such exchanges.
All occurrences of "BTC-E" should thus be read as "BTC-E (or such other exchange
as the issuer chooses to use)".

Changes may only be made by issuer to this contract if either:

1.  There are no outstanding bonds,
2.  A vote is passed approving the changes with 100% of bond-holders voting yes.

LTC-ATF may not hold outstanding LTC-ATF.B1 bonds itself (this is impossible to
do without use of a proxy account anyway).

For the purpose of this offering, BTC and LTC are considered virtual currencies
with no intrinsic value (akin to currencies in online games).  This fund is
being run for the entertainment of the manager and investors with no expectation
of financial gain or loss for either party.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on December 09, 2012, 09:50:21 PM
Bond has now been unlocked for Moderator approval on LTC Global.  Will update when (if?) it gains approval and the initial tranche of bonds are released.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: odolvlobo on December 10, 2012, 05:46:27 AM
I like this bond, though it is odd in a couple ways (none bad, of course).

  • I'm curious why you are putting this on LTC-GLOBAL and not on BTCTC, since it is denominated in BTC. Are you going to use the funds to hedge your currency risk?
  • Why not give the bond a maturity (1 year, for example), instead of making it perpetual? That would reduce your risk (both interest rate and funding) because you wouldn't have to buy it back at face value before maturity. You can put in some kind of rollover provision to allow an investor to roll the bond over to a new maturity date instead of redeeming it, if that is an issue.

BTW, you included the "start small" paragraph twice.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on December 10, 2012, 06:19:25 PM
I like this bond, though it is odd in a couple ways (none bad, of course).

  • I'm curious why you are putting this on LTC-GLOBAL and not on BTCTC, since it is denominated in BTC. Are you going to use the funds to hedge your currency risk?
  • Why not give the bond a maturity (1 year, for example), instead of making it perpetual? That would reduce your risk (both interest rate and funding) because you wouldn't have to buy it back at face value before maturity. You can put in some kind of rollover provision to allow an investor to roll the bond over to a new maturity date instead of redeeming it, if that is an issue.

BTW, you included the "start small" paragraph twice.

Removed the duplicate paragraph.

The funds raised are directly being used to reduce exposure for the fund to the LTC/BTC exchange-rate.  When bonds are sold an equivalent amount will be promptly converted to BTC.  That allows us (the fund) to invest in BTC-denominated assets but with the bulk of that value being offset by a liability (the bonds) also denominated in BTC.  So any exchange-rate movement becomes pretty much a wash - other than the small amount of the fund's own capital tied up in BTC (we have to keep SOME of our own funds in BTC so as to protect bond holders against a small loss in BTC assets + a collapse in LTC leaving us unable to service the bonds).

The net result of that is that the fund's own valuation becomes largely unaffected by BTC/LTC exchange-rate (a massive swing would still have a significant impact - but not a huge one).  That means that investors in the fund can choose their own proportion of exposure to LTC and BTC by balancing their own portfolio.  Without the bonds existing that ratio would vary depening on what portion of the fund's capital was invested (or held) in BTC-denomination.

Listing on LTC Global rather than BTC.CO was done for two reasons:

1.  Simple cost.  250 LTC to create ticker on LTC Global, 5 BTC on BTC.CO.  Given that we're initially only going to selling 10 BTC worth of bonds it would be hard to justify a 5 BTC up-front cost.
2.  Convenience.  This way both assets can be managed from a single account/wallet (comingling of funds isn't an issue here obviously - as the funds ARE one pool).  And users can trade both on one platform.

Obviously against that was offset the extra complexity added by having the bonds transacted in LTC - such as the inability to sell/redeem them through permanent bids (on BTC.CO could have just left up bids at .0099 and asks at .00101).

This offering doesn't prevent us, at some stage in the future, from offering a similar bond - but transacted in BTC - on BTC.CO.

Giving a maturity was an interesting option.  I did consider it, but eventually discounted it for a few reasons:

1.  The need to redeem all bonds at once on a specific date.  Whilst this could, in theory, be handled through rollovers that would likely require use of a second ticker - as there's no way to do a forced buyback of all bonds except specific ones.  An alternative method would be to have those who want to rollover return bonds prior to forced recall then reissue theirs for free after - but I'm not a huge fan of that type of system.  Ultimately with a fixed maturity date I have to plan on having all funds liquid for bonds at that date - which could be inconvenient.

2.  The main problem with it is that the issuing of bonds is likely to be staggered and to be unpredictable.  The need for new funds to be raised from bonds depends on new assets becoming available to trade and/or liquidity in markets increasing.  Now if the bonds have a fixed maturty date at face value how easy would it be to issue new ones a month before that date?  Or a week before that date?  Given that there's a small premium charged over face value on sales (there has to be for currency exchange costs and transfer fees - and that wouldn't change even if bond was listed on btc.co) there comes a point where the maturity date is so close that it makes no sense for anyone to buy the bonds - as the premium on purchase outweighs the dividends receivable before maturity.  And even well before maturity date that acts to reduce the benefit of bond purchase.  So a fixed maturity date effectively locks us into being unable to sell bonds easily for a period prior to that date.

The second issue, as with the first, COULD be addressed by having a fixed maturity date - then issuing a new bond some period before it (on same terms with a new maturity date).  But that then raises entirely new problems for all parties.  On the fund's side we can no longer predict available capital easily - and also potentially have to pay dividends on double the capital we want for the overlap period.  On investors' side they either have to stump up double the investment or risk being shut out of rollover if the new issue sells out before redemption of the initial one.

No doubt there's ways to mitigate those issues (e.g. allowing investors to trade old for new before sales on open market) - but seemed far easier just to not have a maturity date and set a markup on forced recall price such that investors could have confidence it's not something we'd do lightly (only time I can see it happening would be if BTC trading market went dead but LTC one was still viable - where LTC-ATF wouldn't close but would want to get out of BTC-denominated assets).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on December 11, 2012, 05:32:52 PM
Bond is now approved by LTC Global moderators and trading.

Have put 250 up at 1.6861 for now - will initially be selling 1000 total (10 BTC face value).

As will always be the case no huge Ask wall will be maintained - as leaves us open to someone buying up the bonds then maniuplating exchange-rate immediately to force us to buy back at a loss.  Once received funds from sales have been converted to BTC it doesn't of course, impact us if exchange-rate gets manipulated.

Asks will only ever be up when I'm online and pretty active.  Bids from fund will rarely be up - but I'll regaularly being checking for Asks from anyone wanting to sell and filling them if they're priced correctly.

First post has been updated with a section on pricing - explaining to everyone exactly how bid/ask prices are calculated.  Do note that when exchange-rate moves after placement of orders the orders may be slightly out of date for a while (in either direction).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on December 14, 2012, 04:56:46 PM
The initial 1000 bonds placed for sale have all been purchased.

No new ones are currently be sold by Issuer - so all Asks on market will be by investors and may not be anywhere near the current face value.  If any bolds are sold back to Issuer then those will be relisted at usual price (face value +1% basically).

There are no plans to sell more bonds right now - more will only be made available when LTC-ATF needs more BTC-denominated capital.  When that will be depends pretty much on how quickly the volume of assets and trades builds up on BTC.CO (primarily - already it has way more trade volume than Crypto), Crypto and maybe Bitfunder.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 04, 2013, 01:14:20 PM
I've been going over the books and I'm absolutely convinced Deprived has been lying to his investors.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112876.msg1635162#msg1635162

This states he's only invested with ~15% of the fund (84.84% is in currency), and yet he has experienced a 1.56% daily growth rate over the past six months despite paying out 0.6% per week (~1 BTC/week) to LTC-ATF.B1 bondholders. This does not make sense. Remember, LTC-ATF is a fund which invests in securities on BitFunder and BTC-TC. What magical thing has he invested in that has given him over 1,500% growth denominated in BTC in six months? Does this make sense to anyone? With a 1200% increase in BTC, he's had a 1500% increase on top of that, in investments denominated in BTC? Read that again. Deprived is saying that in US dollar terms he has achieved something like .. wait for it...

180,000% growth in 6 months

Even if this was remotely possible three months ago it isn't today with the new exchange rate. Am I dreaming? Does ANYONE really believe Deprived is telling the truth with his financial statements? I mean come on, seriously?

What's even more amazing is now that BTC has gone from $10 to $130, Deprived can still pay out 0.6%/week on LTC-ATF.B1. From what income? Share prices and yields have been declining due to the exchange rate. Deprived is caught in the same trap Ian Bakewell was in. Where is the money coming from?

Ok ok. Let me sum this up as a single question. Deprived. Given that you have an invested asset base of ~450 BTC, how on earth are you pulling 1.56% a day over 29,000 BTC on top of the 0.6% per week to LTC-ATF bondholders? This doesn't make sense. You're lying about something, we just don't know what.

You didn't invest in any thing magic. You invest in satoshidice and what not just like everyone else. Why do you expect people to believe a lie like 1.56% growth a day? Holy shit you're growing faster than Pirate's bond and you don't think people are going to catch on to this?

I think it's time you released your books and let us see where this magical 1.56% growth per day (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112876.0) is coming from.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 02:51:21 PM
What magical thing has he invested in that has given him over 1,500% growth denominated in BTC in six months? Does this make sense to anyone? deprived is saying that in US dollar terms he has achieved something like .. wait for it...

180,000% growth in 6 months

What you totally fail to understand - and this is shocking from someone who ran investments (even badly) - is how currencies play into this.

LTC-ATF mainly holds LTC - most of our BTC investment is backed by these bonds, which cancel them out.  That means that if LTC rises vs BTC or vis fiat our fund's value also rises vs them.

A month ago if I held 10 LTC they were worth $0.70 total.
Now if I hold 10 LTC they're worsth $45.

You do the math on what % growth that is in a few weeks without ANY trading needed at all.

6 weeks ago LTC was at .00232 vs BTC.  Now it's at .03416.  That's over a 1000% increase in 6 weeks without ANY trading needed.  You work out what that is at an annualised rate (hint: it's a LOT higher than the figure you quoted).

If you try to value something in one currency against another currency that it's risen against of course it's going to have fucking risen.  Are you retarded or something?

The ONLY growth that is down to my trading activity is the change in LTC valuation (if LTC falls then not even all of that is - and when LTC rises some of my trading growth is wiped out).  This week LTC has risen massively vs BTC/USD (like 300-400%).  As a result of that at present we're down about 18% for the week (as we have SOME exposure).

You KNOW how I make profit - you've done it accidentally yourself a few times.  I buy things for one price and sell them for a significantly higher one.  With the massive increase in our value from LTC rising there's no way I'll be making same profit any more (in LTC).  I can still make 1% per day on BTC no problem - but when applied to our LTC value that ends up being a tiny percentage.

A month or two back if I made 5 BTC profit that was nearly a 10% rincrease for the week - look back at how small the fund was then.  Today I've made 5 BTC+ profit already whilst AFK and it's not even a 1% increase.  But that has NO impact on ability  to service bonds - as the percentage profit I make on BTC-denominated capital hasn't changed - just the impact it has when applied to (now significantly more valuable) LTC capital base.

No I'm not going to open my books to you.  If you want to learn how to make a profit, go pay someone.  However EITHER of the following options IS open to you:

1.  After this week's report I'll PROVE that I have all the cash I claim to have.  Understand that it's down signficantly form last week - a bunch of units have been bought back in LTC-ATF (this will be hard for you grasp but I've rebought 200-300 BTC worth of units yet our value in BTC has more than doubled this week - it's to do with exchange-rates if you're struggling to figure it out).  I can do it easily enough - by placing bids on all sites (proving on BTC-E will be trickiest : as I risk orders being filled there due to not being able to scroll down order and so am unable to place bids miles out of the money).  Right now we're at 72.3% cash - down from last week due to buying back over 1/4 of LTC-ATF units with cash (obviously).

2.  Find someone I trust not to use/exploit information and I'll open the books for JUST TODAY on one site site to them - show what I sold and when I bought it and at what price.  They can then confirm that JUST today's trading on ONE site generated more than the profit I need to pay the interest on ALL bonds for a week.  I THINK I'm up over a month's bond payments on ONE site TODAY but I know for sure there's at least 2 trades that each made a week's interest for all 162 BTC-worth of bonds.

You just don't understand numbers seems to be the problem.  You think Wow - how can he pay interest on all those bonds?  Yet 0.6% per week interest on 162 BTC worth of bonds is ... a miserly 1 BTC.  Which can be made by flipping 10 BTC worth of shares at a 10% profit.

