Bitcoin Forum

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/andrewalker/2016/06/16/women-segregated-at-london-mayors-rally-n2179082

..... Okay, now that has definitely pissed me off, the fucking retard.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/16/women-sent-back-khan-remain-speech/



------------------------------
The religion of...?

Hope the UK will leave Europe. We don't want any muslim country in the EU.
To leave will also enable the UK to sign a free trade agreement with Saudi Arabia. Cultural exchanges with Iran would also be nice.

UK is already one of the countries where muslins are at home, EU won't change anything.

And don't you see the hypocrisy ?
You don't want anything with muslims except their money...  Cultural and economic agreements are often linked, you won't be able to do any business without any concession.

Sadiq Khan is the same guy, whom several of the liberal posters here were addressing as a "moderate". If the moderate Muslim is behaving like this in London, how the ordinary Muslim is going to behave in that city? Once again, this just proves my point. Islam is not compatible with the European values. No matter how much you try to paint them as moderates, they remain pretty much hardcore on the inside.

I bet you there is great hypocrisy in this article, no one forced or imposed to the woman to have to stand in the back? I am wrong? I think they did it by themselves...

It's Saudi Arabia or Iran, when a couple divorce you can't be friends with both. Sooner or later you will have to take side or lose them both.

The U.K. didn't need the E.U. to bring massive numbers of people from its former colonies...

Ugh London has made sure that all under-class citizens without rights like dhimmis and women remain at the back of the bus or rally, as the case may be

He is definitely suffering from footh-in-mouth syndrome. There is no treatment of this as of now .

What sad is that all those cctvs cameras didn't stop the Rotterdam and others exploitation of British native young girls by the all inclusive society and allowed the cover up by the police.. I am curious to ear the mayor on this subject... But not on a setup where he has is goons, more a gitmo type... Always take precautions.

Oddly if you read the article it says: "Photos from the event show a ring of men at the front with the women further behind. There is no suggestion they were forcably segregated, but the Mayor did not intervene to prevent the women standing at the back."

What was he supposed to do?

Evident me dear Watson, continue his speech and be happy that people took the time to listen to him...

another illustrations of the presstitues... If another example was needeed.


The less you watch them (the lying media), the less ad revenues they get, the more layoff... At the end only journalists aka reporting facts as facts, opinions disclaimed and hypothesis clearly expressed will survive...

It's easy!

And put women behind the men is not demean women? ???



This mayor will still give much news...

this situation is getting worse and worse. women are seen as second claas citizens in islam for that reason this segration is very reasonable in islamic perpective but london mayor should know that he is living in a western society and he should be integrated in it. women dont deserve this horrible humiliation.

"There is no suggestion they were forcably segregated, but the Mayor did not intervene to prevent the women standing at the back."

Oh, c'mon, guys! Are you even serious? This article is whta's called manipulation IMO.

In Salafist / Wahhabist Islam, the women are just commodities, with the sole purpose of providing sexual satisfaction to their husbands. It is forbidden for the women to enjoy sex in Islam (that is why they perform female genital mutilation). Muslim women must remain faithful to their husbands, while the Muslim men are permitted to have sex with non-Muslim women.

Bingo. This is a stupid story that has nothing to do with Islamification. The whole article is based on one shitty photo where we can't even see the whole crowd, and like you said what the hell is the mayor gonna do, shout "bring all dem ladies up to front, Allah's praise be upon them!!"
What a bullshit article.

Plus this source "townhall.com" looks fascist as fuck to me, here's another of their articles on the front page:

Enough: After Orlando, We Must Defund Planned Parenthood and Rethink Gay Marriage Ruling (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/06/17/after-orlando-we-must-defund-planned-parenthood-and-reverse-gay-marriage-ruling-n2179544)

At OP, if you are going to post anti-Islamic material, can it at least be about serious stuff like actual crimes, and not fluff like this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_on_female_genital_mutilation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_on_female_genital_mutilation)

What? Do I want money from muslims? No. I don't need, and I don't think there's much money to take. Millions of muslims living in Europe are on welfare, and the new ones we've seen coming from Syria are broke.

There are rich Muslims (especially those in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Brunei), and there are poor Muslims (those from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria.etc). The main problem is that the rich Muslims are not willing to help the poor Muslims. On the other hand, they think that it is the duty of the native Europeans and other non-Muslims to help them.

That is an unfair reflections I believe. Islam doesn't consider women as you quote, in fact based on the information I gathered, the prophet that helped bring about Islam in the world would have failed had it not been for his wife. Even in those olden times, his wife was a rich business woman, and he respected her for that based on many records.
Regarding multiple marriages, a man is allowed to have 4 marriages, not to have women as a commodity, or because you desire to have more women.
It's because in olden times women couldn't fend for themselves in a harsh world, and a man can offer support in all forms in the manifestation of a marriage as now he becomes liable to take care of the women.
There's good and bad in Islam, but mostly it's wrong interpretation, so generalizing isn't something I'd promote.
Cheers :)

The real reason why multiple wives were allowed in the middle ages was due to the fact that the male mortality was insanely high (due to warfare). A lot of the women would be widowed at an early age, and multiple marriage solved this issue. But my question is, what is the need for this now? Islam need to evolve with the changing times.

Wrong. Remember it's not because a text is from God through his messenger that those who read and interpret it aren't abject ignorant infidels:


Now to be more crude and rude how many dick do you have? Here is your answer.

How can you honestly post that with a clear fucking conscience?

There are ~ 77430 words in 6236 sentences even if you are the biggest antisemit and atheist you rationally can agree that there is automatically some universal truth in it.

Your hate blind you and makes what you try to say irrational.