Bitcoin Forum

Nick Szabo, Dorian Nakamoto, Hal Finney, Dave Kleiman, Craig Wright . . . are among those that have been speculated to be Satoshi.   And there might very well be many more to come.

There are believers for any of the above. Yet evidence has yet to prove that anyone is Satoshi Nakamoto.

Perhaps, after all, the question of the Who is not of relevance. Maybe it's the Why that matters most.

Yet the why is connected to the who.  

Please answer three questions


1.  Was Bitcoin created for or against the World Governments?

2.  Was Bitcoin created for or against the World's population?

3.  Was Bitcoin created independently or with/by the Government?

Thank you.

It is not a problem if Bitcoin was created the government or any 3 letter agency because basically it's open source, so since it's open source we can know what the program does. This is why it doesn't matter who satoshi was, we can make Bitcoin do what we want it to do to benefit us, not someone's else original plan (if this was the case).

Who satoshi really is might be not important, but what matters is who has keys to the 1mil coins satoshi supposedly has. Are these coins for really gone from the market? Or will there be a 1 mil bitcoin dump one day?

I am deeply offended you have left me out of the list.

You, Sir, have earned yourself a place on my small ignore list.

I don't think any government had anything to do with Bitcoin's creation.
It wasn't created for or against the world population, it is for the world to determine the path Bitcoin will take.  ;)

Jeez, another of these threads? How long can everyone beat dead horses? Who cares?  ::)

Craig, is that you?

I don't know what would be the "true" creator and developers of bitcoins purpose for it.
But in my opinion, it was created independently and for some other purpose.

I've always felt Nick Szabo was Satoshi, just a hunch though I don't really have any theory or research on him. The only thing I find funny too is that they share the first letters of their names backwards: Nick (Nakamoto) Szabo (Satoshi), it's a long shot but maybe while looking for an alias this was his original idea.

The coins are not gone, but I don't think they'll be dumped all at once. It'll be a slow sell. But yes, the markets will panic a bit because so many people have convinced themselves that those coins would never see the light of day.

How can you be so sure about that? Who knows?

Again, who knows? Nobody knows the person under the pseudonym, Satoshi Nakamoto. So, the possibility is endless as long as, well, if we don't know who Satoshi Nakamoto is.

Thanks for the interesting answer, guys! Keep them coming :)

I dont think any of the questions can be answered simply like one would think. It all depends on where bitcoin goes with time, and who
and how they use it. Like everything else, bitcoin can be used for both good and bad things.
 
It's like financial weapon how i imagine it, people should use it to defend themselves from financial "attacks", but just like normal weapons,
it can be also used to attack out of bad intentions, like the cases with ransoms, and other illegal transactions.

Creator isnt important figure anymore because he has no more control over this project than any other, and its not important who he is
but rather what his creation is.

who is Nick Szabo?never hear about that guy before. but i think Craig Wright is the popular one.
i dont think so,even some proof guide me to that case,but my goverment take a best way against bitcoin now.
i never think about this,and i'm not agree with this,bitcoin create for better technology in payment method.
of course bitcoin create independently.

Bitcoin was not created against governments or against world's population.
It was created as an alternative to the actual financial system. It is not here to attack others. It is here to give people an opportunity, to have a choice.

Ditto he is Batman ..and I'm Robin in the above....(I was the guy who did the burger and beer runs)

Just saying (for my 'I was there' book) coming out "In Two Weeks" (tm BFL)

also 'miffed' I was not mentioned at least as an 'aside'

"Leave me alone" - Satoshi Nakamoto

sure....now that you don't want 'burger and beer money" anymore while you were coding :(

(hurt I am) :)

To many speculation on who,where is satoshi nakamoto bu no one proves it many names are mentioned but no one in the said name is proven maybr satoshi nakamoto dont want to reveal itself and some other speculates that the real satoshi nakamoto is dead who knows maybe this one is right, because many years past his identity is still unknown.

It's five centuries later and people are still sometimes debating about who really wrote the shakespeare plays.

I figure Satoshi Nakamoto's going to have the same fate.

My own opinion is that Satoshi was created because the business of being the original author of Bitcoin was a very high-risk position.  Optimism about the future of Bitcoin correlates with pessimism about the safety of being its author.  Because bitcoin has been at least somewhat successful so far, and has quite predictably been used as a vehicle for money laundering by everyone from ordinary tax cheats to the crooks at Silk Road to asshat jihadis, there are a whole lot of people who want to rob, tax, prosecute, blackmail, murder, or extort money from Satoshi Nakamoto.  It's better that they don't have any good idea who s/he is. 

I suppose that its creator knew s/he was going to make a lot of enemies with it, and that mob bosses, bankers, and the governments of various nations would be among them.  I suppose that all the "silent" nodes on the Bitcoin network are there listening to see what IP address every transaction originates from, at least in some part because many of those actors want to pinpoint a location and possibly an identity for Satoshi if and when one of those addresses ever moves.  If Satoshi wanted to spend any of those coins and remain unknown, s/he'd have to invest a week of time in OpSec to pull it off. While they listen to try to sort out EVERYBODY who uses Bitcoin, they'd make a special effort and follow up with people on the ground in that case.

I think that the person who created Bitcoin had very strong opinions about the economic exploitation of ordinary citizens, both by banks and by governments, and did in fact seek to oppose those influences.  Ultimately, however, while Bitcoin does change the rules a bit, it presents new rules that don't really prevent economic exploitation so much as they change the methodology for doing it.  Those interests can continue unabated in their economic exploitation of ordinary citizens, and are in the process of adapting, not relenting.

