|
Title: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: alyssa85 on June 18, 2016, 12:51:45 PM Here is the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/18/business/dealbook/hacker-may-have-removed-more-than-50-million-from-experimental-cybercurrency-project.html?_r=0 The Wall Street Journal: http://www.wsj.com/articles/investment-fund-based-on-digital-currency-to-wind-down-after-alleged-hack-1466175033 The register: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/17/digital_currency_ethereum/ Quote Digital currency Ethereum may have less than a month to live. ...The conflict threatens to bring down the credibility of the entire currency. Not only was it possible to hack the system and move millions of dollars worth out of one of the currency's main backers – raising questions of its technical competence – but the developers have proposed intervening potentially for their own financial gain in the inner workings of the entire system – raising political questions over how it is run. The uncertainty is keenly reflected in the currency's price – it has dropped more than 30 per cent since the news broke and continues to drop as the community debates what to do. With just 27 days to go before the proposed solution becomes ineffective, the digi-currency sits at an extraordinary crossroads: intervene and risk undermining the entire currency, or let the theft pass and risk undermining the entire currency Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: iamnotback on June 18, 2016, 12:54:34 PM With just 27 days to go before the proposed solution becomes ineffective, the digi-currency sits at an extraordinary crossroads: intervene and risk undermining the entire currency, or let the theft pass and risk undermining the entire currency Checkmate. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: aidia on June 18, 2016, 12:59:11 PM With just 27 days to go before the proposed solution becomes ineffective, the digi-currency sits at an extraordinary crossroads: intervene and risk undermining the entire currency, or let the theft pass and risk undermining the entire currency Checkmate. ^This At this point I'd like to thank you for pointing out the flaws in DAO before the shit truly hit the fan, did not put a dime in because of this. *thumbs up* Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: whap on June 18, 2016, 01:04:12 PM At this point I'd like to thank you for pointing out the flaws in DAO before the shit truly hit the fan, did not put a dime in because of this. *thumbs up* Well, it hit the fan outright hard already... Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: ATA Group on June 18, 2016, 01:04:35 PM Dat Ni**ha deed brah
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Spoetnik on June 18, 2016, 01:10:22 PM AHHAHA I love it !
I want to give the hacker a big Hug + Reach around and maybe a Cleveland Steamer ! Hacker they should give you your coins you got them fairly. ..congrats on the fine job by the way :) And no i am not brown nosing to warm up to the newly rich millionaire now LOL I don't want anything from you guy.. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: alyssa85 on June 18, 2016, 02:26:19 PM The hacker has posted a signed message:
http://pastebin.com/CcGUBgDG Quote To the DAO and the Ethereum community, I have carefully examined the code of The DAO and decided to participate after finding the feature where splitting is rewarded with additional ether. I have made use of this feature and have rightfully claimed 3,641,694 ether, and would like to thank the DAO for this reward. It is my understanding that the DAO code contains this feature to promote decentralization and encourage the creation of "child DAOs". I am disappointed by those who are characterizing the use of this intentional feature as "theft". I am making use of this explicitly coded feature as per the smart contract terms and my law firm has advised me that my action is fully compliant with United States criminal and tort law. For reference please review the terms of the DAO: It's top quality trolling, that's for sure. He's enjoying this. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Spoetnik on June 18, 2016, 02:27:49 PM And so he should !