And get a clue about exchange-rates and different currencies.  If you invest in BTC and it rises 10% vs USD you don't become a ponzi because you made over 7%.  Simialrly when I invest with LTC and it rises 3000% in 6 weeks vs fiat - don't blame me for that 3000% rise, but you CAN blame me for issuing BTC-denominated bonds to offset (a lot of) our BTC investments so that LTC-ATF got to keep most of that that rise AND most of the profits from trading in BTC all the weeks there wasn't a big rise.

All the results are showing is EXACTLY what the bonds were designed to do.  Increase profits by leveraging capital whilst not incurring overwhelming BTC exposure.

The short answer to "what has he invested in that gave 1500% profit vs BTC" is "LTC".  That's why our shares are sold in LTC.  That's why we're on LTC-Global.  That's why our name begins with LTC.  LTC has approximately tripled vs BTC from fund start until last report (and more than trebled in the last 3-4 days).  Without that our growth is only about 500% - which is the modest trading profits I've made.

And don't short-change me - with this week's trading we're now at over 6500% growth in BTC and I guess an order of magnitude larger in fiat.

We have lots of cash because:

1.  I like high liquidity.  ALL of my assets give instant buybacks at near NAV to ALL investors.  If you want to cash in your LTC-ATF.B1 bonds then either place them on market at near face-value converted to LTC (they sell fast anywhere near it usually) or return them to me and I'll send 99% of face-value in either LTC (pretty random what you get with exchange-rates moving around) or BTC (you get exactly .0099 per share - sent on BTC.CO as Bitfunder doesn't seem to have a transfer function for BTC).
2.  I don't buy stuff just to use cash.  I place orders for what I want at prices I want to pay and wait until they fill.  I'd guess usually 90% of cash on Bitfunder is backing orders and well over 100% on BTC.CO (can use same cash to back multiple orders on different books there).

Now you may well then say "But you're only willing to prove you have 73% of assets in cash - you might be lieing about the rest".  IF you're that stupid then here's a clue :  If your argument is that I can't make the profits I say I make with the assets I claim to have, how did I manage to make most of it without any assets at all?

The cash I can readily show is more than sufficient to buy back ALL LTC-ATF.B1 bonds AND ALL LTC-ATF units other than those I personally own (and I'd still have a nice chunk of cash + the best part of 200 BTC worth of securities).  But maybe I'm running some wierd ponzi - where I keep my own money to cover everyone's deposits, add to it so as I can prove profits I didn't make and then let them cashout nearly ALL their profits at ANY time. 

Remember LTC-ATF has a bidwall up for 100 units at 50 LTC.  That's 5k LTC = ~175 BTC at current exchange-rate.  And you'll see a few hundred already bought back recently - some when rate was even higher.  There's only 300 units outstanding in the fund.  So I have a bid up for 1/3 of those at a rate which can be converted into BTC at the current profit (if measured in BTC) of 6500%.   Oh - and did I mention that I personally own over half those 300 units anyway?  That's AFTER I cashed out some of mine this week (and other investors did too) so we could lock in profits from this LTC bubble.  Pretty bad scam if I'm paying out 6500% profits, not selling more units (we don't need to sell more - in fact I'd LIKE to buy back another 50 units if LTC stays where it is) and keep a bidwall up nearly permanently.  Only time it wasn't up recently was after another investor sold back 100 units whilst I was asleep.  I just rebalanced currencies and slung up another 100 unit order (contract only obliges me to maintain a bidwall for 5% of units but as we have the cash and can't actually use all the LTC I keep a fat wall up).

Summary.  Just because the investments YOU run don't make a profit and can't provide/maintain liqudiity don't assume everyone is so incompetent.  And that I've been averaging 7% per week when capital was low does NOT mean I'll continue to do so (in fact I've recently stated that I almost certainly won't - though amusingly I think I likely WOULD have made 7%+ this week had LTC not risen so much, in fact it could well have been a 20%+ week).

I can very easily prove I have the cash I claim to have.  I'd prefer to do it after publishing a weekly report - as then there's a record of what I'm claiming to have.  I've already given blanket permission for burnside/Ukyo to confirm ANY statement I make about holdings on their site are accurate (I accept this is tricky for shares - especially for lTC-Global with the current exchange-rate madness, but BTC.CO/Bitfunder are easy to prove).  I'm also happy to prove to someone independent and not likely to pass the details on that I've made more than 1 BTC on one site today - which is all I need to make in a week to pay interest on the bonds (your supposed concern).  Suggest someone if you want me to do that - I'd show all trades on that site today, show where those shares were bought (and for how much) and they could then see over 1 BTC profit.  Hell I'll do it for tomorrow instead if you think I cherry-picked today (hint on that - I have unrealised profits I could turn in any time, but they don't go on the books until I do it as until I actually sell the profit isn't secure). 

You can verify the holdings for the pass-throughs (and the float I hold above that) any time with Rini - again without needing further permission from me.  What I'm not going to do is give a play-by-play description of my trades as whilst most of it's very simple stuff there's some things I trade/do that I don't want other people interfering in.

If I can prove I have sufficient cash to cover all units not held by me (at the 6500% profit in BTC level) AND all LTC-ATF.B1 bonds then kind of rules out most scams immediately (as if you believe I DO have the assets then all funds are what I say they are, and if you think I don't then where the fuck did all the profit come from?).  If I can prove I can cover the cost of the bonds in 1 day on 1 site then that proves that I've no problem paying the bonds off.  You're free at any time to ask burnside/ukuo/rini whether I have holdings of the type of size I claim to have -I'm not going to argue over share prices to get to my exact figures : if you think it might only be 6400% instead of 6500% then that's a rather different discussion but feel free to move the goalposts once you've made some enquiries and found out I actually DID have exactly the claimed balances at the time of last report AND shares with around the claimed value (note: on one site, think BTC.CO, an order went through whilst I was producing my reprot - so there's X more BTC and X less value of shares or vice-versa).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 03:34:32 PM
This states he's only invested with ~15% of the fund (84.84% is in currency), and yet he has experienced a 1.56% daily growth rate over the past six months despite paying out 0.6% per week (~1 BTC/week) to LTC-ATF.B1 bondholders. This does not make sense.

You fail to grasp how leveraging works.  For most of the fund's history since bonds were sold we've had bonds out at 75-100% of fund NAV.

If I have 10 units of capital and make 4% per week then owners of those units make 4% per week.
If I then sell bonds with a value equal to 10 units of capital that pay 0.6% per week.
And make 4% profit on the total 20 units of capital.
Then the unit holders make 7.4% profit per week.

You totally failed to grasp BOTH reasons why the bonds were issued:

1.  Exchange-rate exposure limitation (described in previous post)
2.  Leveraging capital to increase profits (explained very simply above)

Somewhere there's a thread I made that explained point 1 in pretty fine detail before the bond was even put up for moderator approval.  I can't be bothered to find it -but you really should as you're totally missing the whole point of the bonds and then struggling to work out why the results they've produced are exactly the results they were designed to produce.  The various limitations/ratios I set on bonds aren't just pulled out of thin air - they're calculated to meet the requirements of the fund whilst protecting those who hold our debt (the bonds).

EDIT: Deleted part of post as it possibly revealed something I don't want to reveal.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 04, 2013, 03:59:48 PM
This states he's only invested with ~15% of the fund (84.84% is in currency), and yet he has experienced a 1.56% daily growth rate over the past six months despite paying out 0.6% per week (~1 BTC/week) to LTC-ATF.B1 bondholders. This does not make sense.

You fail to grasp how leveraging works.  For most of the fund's history since bonds were sold we've had bonds out at 75-100% of fund NAV.

If I have 10 units of capital and make 4% per week then owners of those units make 4% per week.
If I then sell bonds with a value equal to 10 units of capital that pay 0.6% per week.
And make 4% profit on the total 20 units of capital.
Then the unit holders make 7.4% profit per week.

You totally failed to grasp BOTH reasons why the bonds were issued:

1.  Exchange-rate exposure limitation (described in previous post)
2.  Leveraging capital to increase profits (explained very simply above)

Somewhere there's a thread I made that explained point 1 in pretty fine detail before the bond was even put up for moderator approval.  I can't be bothered to find it -but you really should as you're totally missing the whole point of the bonds and then struggling to work out why the results they've produced are exactly the results they were designed to produce.  The various limitations/ratios I set on bonds aren't just pulled out of thin air - they're calculated to meet the requirements of the fund whilst protecting those who hold our debt (the bonds).

EDIT: Deleted part of post as it possibly revealed something I don't want to reveal.

Your fund has experienced 1.56% APD for the last six months. You're either operating a ponzi or you're cooking the books. You're so scared to release anything on your fund you edit your posts to take out figures that might clue people in to what you're doing.

1. You claim to have holdings that amount to 29,000 BTC.
2. You claim to be 15% invested.
3. You claim to be making 1.56% a day on 29,000 BTC. In short you are making 31.2% a day on the 15% invested capital.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 04:56:36 PM
This states he's only invested with ~15% of the fund (84.84% is in currency), and yet he has experienced a 1.56% daily growth rate over the past six months despite paying out 0.6% per week (~1 BTC/week) to LTC-ATF.B1 bondholders. This does not make sense.

You fail to grasp how leveraging works.  For most of the fund's history since bonds were sold we've had bonds out at 75-100% of fund NAV.

If I have 10 units of capital and make 4% per week then owners of those units make 4% per week.
If I then sell bonds with a value equal to 10 units of capital that pay 0.6% per week.
And make 4% profit on the total 20 units of capital.
Then the unit holders make 7.4% profit per week.

You totally failed to grasp BOTH reasons why the bonds were issued:

1.  Exchange-rate exposure limitation (described in previous post)
2.  Leveraging capital to increase profits (explained very simply above)

Somewhere there's a thread I made that explained point 1 in pretty fine detail before the bond was even put up for moderator approval.  I can't be bothered to find it -but you really should as you're totally missing the whole point of the bonds and then struggling to work out why the results they've produced are exactly the results they were designed to produce.  The various limitations/ratios I set on bonds aren't just pulled out of thin air - they're calculated to meet the requirements of the fund whilst protecting those who hold our debt (the bonds).

EDIT: Deleted part of post as it possibly revealed something I don't want to reveal.

Your fund has experienced 1.56% APD for the last six months. You're either operating a ponzi or you're cooking the books. You're so scared to release anything on your fund you edit your posts to take out figures that might clue people in to what you're doing.

1. You claim to have holdings that amount to 29,000 BTC.
2. You claim to be 15% invested.
3. You claim to be making 1.56% a day on 29,000 BTC. In short you are making 31.2% a day on the 15% invested capital.

1.  Holdings have only briefly ever gone just over 1000 BTC (earlier this week when LTC peaked - they've since fallen back to well under that).
2.  Becasue of the rise in LTC and the sale back of units we're currently nearly 30% invested.  But historically 15% invested is about right.
3.  Not 29,000 BTC.  Not 1.56% per day.  Re-read the part on leveraging.  Read it again.  And again.  Until it sinks in.  Even if you ignored levergaing (you can't) and the pulled out of thin air 29,000 number (where the fuck did it come from?) then if I were making 1.56% profit on 100% of capital by using 15% I'd be making 1.56*100/15 which is NOWHERE near 31% on the 15%.  Your math is shocking here.  I just exlained leveraging - yet you insist on taking the profit % made by the base capital and acting as though it were profit made on ALL deployed capital.  The 1.56% figure is wrong even if you ignore leveraging - it's 1% compounded (and that's growth on JUST unit value - so is nearly double the rate made on ALL capital most weeks).  Then you somehow fail at basic math and multiply a totally wrong number by 3 to get an entirely imaginary one.

On your accusation that "You're so scared to release anything on your fund you edit your posts to take out figures that might clue people in to what you're doing." simply No.  Go ask a moderator to look at what I deleted from this post.  There were NO figures at ALL in it - it was a partial explanation of a concept that, on balance, I'd rather not reveal as I don't think any other traders have figured it out.

Do your math again properly then come back with the real figure for what I claim to be making per day on all capital - you'll find it's more like 0.5%-0.6%.  Now think carefully about what having 15% of capital invested means.  DO remember I DON'T invest - I trade.  My profits don't come from buying shares with 15% of capital then holding them and hoping they magically (and it would be) make about 3-4% per day.

