|
Title: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: sgbett on February 12, 2016, 12:20:49 AM Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329 For the longest time now you have argued black and blue that that XT is rekt. Now we finally have the evidence that you need. It's been a long wait and we need to thank everyone that has been so patient. Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase. As the Wu Tang Clan might put it "The Chinese miner ultimatum ain't nothin' ta fuck wit' " Tick tock Title: Re: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: chek2fire on February 12, 2016, 11:50:43 PM i am waiting a new ragequit. I hope that the next ex-developer use in his ragequit photo another carpet that Hearn's safari carpet.
http://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/17/business/17bitcoin-web1/17bitcoin-web1-blog427.jpg Title: Re: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: exstasie on February 13, 2016, 12:26:00 AM Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase. Is XT even maintained anymore? Didn't Gavin and Hearn abandon it? Who is left, toomim? Even he moved onto Classic. Bitnodes doesn't even track XT nodes anymore (either that or no one is running them). Seems rekt to me. Title: Re: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: brg444 on February 13, 2016, 12:37:20 AM Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329 For the longest time now you have argued black and blue that that XT is rekt. Now we finally have the evidence that you need. It's been a long wait and we need to thank everyone that has been so patient. Finally we can put to bed the idea that XT=bip101 and focus on the fact that XT is just one of several clients that supports the block size increase. As the Wu Tang Clan might put it "The Chinese miner ultimatum ain't nothin' ta fuck wit' " Tick tock You spend too much time over at the mental ward. It is pretty sad to see you go down that road. You still think this is about the blocksize? Heh, cute. https://i.imgur.com/mZXXbeX.png https://medium.com/@bramcohen/double-billing-is-not-healthy-competition-b698c345b11e#.88slddy5l Now f0rk off back to your lair will ya? Title: Re: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: iCEBREAKER on February 13, 2016, 01:07:43 AM Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329 There is no mention on the Bitco.in forum of BIP101 being withdrawn. Why is that? Are they so poorly informed, or is the cognitive dissonance too great to confront until later in the grieving process? I demand a Frap.doc greatly saddened reaction shot! OK, found one! Title: Re: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: sgbett on February 15, 2016, 03:51:57 PM Could you please finally once and for all admit that bip101 is off the table https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/329 There is no mention on the Bitco.in forum of BIP101 being withdrawn. Why is that? Are they so poorly informed, or is the cognitive dissonance too great to confront until later in the grieving process? I demand a Frap.doc greatly saddened reaction shot! OK, found one! Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Title: Re: paging icebreaker re bip101 Post by: Jet Cash on February 15, 2016, 04:00:37 PM I've got an XT node in my peer list - Bitcoin XT: 0.11 ip is 50.35.76.117
|
