Bitcoin Forum

"Most women are either bisexual or gay but "never straight", a study suggests. Research has found that though lesbians are much more attracted to the female form, most women who say they are straight are in fact aroused by videos of both naked men and naked women.Nov 5, 2015"

From Kinsey, to Chivers, to Diamond, every sexologist studying female sexuality who has done viable studies, have come to the same conclusion. That all biological women regardless of the sexual orientation they openly identify as, are bisexual. In all of these studies, since the 1960s, it shows that female sexuality is on a continuum, and that all "heterosexual" women actually turned on to be bisexual when shown images and videos of naked women, and that "lesbians" also turned out to be bisexual when shown erotic videos of men. Some also detail "late blooming" lesbians, or women who initially forgo sexual attraction to women growing up, but later in life develop or rather, realize, their sexual attraction to other women, even tv show hosts like Oprah has talked about this.




http://www.medicaldaily.com/female-sexuality-straight-women-turned-attractive-women-are-either-bisexual-or-gay-360486
http://www.advocate.com/bisexuality/2015/08/26/study-women-are-more-likely-be-bisexual-men
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11977121/Women-are-either-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-andre/lisa-diamond-interview_b_1510910.html
http://www.scienceofrelationships.com/home/2014/10/13/debunking-myths-about-sexual-fluidity.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129050832
http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?_r=0
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/arousal-first-desire-may-be-more-typical-for-women-and-it-doesnt-need-a-cure/article25039091/

and much, much, Much more.

They were all molested in their childhood? ???

did they need to spend money studying something so obvious as this

Care to explain?  ???

Or is it that childhood molesting thing?

it is only natural for soft skinned fragrant females to be attracted to one another, childhood molesting thing is to do with sodomites not this, female homosexuality is a harmless joke thing as long as it is the beautiful bisexual model types and not the short haired ugly dykes who want to get "married" and adopt kids

WOAH, seriously?

Y'all don't know shit about sexuality do you? ROFL.

Yeah.

Retard: Are you bisexual?

Woman: No. I am not.

Retard: But as per my study, all the females are bisexual. So you must be bisexual.

Woman: I don't care about your study. GTFO, and leave me alone.

 ;D

about half of females i've asked say they could be persuaded to at least kiss other girls and a lot will do stuff with each other just for fun or being dared because it comes naturally to them, most men on the other hand are sickened by the thought of intimacy with other men

I am not so sure about all, but most women (90%++) are definitively not just bisexual, but lesbian leaning bisexual.
70% - bisexual with a heterosexual preference
25% - bisexual
5% - lesbians

They are also known quite well to fib..

Not in the current age of pussification of men....

What about cyborg women?

Would they be retard cyborg women?

i dont think all the women are bisexual. however, 80% of women have the hots of other women. they like their skin , hair, parfumes etc. even so this doesnt mean they are lesbians , dykes or bisexual. they just name other women beautiful not sexually attractive.

But if My Study purports that All Women Are Bisexual, it will get lots of clicks and views.

And that's all it's really about.

"biological women"... At times I feel like Rip Van Winkle and I've awoken in some bizarro world with all of this ridiculous b.s., only .2 - .3% of the US population considers themselves "transgendered" but you'd think it was much, much higher the way they're portraying and pushing this stuff.

That's true, though I say the term "biological", because transgendered women have a sexual arousal system the same as males(Category based), instead of bioloical women being sexually aroused by basically anything according to the studies.

All girls do not have such sexual attraction to their own sex. Some just pretend to like men or show that they are not like everyone else. For example, a kiss of two girls - this basically means a greeting, they just tend to love tenderness.

I've heard that before. Not sure if you can generalize that much.

I know many girls who get sick when they think about having sex with oter women.

Just another propaganda overload from the liberal leftists. The percentage of homosexuals among the females is around the same as that among the males (i.e around 1%). I am not even going to read the research by lunatics such as Meredith Chivers. That lady is a perfect example of a biased liberal nutcase, and her research is full of lies and misrepresentations.

I know right? It's crazy how people take generalizations about a few people in a group, despite the fact that everyone is different, and apply it to everyone in the group.

I heard this one about radical Is... oops. Never mind.

But seriously, nah. I've seen a straight female and a homosexual female come to blows behind this. Definitely not true.


LOL, nah, this is just some silly shit. Liberals don't buy this shit either, or moderates. This is pseudoscience clickbait bullshit. Oh, and liberals are homophobic as fuck, don't get that gay agenda thing mixed up.

Scientists recently begin to cross borders and give out for their research quite delusional ideas. Even if there are cases confirming their opinion, then this is an exception to the general rule and not otherwise.

Yes. All the studies are not suitable for women from our country. I do not understand how it is possible to conduct research, this is complete nonsense.

Scientists such as Chivers are famous for rigging their research, by giving chemicals to the test subjects in order to alter the sexual orientation. She induces gay behavior in her test subjects and then claim that all the animals in the world are gay.

Homosexuality is a deviation from one's nature, a person is mistaken. But this fact is fixed in history and then people read the story and think that this is normal. So they suggest that scientists conduct research that distorts reality.

Not disagreeing with the sentiment or the conclusion, but a couple factual corrections. I seem to recall that the percentages admitting to one or several same sexual experiences was 5-10%, and those MIGHT be labeled "bisexual." Not homosexual.

I couldn't agree with such labeling though, because if after a same sex experience one returned to opposite sex, that would mean an affirmation of attraction to the opposite sex.

The category being alluded to here, BISEXUAL, would be a group that was attracted or capable of sexual relations with both sexes over a long enough term for that to be considered a personality trait. That would be a quite small percentage. Not really even worthy of discussion or debate.

The twisting of the logic here is apparent. It's as if the claim was that women loved to be raped because they had orgasms while being raped. Orgasms are enjoyable, hence they enjoyed being raped.

That's repulsive and ridiculous.

Couldn't put it any better. Ultra-leftist researchers (in most of the cases funded by the gullible tax payers) are well renowned for cherry-picking the findings which they like the most, and hiding the rest.

Just because women are more beautifully "made up" I think this makes us appreciate one another, in terms of beauty.  I do not think it equates to sexual attraction. I wouldn't go quoting any of those sources on a first date if I were you. :)