Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Scam Accusations => Topic started by: Robertt on February 24, 2016, 11:55:21 AM



Title: Time to be honest
Post by: Robertt on February 24, 2016, 11:55:21 AM
Ponzi schemes owners are supposed to be smart, and yet I ended up getting one to send me 2 bitcoins for basically 5 minutes work. Thanks bitcoins.work.

Dear Joel, I wish you the best of luck in finding 'my alts'. You'll be looking forever because I have none.
Anyway, just some statistics.

Amount I could have scammed at one time: 4.3BTC
Amount I scammed 0 BTC

Sardasa @ BliiNk )I think( I'm working on getting your PayPal funds back.

That's all from me. Bye and have a nice life


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: Lutpin on February 24, 2016, 12:01:33 PM
Amount I could have scammed at one time: 4.3BTC
Amount I scammed 0 BTC
Amount you currently owe: 0.383BTC
First you repay your debts, then you get the chance to be cheeky.


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: wHAFF on February 24, 2016, 03:40:19 PM
Ponzi schemes owners are supposed to be smart, and yet I ended up getting one to send me 2 bitcoins for basically 5 minutes work. Thanks bitcoins.work.


That's all from me. Bye and have a nice life

Can you explain us how you managed to get 2 btc from ponzi owner?


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: teddy5145 on February 24, 2016, 03:43:59 PM
Ponzi schemes owners are supposed to be smart, and yet I ended up getting one to send me 2 bitcoins for basically 5 minutes work.
And i don't think it would be a problem if you spend few minutes of your time repaying those poor people you've been scammed  ::)
You want people to dig your privacy and put it here on the forum ?
Better give their money back, kid :P



Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: Joel_Jantsen on February 24, 2016, 03:44:51 PM
You did scam my dear.Could you tell me where did you get those 3.5 btc's from ? You wanted to buy an Iphone.You hosted a free giveaway of 0.10.Now,you were the type of person who would ask loans of $5 and if you really respected hard earned money,you would not go around distributing free bitcoins to random people unless you've gotten it for free (scam).I can show you your series of posts after you suddenly got that 3.5 btc's where you wanted to in cash them or spend them by buying Iphone and stuff.Come off clean and I will believe you.

Also about the Alt's,didn't you bought a few accounts and resold them ? Specifically a hero account ? If this is true then what makes you think I would not assume you could have bought more accounts.


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: BlInK311 on February 24, 2016, 04:07:45 PM

Sardasa @ BliiNk )I think( I'm working on getting your PayPal funds back.

I sure hope your working on it.  Not holding my breath.  Id rather have my BTC back than my paypal(you might just reverse that again).


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: sardasa on February 24, 2016, 07:42:12 PM

Sardasa @ BliiNk )I think( I'm working on getting your PayPal funds back.

I sure hope your working on it.  Not holding my breath.  Id rather have my BTC back than my paypal(you might just reverse that again).
If the same payment is released by PayPal then it can't be reversed again. (at least that's what I have heard)


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on February 25, 2016, 04:14:03 AM
Ponzi schemes owners are supposed to be smart, and yet I ended up getting one to send me 2 bitcoins for basically 5 minutes work. Thanks bitcoins.work.


That's all from me. Bye and have a nice life

Can you explain us how you managed to get 2 btc from ponzi owner?

I'm more blown away that he has an activity of 70 and a post count of over 1000.  And you see the quality of his posts--that's like a fucking diarrhea shitstorm!

OP, you're full of the aforementioned diarrhea and hopefully you'll find your way out of this forum where you are definitely not wanted. 


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: suchmoon on February 26, 2016, 03:07:30 PM

Sardasa @ BliiNk )I think( I'm working on getting your PayPal funds back.

I sure hope your working on it.  Not holding my breath.  Id rather have my BTC back than my paypal(you might just reverse that again).
If the same payment is released by PayPal then it can't be reversed again. (at least that's what I have heard)

It can still be charged back via credit card.


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: sardasa on February 26, 2016, 04:28:07 PM

Sardasa @ BliiNk )I think( I'm working on getting your PayPal funds back.

I sure hope your working on it.  Not holding my breath.  Id rather have my BTC back than my paypal(you might just reverse that again).
If the same payment is released by PayPal then it can't be reversed again. (at least that's what I have heard)

It can still be charged back via credit card.
On what basis?
If that transaction was investigated by PayPal & released because it was authorised by the sender then how can they allow credit card company to reverse this transaction?
Would not they pay the seller from their own pocket if the seller is protected under their seller's protection program?


Title: Re: Time to be honest
Post by: suchmoon on February 26, 2016, 05:34:21 PM

Sardasa @ BliiNk )I think( I'm working on getting your PayPal funds back.

I sure hope your working on it.  Not holding my breath.  Id rather have my BTC back than my paypal(you might just reverse that again).
If the same payment is released by PayPal then it can't be reversed again. (at least that's what I have heard)

It can still be charged back via credit card.
On what basis?
If that transaction was investigated by PayPal & released because it was authorised by the sender then how can they allow credit card company to reverse this transaction?
Would not they pay the seller from their own pocket if the seller is protected under their seller's protection program?

Banks generally don't care much about PayPal's investigations. As long as the dispute meets the CC issuer's requirements (very liberal for the most part) the payment will be reversed.

PayPal may cover it out of their pocket in some cases but I'm fairly certain this one wouldn't meet seller protection requirements. Seller protection requires a tracked shipment to a verified address.