90%+ of capital on Bitfunder is usually committed to Bids (often all bar less 1 BTC).  100%+ on BTC.CO (can reuse same capital on multiple order books).  It''s not the SAME 15% committed one week (or one day) as the next.  That just happens to be around what is often committed at one instant in time.  The whole 100% of capital on those sites is being used all the time (not the same on LTC-GLobal usually - we DO have active capital there).  So profits are made by the WHOLE 100% capital on those sites - not just the 15% that happens to be tied up (usually) briefly in shares.

A month or two back there was actually a report where we had 100% cash.  We didn't hold a single share at all ANYWHERE.  Go dig out that report, then ask the exchange operators if I actually had exactly that cash at that date - there's zero possible dispute of ANY valuation that one.

I just don't do the sort of shitty investment thing that you did so dismally at. Get over it.

Amusing, by the way, that you think me making 7%/week investing LTC into BTC (with a solid hedge against exchange-rate moves) is impossible - yet spewed thousands of BTC of your own investors money into Obsi who was claiming to do it investing BTC into fiat (with zero hedge against fiat falling vs BTC).

Anyway, if you really honestly are convinced what I've done is faked/scammed then there's a solution to it.  Pick a solid escrow who understands enough about investments to look at transactions and work out profit.  Pick a week - any week - in which I claim to have made large profits and there wasn't much change in the LTC/BTC exchange-rate.

We each pay some reasonable sum into the escrow.  I'll then run through all my trades for that week with him/her.  We'll look at all sales I made and at what price those shares were bought at.  The results will NOT exactly match my results for the week (impossible to reconstruct exactly as I average purchases and mark things down as necessary) but at end of it the simple question will be : does he believe my stated results for the week are a good faith representation of what actually happened.  I can do it over teamview/skype chat or whatever - so he can verify the results are real.

Something like 50 BTC each sound good to you?  With most of it going to me once he confirms I'm right and the escrow getting 10 to cover his time (and it won't take much time - as bulk of profit will come from a handful of trades that made 100%+ profit).  Only other condition I'd impose is that the escrow/judge does NOT reveal details of what securities I traded etc without my approval - just confirms (or denies if you manage to pay him off) that having seen my activity for the week my posted results are credible.

I'll waste my time and jump through some hoops to prove you wrong - but you're going to put your money where your mouth is to get it.   Or you can just go PM burnside/ukyo and ask them whether my holdings seem about right - then when they confirm they're right sort of size (and the cash part is indisuptaly accurate) realise that if I actually have the assets then it's more likely I made it trading than magicked it out of thin air.

Or - and here's another alternative - which would prove me correct without having to explain to you precisely what I do.  See if you can get burnside and/or ukyo to do some queries on my accounts - where the match up every sale I did (other than of my own assets) against purchases of the same and work out the net profit/loss.  If they want to charge for that then either you pay for it OR we bet on it and loser pays.

If I can prove I have the assets and that I made them by trading then it's none of your business exactly what I traded - and against my investors' interests for me to disclose it.  Any other proposals you have which will achieve those ends are welcome - and I'll give permission happily for any calculations (such as in previous paragraph) by exchange operators to be done and the results published.  Any exchange I operate on already HAS my permission to confirm the accuracy of ANY statement I make about my holdings or activities there - just not to disclose further information beyond what I've said myself.

You want to know how I'm doing it.  Tough - you aren't entitled to know that.  But I'm fine with proving I DO do it - and have ouylined a few ways of doing it above.  If it doesn't require much/any effort from me then I'll do it for free.  If it takes a significant amount of time then you'll pay for it - but by an escrowed bet so you have zero risk of me taking your bet cash and running.

I have about 75 BTC personal liquid cash that I'm fine with betting on this (by which I mean cash that could be sent to an escrow right this second).  Can go significantly higher with a day or two's notice.  And as part of any such bet ALL cash held by the fund would also be verified as present - so if any part of my bet was with the fund's cash you auto win the bet.

Put up or shut up.

Either a bet or some proposal that doesn't involve much effort for me. - e.g. go and ask exchange-operators to work out my profits on their sites : with my permission and with any reasonable fee they want for it paid by whichever of us is wrong (so if they wanted 10 BTC for it - not unreasonable - we'd bet say 20 each so there was 10 BTC for my inconvenience as well).  We'd need to work out details - but any reasonable definition of the total trading profits being of the order of magnitude I claim should be fine by me (exchange-rate conversions and currency movement can distort it both ways).

And remember - I'm only interested in proving that I DID make the profit, I'm not teaching you for free/cheap how to do it yourself.

Oh - and it's any help in convincing you easily, right now I claim assets of 650-700 BTC for the fund (LTC having fallen in last hours has lowered it a bit).  If I prove I have those I'm fine with also proving I have the extra 75 BTC of my own lieing around idle (in fact right this instant they're in USD but they may be in BTC some time shortly) as well : so it's pretty simple for me to prove control of more assets than the total value of fund+bonds.  Which just leaves the question of whether i'm periodically depositing more, pretneding they're profit, then allowing investors to withdraw it (which would have to be the worst ponzi ever) or am actually making the profit the way I say I am.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 05:07:15 PM
Actually it may be very easy.

You have my permission to do the following:

Ask burnside/ukyo/rini to query the total value of buys and sales i've made on their sites (leaving out my own assets on LTC-GLObal of course - sale of my bonds/fund units aren't profit).

You can then publish the results.

And then eat your words - as when you see the results it'll be totally obvious that my results are genuine.  They don't need to match up buys/sells as there should be sufficient excess sales to show a clear profit - to which you can add the assets I logically MUST hold plus profits made operating the pass-throughs (which you totally forget to factor in - some weeks those have added a few % to profits on their own without tieing up much capital) plus profits made selling bonds into overpriced buy orders after currency moves etc.

And the best of it is - you still won't have a clue how I'm doing most of it - just that I indisputably am.

EDIT: If you tell the operators you believe I'm committig massive fraud AND that I have zero objection to them publishing the results then I'm pretty sure they'll happily give you the figures.

One additional clause (if not too late) : you should post here stating that you're asking for the figures and commit to posting them after receiving them.  If you want to make a (bigger) fool of yourself you can do it in public.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 04, 2013, 05:21:12 PM
Actually it may be very easy.

You have my permission to do the following:

Ask burnside/ukyo/rini to query the total value of buys and sales i've made on their sites (leaving out my own assets on LTC-GLObal of course - sale of my bonds/fund units aren't profit).

You can then publish the results.

And then eat your words - as when you see the results it'll be totally obvious that my results are genuine.  They don't need to match up buys/sells as there should be sufficient excess sales to show a clear profit - to which you can add the assets I logically MUST hold plus profits made operating the pass-throughs (which you totally forget to factor in - some weeks those have added a few % to profits on their own without tieing up much capital) plus profits made selling bonds into overpriced buy orders after currency moves etc.

And the best of it is - you still won't have a clue how I'm doing most of it - just that I indisputably am.

EDIT: If you tell the operators you believe I'm committig massive fraud AND that I have zero objection to them publishing the results then I'm pretty sure they'll happily give you the figures.

One additional clause (if not too late) : you should post here stating that you're asking for the figures and commit to posting them after receiving them.  If you want to make a (bigger) fool of yourself you can do it in public.

Cut the attitude. I am a 12% holder of LTC-ATF.B1. You work for me, not the other way around. If you don't want to release your books publicly I will respect that despite your lack of respect for other's similar policy.

What you totally fail to understand - and this is shocking from someone who ran investments (even badly) - is how currencies play into this.

What you totally fail to underatand is that this is not about me. This isn't about exchange rates or about how LTC-ATF.B1 lost 90% of it's value. This is about why you are publishing figures that show you are making 1.56% a day yet you claim you are only 15% invested. What you are claiming is impossible.

The ONLY growth that is down to my trading activity is the change in LTC valuation (if LTC falls then not even all of that is - and when LTC rises some of my trading growth is wiped out).  This week LTC has risen massively vs BTC/USD (like 300-400%).  As a result of that at present we're down about 18% for the week (as we have SOME exposure).

This is why it's so difficult to believe you. You claim on one hand that you have growth because of the change in LTC valuation. But in the very next sentence you state that the growth in LTC value is wiping out your profits. Which is it? Where is the massive 1500% growth coming from then? If you lose 18% this week how did you gain 1500% the past 25 weeks as BTC/LTC has been rising this whole time?

You KNOW how I make profit - you've done it accidentally yourself a few times.  I buy things for one price and sell them for a significantly higher one.  With the massive increase in our value from LTC rising there's no way I'll be making same profit any more (in LTC).  I can still make 1% per day on BTC no problem - but when applied to our LTC value that ends up being a tiny percentage.

"I can still make 1% per day on BTC no problem"

You need your head checked. You need to stop being so pissy and explain to your investors how you are making 1% a day because no one believes you. That's what pirate said. 1% a day on exchange rates. What, you think we're stupid? You need to release your books because if anyone thinks you are making 1% a day I have some pirate bonds I'd LOVE to sell you.

Quote
No I'm not going to open my books to you.

What are you so scared of? That we will find out you are lying about making 1.56% per day? We already know that.

1.  After this week's report I'll PROVE that I have all the cash I claim to have.
I can very easily prove I have the cash I claim to have. 

Go right ahead, I will hold you to these statements.

I think you said it best yourself in your contract:

Fairness : I'm by no means shy about expressing criticism of other virtual
securities. It's therefore only fair that I run one myself and give opportunity
for those I criticise to reply in like manner. It's my hope (and expectation)
that my performance, fairness to investors, reporting standards and transparency
will make plain that - whatever else my faults may be - I'm no hypocrite when I
complain about others' lack of those same qualities.


Okay, here I am, 12% insider shareholder, show me your transparency.

If I can prove I have sufficient cash to cover all units not held by me (at the 6500% profit in BTC level) AND all LTC-ATF.B1 bonds then kind of rules out most scams immediately (as if you believe I DO have the assets then all funds are what I say they are, and if you think I don't then where the fuck did all the profit come from?).
...the pulled out of thin air 29,000 number (where the fuck did it come from?)
...I just don't do the sort of shitty investment thing that you did so dismally at. Get over it.

Again, cut the attitude. Here's a clue. You are being asked by an insider-class shareholder to verify your financial statements. You are simply being asked to provide the same level of transparency on your own asset that you claimed you would provide. That will be all.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 05:43:10 PM

What you totally fail to underatand is that this is not about me. This isn't about exchange rates or about how LTC-ATF.B1 lost 90% of it's value. This is about why you are publishing figures that show you are making 1.56% a day yet you claim you are only 15% invested. What you are claiming is impossible.

LTC-ATF.B1 hasn't lost ANY of its value.

LTC-ATF.B1 has a face value of exactly 0.01 BTC.  It's ALWAYS had that face value.  It's traded in LTC to allow investors to gain BTC exposure without having to hold/buy BTC.  Any change in the number of LTC its worth is neither here nor there as it's NOT an LTC investment.  Think of it as a pass-though to BTC.

It's EXPLICIT intent (in its contract) is to maintain a stable BTC value - and its always done that.

You (or any investor) can at ANY time sell them back to me for face value less 1% (would be silly to actually do so - as they sell easily on the market for more).  If I know your BTC.CO account name you can even have it paid there IN BTC so there's no dispute or slippage related to exchange-rates/conversion.

You just don't seem to understand how LTC-ATF and LTC-ATF.B1, taken together, allow investors to (to a large extent - but not totally in the case of LTC-ATF) control what degree of exposure they have to BTC and LTC.  If you bought LTC-ATF.B1 thinking it was an LTC-denominated investment then you badly misread the contract.  It's as though I ran a bond with a face value of $1 then BTC rose vs USD and you started whining how the bond was losing value when it was STILL worth exactly $1.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 05:53:02 PM
Cut the attitude. I am a 12% holder of LTC-ATF.B1. You work for me, not the other way around. If you don't want to release your books publicly I will respect that despite your lack of respect for other's similar policy.

You're confusing debt with equity.

LTC-ATF holders have equity.  LTC-ATF.B1 purchasers own debt.  As a bond-holder you have zero say in how LTC-ATF operates - but an entitlement that your debt is paid off before equity holders get anything in the event of closure.

I don't work for you (I work for the holders of units in LTC-ATF) - I (in my role as the manager of LTC-ATF) owe you money.  The conditions of that debt are clearly laid out in the contract for LTC-ATF.B1.  They do NOT include that LTC-ATF actually makes any profit - but they DO include that LTC-ATF hold BTC-denominated assets worth more than total face value of all bonds issued and that total bond issued have a total face value of no more than 150% the NAV of LTC-ATF.

