Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Service Discussion => Topic started by: loanloanloan on January 13, 2016, 09:20:44 AM



Title: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: loanloanloan on January 13, 2016, 09:20:44 AM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: unholycactus on January 13, 2016, 01:06:56 PM
Some people do click but it's more about visibility anyways.
As long as people are willing to pay to have a spot in others signature, it isn't really your problem.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: teddy5145 on January 13, 2016, 02:34:37 PM
Actually it kinda works ::)
FastDice claimed they had a hundreds of an new account registered during their sig campaigns ;)
And as long as people wanted to pay us to put their links on our signature it means sig. campaigns is not fucked up yet :)


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: bitbaby on January 13, 2016, 02:47:52 PM
It takes time, if you see an advertisement over and over, ultimately you'll get curious to find out what it is. You can't expect to get instant results with advertisements whether they be signature campaigns or any other media. This is why the campaigns who run longer get more results than the ones who only run for a short period of time.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: Laosai on January 13, 2016, 02:58:53 PM
Dude believe it or not, it works. Take the campaign I work with now as an example, do you think they will run for over a year and up to now if the campaign isn't effective?


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: martinacar on January 13, 2016, 03:22:09 PM
Dude believe it or not, it works. Take the campaign I work with now as an example, do you think they will run for over a year and up to now if the campaign isn't effective?

Yeah sure it is about visibility, but some campaigns pay over 4 BTC (secondstrade for example) for their sig. campaigns.
They would not do that just for visibility.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: teddy5145 on January 13, 2016, 03:26:25 PM
Dude believe it or not, it works. Take the campaign I work with now as an example, do you think they will run for over a year and up to now if the campaign isn't effective?

Yeah sure it is about visibility, but some campaigns pay over 4 BTC (secondstrade for example) for their sig. campaigns.
They would not do that just for visibility.
Well running a sig. campaign is not cheap, even Yobit with their low pay rates have to throw in a couple Bitcoins because they have many users
But as long as they're profitable they can and will continue the campaign
It proves that somehow Sig campaign are effective ;)


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: enhu on January 13, 2016, 03:34:06 PM
where else can they advertise than to where the targeted individuals who might be interested to their services. They can go with adnetworks but i doubt any users will be interested to click upon seeing what they wrote on their banners. targeted people are in bitcointalk.org so this is where we are. this is where things happen.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: pinoycash on January 13, 2016, 04:31:51 PM
Signature campaign has a good recall value, plus the advertisers/sites, get unlimited impression for their advertising. its already a win win situation for both users(us) and advertisers.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: Lutzow on January 13, 2016, 04:32:57 PM
I myself clic on signatures and I saw interesting services on it. Maybe i depends on the person looking but for me signature campaig is an effective form of advertising.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: seedtrue on January 13, 2016, 04:34:00 PM
When I used links to my own sites in my sig, I always got a lot of traffic from it. But, I can say that I have never personally clicked on someones sig link.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: robelneo on January 13, 2016, 05:52:53 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
I don't know where you get that idea this is one of the best way to advertise any program or service,it's very noticeable much more noticeable than the post itself ..

Based on my study got a lot of clicks coming from my signature campaign not just from my co -members but also coming from the search engine ..


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: BTCBinary on January 13, 2016, 06:07:56 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money

No, you're wrong. I think it actualy makes sense. Sig campaigns certainly generate the aimed income or else companies wouldn't be wasting their money on them.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on January 13, 2016, 06:11:40 PM
Loanloanloan, LOL.  It's always great when you start topics that are negative and you also get bright red negative trust within your first 5 posts.

I always wonder how Yobit has the dough to keep paying out all the users it does.  It can't be a small amount they spend for their sig campaign, and they are kind of a small exchange.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: erikalui on January 13, 2016, 06:18:09 PM
If nobody would click on these signatures, I don't think these campaigns would be paying users to advertise them. Many people do click on these ads and it's more about the exposure and users who wear these ads in their signatures. Hence many campaigns analyse and then monitor their users from time to time to ensure that they are worthy or not to be a member of the campaign. I'm sure they do earn from this as well (especially dice sites).

It just seems that since you have a negative trust, you are upset about the same.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: crazyivan on January 13, 2016, 06:45:23 PM
I d also like to see some verifiable results from marketeers who set up these campaigns. I think they do work but I d still like to see some confirmation.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: foxkyu on January 13, 2016, 07:27:30 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
That's not true. If it was no one click the signature then why would they keep running the signature campaign?

