Bitcoin Forum

All.


Maybe e-mail is not the best place to do this, but there aren’t many better choices that come to mind right now. Please feel free to quote me and forward this to anyone you see fit. You may even Post it on Reddit or other forums or simply ignore it.

To anyone reading this who was not on the original To: list. It simply means that you were not at the top of my inbox and nothing else. no one has been excluded on purpose at all.


We are clearly facing a crises like we have never faced before in the bitcoin echo-system. It appears to be completely caused by humans this time. It should be seen as a success issue, even if it’s not a nice problem to have.

Bitcoin is, as I hope you all agree, still very very small on the size of global acceptance. We have a long way to go before it actually realizes its true potential. I personally believe that bitcoin can become a great system for many things in the future. We may all have different ideas on where Bitcoin is going but I don’t believe for one second that anyone here will want it to stop and stay exactly where it is.

The issue is by doing nothing we are actually forcing it to stop growing and stay where it is.

We have on-boarded about as many users as we can. There simply is no space left to expand bitcoin. There are many competing ideas there are many smart people and possibly to many ideas. The fact remains the same:
Most of the latest development ideas coming out are not addressing our issues this time. So it will fall back on us to protect what we have built and let it expand into what we think it can become.

So I propose that we jump to 2mb in the Bitcoin classic idea. Not only will this allow us to expand bitcoin and on board more users, it will also show that:

· We will protect our investments and businesses.
· Sound economic rules govern bitcoin businesses and not just ideological ideas.
· Under pressure we can make tough decisions that are for the best of bitcoin and not for any one individual company.
· The ideas and fixes the development team produce need to be more influenced by the economic requirements we have, not just the technical ones.

Now for the other maybe good maybe bad things

· It will cause more rifts in the development teams.
· It will cause us all to go through the pain of a hard fork.

The lists above are not meant to be extensive or exhaustive and there are many that can be added to either side, but the main point is this: It’s no longer really a choice to simply stand still and wait for others to fix this problem.

I propose that we all simply stand up and stand behind bitcoin. Allow it to grow more in the simplest way possible, and I can’t emphasize enough how important simple is to this process. Humans are making this complex we don’t need technology to make it more complex.

So with the above said: We will be changing our code to run 2mb bitcoin classic ASAP, please join me in changing your code to run the same or public show your support.


Thanks,
Sam

Med vänlig hälsning | Best regards
Sam Cole

echo-system

Illuminati confirmed. The most scary thing here is that I've thought it was a ecosystem this whole time!

---

---

Where did you acquire this email from? I want to see the original as evidence not a quote.

1mb, 2mb, 4mb blocks? It's all a laugh!

The capacity of a floppy in one Block, well bright boys that's the future ;)

Maybe raising it slowly is easier to implement and causes less disturbances instead of raising it all at once....

1mb, 2mb, 4mb blocks? It's all a laugh!
The capacity of a floppy in one Block, well bright boys that's the future ;)

It's rather odd that this isn't posted on KNCs website.  If Sam Cole were serious about it, why would he not advertise this on his mining website?  My bet is on hoax.

Bitcoin core = altcoin. Soon.

Can we talk about bitcoin classic here or will we get banned?

Bitcoin core = altcoin. Soon.

It is quite urgent to expand the block size now. Without it, there is not much use of bitcoin. Blockstream will not come online next month.

if the Core devs would just make a compromise to 2 MB they would kill all discussions at once.... ::)

Very soon:

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4147zs/bitfurygroup_is_ready_to_move_forward_and_support/
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/413w2s/check_out_bitcoinclassics_miners_support_list_now/

increasing the limit of core to 2mb, is making bitcoin an altcoin? since when? this change is needed, even satoshi said so

the limit was there because of past reason, there is no need to maintain it anymore

what xt was proposing was worse, because they were adding other random crap like ip checking and the increae was too high(8mb)

So what is actually stopping this from happening? What are the possible downsides of increasing the block size to 2mb?

Bitcoin Classic is using concerning tactics to overtake Core. jtoomim is willing to have consensus threshold be as low as 60% for hard fork. This could lead to dangerous forking situations.

increasing the limit of core to 2mb, is making bitcoin an altcoin? since when? this change is needed, even satoshi said so

the limit was there because of past reason, there is no need to maintain it anymore

what xt was proposing was worse, because they were adding other random crap like ip checking and the increae was too high(8mb)

If the BitcoinClassic increase the block size to 2MB and supported by most miners, bitcoin Core does not increase the block size. There will two groups of miners, most will support Classic so Core will be altcoin.

from where you've gathered the info that core is not going to increase the block at leats indirectly to 2mb?, they are doing it in different way with segwit

i still want them to increase it directly though, but whatever, they need to hurry at this point