Bitcoin Forum

Other => Beginners & Help => Topic started by: xeverse on January 28, 2013, 12:32:30 PM



Title: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: xeverse on January 28, 2013, 12:32:30 PM
 
Why? What's the major requirement for your btc client software?

1. Security > 2. Style/Neat > 3. Local Resources (cpu, mem, storage) > 4. ?


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: ingrownpocket on January 28, 2013, 12:42:09 PM
Blockchain.info and Electrum.

Voted Electrum since it's where I have most of my Bitcoins.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Midnight Man on January 28, 2013, 12:55:46 PM
Being very new to all of this, I went with the original (Bitcoin-qt) client.

It seems to do the job, I'm not sure what else a client is supposed to do other than store coins, and offer encryption?


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Gabi on January 28, 2013, 01:08:19 PM
Where is MultiBit in this survey???

I use MultiBit, no blockchain, a good interface, it's what i need.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Ryland R. Taylor-Almanza on January 28, 2013, 01:15:50 PM
Where is MultiBit in this survey???

I use MultiBit, no blockchain, a good interface, it's what i need.
MultiBit uses the blockchain, it's just significantly smaller for reasons I can't remember. Anyways, your right, MultiBit should be in the poll.

I use Electrum.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Gabi on January 28, 2013, 01:25:39 PM
It loads in few seconds, it is not the qt client blockchain.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: caveden on January 28, 2013, 01:32:59 PM
MultiBit uses the blockchain, it's just significantly smaller for reasons I can't remember. Anyways, your right, MultiBit should be in the poll.

It's significantly smaller because it only stores the block headers, which are tiny. Currently it downloads the entire blocks (but downloading isn't the hardest part, storing them in an indexed database is). As soon as bloom filters are implemented, bitcoinj will be capable of only downloading the transactions that concerns the client.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Geraldine on January 28, 2013, 01:38:36 PM
Do you guys use offline/paper wallets as well?


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: xeverse on January 28, 2013, 02:30:08 PM
It seems to do the job, I'm not sure what else a client is supposed to do other than store coins, and offer encryption?

Presumably many other things, that's why there are different clients being developed.
Usability, style, everexpanding blockchain in the cloud instead of our storage (Electr & MultiBit),
Electrum for instance provides some recovery options as well (seeds), what else?

A shame but many clients keep the wallet.dat file in the same directory with other files (blkchidx)
this way it's impossible to utilize symlinks and move the wallet to another truecrypted partition..



Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: carpetbagger on January 28, 2013, 02:37:13 PM
I use Electrum for its low bandwidth requirements. Its also pretty neat.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: xeverse on January 28, 2013, 02:39:01 PM
Where is MultiBit in this survey???
Now it's there..

I use Electrum for its low bandwidth requirements. Its also pretty neat.
Yes it is pretty neat..


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Ipotex on January 28, 2013, 07:42:42 PM
Just the standard QT bitcoin Client.  It's only I love QT framework ;)


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: jackcadderty on January 28, 2013, 08:19:05 PM
Original ftw!


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: timando on January 28, 2013, 09:13:14 PM
I actually installed a bunch of clients, but I find electrum the best. Multibit would be good, but there's no way to encrypt the wallet.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Offthechain on January 28, 2013, 10:04:50 PM
I'm liking Armory, seems to have the best feature set. I like the click to copy address as I'm always worried Ill mess it up with a right click and cut!

Its also got some anti-corruption ability or something... cant be safe enough.
Oh and it runs on linux which I am about to install on a laptop just for my coins... my precious!


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: ilian000 on January 28, 2013, 10:49:43 PM
I use BlockChain.info becuse it is easy to use an very light and fast!


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: xeverse on January 28, 2013, 11:05:36 PM
I use BlockChain.info becuse it is easy to use an very light and fast!
Do you have to trust your private key to the server?


Hmmm.. Actually Qt is quite popular...


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: DannyHamilton on January 28, 2013, 11:31:50 PM
I use BlockChain.info becuse it is easy to use an very light and fast!
Do you have to trust your private key to the server?
When it is working as intended, the server only has access to an encrypted copy of your private key.  The private key is decrypted in your browser locally when needed.

It could be possible for the site to provide you with an altered version that could capture your password and send it to the server, but I think there is a browser plug-in that you can install to alert you if this happens.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Prospero on January 28, 2013, 11:39:14 PM
bitcoind. it uses much less memory and cpu.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: PatrickOMFG on January 28, 2013, 11:40:19 PM
I use BlockChain.info becuse it is easy to use an very light and fast!
Do you have to trust your private key to the server?
When it is working as intended, the server only has access to an encrypted copy of your private key.  The private key is decrypted in your browser locally when needed.

It could be possible for the site to provide you with an altered version that could capture your password and send it to the server, but I think there is a browser plug-in that you can install to alert you if this happens.

That's correct. There's a plugin you can get for your browser (https://blockchain.info/wallet/verifier) that checks the javascript of blockchain.info against the javascript in blockchain.info's github, and if something's not right it will notify you.