I can prove either of those conditions is met by showing just cash (that's not always the case - but is right now due to LTC being so high).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 06:00:48 PM
This is why it's so difficult to believe you. You claim on one hand that you have growth because of the change in LTC valuation. But in the very next sentence you state that the growth in LTC value is wiping out your profits. Which is it? Where is the massive 1500% growth coming from then? If you lose 18% this week how did you gain 1500% the past 25 weeks as BTC/LTC has been rising this whole time?

Please - just go look at actual exchange rates before talking such crap.

Here's how it works.

LTC-ATF keeps around 15% exposure to BTC.  Because I dynamically rebalnce to 15% regularly this equates to the following:

If LTC doubles in value vs BTC then NAV/U of the fund (in LTC) will tend to DROP by around 8-12% (actual amount varies depending how often I rebalance - which depends on how fast the move occurs and whether I'm even online).
If LTC falls vs BTC then NAV/U will tend to RISE by a similar sort of amount (8-12% per halving).

WHen the fund started the rate was .00346.  6 weeks ago it hit a low of around .0023% - so in total until then the overall impact of exchange-rate movment was a small increase in NAV/U.

THis week alone, LTC is still more than TREBLE what it started the week at (it was QUADRUPLE when I posted earlier but is falling back).  THAT is why there's a huge fall from it this week - but hasn't been before.  If you look back at historical data for LTC-ATF you'll see we've had 2 previous losing weeks - BOTH when LTC rose sharply.

Read the data.  Understand it.  Verify that what I'm sayng is true via a charting site.  Don't just guess and spout total crap like "BTC/LTC has been rising this whole time?" when in fact LTC has had a few big rises - and a few big falls but NOTHING like the last few days since the fund started.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 06:11:33 PM
You KNOW how I make profit - you've done it accidentally yourself a few times.  I buy things for one price and sell them for a significantly higher one.  With the massive increase in our value from LTC rising there's no way I'll be making same profit any more (in LTC).  I can still make 1% per day on BTC no problem - but when applied to our LTC value that ends up being a tiny percentage.

"I can still make 1% per day on BTC no problem"

You need your head checked. You need to stop being so pissy and explain to your investors how you are making 1% a day because no one believes you. That's what pirate said. 1% a day on exchange rates. What, you think we're stupid? You need to release your books because if anyone thinks you are making 1% a day I have some pirate bonds I'd LOVE to sell you.

No - I don't need to release my books.  I can provide that proof WITHOUT needing you show you the books.  Do you see any of my investors (equity holders) asking for the books to be made public?  Of course not - as it would be against their interests for me to provide information on exactly how a lot of the profit is being made.  If you read my posts some of it is explained - e.g. when I explained we had sizable DMC holdings and why.  The 12 BTC (from memory) of those we had made 20+ BTC profit for us in a few weeks - which was over a 20% growth ALONE for the fund (LTC was low then).  That single set of trades more than covered 2 weeks of 7% growth (nearly 3) using about 5% of total capital.  Before you come back saying my math doesn't add up, re-read my earlier posts about leverage.

I've already explained exactly how you can go find out (with my approval) that I AM making that sort of profit by buying and selling shares on the exchanges - but you have no right to the detail of individual trades.  I'm selling Coca-Coca and you think that entitles you to the secret recipe.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 06:17:34 PM
What are you so scared of? That we will find out you are lying about making 1.56% per day? We already know that.

Imagine, just for a second, that you're good at trading and making decent profits (a stretch I know - but give it a try).  Now imagine someone who is clueless and makes a loss wants to know exactly HOW you do it - likely with the intent to compete.  Would you give them the information for free that allows them to work out how to do things - and reduce your own profits?  Or would you say "Sorry - I'll prove that I AM making the profit but precisely how I do it is none of your fucking business".

If you managed the leap of faith (imagining you were making a profit etc) then you should have stumbled on the answer to your question.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 06:41:29 PM
1.  After this week's report I'll PROVE that I have all the cash I claim to have.
I can very easily prove I have the cash I claim to have. 


Sure - will do that.  I usually do reports Sunday evening - after this week's I'll flash the cash (place orders on all sites).

Realise that cash is less this week than previous.  You can do the math of why yourself easily enough.  This week we bought back units (you can verify the drop in units yourself).  Obviously they were bought back in cash.  That reduced cash withotu changing other assets - making cash a lower percentage of holdings.  Because that reduction was in LTC that was a good thing - as a lot of lTC was unused.  If LTC falls heavily then the percentage in cash will rise again automatically - otherwise it's likely to stay lower than in previous weeks (largely because noone's buying on LTC-GLobal right now).

That cash will more than cover ALL bonds plus ALL units of LTC-GLobal other than my own (with some left over).  So just from that you'll know that I have more cash alone than I claim to owe investors including all the profits you think I made up (and the interest I've paid out).  Near in mind that just the buy order on LTC-ATF units thats always up covers ALL bonds right now (only because LTC's so high - usually it's only covered a small fraction of them).

You can choose which security you want me to place a bid on for each exchange (LTC-GLobal, BTC.CO, Bitfunder and MPEx via CoinBR).  But it must be soemthig decent - I'm not going to risk putting bids even at tiny prices on some scammy junk where it may get filled.  You can pick the price you want the bids put at - so long as its well below the trading zone.

BTC-E is more tricky - as you can't view below the top orders, so I can't place an order well outside the money and have you able to see it unless you use the API.  I'm open to suggestions on that - as approx 10% of fund value is sitting in cash there (for currency rebalancing, cross-currency liquidity and to lock funds against mass order fillings on sites).  Might be able to do it on the RUR pairs as there's little action so can get 5% away from spread visible.

I'll need a pretty precise time agreed in advance for it plus a list of assets/site and you can give some 3 digit ending you want so you can see the bids are the size I state AND the right ending so are obviously mine (or someone else putting them up on my behalf I guess).

I've no clue what the total will be.  Right now cash is around 500 BTC worth (15K LTC worth).  If LTC were to halve by then, it could be down to 300-350 BTC worth (20k LTC worth).  If you wonder why the values are so different to last week (way more in BTC, way less in LTC) then the answer is exchange-rate trebling + buyback of a large chunk of LTC-ATF units (capital no longer needed due to LTC rise and investors wanting to protect against the crash/correction that's happening as I type).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 04, 2013, 06:53:52 PM
Cut the attitude. I am a 12% holder of LTC-ATF.B1. You work for me, not the other way around. If you don't want to release your books publicly I will respect that despite your lack of respect for other's similar policy.

You're confusing debt with equity.

LTC-ATF holders have equity.  LTC-ATF.B1 purchasers own debt.  As a bond-holder you have zero say in how LTC-ATF operates - but an entitlement that your debt is paid off before equity holders get anything in the event of closure.

I don't work for you (I work for the holders of units in LTC-ATF) - I (in my role as the manager of LTC-ATF) owe you money.  The conditions of that debt are clearly laid out in the contract for LTC-ATF.B1.  They do NOT include that LTC-ATF actually makes any profit - but they DO include that LTC-ATF hold BTC-denominated assets worth more than total face value of all bonds issued and that total bond issued have a total face value of no more than 150% the NAV of LTC-ATF.

I can prove either of those conditions is met by showing just cash (that's not always the case - but is right now due to LTC being so high).


No, I'm not confusing debt for equity, bondholders have senior claim on the assets of LTC-ATF according to the contract.

Again, I'm not going to respond to your 6 posts essay other than to say that I am one of your major bondholders and you need to cut the attitude with me and realize who you are working for. If this is how you treat your other major bondholders when they ask questions you probably don't have what it takes to be a fund manager.

Just prove you have the money like you said you would, and after that just make sure you don't screw up the payment of your bond coupons and I don't see a problem. We just can't afford another screw up like pirate, and when you waltz in here swearing at people who ask you how you're making 1.56% a day it doesn't look very good.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 07:55:39 PM
Cut the attitude. I am a 12% holder of LTC-ATF.B1. You work for me, not the other way around. If you don't want to release your books publicly I will respect that despite your lack of respect for other's similar policy.

You're confusing debt with equity.

LTC-ATF holders have equity.  LTC-ATF.B1 purchasers own debt.  As a bond-holder you have zero say in how LTC-ATF operates - but an entitlement that your debt is paid off before equity holders get anything in the event of closure.

I don't work for you (I work for the holders of units in LTC-ATF) - I (in my role as the manager of LTC-ATF) owe you money.  The conditions of that debt are clearly laid out in the contract for LTC-ATF.B1.  They do NOT include that LTC-ATF actually makes any profit - but they DO include that LTC-ATF hold BTC-denominated assets worth more than total face value of all bonds issued and that total bond issued have a total face value of no more than 150% the NAV of LTC-ATF.

I can prove either of those conditions is met by showing just cash (that's not always the case - but is right now due to LTC being so high).


No, I'm not confusing debt for equity, bondholders have senior claim on the assets of LTC-ATF according to the contract.

Again, I'm not going to respond to your 6 posts essay other than to say that I am one of your major bondholders and you need to cut the attitude with me and realize who you are working for. If this is how you treat your other major bondholders when they ask questions you probably don't have what it takes to be a fund manager.

Just prove you have the money like you said you would, and after that just make sure you don't screw up the payment of your bond coupons and I don't see a problem. We just can't afford another screw up like pirate, and when you waltz in here swearing at people who ask you how you're making 1.56% a day it doesn't look very good.

Sorry - but you ARE confused.

Yes - bond holders have senior claim on assets and LTC-ATF have to maintain assets to cover the bonds.  But I am NOT working for bond-holders - what you get paid is entirely unrelated to how profitable my trading is or even whether I trade at all or not.  I work for LTC-ATF and LTC-ATF owes you debt.  If I borrow money on a credit card then I don't suddenly start working for the credit card company.  Same if I borrow money from anyone.

Here's a start on proof of cash.

LTC-GLOBAL.  Have placed a buy order for a further 50 units of LTC-ATF at 50 LTC each - so total buys for 150 units at 50 LTC each.
There's only 300 units of LTC-ATF total and I hold 160 of them (which I've put up for sale at 999 each).

So even allowing for the bid being a bit below NAV/U (currentl over 52 - but being cautious as rate is very volatile) there's enough LTC up there to buy back every unit owned by anyone other than me.

8K LTC = 264 BTC at current exchange-rate of 0.033.

BTC.CO we currently have 61 BTC in cash.  I've put 60 BTC of it up at .01 on :

https://btct.co/security/BTC-TRADING-PT

So we're already at all units of LTC-ATF and nearly half all bonds covered IN CASH on just 2 sites (the 2 it's easy to show cash on -as don't have to cancel all my other orders).

Other cash currently is: 

81 BTC on BTC-E (a mix of LTC/BTC - I have orders up on both sides of the book to balance our currency as price moves).
63 BTC on Bitfunder (nearly all committed on bids)
22.5 BTC on MPEx (via CoinBR)

Which would put me at about 60 BTC in CASH over total obligations to all bondholders and investors in LTC-ATF other than myself.  Pretty poor form if it's a ponzi.

Feel free to ask Ukyo whether I have 63 BTC there now (and haven't moved any in or out today).

If you want to see all of it on Sunday let me know - and I'll cancel all orders etc.  And do bear in mind, this is with nearly 30% committed to securities - usually we're even MORE cash heavy than this but bought back about 40% of all units in the fund this week.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 04, 2013, 07:57:22 PM
If the orders on LTC-ATF/BTC.CO aren't there it doesn't mean I'm lieing btw - just means one of my real orders got filled and these ones got auto-cancelled (probably only partly cancelled as did both with multiple bids).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 05, 2013, 03:45:05 AM
Sorry - but you ARE confused.

I cannot be confused because I am asking a question. You can either answer it or not. Here watch, I'll ask the question again:

I am a 12% bondholder in LTC-ATF.B1. I have seen your financial reports, and they're rubbish -- you are claiming to have made 1.56% per day which is difficult to believe. After all, LTC-ATF is a fund; you don't produce anything. You just trade. I also trade. In fact I run a fund. I flipped a few hundred K of ZigGap for example, recently, for a 3 BTC profit. Yes, we all get lucky sometimes. But a 1.56% profit each and every single day even on average, over a 6 months period, is statistically impossible.

Here's why. You would need to double your money. That would be 100% gain. Then you would need to double your money again. That would be 300%. Then double again. 600%. Then double again. 1200%. And now, based on your 6500% gain comment, you have not only doubled your money again but again again after that. So in other words, you run an investment fund which doubles it's money each and every single month.

