Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Hardware => Topic started by: opentoe on February 26, 2013, 08:14:08 PM



Title: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: opentoe on February 26, 2013, 08:14:08 PM
Do you need to know any programming or how to code anything to setup an Avalon miner? Is it as easy as downloading the miner program and setting up a worker and ahead you go? Does anyone know what would go into setting one up, and what you need to know or BUT beforehand? Thanks.



Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: crazyates on February 26, 2013, 08:32:04 PM
Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly? In a word: yes.

Avalon units are not for the uninitiated, or the timid. It comes with no instruction manual of any kind. It comes with a per-configured IP, that you have to remote into, and change the default config settings. Once it is running, I've heard of Jeff complaining about restarts, but I think that's been pretty well addressed by the memory leak fix in CGMiner 2.10.5.

BFL Singles will be very similar to their current products: plug the device into a USB port on your computer, and run a program (like CGMiner).


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: creativex on February 26, 2013, 08:36:02 PM
Do you need to know any programming or how to code anything to setup an Avalon miner?

No.

Quote
Is it as easy as downloading the miner program and setting up a worker and ahead you go? Does anyone know what would go into setting one up, and what you need to know or BUT beforehand? Thanks.

Looks pretty st8forward and easy to me. Most of this stuff has been addressed in user threads threads available here and elsewhere:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140539.0

...as to comparisons to BFL gear ease of use, one can only speculate as no end users have their gear.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: opentoe on February 26, 2013, 09:28:07 PM
I can get around a command line pretty well and operate Linux pretty good. If that's all this machine is using then I'm pretty sure I'll be able to get by. What I'm really trying to figure out is how does cgminer or other pool programs recognize the unit? Is the unit hooked up to your computer via USB or Ethernet somehow? Just trying to learn how it connects and how the unit is administered. I saw the pictures, but was too hard to see the connections.



Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: 01BTC10 on February 26, 2013, 09:34:10 PM
Avalon is standalone and don't need to be hooked to a computer. Connectivity is done via wireless or ethernet.

You need a computer only for first time setup via ethernet.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: crazyates on February 26, 2013, 10:42:33 PM
I can get around a command line pretty well and operate Linux pretty good. If that's all this machine is using then I'm pretty sure I'll be able to get by. What I'm really trying to figure out is how does cgminer or other pool programs recognize the unit? Is the unit hooked up to your computer via USB or Ethernet somehow? Just trying to learn how it connects and how the unit is administered. I saw the pictures, but was too hard to see the connections.
It connects directly to your network via an ethernet jack. You need to use another computer to remote into the device (SSH or webportal, IIRC), and then set it up for your network and pool credentials. After that, it connects to the pool directly and mines away. I would say that if a CLI or manually setting an IP scare you, then Avalon is not for you. Sounds like you could probably handle it, as it's not exactly rocket science. However, there are a few members on here who openly admit they are scared of a command prompt, and refuse to touch anything of the sort. They're more than happy to plug their Singles into a laptop, and run the Bitminter client. For those people: no, Avalon is not a good idea.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: gyverlb on February 26, 2013, 11:33:29 PM
Do you need to know any programming or how to code anything to setup an Avalon miner? Is it as easy as downloading the miner program and setting up a worker and ahead you go? Does anyone know what would go into setting one up, and what you need to know or BUT beforehand? Thanks.

To setup an Avalon miner, the first step is to raid China customs mining with them at the moment. To setup a BFL single, the first step is to teleport in the magical land where the unicorns are currently testing and packaging them.

I'm not exactly sure which one is the easier.

If you manage to get one unit though, we know Avalon can be made to work and information is already available on how to do so on the forums with known quirks/workarounds/patches. For BFL, there isn't any tested procedure at all yet so people can only guess based on what BFL published.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: Fuzzy on February 27, 2013, 03:52:40 PM
It's taking me FOREVER to get my BFL ASIC mining, I can't even get my hands on the damn thing, let alone get it running.


 :P


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: opentoe on February 28, 2013, 02:55:47 AM
I can get around a command line pretty well and operate Linux pretty good. If that's all this machine is using then I'm pretty sure I'll be able to get by. What I'm really trying to figure out is how does cgminer or other pool programs recognize the unit? Is the unit hooked up to your computer via USB or Ethernet somehow? Just trying to learn how it connects and how the unit is administered. I saw the pictures, but was too hard to see the connections.
It connects directly to your network via an ethernet jack. You need to use another computer to remote into the device (SSH or webportal, IIRC), and then set it up for your network and pool credentials. After that, it connects to the pool directly and mines away. I would say that if a CLI or manually setting an IP scare you, then Avalon is not for you. Sounds like you could probably handle it, as it's not exactly rocket science. However, there are a few members on here who openly admit they are scared of a command prompt, and refuse to touch anything of the sort. They're more than happy to plug their Singles into a laptop, and run the Bitminter client. For those people: no, Avalon is not a good idea.