EDIT: Also, to answer the poll, I started with blockchain.info's hybrid e-wallet, but decided I wanted a desktop program for my wallet and am now happily using electrum. nothing wrong with blockchain.info, just personal preference.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Moshi on January 29, 2013, 12:11:07 AM
Running a full Bitcoin-qt node on my desktop (which also happens to mine 24/7), but store my funds in an Electrum wallet on my notebook. That'll probably get more more rust as I slowly get a finite amount of BTC, however.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: velacreations on January 29, 2013, 01:48:15 AM
I have a blockchain.info wallet, and instawallet, and a BitCoin-QT on my computer.  I am still waiting on the first sync with QT, after installing a few days ago.

I like the ease of instawallet, but the blockchain.inf wallet seems a bit better, has a decent API and more features.

I'm going to play with all 3 for a while until I decide on one that I like the best.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: saddambitcoin on January 29, 2013, 01:59:38 AM
I use Bitcoin-QT so I can support the network with a full node

Blockchain.info wallet comes in handy for mobile payments and in-person transactions. 

Paper wallet for long term storage. 



Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: wikes82 on January 29, 2013, 03:00:43 AM
i tried the satoshi client, but the download took forever(never finished it), and I found out about electrum, been using it since then


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Offthechain on January 29, 2013, 07:07:24 AM
No matter what your main client is, I think people should run Bitcoin-QT to support the network!

As more people come on board I imagine we will need more nodes.
Hopefully some more big servers will be set up to take the load.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: xeverse on January 29, 2013, 05:34:57 PM
bitcoind. it uses much less memory and cpu.
Good point man, did you compare all of them?

Being resource wise is essential these days.

Though the storage space is one extra parameter to consider..


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: dancupid on January 29, 2013, 05:50:53 PM
I use blockchain.info but with the bulk of my bitcoins stored in a brainwallet (address as a watch only).
I also keep the blockchain up to date on the Satoshi client because I want to contribute to the network


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: onkelpatte on January 29, 2013, 06:23:26 PM
At first I started using BitcoinQT, for about one year. Then I switched to Electrum because I got tired of updating the blockchain. When you were not online for a few days it took some time to do so...
And by the current growth of the blockchain it might even take longer in the future.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client
Post by: Ryland R. Taylor-Almanza on February 08, 2013, 05:37:40 PM
No matter what your main client is, I think people should run Bitcoin-QT to support the network!

As more people come on board I imagine we will need more nodes.
Hopefully some more big servers will be set up to take the load.
As I understand it, just being a node really doesn't have any significant impact at this point. If your not mining, there's not much of a point in being a node. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: duhduh on February 09, 2013, 12:03:18 AM
Been using Bitcoin-QT since started playing with Bitcoin, early 2011.
Kept it running inside a VM.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: bit365 on February 09, 2013, 01:20:46 AM
Armory hands down.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: Oktoberfest on February 09, 2013, 03:56:58 AM
 Bitcoin-QT here! Haven't had any issues with it.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: inge on February 09, 2013, 05:13:38 PM
Bitcoin-QT on the server and MultiBit on the desktop.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: veteranBtc on February 09, 2013, 05:22:27 PM
Armory is nice  :)


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: veteranBtc on February 09, 2013, 07:14:29 PM
Armory. After all, what good are your bitcoins if they aren't secure?  ;)
I use BitcoinQT .. just saying i used Armory


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: Cred on February 09, 2013, 08:19:06 PM
I'm liking Armory for the offline feature but I originally found it searching for deterministic wallet hoping to find one where I could use my own seed so I don't have to write it down.

Is there a client that can generate a wallet from a specified seed? The length of the seed doesn't matter but I want to be able to generate it from an ASCII string of a the required length. I have memorised an algorithm that I use to generate any length of string so I don't have to remember a long phrase or write it down.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: superduh on February 09, 2013, 09:09:26 PM
too many options!!


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: SammyBlackstar on February 10, 2013, 07:19:19 AM
1) Bitcoin QT
2) Electrum
3) Blockchain


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: MrGoodguy on February 10, 2013, 09:14:22 AM
I use blockchain.info :)


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: don giovanni on February 12, 2013, 08:04:27 AM
Ive found electrum to be pretty neat, no need for storing and updating multiple wallets, no need to leave the computer on for days updating the blockchain, and if you lose your wallet you can get it back by typing in a string of random words that are easy to write down.

Online wallets make me nervous.


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: DannyHamilton on February 12, 2013, 12:32:37 PM
. . . Online wallets make me nervous.
Why?


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: Gabi on February 12, 2013, 12:37:16 PM
. . . Online wallets make me nervous.
Why?
The day they disappear... well good luck  :)


Title: Re: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice
Post by: DannyHamilton on February 12, 2013, 01:12:02 PM
. . . Online wallets make me nervous.
Why?
The day they disappear... well good luck  :)
If you keep a backup of your wallet, I don't see why that would be a problem?