Peww peew peeeeeew !!! http://img07.deviantart.net/c201/i/2011/028/e/8/angwy_penguin_super_fort_by_star_bunny_honeybee-d389fud.jpg Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mining1 on June 18, 2016, 03:57:32 PM @alyssa85 You are probably Smart enought to realise its most likely a fud message for obvs reasons
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: iamnotback on June 18, 2016, 04:03:28 PM @alyssa85 You are probably Smart enought to realise its most likely a fud message for obvs reasons Those 2000 BTC worth that was reportedly short ETH just before the attack. Now he gets the capitulation to $7 or $1, so he can cash out BTC. And assuming he was highly leveraged on the shorts, when he covers that will probably be the bottom. He might even go long ETH if it overshoots to the bottom side and he wants to profit off any bounce. Also others who probably went short on the initial deadcat bounce after the flash crash to $13. But remember don't buy until there is blood in the streets. It must get very bloody and many must panic before it is a nobrainer buy. And don't catch a falling knife. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: GreenBits on June 18, 2016, 04:17:31 PM @alyssa85 You are probably Smart enought to realise its most likely a fud message for obvs reasons Those 2000 BTC worth that was reportedly short ETH just before the attack. Now he gets the capitulation to $7 or $1, so he can cash out BTC. And assuming he was highly leveraged on the shorts, when he covers that will probably be the bottom. He might even go long ETH if it overshoots to the bottom side and he wants to profit off any bounce. Also others who probably went short on the initial deadcat bounce after the flash crash to $13. But remember don't buy until there is blood in the streets. It must get very bloody and many must panic before it is a nobrainer buy. I didn't know about this short business, now this is starting to feel like an inside job. Surely the SEC/FBI will investigate the person(s) responsible for placing the order, if this were an SEC regulated asset that would be a no brainier. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: pbleak on June 18, 2016, 04:22:02 PM @alyssa85 You are probably Smart enought to realise its most likely a fud message for obvs reasons Those 2000 BTC worth that was reportedly short ETH just before the attack. Now he gets the capitulation to $7 or $1, so he can cash out BTC. And assuming he was highly leveraged on the shorts, when he covers that will probably be the bottom. He might even go long ETH if it overshoots to the bottom side and he wants to profit off any bounce. Also others who probably went short on the initial deadcat bounce after the flash crash to $13. But remember don't buy until there is blood in the streets. It must get very bloody and many must panic before it is a nobrainer buy. I didn't know about this short business, now this is starting to feel like an inside job. Surely the SEC/FBI will investigate the person(s) responsible for placing the order, if this were an SEC regulated asset that would be a no brainier. Griff Green mentioned that there are only 500 people capable of this attack, i.e. the broad Ethereum dev community. The message also suggests someone who believed his hack was not stealing because it followed the principles of the code. The ironic thing is the attacker could have likely keep doing small versions of this without causing the price to tanker. Makes me think it was someone who wanted to make a statement rather than a simple criminal. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: alyssa85 on June 18, 2016, 04:33:34 PM Griff Green mentioned that there are only 500 people capable of this attack, i.e. the broad Ethereum dev community. The message also suggests someone who believed his hack was not stealing because it followed the principles of the code. The ironic thing is the attacker could have likely keep doing small versions of this without causing the price to tanker. Makes me think it was someone who wanted to make a statement rather than a simple criminal. So any idea about the identity of the hacker? Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: rocketron on June 18, 2016, 04:38:50 PM I dont beleve this is a genuine message from the hacker..if it is... his identity will become known in the near future, and you can be sure..that his life will be in danger then. there are mafia and gangs and what not involved with investments in cryptos. they will not let the hacker away with it.
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: alyssa85 on June 18, 2016, 05:25:03 PM I recommend people having a read of the Ether subreddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/ Some of them are trying to track the culprit, some are arguing for a fork, others that Ether should just take the loss on the chin. I feel really bad for them, they've all put hard cash into the thing. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mining1 on June 18, 2016, 06:07:22 PM Price atm is important for Day traders since it only causes short term panic and a drop in price. It doesnt affect the project, it ll probably help the project as a whole and after people will start realising that is not your average proj like monero, dash or other wannabe btc proj, and that devs keep delivering their promisesem price will go up rather fast
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: kingorbust on June 18, 2016, 06:16:11 PM With just 27 days to go before the proposed solution becomes ineffective, the digi-currency sits at an extraordinary crossroads: intervene and risk undermining the entire currency, or let the theft pass and risk undermining the entire currency Checkmate. or you know, maybe they catch the guy or the guy/hacker wont sell the ETH? Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mandica on June 18, 2016, 06:17:24 PM Price atm is important for Day traders since it only causes short term panic and a drop in price. It doesnt affect the project, it ll probably help the project as a whole and after people will start realising that is not your average proj like monero, dash or other wannabe btc proj, and that devs keep delivering their promisesem price will go up rather fast The publicity generated by this DAO crisis could be useful to the Ethereum. It might attract more capable codes to help it. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: leopard2 on June 18, 2016, 06:22:58 PM Total and utter rubbish. >:(