When looking around we see that you couldn't have possibly done this merely because there was no place for you to have done it. Maybe BTC has gone up, but your fund is denominated in BTC. So you couldn't have profited from the 1500% rise in BTC. No, the 1500% rise in BTC should have cut your portfolio by about 90%. You know, like it did to anything else denominated in an asset. Like a mining stock. Or an ART kiln security. Or a silver/gold fund -- like John Galt Asset Management's GOLD fund, for example. But no.

You GAINED 1500% during this time.

Okay. It obviously couldn't have come from the 15% invested position, so it had to come from the 85% of your holdings which are kept in currency. I get that. But you yourself state that when LTC rises in price your fund loses money. In fact you put a number on it; last week's rise in LTC price cost you 18%. So here's what I don't get. How did you make the money? I'll be honest with you. Pirate got all pissy when people asked him about it too.

What makes this whole situation deliciously ironic is, in fact, that you won't release your books. You participated in the theft of TU.SILVER's books and posted them online, which was the culmunation of six months of trolling and manipulating of my securities asset prices which were placed on line. But when put to the test yourself, it turns out you can't keep a straight book and I doubt if anyone is surprised.

At this point, if you are refusing to release your books to a 12% shareholder then you and your fund have serious problems. I will be liquidating my personal holdings in LTC-ATF and I can only advise all investors to avoid your security because it is beginning to look like a ponzi. Sorry Deprived, but no one makes 1.56% a day. Not even the guy who ran the trading desk at the Quantum fund.

So you see, it is you who is very confused. Proving you have cash proves nothing. Of course you have cash. You've sold a lot of very expensive shares to people. And I don't doubt you have your own money. But this is nothing to do with your business which cannot possibly have grown 1500% (sorry, 6500%, your words) in the face of a 1500% BTC price increase.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 05, 2013, 04:07:25 AM
Another issue entirely is whether or not the 0.6% bond coupon is sustainable from operations. Cash on hand means nothing.

I will explain. If LTC-ATF is worth 100 bananas, and there is a senior claim to 50 of these bananas that demands a 0.6% interest rate, then looking at your portfolio logically you only need to make 0.3% a week to cover the bondholders. That leaves LTC-ATF holders with nothing. So on top of 0.3% a week (16.8% a year) just to pay your bond coupons, you're claiming thousands of percent for the fund itself. In other words you are claiming to be the best fund manager in the history of the entire world, but there's just one condition, you can't release your books.

If you want to see all of it on Sunday let me know - and I'll cancel all orders etc.  And do bear in mind, this is with nearly 30% committed to securities - usually we're even MORE cash heavy than this but bought back about 40% of all units in the fund this week.

But you have already been caught in a lie. You claimed to own 160/300 units of the fund personally, then just now said you bought back 40% of the units of the fund this week. So you're saying there's just 20 units of the fund outstanding? Then where is all the money coming from if the fund has no outstanding units? (i.e. no sales?) What secondary entity is operating separate from the invested funds? You're telling me 20 units of the fund are now worth 29,000 BTC? No, what has become obvious is you are mixing up your company's finances with your own. That is a major no-no. So showing you have a lot of cash is meaningless because it does not show that the business model and trading strategy you have is solvent.

Pertinent example. When Ian Bakewell defaulted on $100,000 in loans, BTCINVEST was going to crash. So I sold all of my personal stake in BTCINVEST immediately. I was the first to sell. I didn't follow up on it so I don't know if others did, but I got out with a long-term breakeven result. Later, in extensive discussions with TradeFortress I learned he was going to step in and defend his company with his own personal money. How valiant.

How admirable, I thought. But this is not ONLY what I look for in a company. I look for the fact that they failed in the first place. By hiding the books of LTC-ATF and lying about how much money you are making, you are essentially defrauding your investors because they cannot make a reasonable and informed decision on whether or not you are a competent fund manager. Sure, you use your own personal money to cover bond payments. But how long can you continue to do this? One day you will run out of money and it will all come crashing down like Bernie Madoff.

I'm sure you don't mean to scam but this is how it is turning out.

Just keep it simple. If you are not running a ponzi scheme then you need a clear cut reason why you shouldn't release your books right now. So carefully and calmly, explain that reason to us and let us think about whether or not it is good enough to balance the fact you are claiming to have made 6,500% over the last six months.

I can still make 1% per day on BTC no problem [...]
And don't short-change me - with this week's trading we're now at over 6500% growth in BTC and I guess an order of magnitude larger in fiat.

Do you see why people are starting to think you're running a bigger ponzi scheme than Pirate? Seriously Deprived, cut your rubbish attitude, stop pissing in other fund's threads, and deal with your own company's issues.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 05, 2013, 07:20:31 AM
But you have already been caught in a lie. You claimed to own 160/300 units of the fund personally, then just now said you bought back 40% of the units of the fund this week. So you're saying there's just 20 units of the fund outstanding?

WHy don't you JUST FOR ONCE look at figures before makng them up.

There's currently 300 units of the fund outstanding - of which I own 160.

At time of last report (on the weekend) there were 514 units outstanding.  214 of those (over 40%) have been bought back by the fund (i.e. were sold into the bidwall I maintain).  In fact 215 were bought back as I received 1 unit as management fee - so oustanding would have gone to 515 at that point.  Outstanding shares is reported every week - and anyone can verify just by looking at the details tab for the asset, so it's not something I COULD lie about.

Rest of your post seems based on this total lack of comprehension/spending 5 seconds checking a stat that's visible to the public.  On LTC-GLobal you can SEE how many shares are outstanding on the asset (Bitfunder only shows issued).

LTC-ATF has a stupid number of available shares (an arbitrary large number as no means of issuing new ones manually exists) - by contract I could currently sell up to 2500 total of them.  However unless/until LTC drops a lot lower no new ones will be sold.  Managing capital and exchange-rates is a key part of what I do to maximise profits.  Unlike most other funds I DON'T OFTEN SELL UNITS - and the number outstanding is the lowest now that it's been for ages (certainly this year - probably almost since start).

Now you figure out how I could be running a ponzi, buying back shares at 5-6 times original price, not selling new ones and still easily show cash to cover all remaining shares/bonds.  If LTC manages to stay around current value I'll be buying back MORE units (at a price including all the profit you think is imaginary) and not selling new ones.  Ideally at current price I'd like to buyback somewhere in the range of 50-100 more units (I'd sell back half of them myself and keep my holdings around the 50% mark).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 05, 2013, 07:27:34 AM
You're telling me 20 units of the fund are now worth 29,000 BTC?

No.   I asked earlier where this 29,000 BTC came from.  It's not a figure of ANY releveance whatsoever and I've no clue where you pulled it from.  Maybe you multiplied the number of units I'm authorised to sell by the value/unit - and got a meaningless result (units not sold have no cash backing and no value - other than in a few mismanaged funds that use shares/units to track somethign other than ownership).

Total assets managed by the fund are under 1000 BTC and oly briefly ever went over that earlier in week when LTC was at peak (and fell below it due to buying back units).  Already explained that the 20 units is just wrong.

If you pull one number (20) out of your ass even though the real value (300) is visible on the exchange then divide it into another number (29,000) that you pulled out of thin air then you get a result which has no relevance to anything.  Which may work for you when valuing your assets but doesn't do the job for me.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 05, 2013, 07:36:50 AM
Sorry - but you ARE confused.

I cannot be confused because I am asking a question. You can either answer it or not. Here watch, I'll ask the question again:

I am a 12% bondholder in LTC-ATF.B1. I have seen your financial reports, and they're rubbish -- you are claiming to have made 1.56% per day which is difficult to believe. After all, LTC-ATF is a fund; you don't produce anything. You just trade. I also trade. In fact I run a fund. I flipped a few hundred K of ZigGap for example, recently, for a 3 BTC profit. Yes, we all get lucky sometimes. But a 1.56% profit each and every single day even on average, over a 6 months period, is statistically impossible.

Here's why. You would need to double your money. That would be 100% gain. Then you would need to double your money again. That would be 300%. Then double again. 600%. Then double again. 1200%. And now, based on your 6500% gain comment, you have not only doubled your money again but again again after that. So in other words, you run an investment fund which doubles it's money each and every single month.

When looking around we see that you couldn't have possibly done this merely because there was no place for you to have done it. Maybe BTC has gone up, but your fund is denominated in BTC. So you couldn't have profited from the 1500% rise in BTC. No, the 1500% rise in BTC should have cut your portfolio by about 90%. You know, like it did to anything else denominated in an asset. Like a mining stock. Or an ART kiln security. Or a silver/gold fund -- like John Galt Asset Management's GOLD fund, for example. But no.

You GAINED 1500% during this time.

Okay. It obviously couldn't have come from the 15% invested position, so it had to come from the 85% of your holdings which are kept in currency. I get that. But you yourself state that when LTC rises in price your fund loses money. In fact you put a number on it; last week's rise in LTC price cost you 18%. So here's what I don't get. How did you make the money? I'll be honest with you. Pirate got all pissy when people asked him about it too.

What makes this whole situation deliciously ironic is, in fact, that you won't release your books. You participated in the theft of TU.SILVER's books and posted them online, which was the culmunation of six months of trolling and manipulating of my securities asset prices which were placed on line. But when put to the test yourself, it turns out you can't keep a straight book and I doubt if anyone is surprised.

At this point, if you are refusing to release your books to a 12% shareholder then you and your fund have serious problems. I will be liquidating my personal holdings in LTC-ATF and I can only advise all investors to avoid your security because it is beginning to look like a ponzi. Sorry Deprived, but no one makes 1.56% a day. Not even the guy who ran the trading desk at the Quantum fund.

So you see, it is you who is very confused. Proving you have cash proves nothing. Of course you have cash. You've sold a lot of very expensive shares to people. And I don't doubt you have your own money. But this is nothing to do with your business which cannot possibly have grown 1500% (sorry, 6500%, your words) in the face of a 1500% BTC price increase.


For the last time - the fund is NOT denominated in BTC, but in LTC.

Learn to fucking read please.

At time of last report, the value of a unit had grown by a bit over 500% in the 6 months it had been running (in LTC).  That's from 10 to 60-odd.

If you valued those shares in BTC then the rise is MUCH higher - as LTC was worth 3 times as much vs BTC at the time of report as at start of the fund.  SO obviously if it's value is now 6 times what it was in LTC it'll be 18 times as much in BTC just because of how exchange-rate has changed.

SInce that report, LTC again quadrupled vs BTC (now back down to a bit over treble) - so the value MEASURED in BTC has trebled again despite falling in LTC.

Either stop trolling or work out the VERY BASICS of how exchange-rate changes effect the value of something held in currency X if you choose to value it in currency Y.  At this stage I seriously think you may just be trolling - as you're misunderstanding an absolutely simple point (and still haven't grasped how the bonds actually work).

You also mentioned you'd like to liquidate your bonds.  Sure - you can either do it via market or by redmeption via me at 99% of face value.  Just transfer the shares back to me on LTC-GLOBAL and tell me whether you want LTC or BTC and I'll send it.  I'd recommend taking BTC then I won't have to explain to you how exchange-rates work and why you got the number of LTC you did.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 05, 2013, 07:47:11 AM
Actually, if you want to sell your bonds I'll take them personally off you at 2% over face-value (as I want some more myself but aren't issuing any on fund until I see where LTC price settles) - so you can even get out at a profit.  Send them to my personal account on LTC-GLobal (Deprived) and post here a BTC address you want the cash sent to + number of bonds.

Not sure how many you have - as the % you claim doesn't match what's on your email address.  Offer's limited to 25 BTC worth - which I'm sure covers you.  For clarity I'd be paying exactly .0102 BTC per bond.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 05, 2013, 09:56:29 AM
Learn to fucking read please.
[...]
You also mentioned you'd like to liquidate your bonds.

I will be liquidating my personal holdings in LTC-ATF

I didn't say I would be redeeming my LTC-ATF.B1 bonds. Furthermore, as I've pointed out on several occasions you have a bad attitude. This is just a due diligence process I go through. There's no need to swear at your majority bondholders for asking to see some data backing your financial statements.

