Bitcoin Forum

Where is the list of US supported "Good Terrorists" In Syria?
Mr. Lavrov sait, that the question is still OPEN, who is a "bad terrorist" there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhH8EWCjNc

Its a mess now, Syria has at least 50 groups active.
Did not realize so many active groups pulling for power. To answer the question it all depends on the dog you want to back.

Isn't all terrorism bad by definition?

What makes a terrorist good? When America pays their salary instead of Syria?

Try to find ISIS in a ufficial "USA terrorist groups" listed.

I suppose it's likely complicated... Obama calls them ISIL

It could also be about the money... I heard something about $billions being seized... I suppose if you take their money, then kill them, they can't complain?

Find any type of ISIS, Daish or something in USA ufficial recognised terrorists organisations.

Terrorists are in it for themselves and take no hostages so to speak, When they can kill their own kind then you know they have no pity.

Not 50. The number is in the hundreds. Check this:

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/nearly-100-opposition-groups-agree-to-two-week-long-ceasefire/

Almost 100 rebel groups are taking part in the recently declared ceasefire agreement between the regime and the opposition. However, the ceasefire is not applicable to the Islamist groups such as the Jaysh al Islam, Ahrar ash Sham and the Al Nusra. These groups constitute more than 80% of all the rebel groups in Syria.

good terrorists are who works for western blood suckers.. on the otherhand, bad terrorists are working by islamic histeria.. these are the true definition..

Wrong.
The rebelling on injust head ot the State is against Quran.
So, salafits are not muslims, but a totalitarian sect.
The same are "armed opposition in Syria", they are not fitting in Quran rules.

i perfectly agrre with you.. good ones are the slaves of western contiries and bad ones are the slaves of islamic state..

There is not much difference in good terrorists or bad terrorists if they both take innocent lives in their causes!
But good terrorists are known for a thread to peace not for lives. I hate both of them.

Double standarts!
Usa is the biggest terrorist supporter on the world. It supports terrorist groups until it defeats them. Supports, uses and finally defeats. Nobody can say that Usa didn't support Al Qaeda!  Bin Ladeen was Bush's company's partner and he was in Usa while 9/11
Today, ISIS uses american vehicles and weapons
In other side, Pkk,  kurdish terrorist group in Southeastern Turkey is in terrorist organisations list of Usa but Pkk's Syrian branch Pyd is not in that list. Contrarily Usa supports them logisticaly. Because they are a balance instrument for Usa's benefit.

Isn't it double standard?

Sadly, you are right.
Big politics is not much diferent than runing crime organisation.
Theres just to big of a profit to loose.
And wheres politics there must be banking and others players with big bucks, seting up
a new war or conflict just to make some $$$

Bad terrorists can be summed up as heartless and un-targeted, meaning they will strive for their needs and demands even if it means taking the lives of innocent victims. Good terrorists on the other hand can be summed as those who strive for their demands but make sure no innocent lives are taken or lost, at least their strategy can be some what more accepting.

No it depends of your perspective.
Terrorism is only a matter of point of view, for some it will be "legitimate guerilla"

Exactly. Good terrorism is when you're allied with the right persons.

I hate terrorism in common either good or bad. Because terrorism is causing panic among people and societies but if the government had been more responsive and submissive to earlier issues then obviously terror wouldn't be around.

What you seem to ignore (and it's a bit strange to actually ignore such a thing, I mean come on just think for 1 min) ist that the title is a bit ironical because there is no "good" or "bad" terrorism. There is only terrorism and it is always bad, i mean how can you imagine bomb attacks as a good thing?

There's no good terrorist. Terror is dirty and treacherous.
Even today bites your enemy, tomorrow bites you. God Damn All! They are all brainwashed worms
Terror has no religion even is claimed name of a religion.

As long as we have good and bad terrorists, terrorism will grow. I bet almost every terrorist organization have at least one government supporting them with money, goods and intel.

Absolutely right!  For example Isis. That organisation appears that yhe biggest terrorist trouble on world. Usa complains, Europe complains,  Russia complains as professed but that organisation uses American and Russian made weapons and vehicles. It is claimed that Patreus has founded that organisation.

