|
Title: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: pbleak on April 25, 2016, 08:08:42 PM https://medium.com/@paulennis/an-anatomy-of-the-bitcoin-scaling-debate-part-i-bitcoin-xt-and-classic-45cf18a88de#.26yo3ftol
Tips, insights, etc., welcome. Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: AgentofCoin on April 26, 2016, 12:54:27 AM ... Tips, insights, etc., welcome. Enjoyed reading. Interested to see how you explain the miners take in Part 2. Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: BTC-Joe on April 26, 2016, 01:04:58 AM This is deep in the weeds for most people. Why not explain the benefits of a larger block size, for starters?
Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: pedrog on April 26, 2016, 02:34:51 PM This is deep in the weeds for most people. Why not explain the benefits of a larger block size, for starters? More transactions per block. Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: pbleak on April 27, 2016, 02:39:36 PM ... Tips, insights, etc., welcome. Enjoyed reading. Interested to see how you explain the miners take in Part 2. Cheers, quite a complex lot (Chinese barrier). Should be up pretty soon. Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: pbleak on April 27, 2016, 02:40:45 PM This is deep in the weeds for most people. Why not explain the benefits of a larger block size, for starters? I have in mind the bitcoin community here who know who is who and whatnot. There is plenty out there on the merits or demerits of the changes. Plus I don't want to pick a side. I'm just trying to find out how all this went down. Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: pbleak on April 27, 2016, 02:41:11 PM This is deep in the weeds for most people. Why not explain the benefits of a larger block size, for starters? More transactions per block. Indeed, I think people most know this so I didn't want to dwell on it. Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: BTC-Joe on April 27, 2016, 08:40:16 PM Indeed, I think people most know this so I didn't want to dwell on it. Yet it's the main "benefit" of bitcoin-xt. Is there a transaction bottleneck caused by block size on the bitcoin network? Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: alyssa85 on April 27, 2016, 10:39:10 PM That's a good write up. I'm not up to speed with how the take up of Classic is going. I did see a thread on reddit which said that some of the payment processors were thinking of setting up their own mining pool because they were were frustrated with the Chinese miners - would love it if you could write about that in your next article.
Title: Re: Anatomy of the Bitcoin Scaling Debate, Part I: Bitcoin XT and Classic Post by: pbleak on April 28, 2016, 12:04:58 PM That's a good write up. I'm not up to speed with how the take up of Classic is going. I did see a thread on reddit which said that some of the payment processors were thinking of setting up their own mining pool because they were were frustrated with the Chinese miners - would love it if you could write about that in your next article. Cheers, can you remember anymore? Often the best details are hidden in places like reddit. |