ETH is safe and has not been attacked at all. A vehicle using ETH has been attacked. Suppose a large bank gets robbed, USD are stolen. Would the mainstream media say, USD is no longer safe? Rubbish. In fact the USD could not be arrested, while the stolen ETH can. This is positive. ETH is still safe and not reversible, but contracts are a different story. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Suggestive Melon on June 18, 2016, 06:23:54 PM With just 27 days to go before the proposed solution becomes ineffective, the digi-currency sits at an extraordinary crossroads: intervene and risk undermining the entire currency, or let the theft pass and risk undermining the entire currency Checkmate. or you know, maybe they catch the guy or the guy/hacker wont sell the ETH? catching him implies he did something illegal, and that does not appear to be the case Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: wwdz99 on June 18, 2016, 06:29:39 PM DAO has been hacked/exploited, and Ethereum is rapidly losing trust in their developers, as they want to introduce an ETH hardfork to reverse the hack. What a wonderful decentralized currency where a few people decide what happens and the entire network is subjugated to the decisions of a few. Not to mention Ethereum already has big blockchain, soon ethereum will turn into a centralized bank , if it doesnt die before that. Here are a few important things: 1) 20 second block timer with average blocksize = 89 Kb, that means that the blockchain grows 375 Mb /day. The ETH blockchain in 2 years will be bigger by 264 Gb +- The ETH nodes will start dissapearing pretty quickly with that size, because the reindexing and all other operations you need to perform when you download and update a node, will take far too long for anyone to bother. Soon only a few datacenters will be able to operate ETH. 2) The development is wreckless, they spend more time on going to PR events than to actually engineer the code well, first wallet softwares were buggy as hell, took years to sync, which is fair because bitcoin was buggy also at first. However instead of promoting a buggy as hell client, they should have focused on development first and then marketing. 3) Ethereum is too complex, and the more complex something is, the more attack surfaces it has. An ideal cryptocurrency has to be simple and secure. And ETH has many more 0 day bugs that we dont know of yet, so this wont be the last hack. It came out far too fast because of PR pressure. The devs should have stayed 1 more year reviewing and researching the code and make the coin secure in that time, before pushing it out to the public. 4) It's already centralized as hell, the devs can just reverse transactions like this. Sure reversing a hack is obviously good right ?, but the road to Hell is also paved with good intentions. Abusing power comes in small increments. First they only reverse hacks, and then later you find out that everyone will become censored. 5) ETH devs want to impose capital controls on ETH holders. The ETH devs don't respect the free market. The lost cost were already supposedly locked in a child DAO, so then why are they not allowing people to trade? Because they know that people would sell their ETH fast. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClKl69XVAAAAXsU.jpg Since the legitimately transferred coins are being auto locked in by a Child DAO for almost a month as designed why is he telling exchanges to freeze trading and deposits? Such a comment is outrageous to make in this context. Oh shit, it gets worse , these guys are literally insane. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClK0vTAXEAAzL1K.jpg There are 3 options for ETH and in the next 27 days the devs and the ETH community will have to decide on one of them, and in my opinion the results will be the following: 1) They decide to not hardfork in which case the thief gets away with the loot but atleast the integrity of ETH is preserved. The result will probably be a massive selloff of ETH and loss of future confidence in the ETH devs as they failed to provide secure code, it will seriously impact the future growth of ETH which they may or may not recover from. 2) They decide to hardfork, in which case all confidence will be lost in ETH, and it will probably deal a fatal blow to this currency's future, and it will shows as an example how a decentralized currency may not be so decentralized, and a warning to all future altcoin devs to change their attitude. It will impact BTC as well, and many media shills will try to put dirt on BTC's reputation as well. 3) They wait the full 27 days and in the last minute they decide 1) or 2). In this case, the panic and uncertainty will just magnify the negative effects caused by their decision, and whichever they decide upon, the effects will just be much worse. So by logic they should decide 1) and announce it fast, since the longer they wait the more uncertainty they cause by the inaction. That's just my honest opinion. I really think people should just switch over to NXT, because it's far more decentralized and it has better developers. When last time a hack happened in NXT, the developers didnt reversed the transaction. Because in the NXT community the decentralization, transparency and fungibility is the number one priority, that supercedes everything else. The police can catch the hacker with any other method and recover the funds, but the decentralization is sacred. Totally agree Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: iamnotback on June 18, 2016, 06:33:48 PM Suppose a large bank gets robbed, USD are stolen. Would the mainstream media say, USD is no longer safe? Rubbish. If 10% of the shares of a company are transferred in an unexpected instant to someone who has every incentive to dump them, then this can cause a $billion speculative bubble to deflate. The valuation of ETH was based on many people believing that significant use cases were right around the corner and that the rampant level of speculation was justified. With a more sober reality, the enthusiasm might be less but I am not sure. What do you think? Safe can also mean the value is safe. What is the utility of tokens which are devalued by -95% in any instant (assuming ETH drops to $1). Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mkc on June 18, 2016, 06:43:53 PM Who is the Bitcoin guru that dump all his coins and move into ETH? I wonder what he will say now.