I must admit I'm tempted to liquidate all my bonds immediately simply because you get sand in your panties every time someone asks you how you are making more money than pirate; but so long as you prove you have the cash on hand (and can guarantee that this cash will be used to pay bondholders) that will probably do for now.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 21, 2013, 01:53:47 AM
Announcement:

To help out the somewhat illiquid market on LTC-TC, I have decided to market-make LTC-ATF.B1. There's several reasons, not least among them,

a) I want to help out the Litecoin community and add to the liquidity of the exchange.
b) I want to make sure that people don't get ripped off when they buy and redeem units of LTC-ATF.B1.
c) Deprived has been breaking his contract in subtle ways and to me this is not acceptable so I will keep a very close eye on him going forward.

From today, you can expect a fair price for LTC-ATF.B1, within a few percentage points of their face value in bitcoins. I'll be checking in a couple of times a day as I make my rounds. I'm committing a significant amount of LTC to this, and chaining Deprived to his contract, so if you have any questions about the security and what the entry/exit price points are PM me and we can talk.

Good luck and happy trading!


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 21, 2013, 02:01:41 AM
With reference to the above, I am making a backup of Deprived's LTC-ATF.B1 contract as it stands, to make sure he doesn't change it.

Date of c/p: April 21st, 11AM JST

Quote from: DEPRIVEDASSET <deprivedltcasset@hotmail.co.uk>
Ticker
BOND: LTC-ATF.B1

Moderator Score
7  (7/0)

Moderator Votes
YES 7 / 0 NO    (1 ABSTAINING -- Users with 10 or more shares of LTC-GLOBAL are allowed to vote.)

oZoNo voted YES with comment: Note: Although this bond never matures, the issuer promises to redeem bonds at face value (or greater) under certain conditions, including canceling the bond. Note: This bond is callable.
BTCTRADINGPT voted YES with comment: BTC-TRADING-PT shareholders voted to approve: 749-31

Shares
Outstanding 16037 / 100000 Issued

Issuer
DEPRIVEDASSET <deprivedltcasset@hotmail.co.uk>

Forum
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=129985.0

Issuer Detail
This bond is issued by the Fund operating under the ticker LTC-ATF on the
Litecoin Global Exchange. Further information about the issuer can be found at:

The listing for the fund at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF
The LitecoinTalk thread for the fund at
http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,657.0.html
The Bitcoin forums thread for the fund at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112876.0

The threads in the last two links contain pretty much identical information (I
post all significant updates to both) so there's no need to read both.

Contract
DEFINITIONS

(The) Issuer / The fund trading with the ticker LTC-ATF on the Litecoin Global
Exchange.

(The) Manager : The individual controlling the user account
with the name "Deprived" on The bitcointalk forums.

The Bond : The security offered on Litecoin Global Exchange using the ticker
LTC-ATF.B1


OVERVIEW

LTC-ATF.B1 is a bond issued by the LTC-ATF. It is a sort of hybrid lieing
somewhere between a regular bond and a 'perpetual' bond. LTC-ATF is issuing
this bond rather than raising new capital via sale of additional units for two
primary reasons:

1. To allow LTC-ATF to trade in BTC-denominated securities without massive
exposure to the LTC/BTC exchange-rate.
2. To reduce the portion of future profits distributed to new investors - and
hence increase the profit retained by early investors. This increase in
retained profits comes with an associated increase in accepted risk (by existing
LTC-ATF investors, not bond holders).

The bond is primarily transacted in Litecoins (LTC) but has a face-value
denominated in BTC. Dividends are paid based upon this face-value. This means
that bond-holders are effectively making a BTC-denominated investment - with
transactions just happening to occur in LTC. This has advantages and
disadvantages for both investor and issuer - which should be carefully
considered before investing.

The bond pays a fixed-rate of interest weekly. This rate may be increased
without notice by the issuer but may not be reduced once increased. Bonds will
initially be offered paying a 0.6% per week dividend - then the rate will be
gradually increased as necessary until demand meets supply. Any such increases
apply to ALL outstanding bonds, not just to new ones sold after the date such
increase is announced.


FACE VALUE

Each bond will begin with a face value of 0.01 BTC. All Asks and Bids placed by
the issuer will be at approximately this face-value less (or plus in the case of
Asks) a 1% administration fee. The exchange-rate used by the issuer when
placing such orders will be the rate available for immediate conversion (i.e.
buying or selling into existing orders) on the BTC-E exchange.

In general the face value of bonds will not change. The exception to this is if
a platform on which LTC-ATF operates defaults, is hacked or otherwise loses
assets rightfully belonging to LTC-ATF. This is dealt with in more detail in a
later section of this contract.


REDEMPTION OF BONDS

The bonds have no expiry date - that is they are perpetual in nature. However
provision is made to allow redemption at any time (subject to certain
provisions) by holders.

Issuer undertakes to attempt to redeem at least 10% (or 1 BTC worth - whichever
is higher) of outstanding bonds on any calendar day on demand. This will be
conducted through two primary mechanisms:

1. Issuer will regularly check the LTC Global market for any Asks which are
priced at 99% of face value or less. Any such orders will be filled.
2. Any bond holder may directly redeem bonds provided at least 100 bonds are
redeemed in a batch. This is done by transferring the bonds to the manager
(DeprivedAsset). When manager notices such a transfer he will sell an amount of
BTC on BTC-E equivalent to the face value of the transferred bonds then transfer
99% of received funds (in LTC) to the holder.

Unfortunately, due to the bonds being valued in BTC but transacted in LTC it is
not possible for issuer to leave standing bids up on LTC Global in the manner
that is used to provide liquidity for LTC-ATF.

At his discretion manager may agree to redeem bonds by means of a transfer of
BTC on the BTC.CO exchange. Where this occurs, such redemption will be made at
99% of face value (with no exchange-rate relevant). This would need to be
arranged in advance and it established beyond doubt that the nominated BTC.CO
receiving account is indeed controlled by the same indivual as transferred the
bonds on LTC Global.

Manager may at his discretion sell bonds at below face value to existing bids on
the market. This would only be done if there were a specific very profitable
(and with short-term availability) opportunity available.


DIVIDENDS

Dividend payments are due at a nominal time of 23:59:59 GMT each Saturday. In
practice the dividend payment will be made at some time on either Saturday or
Sunday - typically just before weekly results for LTC-ATF are published. It is
not possible to schedule dividends in advance as the amount of the dividend (in
LTC) cannot be calculated without knowing the exact exchange-rate available at
the time of payment.

Dividend will be a fixed percentage each week. This percentage will be set at
0.6% per week when the bond is first placed for sale. Thereafter the rate may
be increased at any time without ntoice by the issuer. The rate may never be
decreased by the issuer whilst there are any outstanding bonds. Changes to the
interest rate will be published in the official threads for this security and in
the LTC-ATF threads. Any increases in interest rate apply to all oustanding
bonds, not just to ones sold after such increases.

When a dividend is paid the following procedure will be used to calculate the
amount to be dividended:

1. The BTC value of the dividend will be calculated - the number of outstanding
bonds multiplied by their individual face value multiplied by the current
interest rate paid.
2. a) If the issuer does NOT need to convert BTC into LTC to pay the dividend
then the exchange-rate used to calculate the LTC to pay will be the mid-point
between highest bid and lowest ask on the BTC-E LTC/BTC trade list.
b) If the issuer DOES need to convert BTC into LTC to pay the dividend then
an amount of BTC equal to the due dividend will be used to purchase LTC on
BTC-E. The LTC received from this transaction(s) will be the amount dividended.
3. The full amount of LTC calculated (or obtained) will then be dividended out.
No admin fees or transfer fees will be deducted from it.


MANAGEMENT FEE

No management fee is taken for maintaining operation of these bonds. The
manager expects to gain his reward from increased profits from his personal
LTC-ATF units and his 10% fee on LTC-ATF earnings.

The admin fees charged on purchases and sales are to cover (or reduce) the
various transfer and exchange-use fees necessary to conduct such actions.


RISK EXPOSURE AND MITIGATION

In general bond holders have senior claim against all assets of LTC-ATF (up to
face value of the bond). Most risks associated with LTC-ATF's operations are
carried by LTC-ATF rather than this bond. There is one specific risk which is
shared with bond-holders - the full or partial default of a platform (e.g.
exchange) on which LTC-ATF holds funds. This particular risk is share with
bond-holders for two reasons:

1. There is nothing LTC-ATF can practically do to mitigate this risk.
2. Bond-holders already accepted this risk when they deposited funds to LTC
Global to invest.

In the event that a platform on which LTC-ATF trades (or holds funds) loses (or
ceases to make available for use) assets belonging to the fund then the face
value of bonds shall (at the discretion of manager) be reduced by a percentage
equal to the percentage of asset value controlled by LTC-ATF lost (or made
unusable).

So if (for example) BTC-E vanished with all our funds on there, and those funds
amounted to 10% of the total assets managed by LTC-ATF then the face value of
all bonds would be reduced by 10% to 0.009 BTC.

If such a reduction occurs and LTC-ATF continues trading (rather than closes
down) then half of all future profits made (after payment of bond dividends and
before management fee is taken) would be applied to increasing bond face value
back up towards its initial value of 0.01 BTC.

Other than the above, all risks associated with trading (prices crashing, typoed
orders that lose money, investments that turn out to be scams etc) are carried
by LTC-ATF and do not affect the face value of bonds or the dividend payments
due on them.

So there are precisely two risks bond-holders have (other than that the issuer
scams them) :

1. Losses caused by default/theft from an exchange used,
2. That the value of LTC-ATF assets falls to a level such that the total assets
of LTC-ATF are less than the face value of issued bonds.

Here are specific risks associated with point 2 - and how they are addressed:

Exchange-rate changes : If all of LTC-ATF's investments were in LTC-denominated
securities and LTC suddenly tanked against BTC then LTC-ATF could end up with
insufficient funds to cover the face value of outstanding bonds. To counter
this the fund must maintain BTC-denominated assets such that outstanding bonds
amount to a liability of no more than 90% of such assets. So if we have 90 BTC
face-value of outstanding bonds then we must hold at least 100 BTC of
BTC-denominated assets. Funds will be exchanged between currencies as needed to
maintain this minimum ratio. This percentage will be included in LTC-ATF's
regular reports (usually, but not always, produced weekly).

Trading Losses : It is possible for LTC-ATF to accumulate trading losses such
that it no longer holds sufficient assets to cover outstanding bonds at face
value. This cannot be totally removed as a risk (as exchange-rate could) but is
very heavily mitigated through a few methods:

1. Every effort is taken to spread exposure rather than allow a single point of
failure (one asset issuer) to be able to cause massive losses to LTC-ATF. As
LTC-ATF expands back into BTC-denominated investment the range of securities we
can trade grows - and we can reduce exposure per security. Prior to bond launch
LTC-ATF has targetted a maximum exposure of 20% of assets to a single issuer.
After significant bond sales this target will fall to 10% (until a significant
number of bnds have sold this risk is irrelevant unless every investment
collapses at once). That's a target - not a firm commitment - but one taken
very seriously. Exposure to a single asset issuer includes indirect as well as
direct exposure - so holdings of investment companies traded ARE taken into
account. LTC-ATF never trades securities of investment companies that don't
disclose their holdings.

2. A limit is placed on the number of bonds that LTC-ATF may have outstanding.
This limit is defined as bonds with a total face value of 150% of LTC-ATF's own
NAV. So if LTC-ATF had 100 BTC of assets without any bonds then maximum bonds
it could issue would be 150 BTC worth. This ratio will also be included in all
regular reports of LTC-ATF. If this ratio ever rises above 150% then manager
will promptly ensure that it is reduced below 150% by either issuing more units
of LTC-ATF and/or repurchasing bonds from the market.

In practice there is no plan to ever intentionally get close to the two limits
defined above. However the first likely will on occasion need to be corrected
(if a few BTC investments suddenly fall heavily in value). The second is only
likely to need adjustment if LTC falls very heavily against BTC.

Despite the above mitigating actions risk cannot be totally eliminated. To
claim otherwise would be ignorant and/or deceitful. Investors should always
consider potential risks before investing - that is the case here as it is
everywhere else.


BOND RECALL

The issuer has the right to forcibly recall all outstanding bonds at will. This
must be done at 105% of face value - with the LTC payment made defined as the
LTC obtained by selling 105% of total bond face value (in BTC) on BTC-E. No
admin fee or transfer fees may be deducted from this.

Whilst there's no intention to ever do this, this right has to be reserved in
case trading conditions become such that supporting outstanding bonds can no
longer be justified. An example would be if BTC-denominated exchanges closed
down but LTC Global remained open - where LTC-ATF could continue but there'd be
no need or use for BTC-denominated capital.


