|
Title: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: Simran on February 23, 2013, 05:52:58 AM http://imgur.com/Bfewd1X&15w5Os0&QeH7so9&fWrKoRw&gNdrKgy&f7mh134
The whole log is there. People trying to act like pooler! Title: Re: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: hamdi on February 23, 2013, 01:07:58 PM so open up reg and avoid these scammers.
Title: Re: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: CannedHeat on March 04, 2013, 01:30:01 PM Interesting. From what I heard the individual in question actually did make accounts for users. Since he gave away accounts before payment [if taking any at all] maybe he was telling the truth? He asked the interested party what user name they desired and then made the accounts on the fly. He must have been an admin there.
/h33t Title: Re: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: serraz on March 06, 2013, 10:13:37 AM actually he started swearing and support banned him it was a funny night
Title: Re: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: bushstar on March 06, 2013, 12:11:26 PM Didn't Pooler stop registrations so that the pool did not run over 51% of the total network?
This should no longer be the concern that it was so perhaps Pooler will grow the user base on his pool. Title: Re: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: pooler on March 06, 2013, 09:07:19 PM Just wanted to confirm that this is indeed a scam.
I'm not going to open up registrations for the time being because performance-wise I'm happy with the current hash rate of the pool, but (as I've already stated before) people who really, really want to mine at litecoinpool.org just need to contact me and provide some kind of justification as to why they don't want to use another pool. Title: Re: People acting like pooler? Selling Litecoinpool.org accounts? Post by: Palmdetroit on March 06, 2013, 10:21:51 PM Didn't Pooler stop registrations so that the pool did not run over 51% of the total network? This should no longer be the concern that it was so perhaps Pooler will grow the user base on his pool. yes , and in doing so, has encouraged another pool to >51%. Irony |