You all do realize that after the words good and bad there comes the word terrorist. One who deals terror. They just are terrorists. Not good or bad.

Stop lying!

The ISIS is not getting funded by the Americans or the Russians. Your own country (Turkey) and the GCC nations (especially Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar) are funding the ISIS and arming them. And there are no Russian weapons currently being used by the ISIS, other than the ones which they seized from the regime forces.

Yes!  If you believe Cnn, Usa innocent like a bird chick about terrorism. With American planes,  Russians drop logistic support in Iraq. Anyway ISIS uses turkiah weapons. I don't lie. Actualy you stop believing their lies

Basically all type of terrorism are the consequence of society that model a persons conception and thoughts. In the ideal world there would be harmony but in a country where the government is corrupt, fully opposed to any righteous demands or neglect of its people then they ultimately sow the seeds for terrorism.

Many geographia is under fire, blood, tear, pain and death in Middle East, Africa and Asia.
Greedy West explored America first. They exterminated Inca Civilization and Indians. In big America Continent, they needed workers and brought black slaves from Africa and while that they killed around 100 million people.
India, Australia, Middle East, Africa were under western attack for sources. People lost their land, their live. That wild capitalist monster didn't recognise them right to live.
Today those geographies in terror and chaos.
Now please think with coincience and commonsense,  who is guilty?

Terrorists cause terror and therefore are all bad in my opinion.  If a group is trying to stop terrorists, then they aren't causing terror so they shouldn't be called terrorists.  I know that sounds weird to say it that way, but I think that is the best way I can say it.

Good Terrorist means working for US corporate interest. It's not about morality.

People might probably claim they are killing people who are bad for the planet.

Terrorists never indiffenciate good people or bad. Their aim is to make chaos in target place.
No matter the terrorist is muslim or belongs any others. If one muslim really terrorist, he's not a real muslim. If he is christian, he is not a real christian. Because, those religions never call people to kill.

Good or bad they are still terrorists they only have one goal and that is to terrorize.
They kill for a living without hesitant on the live that will be lost.

I condemn all terrorists!
There's no difference between Al Queda, Isis, Pkk, or else.
I condemn bombing in Spain metro
I condemn bombing in London metro
I condemn Beslan attack
I condemn Ankara bombings
I condemn Israel's terror.
And i condemn who supports terror whatever the purpose is.

Good, now ask your mosque to organize a peaceful demonstration against Jihadists and post pictures.

You do condemn Jihadists, don't you?

 

Lol! there is NO GOOD Terrorists or BAD Terrorists - A Terrorist is a Terrorist.

You are right, no one is born to kill, everyone wants to live a peacefully life yet, corrupt governments, opposing political powers, religious leaders, they all contribute to an unstable society where the innocent turn terrorist since the beginning of time.

You stupid should know that know that islam doesn't order war except defence. Do you condemn your national army?  Or if your country would be invaded, don't you defend it? Or you turn your ass and run?
If you were able to see, i also condemned Beslan attack and they were Chechen fighters. To defent your homeland and to make it terrorize are different things. You blind minded moron cannot see that.
(My insulting words are an answer to your free speech mentality)

I knew a terrorist would come out, sooner rather than later.  

Why a religion of peace would need an army of warriors?

BTW, Islam was founded to wage wars of conquest.  Jihadist ideology is at its core, as you correctly pointed it out.

Not condemning Jihadists makes you a closet supporter of terrorism.

That is why your religion will never be peaceful or constructive, unless you burn the Quran, drop the Jihadism, drop the violence, misogyny, slavery, hate of non-believers, gays etc.  Only then will Islam  be a religion of peace.  But it will not be Islam if you strip down all these essential doctrines.


Your religion is evil, your prophet was a pedophile and a warlord.  The only question remains if he married under aged goats as well?  

If you continue down the path of Islam, sooner rather than later you will be ready to perform your duty of Jihad, and become a terrorist yourself.

Today we had once more a terrorist attack in Ankara. 27 died and 75 injured.  Turkey is mostly aggrieved country by terror and we know well how terror is bad.
God damn all terrorists!