It was not created by a Government agency.  Governments are not in the business of changing things that are working for them, and the central banking system/currency controls were working for them. 

made song about these guys.. thanks for this thread. I do need to make it longer


https://soundcloud.com/proofofbeats/whonakamoto

Interested in your views Cryddit - what makes you say/believe the above ? I believed this a few years back also, or wanted to - but today I'm not so sure. Looks to me like the myopic and politically naive libertarian idea that an unfettered deregulated market with perfect competition is all thats really required could well be (and have been) the guiding precept upon which this was all started.

 
Completely agree - and those that believe otherwise need to wise up a bit. If I were being the dour sceptic, I might argue that the blockchain could faciltate that exploitation in ways not imagined possible previously.

Hey Craig, you hanging around this forum still?

What you have stated above is not what Cryddit said.
He said he believed Satoshi sought to oppose those influences. (Like a counter-weight.)
He didn't say Satoshi sought to deregulate the markets and overthrow the financial world.

Craig, why don't you tell us why you created Bitcoin then?

Did he ?

The blockchain was meant to be like a counter weight to the free market ? Can't see it myself.

Seems more like to me that the initial impetus/economic theory wasn't that we needed a more caring capitalism, that the market needed keeping an eye on. More, the idea that it was manipulations of the free market by various means that distorted the outcomes for the ordinary man on the street. The efficiency and transparency of the blockchain would provide a means by which these imperctions in the market could be ironed out.
IOW the untrammelled market wasn't our oppressor, but, when realised via the blockchain, it would be our liberator. ie. Libertarianism.

I thought Cryddit was meaning that BTC/the blockchain/SN initially sought to liberate people in a way more fundamental than allowing the market unfettered access to everything that we, the majority, ever say, think, or do. That it was more than just free market libertarian capitalism par excellence.




Are you on drugs ?

Cryddit didn't mention free market in his posting.
All he said was, in his opinion, created to oppose the exploitation of people by banks and governments.
Thus currency manipulation and such economic policies like quantitative easing.
If you notice, he did not mention wall-street, financial firms, markets, or corporations.

Political ideologies and their economic theory is irreverent to what Satoshi started.
Satoshi said he was creating a currency, not a way to bring about new world economic system.




Free-market arguments are not discussed by Cryddit nor Satoshi to my knowledge.
You are putting words in Cryddit's mouth and Satoshi's as well.

If Libertarians have attached themselves to Bitcoin/bitcoin, that has nothing to do
with what Cryddit said or what Satoshi created.




Thats a major theory/argument coming from what little detail Cryddit provided in his opinion.
Almost everything you are saying is not based on prior Satoshi comments nor from what Cryddit stated.

By implication.

No, by assumption.

Some interesting stuff here :-

https://vimeo.com/149119154
https://vimeo.com/149115042
https://vimeo.com/149035662

In mid 2008, most of the world's governments (especially the US gov't) printed an assload of money to bail out the crooks who trashed the world economy via blatantly illegal actions like credit fraud and misrepresentation of securities.  This was widely seen (and to some extent correctly) as a big ol' ripoff perpetrated against ordinary citizens by Bankers, with governments acting as bought-and-paid-for accomplices: accessories before, during, and after the fact.  If it doesn't seem that way in your country, ask anybody from Cyprus, Greece, Spain, or Argentina.  There's a not-unreasonable point of view that says Governments were abusing the power of currency issuance to facilitate a giant theft by their banking cronies.  

A few months later, in November 2008, I'm looking at some first-cut code for Bitcoin, and some guy named Satoshi Nakamoto has an idea for a currency that nobody can play that kind of game with.   A few months after that, after a lot of work mostly by Satoshi and Hal Finney, it's ready to launch.  (I was an idiot and didn't mine early when I had the chance; I figured it was doomed, like all the scores of cryptocurrency ideas before it).

Anyway the connection seemed pretty clear at the time.  It was widely understood that bankers and governments were abusing the power of money supply regulation to the detriment of ordinary people, and Bitcoin was seen as a response to that.  (At least in Hal's mind and mine; I suspect the same of Satoshi but Satoshi didn't normally talk politics in email.  He sometimes talked economics, but IMO his grasp of economics was fairly naíve).

I'd known Hal for 20 years on and off, mostly as an email correspondent via several cryptography forums, and Hal was extremely unhappy about the way he'd been treated by government people on a few occasions.  He'd been a libertarian all his life, with a profound belief in the fairness of unregulated markets if they could only be preserved from manipulation.   Hal had in fact gone all the way to Ayn Rand style libertarianism and was something of a demagogue about free markets.  Bitcoin was like catnip for him; pseudonymous hence free market, with built-in mathematical blocks against currency-supply manipulation.  Hal was also an able cryptographer of the sort who gets down into the grotty details of the code. Satoshi could not possibly have found a better or more willing hand to help bring this about.

So, yeah, I believe that the creation of Bitcoin was to some extent a political act - It could be considered as political speech in the form of a protest against abuse of economic regulatory power.

Thanks for going into more detail about your experiences and opinion.

This posting is more informative and valuable over hundreds of thousands
of comment on this site (in relation to this topic). I'm glad there are still people
here from the early days who can say "yes" or "no" or "maybe" with more than
just speculation or conjecture backing up their viewpoint or opinion.

how anyone can compare a hoaxer scammer like Wright and no one like Kleiman with Nick Szabo, Hal Finney and with a wise man like mr Dorian Nakamoto?

Maybe the 1 mil bitcoin have been utilized as a diversion. Perhaps the person/people behind Satoshi Nakamoto mined many more coins (and continue to do so) because they had such a head start and could reinvest in mining equipment. By having everyone focus on the 1 mil unmoved coins they can dump their other mined coins without inducing panic. It seems odd that SN would put such effort into mining in the beginning and then just decide to quit mining altogether.  Maybe "moving on to other things" was creating a massive chinese mining farm.