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mining1 on June 19, 2016, 01:50:59 PM Is it only me that thinkss the dao attack will be great for ethereum project? Its like a wake up call, everything worked so well ,something like this had to happen and remember them the project is still far from being perfect and theres alot of work ahead. They probably did more in the past few days than in a whole month, even started a bounty hunt for bugs and fix them at a very fast pace. Ofc there will be alot of fud along the way thanks to btc maximalists that are so scared about competition and are trying to kill it to secure their investment and profits. Eth is dumped for 2 days now with a huge volume of 150mil and i still holding ground, sign that theres alot of buying supp in10-15 range. And as soon as the dumping is over the price will be back to 20+. But only after this dao attack charade is over.
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: alyssa85 on June 19, 2016, 01:57:02 PM Suppose a large bank gets robbed, USD are stolen. Would the mainstream media say, USD is no longer safe? Rubbish. All the US Mint does is print the cash - it doesn't design bank systems, that is up to the banks. The trouble with this heist is that the design flaw was made by the Ether devs... Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mining1 on June 19, 2016, 02:11:17 PM This fudder above just proved my point. Thank you!
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: biggbox on June 19, 2016, 02:18:59 PM Bitcoin has often been mentioned negatively in the mainstream press but it is doing well. As long as the fundamentals of the coins are solid, it should withstand scrutiny and negative press.
The issue now is with DAO, not Ether. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 02:20:49 PM The issue now is with DAO, not Ether. Incorrect (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1505886.msg15278364#msg15278364). Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: biggbox on June 19, 2016, 02:27:04 PM The issue now is with DAO, not Ether. Incorrect (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1505886.msg15278364#msg15278364). Okay. That is too technical. It is beyond my understanding. Do you mind explaining it in layman terms or, at least in bachelor's level? Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: shyliar on June 19, 2016, 02:49:55 PM I dont beleve this is a genuine message from the hacker..if it is... his identity will become known in the near future, and you can be sure..that his life will be in danger then. there are mafia and gangs and what not involved with investments in cryptos. they will not let the hacker away with it. Will these Mafia and gangs also be going after the writer of the DAO code? Seems equally applicable (If not more so since the Mafia and gangs at least will have an appreciation and respect for the skills of the hacker). Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 03:01:58 PM The issue now is with DAO, not Ether. Incorrect (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1505886.msg15278364#msg15278364). Okay. That is too technical. It is beyond my understanding. Do you mind explaining it in layman terms or, at least in bachelor's level? Does this help? http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2008/01/19/how-dr-suess-would-prove-the-halting-problem-undecidable/ Scooping the Loop Snooper an elementary proof of the undecidability of the halting problem Geoffrey K. Pullum, University of Edinburgh No program can say what another will do. Now, I won’t just assert that, I’ll prove it to you: I will prove that although you might work til you drop, you can’t predict whether a program will stop. Imagine we have a procedure called P that will snoop in the source code of programs to see there aren’t infinite loops that go round and around; and P prints the word “Fine!” if no looping is found. You feed in your code, and the input it needs, and then P takes them both and it studies and reads and computes whether things will all end as they should (as opposed to going loopy the way that they could). Well, the truth is that P cannot possibly be, because if you wrote it and gave it to me, I could use it to set up a logical bind that would shatter