With signature service in here they can get a lot off traffic to their website.




Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: Amph on January 13, 2016, 07:50:45 PM
I d also like to see some verifiable results from marketeers who set up these campaigns. I think they do work but I d still like to see some confirmation.

i think their profit is very marginal, otherwise it would not explain why they are lowering their rate, since all their earning is in bitcoin, from their cloud/exchange and not in fiat

it mean that there is no excuse about bitcoin being higher in value...


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: ThunderThomas on January 13, 2016, 11:01:51 PM
I d also like to see some verifiable results from marketeers who set up these campaigns. I think they do work but I d still like to see some confirmation.

i think their profit is very marginal, otherwise it would not explain why they are lowering their rate, since all their earning is in bitcoin, from their cloud/exchange and not in fiat

it mean that there is no excuse about bitcoin being higher in value...

Yes most campaigns got a limit of users. I am not sure of the manager requests it or it is due budget limitations.
If they would make a fortune i am sure they would raise the amount of participants.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: oblivi on January 13, 2016, 11:21:59 PM
I guarantee you that advertisement in sig campaign form works and works very well, a lot of the guys that have run successful campaings get a lot of traffic on their website. Bitmixer has been running this campaign for years now, so ask yourself, why do they keep doing it unless it was profitable? get a clue.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: botany on January 14, 2016, 01:35:48 AM
Campaigns sometimes do have a separate referral link, through which they track clicks on the signature.
If they think it is worth the money, they continue. Otherwise, they wind up.  :)


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: jayce on January 14, 2016, 05:53:06 AM
. Bitmixer has been running this campaign for years now, so ask yourself, why do they keep doing it unless it was profitable? get a clue.

Alot of sig campaign has been stopped due to low traffic gained from the sig campaign. Just because bitmixer is succesfull with its campaign doesnt mean any other signatue campaing success as well since it depends on some factor, bitmixer is qjite popular when you are thinking of mixing your coins anyway


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: crazyivan on January 14, 2016, 07:40:27 AM
I d also like to see some verifiable results from marketeers who set up these campaigns. I think they do work but I d still like to see some confirmation.

i think their profit is very marginal, otherwise it would not explain why they are lowering their rate, since all their earning is in bitcoin, from their cloud/exchange and not in fiat

it mean that there is no excuse about bitcoin being higher in value...

Lowering of their rate s gotta nothing to do with their profit. They have a fixed fiat fee they are ready to pay for one post and I see no reason why would they pay more. The only thing which can increase these rates is competition.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: btvGainer on January 14, 2016, 07:53:31 AM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
It makes people aware of existing product or service and whenever they need it,they can visit the site.Last month there was a campaign "Black Friday" although the campaign didn't pay the participants but they must have made good business with their signature campaign


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: steveds on January 14, 2016, 08:07:32 AM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
This has become like a culture and a ritual in it are these sig' campaign's.They do this just to remain in the market and spending some coins a month might not be lot for them.However,running a casino is a lot different from a blog.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: amacar2 on January 14, 2016, 10:19:04 AM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
I think it will be only boring for you as you have already got red mark on your trust and you will not get approved by any signature campaign. If it was not worth than you would have not seen this massive amount of campaign opening regurarly and some campaign running for more than 6 months here.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: WENGER on January 14, 2016, 10:30:47 AM
I don't agree with the OP completely , since when new signature campaigns emerge in the forum, they get  lot of visitors  but not all of them click the link in the signature but rather they type the name of the site in their browsers instead so if someone evaluates signature click for the sole purpose of tracking visitors brought by advertising campaigns here, its wrong and should re-think their advertising strategy as nothing brings better traffic than these signature ads.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: enhu on January 14, 2016, 10:49:17 AM

According to the webmasters and search engine specialist (SEO) , websites must at least stay on the related niche to target users and they recommend to simply insert links to related sites which means these advertisers are doing it right. They are of course concern about search engine visibility and ranking because it adds density to the indexing of the search engines.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: panjul07 on January 14, 2016, 11:31:09 AM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money

How did you know that there is no one click on signature?
I have a referral link on my signature, and I have some referrals atm. It means that there were some people click on it.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: avatar_kiyoshi on January 14, 2016, 12:14:52 PM
Not really I think. Because this forum is the biggest bitcoin community, so I think not waste to advertising on this forum, especially sig campaign. Look bitmixer or bit-x if they waste their money, they will close the campaign.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: nickaizoku on January 14, 2016, 12:21:32 PM
im using signature campaign too, but when i saw interesting signature on people. i would click that signature.. its mean signature are important too.
so its not like you think that bad.. well without signature campaign i think wont anymore people have interest to posting


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: adicted on January 14, 2016, 04:49:11 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money

Are you really sure no one gives a damn on someone's signature? IMO signature ads were more appealing than those forum banner ads. I also knew some sites not because I googled it but because I saw it on someone's signature. And if its a big waste of money, then why does it still exist?