Yea, sounds easy stuff to me. I thought I would need to know programming and all that crazy stuff. If I can setup a good usenet indexer via command line, this looks to be much easier. I wish I knew which to try and order from.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: -ck on February 28, 2013, 09:43:37 AM
Avalon is almost trivial to set up. Initially you need a computer to set it up but after that, even the computer is not needed. But... the firmware that is currently installed on it is still not stable with the few Avalon owners out there forced to regularly reboot it when it just stops. Of course with time this will be fixed, but as trivial as it is to set up, it's not a set-up-and-forget affair just yet...

When the BFL hardware eventually comes out, we plan to work very hard to make cgminer work very well on it and become reliable software to use quickly and to run stable for very long periods without intervention. However it will require a separate PC/laptop/tablet/phone or something to actually keep running it.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: bonker on February 28, 2013, 10:29:04 AM
Basically its like this:

1) Avalon are slightly more technical to set up, some tweeking with the ethernet is required.

2) BFL is a much easier machine to get going on better technology

3) GoblinAsic is possibly the best option out there are present, the highest Hash/Watt with a trivial plug-and-hash setup.

But pretty much all three are essentially free money. Just plug them in and effortless money falls out.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: creativex on February 28, 2013, 10:32:38 PM
Basically its like this:

1) Avalon are slightly more technical to set up, some tweeking with the ethernet is required.(fair)

2) BFL is a much easier machine to get going on better technology(speculative)

3) GoblinAsic is possibly the best option out there are present, the highest Hash/Watt with a trivial plug-and-hash setup.(fairy tale nonsense)

But pretty much all three are essentially free money. Just plug them in and effortless money falls out.(silly)

FTFY


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: DrG on March 01, 2013, 04:24:05 AM
Basically its like this:

1) Avalon are slightly more technical to set up, some tweeking with the ethernet is required.(fair)

2) BFL is a much easier machine to get going on better technology(speculative)

3) GoblinAsic is possibly the best option out there are present, the highest Hash/Watt with a trivial plug-and-hash setup.(fairy tale nonsense)

But pretty much all three are essentially free money. Just plug them in and effortless money falls out.(silly)

FTFY

Did I just see somebody try to "correct" one of Bonkers' posts  :o


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: creativex on March 01, 2013, 04:47:53 AM
Basically its like this:

1) Avalon are slightly more technical to set up, some tweeking with the ethernet is required.(fair)

2) BFL is a much easier machine to get going on better technology(speculative)

3) GoblinAsic is possibly the best option out there are present, the highest Hash/Watt with a trivial plug-and-hash setup.(fairy tale nonsense)

But pretty much all three are essentially free money. Just plug them in and effortless money falls out.(silly)

FTFY

Did I just see somebody try to "correct" one of Bonkers' posts  :o

Guilty. I was bored. ...No I do not expect any lasting impact.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: bonker on March 01, 2013, 10:08:52 AM
Basically its like this:

1) Avalon are slightly more technical to set up, some tweeking with the ethernet is required.(fair)

2) BFL is a much easier machine to get going on better technology(speculative)

3) GoblinAsic is possibly the best option out there are present, the highest Hash/Watt with a trivial plug-and-hash setup.(fairy tale nonsense)

But pretty much all three are essentially free money. Just plug them in and effortless money falls out.(silly)

FTFY

Did I just see somebody try to "correct" one of Bonkers' posts  :o

Guilty. I was bored. ...No I do not expect any lasting impact.

Come on now, I do make some pretty good posts.... At least one national magazine has picked up on my wisdom


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: DrG on March 01, 2013, 11:03:55 AM
Basically its like this:

1) Avalon are slightly more technical to set up, some tweeking with the ethernet is required.(fair)

2) BFL is a much easier machine to get going on better technology(speculative)

3) GoblinAsic is possibly the best option out there are present, the highest Hash/Watt with a trivial plug-and-hash setup.(fairy tale nonsense)

But pretty much all three are essentially free money. Just plug them in and effortless money falls out.(silly)

FTFY

Did I just see somebody try to "correct" one of Bonkers' posts  :o

Guilty. I was bored. ...No I do not expect any lasting impact.