your reason and scramble your mind. Here’s the trick I would use – and it’s simple to do. I’d define a procedure – we’ll name the thing Q – that would take any program and call P (of course!) to tell if it looped, by reading the source; And if so, Q would simply print “Loop!” and then stop; but if no, Q would go right back to the top, and start off again, looping endlessly back, til the universe dies and is frozen and black. And this program called Q wouldn’t stay on the shelf; I would run it, and (fiendishly) feed it itself. What behaviour results when I do this with Q? When it reads its own source, just what will it do? If P warns of loops, Q will print “Loop!” and quit; yet P is supposed to speak truly of it. So if Q’s going to quit, then P should say, “Fine!” – which will make Q go back to its very first line! No matter what P would have done, Q will scoop it: Q uses P’s output to make P look stupid. If P gets things right then it lies in its tooth; and if it speaks falsely, it’s telling the truth! I’ve created a paradox, neat as can be – and simply by using your putative P. When you assumed P you stepped into a snare; Your assumptions have led you right into my lair. So, how to escape from this logical mess? I don’t have to tell you; I’m sure you can guess. By reductio, there cannot possibly be a procedure that acts like the mythical P. You can never discover mechanical means for predicting the acts of computing machines. It’s something that cannot be done. So we users must find our own bugs; our computers are losers! Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: JohnnyBTCSeed on June 19, 2016, 03:09:27 PM @Geoffrey K. Pullum, University of Edinburgh
https://s32.postimg.org/839k0bfx1/images_duckduckgo_com.png Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Spoetnik on June 19, 2016, 04:26:08 PM This fudder above just proved my point. Thank you! Your point Noob account ETH Shill ? You get robbed and your better for it ? L O L Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: RealityTruth on June 19, 2016, 05:03:32 PM now masses "know" that cryptocurrencies can be hacked and will stay away from bitcoin also. ethereum is doing bad to us all :(
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: jiefes on June 19, 2016, 05:09:27 PM Ha ha ha! No bad publicity. Now for ETH and DAO will learn and those who have not heard earlier them. No wonder to stir up some clones of ETH , as SHIFT.
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Kaller on June 19, 2016, 05:17:05 PM Ha ha ha! No bad publicity. Now for ETH and DAO will learn and those who have not heard earlier them. No wonder to stir up some clones of ETH , as SHIFT. They will also have the same shortcoming and they do not have enough funds to employ more capable programmers. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Vaccinus on June 19, 2016, 05:18:00 PM the negative coverage is what is causing the dumping, not the security hole, reverse hype is bad
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mandica on June 20, 2016, 01:39:05 PM the negative coverage is what is causing the dumping, not the security hole, reverse hype is bad Maybe we shall wait on the side line and see the price action and the action by the developers. If they are good, we can buy more. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: dste123 on June 20, 2016, 01:44:35 PM now masses "know" that cryptocurrencies can be hacked and will stay away from bitcoin also. ethereum is doing bad to us all :( Agreed - bad publicity will keep away regular folks that were on the fence about learning / investing in bitcoin. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mandica on June 21, 2016, 12:25:59 PM now masses "know" that cryptocurrencies can be hacked and will stay away from bitcoin also. ethereum is doing bad to us all :( Agreed - bad publicity will keep away regular folks that were on the fence about learning / investing in bitcoin. The DAO is one failed eexperiement of digital platform. there will be more failures in the future, But it will succeed eventually. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: frobley on June 22, 2016, 03:58:13 AM then it seems like the old adage is true, "There is no such thing as bad publicity", now 0.022 and climbing ???