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: yoona on January 14, 2016, 06:01:25 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
i dont think so,signature campaign is still effective,yes if you said that no one click that advertise,but so many people interest with that,and many people sign up on some advertise,esspesially signature campaign effective on gambling site.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: lolxxxx on January 14, 2016, 06:04:48 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money

The signature advertisements are not for the person like you. These for the peoples who are interested in something else . It's still an good way to get attention of user here.Last time i betted on PD now i have seen a signature of betcoin i thought why don't i try this site i went there and betted some coins. So it's still effective to the users and it's nit a waste of money . Peoples like different things .


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: hasiramasenju on January 14, 2016, 06:23:49 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
fortunately not all company have same mind just like you and considering also signature campaign as one of good way to promote their service or website and i don't know what happen with OP but looks like he does have bad experience with signature campaign


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: btvGainer on January 14, 2016, 10:11:17 PM
I assume most of members who oppose signature campaigns are early adopters and have good amount of bitcoins.They dont want others to earn it and are jealous.That is the only reason I can think of them opposing sig campaigns


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: teddy5145 on January 14, 2016, 10:34:16 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
fortunately not all company have same mind just like you and considering also signature campaign as one of good way to promote their service or website and i don't know what happen with OP but looks like he does have bad experience with signature campaign
Maybe no one clicks on his signature thus he think that sig campaign are just a waste of time :P
But yeah, i don't signature either but i saw a huge traffic increase from a few gambling website after they put a campaign ::)


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: venan on January 14, 2016, 10:34:37 PM
Some people do click but it's more about visibility anyways.
As long as people are willing to pay to have a spot in others signature, it isn't really your problem.


aga, people are paying money to you almost for nothing and i cannot understand what you problem


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: MaritiJames3 on January 15, 2016, 09:45:00 AM
It shouldn't really matter to you anyway. Most people are doing it because it's a nice way to earn some btc.

Nobody needs to click on it, I believe the signatures are more for advertisement to get it more known not really needed for people to click on it.

If you see an advertisement on tv, doesn't mean that you have to buy something. It's just to make people aware that it's available.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: Bitcoinbro on January 15, 2016, 10:01:58 AM
Signature campaign is not just waste of time in my opinion is the same for those advertisement boards in freeway.
With this is with bitcoin and with bitcointalk there is no problem with it and you can earn money with it and is always a good idea for us and for them. Not all people can earn bitcoin that is easy and with signature campaign is a great think to have.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: fortunecrypto on January 15, 2016, 01:45:07 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money
You're a newbie how can you tell,is this to discourage advertisers to launch this kind of campaign ? In my opinion this is one of the right way to advertiser this forum is well indexed so all th epost will show up on the search engine and readers and visitors will be exposed on all those signature campaign this thread could give you a negative trust


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: iv4n on January 15, 2016, 02:10:53 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money

I do! And about "big waste of money" I will advise u to go and check how much money coca cola, nike, adidas...and many many other spend on advertising.
I get what u wish to say, it would be much better to use all that money in something better. Marketing industry is bigger and bigger each year, so instead of fighting against it maybe its better to join in one.


Title: Re: Sig campaigns are fucked up
Post by: praprata on January 15, 2016, 03:07:32 PM
No one click on signature advertising.
it became boring idea to advertise . is sig advertisers fucked up ? big waste of money

I do! And about "big waste of money" I will advise u to go and check how much money coca cola, nike, adidas...and many many other spend on advertising.
I get what u wish to say, it would be much better to use all that money in something better. Marketing industry is bigger and bigger each year, so instead of fighting against it maybe its better to join in one.

Yup I think he is jealous that he doesn't have a signature campaign. Having some wonderful community here and with signature campaign at least you can ear something with posting and that is great so your time have been always useful.