|
Title: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: lottery248 on January 17, 2016, 08:53:51 AM reminder: i added up those quotation for reference/real examples only.
first of all, a random account is opened today, then opened a scam accusation thread against me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330754.0 second, it talks about the rep loan, matter. it is valid but did not state any reason and the point that figures out if i am a scammer. third, after a few hours he opened a thread, he started to post the stuff below to threaten me. Lick my big cock you pathetic Hong kock 13 year old bitch wtf are you doing? you open a thread just for kicks? you are more likely a gay, and yet you are attempting to violate the bitcoin forum rule, and probably use them to evade the ban in case. if you accuse me like this, you are not seriously accusing against me, no matter your evidence is valid or not. you are trolling against me. :( i have reported that post once for harassing, and jokingly opening a scam accusation to troll against me, and completely zero value (only on the quote above). second, although this comes to a hero member, i doubt that he is threaten me, starting from this quote: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1323765.msg13580613#msg13580613 i accused that guy to be scamming, however he was still aggressively stating that his "scam" is his business, before that matter, he replied "I didn't scam anyone you piece of shit." while "didn't scam anyone" is confirmed false, and then threatened me that someone would accuse against me of being alt of him - explicitly trolling. main point is, what happened to the people? are those cases legitimately tolerated? for the first one, i even suspect that if someone created an alt to evade the ban in case. in general, they did the similar this which is baseless threatening. any point that they are not breaking the rule? Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: --Encrypted-- on January 17, 2016, 08:57:31 AM it looks like the thread got deleted. so I think that means it's against the rules, and is not tolerated.
edit: that user got nuked. Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: lottery248 on January 17, 2016, 08:59:29 AM it looks like the thread got deleted. so I think that means it's against the rules, and is not tolerated. although the thread is deleted, this kind of "trolling" is still on. beware. Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: --Encrypted-- on January 17, 2016, 09:04:27 AM as for the second one. (didn't notice that before)
for me it looks like a normal heated argument that happens all the time when someone accuses another. you might be a little mad because you're in it but I don't think it's wrong. well, maybe except the "piece of shit" parts. Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: lottery248 on January 17, 2016, 09:09:35 AM as for the second one. (didn't notice that before) for me it looks like a normal heated argument that happens all the time when someone accuses another. you might be a little mad because you're in it but I don't think it's wrong. well, maybe except the "piece of shit" parts. he calls me a "piece of shit" for baseless reason. btw how can you know he is already nuked (banned)? ??? Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: mexxer-2 on January 17, 2016, 09:13:20 AM he calls me a "piece of shit" for baseless reason. https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.phpbtw how can you know he is already nuked (banned)? ??? Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: --Encrypted-- on January 17, 2016, 09:14:34 AM as for the second one. (didn't notice that before) for me it looks like a normal heated argument that happens all the time when someone accuses another. you might be a little mad because you're in it but I don't think it's wrong. well, maybe except the "piece of shit" parts. he calls me a "piece of shit" for baseless reason. btw how can you know he is already nuked (banned)? ??? it's just an insult. some users like QS and Vod or even theymos get a ton of those but they mostly don't care. you can report them if you feel that they're too much but I'm not sure if the mods are going to deleted them. https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #729761 Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: lottery248 on January 17, 2016, 09:15:58 AM he calls me a "piece of shit" for baseless reason. https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.phpbtw how can you know he is already nuked (banned)? ??? thanks :) as for the second one. (didn't notice that before) for me it looks like a normal heated argument that happens all the time when someone accuses another. you might be a little mad because you're in it but I don't think it's wrong. well, maybe except the "piece of shit" parts. he calls me a "piece of shit" for baseless reason. btw how can you know he is already nuked (banned)? ??? it's just an insult. some users like QS and Vod or even theymos get a ton of those but they mostly don't care. you can report them if you feel that they're too much but I'm not sure if the mods are going to deleted them. https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #729761 Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: lottery248 on January 17, 2016, 09:22:54 AM i think this kind of act is to attract us to abuse the report IIRC, in that case mod would probably need to change the rule.
Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: MyBTT on January 17, 2016, 10:17:21 AM reminder: i added up those quotation for reference/real examples only. first of all, a random account is opened today, then opened a scam accusation thread against me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330754.0 second, it talks about the rep loan, matter. it is valid but did not state any reason and the point that figures out if i am a scammer. third, after a few hours he opened a thread, he started to post the stuff below to threaten me. Lick my big cock you pathetic Hong kock 13 year old bitch wtf are you doing? you open a thread just for kicks? you are more likely a gay, and yet you are attempting to violate the bitcoin forum rule, and probably use them to evade the ban in case. if you accuse me like this, you are not seriously accusing against me, no matter your evidence is valid or not. you are trolling against me. :( i have reported that post once for harassing, and jokingly opening a scam accusation to troll against me, and completely zero value (only on the quote above). second, although this comes to a hero member, i doubt that he is threaten me, starting from this quote: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1323765.msg13580613#msg13580613 i accused that guy to be scamming, however he was still aggressively stating that his "scam" is his business, before that matter, he replied "I didn't scam anyone you piece of shit." while "didn't scam anyone" is confirmed false, and then threatened me that someone would accuse against me of being alt of him - explicitly trolling. main point is, what happened to the people? are those cases legitimately tolerated? for the first one, i even suspect that if someone created an alt to evade the ban in case. in general, they did the similar this which is baseless threatening. any point that they are not breaking the rule? You have nothing to worry about now. The thread has already been deleted or the account was deleted. Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: lottery248 on January 17, 2016, 10:19:45 AM reminder: i added up those quotation for reference/real examples only. first of all, a random account is opened today, then opened a scam accusation thread against me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330754.0 second, it talks about the rep loan, matter. it is valid but did not state any reason and the point that figures out if i am a scammer. third, after a few hours he opened a thread, he started to post the stuff below to threaten me. Lick my big cock you pathetic Hong kock 13 year old bitch wtf are you doing? you open a thread just for kicks? you are more likely a gay, and yet you are attempting to violate the bitcoin forum rule, and probably use them to evade the ban in case. if you accuse me like this, you are not seriously accusing against me, no matter your evidence is valid or not. you are trolling against me. :( i have reported that post once for harassing, and jokingly opening a scam accusation to troll against me, and completely zero value (only on the quote above). second, although this comes to a hero member, i doubt that he is threaten me, starting from this quote: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1323765.msg13580613#msg13580613 i accused that guy to be scamming, however he was still aggressively stating that his "scam" is his business, before that matter, he replied "I didn't scam anyone you piece of shit." while "didn't scam anyone" is confirmed false, and then threatened me that someone would accuse against me of being alt of him - explicitly trolling. main point is, what happened to the people? are those cases legitimately tolerated? for the first one, i even suspect that if someone created an alt to evade the ban in case. in general, they did the similar this which is baseless threatening. any point that they are not breaking the rule? You have nothing to worry about now. The thread has already been deleted or the account was deleted. knew it, buddy. but i am not sure if the same thing is gonna happen against me or others. Title: Re: i don't think that this kind of act could be tolerated. Post by: Astargath on January 17, 2016, 02:20:48 PM reminder: i added up those quotation for reference/real examples only. first of all, a random account is opened today, then opened a scam accusation thread against me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330754.0 second, it talks about the rep loan, matter. it is valid but did not state any reason and the point that figures out if i am a scammer. third, after a few hours he opened a thread, he started to post the stuff below to threaten me. Lick my big cock you pathetic Hong kock 13 year old bitch wtf are you doing? you open a thread just for kicks? you are more likely a gay, and yet you are attempting to violate the bitcoin forum rule, and probably use them to evade the ban in case. if you accuse me like this, you are not seriously accusing against me, no matter your evidence is valid or not. you are trolling against me. :( i have reported that post once for harassing, and jokingly opening a scam accusation to troll against me, and completely zero value (only on the quote above). second, although this comes to a hero member, i doubt that he is threaten me, starting from this quote: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1323765.msg13580613#msg13580613 i accused that guy to be scamming, however he was still aggressively stating that his "scam" is his business, before that matter, he replied "I didn't scam anyone you piece of shit." while "didn't scam anyone" is confirmed false, and then threatened me that someone would accuse against me of being alt of him - explicitly trolling. main point is, what happened to the people? are those cases legitimately tolerated? for the first one, i even suspect that if someone created an alt to evade the ban in case. in general, they did the similar this which is baseless threatening. any point that they are not breaking the rule? You have nothing to worry about now. The thread has already been deleted or the account was deleted. knew it, buddy. but i am not sure if the same thing is gonna happen against me or others. But who cares anyways about a newbie with 0 posts talking shit? Is it going to affect you in any way? Of course not, why don't you just ignore it and focus on the negative trust you already have. |