FUND CLOSURE

In the event of LTC-ATF closing operations all outstandings bonds will be
redeemed at 100% of face value - with the LTC payment made defined as the LTC
obtained by selling the total bond face value (in BTC) on BTC-E. No admin fee
or transfer fees may be deducted from this.

Dividends remain due every week until such time as LTC-ATF is able to make such
a final payment.

If fund closure is announced then LTC-ATF may not repurchase any units or make
any payments of settlement to LTC-ATF investors until all bonds have been fully
redeemed. Bond holders have absolute seniority over LTC-ATF unit holders in all
claims on LTC-ATF assets in such a circumstance.


GENERAL ISSUES / FINE PRINT

In various places this contract refers to BTC-E when discussing currency
exchange. Whilst at the time of making this contract that is the exchange used,
such use is not intended to restrict issuer from using other such exchanges.
All occurrences of "BTC-E" should thus be read as "BTC-E (or such other exchange
as the issuer chooses to use)".

Changes may only be made by issuer to this contract if either:

1. There are no outstanding bonds,
2. A vote is passed approving the changes with 100% of bond-holders voting yes.

LTC-ATF may not hold outstanding LTC-ATF.B1 bonds itself (this is impossible to
do without use of a proxy account anyway).

For the purpose of this offering, BTC and LTC are considered virtual currencies
with no intrinsic value (akin to currencies in online games). This fund is
being run for the entertainment of the manager and investors with no expectation
of financial gain or loss for either party.
Executive Summary    This bond is a product - not a company. The business issuing the bond is
LTC-ATF - which I now give a brief rationale for.

WHAT IS LTC-ATF AND WHY DOES IT EVEN EXIST?

LTC-ATF is a small fund established to trade in securities denominated in
crypto-currencies. The fund's focus is very much on trading rather than
investment - it doesn't sit on investments waiting for them to (hopefully) make
a profit, rather it strives to buy and sell making profit in a much shorter
time-scale.

The obvious question to ask is "Why bother setting up a fund with such a small
amount of capital - couldn't you just use your own funds to trade?". There are
a range of reasons why the fund exists - hopefully the give some insight into
the rationale behind the fund and why it operates the way it does. In no
particular order :

Funding : Of course I have sufficient funds to use my own capital for an
operation this size. But if market conditions (range of securities and volume
traded) change such that a much larger operation is desirable then without a
track-record it would be hard to raise the funds to take advantage of that.

Fairness : I'm by no means shy about expressing criticism of other virtual
securities. It's therefore only fair that I run one myself and give opportunity
for those I criticise to reply in like manner. It's my hope (and expectation)
that my performance, fairness to investors, reporting standards and transparency
will make plain that - whatever else my faults may be - I'm no hypocrite when I
complain about others' lack of those same qualities.

Fun : It's far more enjoyable running the fund in public than it was when I just
invested my own funds in private.

Motivation : Having a responsibility to my investors causes me to put more
effort into my endeavours than I otherwise likely would. If I become lazy, lax
or careless then it will become a matter of public record - a great incentive to
do none of those.

Start Small : It's painful watching people attempt to create new companies in
areas they have no proven expertise in and trying to raise thousand or tens of
thousands BTC right from the start. I'm doing it (what I believe to be) the
right way - start small, prove you can do well whilst small, then and ONLY then
expand.


Business Description
This bond is issued by LTC-ATF. I describe here the areas of business LTC-ATF
operates in. The capital raised from sale of bonds is used in the execution of
these business areas.

WHAT SECURITIES DOES LTC-ATF OFFER?

At present LTC-ATF offers two securities on LTC Global:

LTC-ATF - This is the parent fund. Investors in this purchase units of the fund
representing a portion of the assets owned by the fund. This fund does not pay
dividends - all profits (or losses) are reflected in a regularly updated and
published fund valuation. Liquidity is provided via a constantly maintained
bid-wall just below NAV/U. Units of LTC-ATF are valued and transacted in LTC.

LTC-ATF.B1 - This is a bond issued by LTC-ATF. The bond's purpose is two-fold -
to retain as much of profit as possible for LTC-ATF investors and to allow
trading in BTC-denominated securities with greatly reduced exposure to fund
value changes casued by exchange-rate movement. This bond has a face value (and
pays dividends) denominated in BTC but transacted in LTC. Dividends are paid
weekly at a fixed rate which can be raised by the fund manager at will (but
never lowered again). Liquidity is provided via buying back through the market
at just below face value and by facilitating sell-back of larger quantities of
bonds through direct transfer.


Definition of the Market
The market for this bond broadly falls into three groups of investors. These
are now addressed in INCREASING order of importance :

1. Unsophisticated investors (mouthbreathers). These invest in anything which
pays dividends. They probably don't read contracts in full and definitely don't
do any analysis to determine whether an investment is likely to be profitable.
If they see this bond's price rise they'll assume it means LTC-ATF doing well,
if they see it falling they'll assume LTC-ATF is doing badly (price of this bond
is actually set 100% by exchange-rate and entirely unrelated to LTC-ATF's
performance). If you're reading this you probably aren't in this category.

2. Speculators. This bond provides a useful way to bet against LTC in the
medium term (short-term the admin fees wipe out gain, long-term you probably
shouldn't even be using this exchange). Speculators can also pick off orders
that aren't updated to reflect changes in the exchange-rate to make a fast profit.

3. More sophisticated investors. It's important at this point to consider WHY
people invest in specific securites. There are intangible reasons (want to
support community, think it's interesting etc) but one very tangible one which
applies to a lot of investors - to make profit.

But what does "profit" actually mean - and, more relevantly, how is it
calculated? Is an investor interested in increasing the number of LTC they own?
The number of BTC they can purchase? The purchasing power of their assets if
converted to fiat?

A more sophisticated investor may well opt not to put all their eggs in one
basket (for example investing/holding solely assets whose profitability is
determined in LTC). This is where these bonds fill a useful niche in the market
- they allow investors to effectively convert part of their LTC holdings into
BTC AND earn growth on them. That allows them to hedge against a total collapse
of LTC vs BTC. And they can do it without ever having to move any funds off of
LTC Global or use an exchange.

There's also two classes of investors for whom this bond is absolutely NOT suitable:

1. Ones who want to go "all-in" on LTC increasing in value faster than BTC in
the short to medium term (if they only want to gamble like that long-term than
the bond MAY make sense for them in the medium term).

2. Ones who want to hedge their investment portfolio against the devaluation of
BTC/LTC against fiat. This bond provides no such protection.
Products and Services    This bond is, itself, a product of LTC-ATF - it pays a fixed rate of interest
and does not offer any products or services.

At present it is the only offering on LTC Global offering a reasonable rate of
interest with the bond value tied directly to BTC. As such, it has no direct
competitors.


Organization and Management
This bond is offered by LTC-ATF. LTC-ATF is a one-man operation running a
virtual security for educational/entertainment purposes. Accordingly, no
licences or permits are required or held.

More information about the operations of LTC-ATF can be found in its contract
and discussion threads.


Marketing Strategy
Our target market is described in a previous section of this document.

Initially we are only releasing a very small number of bonds - so the
expectation is that little effort will be needed to sell them. Indeed our
requirement for funds isn't for all to sell at once anyway - so a slow pace of
sales is not some big disadvantage.

This bond has a fixed interest rate which can be raised at will by the issuer
(subject to a defined maximum rate). If our requirement for funds from bonds is
not being met then our marketting response is very simple - we raise the rate of
interest we offer until demand meets the supply we need to sell.
Financial Management    There is no relevant financial management required for the operation of this
bond - beyond that detailed in the contract. As a bond, the profitability or
otherwise of the issuer (LTC-ATF) has no bearing on the face value of the bond
or the size of dividends paid.

The regular reports of LTC-ATF (published in its thread on LTC and BTC forums)
will (from launch of this bond) contain the two ratios relevant to operation of
this bond:

The ratio of outstanding bonds (total face value) to unencumbered LTC-ATF assets
- which determines whether more bonds may be sold.

The ratio of capital raised from bonds to total BTC-denominated assets held by
LTC-ATF - which ensures no exchange-rate swing can make LTC-ATF unable to
service outstanding bonds.


Financial Management
There is no relevant financial management required for the operation of this
bond - beyond that detailed in the contract. As a bond, the profitability or
otherwise of the issuer (LTC-ATF) has no bearing on the face value of the bond
or the size of dividends paid.

The regular reports of LTC-ATF (published in its thread on LTC and BTC forums)
will (from launch of this bond) contain the two ratios relevant to operation of
this bond:

The ratio of outstanding bonds (total face value) to unencumbered LTC-ATF assets
- which determines whether more bonds may be sold.

The ratio of capital raised from bonds to total BTC-denominated assets held by
LTC-ATF - which ensures no exchange-rate swing can make LTC-ATF unable to
service outstanding bonds.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 21, 2013, 02:44:51 AM
LTC-ATF.B1 REPORT CARD #1 : APRIL 21st, 2013
MANAGER'S GRADE: B (76.3%)


SHARE INCREASE
On April 21st, while market-making LTC-ATF.B1, I purchased a quantity of 244 shares at 0.455 and 0.46. The face value of 0.01 BTC converted into LTC going rate was 0.451 at the time. I then noticed the number of outstanding shares of LTC-ATF.B1 had increased from 15793 by 244 shares. Here's the relevant data:

DIVIDENDS:
2013-04-21 05:15    Ł 42.6411    15793    0.00270000    COMPLETE

TRADE HISTORY:
2013-04-21 05:20:09    Market    44    Ł 0.455    Ł 20.02
2013-04-21 05:20:04    Market    200    Ł 0.46    Ł 92

The relevant section of the contract covering this transaction has been quoted for your convenience:
Each bond will begin with a face value of 0.01 BTC. All Asks and Bids placed by
the issuer will be at approximately this face-value less (or plus in the case of
Asks) a 1% administration fee. The exchange-rate used by the issuer when
placing such orders will be the rate available for immediate conversion (i.e.
buying or selling into existing orders) on the BTC-E exchange.


It is my opininon that by entering a market order for 0.455, Deprived has not broken his contract. A+ (95%)



PAID THE CORRECT AMOUNT AT THE CORRECT TIME
The above-listed payment also conforms with the dividend policy, quoted for your convenience:
Dividend payments are due at a nominal time of 23:59:59 GMT each Saturday. In
practice the dividend payment will be made at some time on either Saturday or
Sunday - typically just before weekly results for LTC-ATF are published.


Secondly, the paid amount was within 0.1% of the stated amount:
Dividend will be a fixed percentage each week. This percentage will be set at
0.6% per week when the bond is first placed for sale. Thereafter the rate may
be increased at any time without ntoice by the issuer. The rate may never be
decreased by the issuer whilst there are any outstanding bonds. Changes to the
interest rate will be published in the official threads for this security and in
the LTC-ATF threads. Any increases in interest rate apply to all oustanding
bonds, not just to ones sold after such increases.


This earns Deprived another A+ (95%), but a C- for spelling  ;D



MINIMUM BTC AMOUNT
"...the fund must maintain BTC-denominated assets such that outstanding bonds
amount to a liability of no more than 90% of such assets. So if we have 90 BTC
face-value of outstanding bonds then we must hold at least 100 BTC of
BTC-denominated assets. Funds will be exchanged between currencies as needed to
maintain this minimum ratio. This percentage will be included in LTC-ATF's
regular reports (usually, but not always, produced weekly). "


The outstanding shares are now 16037 as reported online, or 160.37 BTC. Divided by 0.9, we see a reserve requirement of 178.19 BTC. Deprived has stated he can prove he has the cash:

If anyone has serious concerns that the claimed funds belonging to LTC-ATF don't exist then it's actually pretty easy for me to prove otherwise.  Most of the time 80%+ of the assets managed by the fund are in cash.  I can, at any time, show all of that cash by placing pre-agreed bids on the various sites I trade on

His cash position is extremely unclear:
If you look at the LTC cash on LTC-GLobal it says 8048 LTC then reports that as being worth 8100 BTC!  Obviously what happened is that at some point I typed the LTC balance into the BTC-value field and never noticed.  The mistake has no ramifications other than being embarassing - the BTC-value there isn't used in any calculations of significance and doesn't impact on the final NAV.  If (and it HAS happened) I enter a wrong figure into a cell that actually matters then I tend to notice it immediately as it causes a massive unexpected move in NAV/U - which lets me know I just made a cockup.

he also claims to have a lot of cash (80% in cash?) but then says:
...I'd like us to be trading ASICMINER - but we don't really have the spare cash to do so.