Come on now, I do make some pretty good posts.... At least one national magazine has picked up on my wisdom

My favorite post of yours was the one about cooling the miners by leaving a refrigerator door open.  I hate you - had to buy 23 mini fridges only to find out it wasn't making the room cooler  :'(


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: bonker on March 01, 2013, 12:55:10 PM


My favorite post of yours was the one about cooling the miners by leaving a refrigerator door open.  I hate you - had to buy 23 mini fridges only to find out it wasn't making the room cooler  :'(

Sounds like there's something wrong with your fridges.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: opentoe on March 02, 2013, 04:16:54 PM
The Avalon needs to be connected to the internet at all times for mining, right? If you are connected to the Avalon using the Ethernet cable, how is is connected to the Internet at the same time? Is a switch/hub used? I mean the Avalon's have a fully working Ethernet port capable of a standard IP address via DHCP or static, right?



Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: creativex on March 02, 2013, 05:31:26 PM
The Avalon is wireless capable.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: wormbog on March 04, 2013, 05:55:46 PM


My favorite post of yours was the one about cooling the miners by leaving a refrigerator door open.  I hate you - had to buy 23 mini fridges only to find out it wasn't making the room cooler  :'(

Sounds like there's something wrong with your fridges.

Fridges make it cooler inside the box by moving the heat to the outside.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: crazyates on March 05, 2013, 03:23:32 AM
My favorite post of yours was the one about cooling the miners by leaving a refrigerator door open.  I hate you - had to buy 23 mini fridges only to find out it wasn't making the room cooler  :'(
Sounds like there's something wrong with your fridges.
Fridges make it cooler inside the box by moving the heat to the outside.
Not worth your time, dude. Not worth the time.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: bonker on March 05, 2013, 10:28:46 AM
My favorite post of yours was the one about cooling the miners by leaving a refrigerator door open.  I hate you - had to buy 23 mini fridges only to find out it wasn't making the room cooler  :'(
Sounds like there's something wrong with your fridges.
Fridges make it cooler inside the box by moving the heat to the outside.
Not worth your time, dude. Not worth the time.

Listen up, last time we established that fridges dump heat through their power cable as load on the power plant.

Now, I  don't want to hear no more of this "refrigerators don't work" cry baby nonsense. I think you UFO conspiracy nuts should leave physics alone.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: DrG on March 05, 2013, 11:59:08 AM


My favorite post of yours was the one about cooling the miners by leaving a refrigerator door open.  I hate you - had to buy 23 mini fridges only to find out it wasn't making the room cooler  :'(

Sounds like there's something wrong with your fridges.

Fridges make it cooler inside the box by moving the heat to the outside.

Newbie.  The science has been documented : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=30602.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=30602.0)


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: NEO2012 on March 07, 2013, 05:53:35 PM
Do you need to know any programming or how to code anything to setup an Avalon miner? Is it as easy as downloading the miner program and setting up a worker and ahead you go? Does anyone know what would go into setting one up, and what you need to know or BUT beforehand? Thanks.



well  avalon has a sotware link dowlaode included so u will be minning n minutes

bfl dosent have a single asic unit running  even for testing as of march 7 2013

but they were supose to have them  in octomber 2012  delivered by the thausands

so how can u even hae a software for something that dosent even exist

after 10 months of promises ?

i hope that answers ur question

primeasic from hungary has 89ghs units in stock fro delivery  and local pickup


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: 01BTC10 on March 07, 2013, 06:11:17 PM
Quote
primeasic from hungary has 89ghs units in stock fro delivery  and local pickup
This is not confirmed yet.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: NEO2012 on March 07, 2013, 07:10:02 PM
Quote
primeasic from hungary has 89ghs units in stock fro delivery  and local pickup
This is not confirmed yet.

oh by all means  pls wait until u see pcitures  screen shots  braging happy cosutmers


until u say ok they are confirmed now:)

with the money thos units make a day can buy a ticket  air  be there tomrow with cash in hand

i waanna buy ur stock:)

thats the wiiners atitude

or well i just wait  for bfl to deliver  hopefully this year so i can at least get my money back

on the other hand:)


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: 01BTC10 on March 07, 2013, 07:25:43 PM
You must be drunk and typing from a smartphone.


Title: Re: Are Avalon's hard to use or setup compared to Butterfly?
Post by: NEO2012 on March 07, 2013, 07:36:27 PM
You must be drunk and typing from a smartphone.

MUST BE TALKING FROM EXPERIENCE LOL:)

SINCE UR RIGHT:)