Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Digital goods => Topic started by: bitbite111 on May 01, 2016, 06:45:52 PM



Title: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: bitbite111 on May 01, 2016, 06:45:52 PM
Please make your offer.


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014. Almost full member status
Post by: traderbit on May 01, 2016, 06:47:31 PM
Please make your offer.

Almost full member status? Full member status can only be reached at 120+ activity and you are far away from this target (more than 60+ activity), secondly you should provide if you can sign a bitcoin message from the addresses that you posted here (if any)


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014. Almost full member status
Post by: bitbite111 on May 01, 2016, 06:51:46 PM
Please make your offer.

Almost full member status? Full member status can only be reached at 120+ activity and you are far away from this target (more than 60+ activity), secondly you should provide if you can sign a bitcoin message from the addresses that you posted here (if any)

I'm not exactly sure what that means. How would signing a bitcoin address make any difference? Please explain, i'm ignorant when it comes to trading on here.


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: toy4lov3rs on May 01, 2016, 06:55:39 PM
Account age doesn't maters but account rank does
I can give you 0.003 for this account if you able to sign message


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: Paultango on May 01, 2016, 06:59:18 PM
If thats a member account i will buy it for 0.004 if you like.
Please post its merchant token from http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: traderbit on May 01, 2016, 07:04:06 PM
Please make your offer.

Almost full member status? Full member status can only be reached at 120+ activity and you are far away from this target (more than 60+ activity), secondly you should provide if you can sign a bitcoin message from the addresses that you posted here (if any)

I'm not exactly sure what that means. How would signing a bitcoin address make any difference? Please explain, i'm ignorant when it comes to trading on here.

I checked your stats and you have a potential of 56 activity which is far away from full member. Another thing that i saw it that you haven't posted any bitcoin address so you can't prove that you are the owner of that account, have made any deal with any member here, even through PM?


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: bitbite111 on May 01, 2016, 07:07:49 PM
Please make your offer.

Almost full member status? Full member status can only be reached at 120+ activity and you are far away from this target (more than 60+ activity), secondly you should provide if you can sign a bitcoin message from the addresses that you posted here (if any)

I'm not exactly sure what that means. How would signing a bitcoin address make any difference? Please explain, i'm ignorant when it comes to trading on here.

I checked your stats and you have a potential of 56 activity which is far away from full member. Another thing that i saw it that you haven't posted any bitcoin address so you can't prove that you are the owner of that account, have made any deal with any member here, even through PM?

I have made a 0.15 bitcoin trade, where I sent first to a trusted member and the transaction went smoothly. But I never had to sign a bitcoin address.


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: traderbit on May 01, 2016, 07:09:10 PM
I checked your stats and you have a potential of 56 activity which is far away from full member. Another thing that i saw it that you haven't posted any bitcoin address so you can't prove that you are the owner of that account, have made any deal with any member here, even through PM?

I have made a 0.15 bitcoin trade, where I sent first to a trusted member and the transaction went smoothly. But I never had to sign a bitcoin address.

In this case you should provide to the buyer the signed message from that address and require from the seller or buyer that you traded to confirm, that's all, good luck with sales.


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: bitbite111 on May 01, 2016, 07:09:43 PM
If thats a member account i will buy it for 0.004 if you like.
Please post its merchant token from http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/

Your token is g9l4rfak
Estimated Price: 0.016


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: jt byte on May 01, 2016, 08:44:32 PM
Why you post your account (THIS in title as in bitbite111 ???)? You know that it will be tagged as sold?


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: pawel7777 on May 01, 2016, 09:21:27 PM
Why you post your account (THIS in title as in bitbite111 ???)? You know that it will be tagged as sold?

What's wrong in selling openly? He doesn't have positive trust, is not enrolled in any sig campaign and is a low rank, so I don't see what would be the point of tagging it.


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: jt byte on May 02, 2016, 09:46:00 PM
Why you post your account (THIS in title as in bitbite111 ???)? You know that it will be tagged as sold?

What's wrong in selling openly? He doesn't have positive trust, is not enrolled in any sig campaign and is a low rank, so I don't see what would be the point of tagging it.
No but now he has negative trust  ;)
You don't reveal that kind of information when selling an account. That is obvious.


Title: Re: [WTS] This bitcointalk account. Registered March 2014.
Post by: pawel7777 on May 03, 2016, 08:06:17 AM
Why you post your account (THIS in title as in bitbite111 ???)? You know that it will be tagged as sold?

What's wrong in selling openly? He doesn't have positive trust, is not enrolled in any sig campaign and is a low rank, so I don't see what would be the point of tagging it.
No but now he has negative trust  ;)
You don't reveal that kind of information when selling an account. That is obvious.

He got neutral tag. Negative is retaliation for the trust rating the OP left KWH.

Neutral tag shouldn't really be a problem for the buyer if he's intentions for buying account were genuine.