Oh really, what about this:
Right now cash is around 500 BTC worth (15K LTC worth).  If LTC were to halve by then, it could be down to 300-350 BTC worth (20k LTC worth).

That's just WEIRD!


Deprived has time and time again lied about showing he has the cash:
1.  After this week's report I'll PROVE that I have all the cash I claim to have.
I can very easily prove I have the cash I claim to have.  


Sure - will do that.  I usually do reports Sunday evening - after this week's I'll flash the cash (place orders on all sites).

In general I give Deprived an A+ for how he's handled his security today. But on the point of showing us the cash I am forced to give Deprived an F (39%). The average grade is a B (76.3%). For the record I don't doubt he has the cash; I'm just a little weirded out by his caustic attitude, swearing at me every time I ask to see it, and launching troll threads in the Securities forum swearing at me. I also wonder about why he's releasing more shares right around dividend payment time. It's a very minor red flag. If we penalize Deprived 1% for that and 1% for swearing at bondholders and his ridiculous troll campaign his actual mark would be a bit less -- say 74.3%.

If you're going to put something in your contract, stand by it, and don't swear at people when they call you on it. Right?


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 21, 2013, 03:31:09 AM
Just to address a couple of perfectly valid points raised.

1.  Me saying we haven't the cash to trade ASICMINER-PT whilst having 80% cash.

There's two seperate parts to how these two things reconcile:

A.  A significant part of cash is in LTC.  It can't be converted to BTC - as LTC-ATF is committed to holding around 85% of net assets in LTC.
B.  Whilst we have plenty of cash, it's committed to buy orders.  This is of particular importance on Bitfunder - where the same cash can't be applied to orders on different assets.  So right this instant I have 79.227 BTC cash on Bitfunder but under 0.2 BTC available to place on new orders - the other 79 is already commited to Bids.  So I can't bid on ASICMINER-PT there without cancelling other bids - and I don't want to cancel other bids or I wouldn't have them up in the first place.

2.  Me selling shares near dividend date.

Usually I don't do this - though see my next paragraph for the exception.  But 2700 were sold back to the fund by ThickAsThieves late in the week, so I was willing to sell a small number to replace the cash I'd used to buy his bonds back.

One a general point, do remember that I can't control the price you (or anyone else bids at).

So, for example, right now face value for a bond + our 1% markup is around .455 (I just sold into a few order slightly above that).  But if you had a bid up at (say) .5 then I'm not going to refuse to sell into it because it's more than 1% over face value.  If people place bids at high prices then rather obviously when I place an Ask at the correct price it'll fill their order - and there's nothing I can do to prevent that other than not sell bonds.  Which does lead to the other exceptions where I'll sell near the end of the week:

1.  If bids are up at 1.6% or more over face-value.  Then the purchaser is paying for the week's interest so the usual reason not to sell near end of week no longer applies.

2.  If there's little liquidity on the ask side on BTC-E and I need to convert BTC into LTC to balance currencies.  In that instance I can sell at 1% over face value and the 0.6% I lose on paying a week's interest for newly sold shares is balanced by me saving a 0.2% transaction fee plus having to convert at a less favourable rate (because of a lack of volume of asks near the current trading price).

In general my policy is to check LTC-ATF.B1 order book regularly while I'm online.  If I see Asks that can be filled at 99% or less of face-value (at the rate I could convert at) then I'll buy them back.  If I see Bids at 101% or more of face-value (and I'm looking to sell more bonds) then I'll fill them.

I don't tend to put up Asks myself unless the exchange-rate is very stable - a 1% margin is too small to leave orders up unattended in a volatile market (this is the one BIG disadvantage of having a bond denominated in BTC but transacted in LTC).

Anyway, thanks for market-making : eventually I'd like to get my bot to do it, but that's some way off.  I'm waiting for someone to start writing options on the bonds - it's possible to speculate on the BTC/LTC exchange-rate by doing that.  Do be aware there's at least two other people who do it (market-make) from time to time - though one of them only does it with tiny orders (1-5 bonds).

FYI at present I'll be selling bonds if/when orders exist up to about 180 BTC total face-value.  I'd indicated 200 BTC as a likely target in last week's LTC-ATF report but we won't need to sell that many as I've stopped trading a couple of thiings.  If you (or anyone else) wants to buy at face-value + 1% then feel free to drop me a PM after placing an order and I'll fill it soon as I notice (if exchange-rate hasn't changed).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 21, 2013, 03:54:18 AM
Deprived has time and time again lied about showing he has the cash:
1.  After this week's report I'll PROVE that I have all the cash I claim to have.
I can very easily prove I have the cash I claim to have.  


Sure - will do that.  I usually do reports Sunday evening - after this week's I'll flash the cash (place orders on all sites).

You ruined an otherwise decent post with this.  Read my whole response.  Further down in same post I say:

I'll need a pretty precise time agreed in advance for it plus a list of assets/site and you can give some 3 digit ending you want so you can see the bids are the size I state AND the right ending so are obviously mine (or someone else putting them up on my behalf I guess).

There's obviously no point me cancelling order etc unless I know you'll be around to see the bids I put up.  You made no effort to indicate a time at which you'd like to see the cash - and when I did, shortly after making that post, put up bids with our cash on  LTC-Global and BTC.CO (amounting to more than total cash outstanding in bonds) there was zero acknowledgement of it despite the bids staying up whilst I slept overnight.

That's why I want a time agreed in advance - so you can't pretend you didn't see the cash afterwards.

Offer's open for this week (later today) after doing weekly reports as well.  I'd like to modify it slightly however (giving you MORE information, not less).  For BTC.CO/LTC-GLobal I'll just sling up bids - as can do it there without cancelling anything.

For Bitfunder/CoinBR/BTC-E I'll show the cash over Teamviewer - so you can see the account name and balances.  You can also then verify that I do, indeed, have on CoinBR the shares backing the pass-thoughs and the extra float of shares I hold in each (which are declared in my report anyway).  The cash + those shares on CoinBR will likely add up to 85%+ of all LTC-ATF assets so whilst it won't prove my valuation is accurate it WILL prove that we have assets of around the claimed magnitude (and I assume you're not going to claim I hold zero securities - so you'd know it can't be too far off).

I just need a time to do it - somewhere between about 18:00 and 23:00 GMT would work best for me, then I can make sure to do the weekly report shortly beforehand.  

I'm open to other reasonable suggestions on showing the cash - I have absolutely no objection to doing so.  My only condition remains that you post here and confirm having seen it.  Obviously I can't do much if someone buys or sells to me between the report being produced and you viewing cash (I draw the line at cancelling all Asks in particular).  If that happens then you can obviously comment on that discrepancy when you report back - depending on which site and asset it is, I MAY be able and willing to prove that a transaction actually occurred changing cash on hand (some assets I don't particularly mind revealing trades in).



Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 21, 2013, 04:33:56 AM
LTC-ATF.B1 REPORT CARD #1 : APRIL 21st, 2013
MANAGER'S GRADE: B (76.3%)


SHARE INCREASE
On April 21st, while market-making LTC-ATF.B1, I purchased a quantity of 244 shares at 0.455 and 0.46. The face value of 0.01 BTC converted into LTC going rate was 0.451 at the time. I then noticed the number of outstanding shares of LTC-ATF.B1 had increased from 15793 by 244 shares. Here's the relevant data:

DIVIDENDS:
2013-04-21 05:15    Ł 42.6411    15793    0.00270000    COMPLETE

TRADE HISTORY:
2013-04-21 05:20:09    Market    44    Ł 0.455    Ł 20.02
2013-04-21 05:20:04    Market    200    Ł 0.46    Ł 92

Just noticed that you can't even get basic facts straight.

The 44 at .455 was actually ME buying, so I know for certain it wasn't you.  After the dividend went through I placed a buy order from my personal account (at face value + just over 1%) then sold into it and the 200 order at .46 (which WAS yours I believe).  So your claim that you bought 244 shares is incorrect.  You bought 200 bonds.

Not particularly important - but please pay some attention to detail before you end up making false claims that actually matter. 

At that time I had face-value at .4479 - minor difference from your .451 is likely because you're having to look at trade data whilst I was going by what was actually available on the exchange right that instant (as it was after dividend payment I obviously didn't convert funds - if you can't see why that's obvious consider what happens to cash balances in each currency, and hence to the ratio of assets per currency, when I pay the dividend).


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 21, 2013, 08:37:12 AM
TRADE HISTORY:
2013-04-21 05:20:09    Market    44    Ł 0.455    Ł 20.02
2013-04-21 05:20:04    Market    200    Ł 0.46    Ł 92

Just noticed that you can't even get basic facts straight.

The 44 at .455 was actually ME buying, so I know for certain it wasn't you.

No, I didn't say THAT 44 was me. You're misquoting me and putting words in my mouth -- that is a cut and paste from the public log of trading at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF.B1 (see "History"). Yes, considering that trade, only 200 showed up on my trade history but that has nothing to do with what I bought and sold. The above quote is obviously from trade history and not my personal account or it would show fees and say BUY or SELL.

Anyways, I'm sorry you feel the post was ruined because someone thought you were doing a bad job. I should be thankful you're not swearing at me.

You'll be happy to know I made 50% profit trading LTC-ATF.B1 alone over the last 3 weeks (200 LTC and 300 shares up). I sent the trading logs to DeaDTerra already, and updated the spreadsheet for TU.SILVER. We may even consider taking our position to 50% someday, if you think you can handle it.

I'm waiting for someone to start writing options on the bonds - it's possible to speculate on the BTC/LTC exchange-rate by doing that.

Given what you've said about options in the past I have to wonder why. Well, tell me what kind of option you want and I'll go write one :)


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 21, 2013, 01:58:30 PM
TRADE HISTORY:
2013-04-21 05:20:09    Market    44    Ł 0.455    Ł 20.02
2013-04-21 05:20:04    Market    200    Ł 0.46    Ł 92

Just noticed that you can't even get basic facts straight.

The 44 at .455 was actually ME buying, so I know for certain it wasn't you.

No, I didn't say THAT 44 was me. You're misquoting me and putting words in my mouth -- that is a cut and paste from the public log of trading at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/LTC-ATF.B1 (see "History").

Why do you lie just for the sake of it when it's obvious to everyone that you're lieing.

Here's the bit you failed to quote:

LTC-ATF.B1 REPORT CARD #1 : APRIL 21st, 2013
MANAGER'S GRADE: B (76.3%)


SHARE INCREASE
On April 21st, while market-making LTC-ATF.B1, I purchased a quantity of 244 shares at 0.455 and 0.46.

See - you DID say it was you buying them.  Just for once write a post without lieing in it please.  It gets silly when you make a post with a lie/error in it then go so far as to lie about what you said even though the evidence is still visible.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 21, 2013, 09:18:44 PM
Why do you lie just for the sake of it when it's obvious to everyone that you're lieing.

I think that's a question you should ask yourself.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: Deprived on April 21, 2013, 09:41:11 PM
Why do you lie just for the sake of it when it's obvious to everyone that you're lieing.

I think that's a question you should ask yourself.

Well I think it's because you have some mental problem where you've lost touch with the reality the rest of us inhabit.  I have no idea whether you believe your own lies or not.  You don't seem stupid enough to be unable to read your own posts and see what you said - yet you routinely lie about what you've said in the past even when it's in posts you haven't got around to deleting yet.  Maybe it's just some very severe memory problem.  I honestly don't know what the problem is, just that you have a very major one.


Title: Re: [LTC-GLOBAL] LTC-ATF.B1
Post by: usagi on April 22, 2013, 03:31:28 AM
Why do you lie just for the sake of it when it's obvious to everyone that you're lieing.

I think that's a question you should ask yourself.

Well I think it's because you have some mental problem where you've lost touch with the reality the rest of us inhabit.  I have no idea whether you believe your own lies or not.  You don't seem stupid enough to be unable to read your own posts and see what you said - yet you routinely lie about what you've said in the past even when it's in posts you haven't got around to deleting yet.  Maybe it's just some very severe memory problem.  I honestly don't know what the problem is, just that you have a very major one.

Well I think it's because you have some strange agenda where you have decided to cause financial damage to myself and my companies. I have a pretty good idea you know you're lying and you're treating this as some sort of tit-for-tat game. You don't seem stupid enough to be unable to read my financial reports or contact our financial advisor - yet you routinely lie about what I've written and misrepresent my character in the worst light possible. Maybe it's just some very severe anger problem. I honestly don't know what the problem is, just that you have a very major one.