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: biggbox on June 22, 2016, 04:32:17 AM then it seems like the old adage is true, "There is no such thing as bad publicity", now 0.022 and climbing ??? Is it because btc prices have fallen? Ether adds another layer of conversion Dollar -> btc -> ether. Or i should not calculate in this manner? Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: kiklo on June 22, 2016, 07:18:51 AM then it seems like the old adage is true, "There is no such thing as bad publicity", now 0.022 and climbing ??? Is it because btc prices have fallen? Ether adds another layer of conversion Dollar -> btc -> ether. Or i should not calculate in this manner? Most likely conversion is : btc -> Dollars -> Hookers & Cocaine ether -> Dollars -> Hookers & Cocaine http://www.moviequotesandmore.com/wp-content/uploads/wolf-of-wall-street-5.jpg It is what all of the wall street types are doing. Circle of Money or Sexual Diseases, can never remember which. :P 8) Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: HCLivess on June 22, 2016, 08:51:08 AM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low
Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mandica on June 22, 2016, 12:26:10 PM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low When do you think the price will reach a all time low? I thought the Ethereum will be better after bug fix. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: shyliar on June 22, 2016, 12:30:43 PM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low When do you think the price will reach a all time low? I thought the Ethereum will be better after bug fix. They are not fixing the bug. Poor code will continue to be written (many contracts out there already contain a similar bug). They are simply locking the transferred funds. Edit: Unless hardfork follows allowing funds to be recovered. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mandica on June 27, 2016, 06:45:23 PM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low When do you think the price will reach a all time low? I thought the Ethereum will be better after bug fix. They are not fixing the bug. Poor code will continue to be written (many contracts out there already contain a similar bug). They are simply locking the transferred funds. Edit: Unless hardfork follows allowing funds to be recovered. If there is no hard fork, these 3.6 million Ethereum could be lost forever. That will increase the value of existing coins. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: antiscam2000 on June 27, 2016, 11:52:38 PM Someone must be in it so deep he can't exit anymore and the only thing left to the trappd pumper is to support the price and hope for the best.
No other way to explain this hasn't dropped below ico-price yet. He'll run out of money eventually thanks to the high inflation. Hope he'll be okay once he gets roasted. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: Minecache on June 28, 2016, 12:51:17 AM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low When do you think the price will reach a all time low? I thought the Ethereum will be better after bug fix. They are not fixing the bug. Poor code will continue to be written (many contracts out there already contain a similar bug). They are simply locking the transferred funds. Edit: Unless hardfork follows allowing funds to be recovered. If there is no hard fork, these 3.6 million Ethereum could be lost forever. That will increase the value of existing coins. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: GreenBits on June 28, 2016, 12:55:02 AM Someone must be in it so deep he can't exit anymore and the only thing left to the trappd pumper is to support the price and hope for the best. No other way to explain this hasn't dropped below ico-price yet. He'll run out of money eventually thanks to the high inflation. Hope he'll be okay once he gets roasted. Amen! Every time I check the ticket on this I'm like "wtf?!" Something is propping the price of this asset up, it isn't even correlating with the news on Reddit anymore. Price was tracking with public confidence in the "DAO Wars". Science fiction. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: mandica on June 29, 2016, 05:51:36 PM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low When do you think the price will reach a all time low? I thought the Ethereum will be better after bug fix. They are not fixing the bug. Poor code will continue to be written (many contracts out there already contain a similar bug). They are simply locking the transferred funds. Edit: Unless hardfork follows allowing funds to be recovered. If there is no hard fork, these 3.6 million Ethereum could be lost forever. That will increase the value of existing coins. Would that lead to 3% price rise or 30%, or 300%? I wish the DAO holders will be compensated by the price rise of their existing Ethereum. Title: Re: Ethereum is now getting negative coverage in the mainstream media Post by: biggbox on June 29, 2016, 06:05:26 PM This is the reason why you will see a new all-time-low When do you think the price will reach a all time low? I thought the Ethereum will be better after bug fix. They are not fixing the bug. Poor code will continue to be written (many contracts out there already contain a similar bug). They are simply locking the transferred funds. Edit: Unless hardfork follows allowing funds to be recovered. If there is no hard fork, these 3.6 million Ethereum could be lost forever. That will increase the value of existing coins. How does your ETH doubler works? Is it paying? |
