|
Title: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: CantWithhold on June 26, 2016, 01:35:34 AM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 The time has come for a statement of Poloniex, Wilmington, DE, USA, concerning the “Waves Platform”. I am a high-ranking employee of the exchange and wish to remain anonymous. We have been contacted by Alexander Ivanov, founder of Coinomat and Wavesplatform. Mr. Ivanov has asked us repeatedly to list a WAVE/BTC trading pair and sent us the full node code that is required for integration. After an extensive audit we have decided not to add Waves to our exchange. The code contains malicious functions that allow the Waves developers to execute arbitrary commands. Additionally, we have discovered that the code sends statistics to the Russian government. Poloniex will not cooperate with the Waves platform. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXbzEcAAoJEOK6co7Be6Gkk+YP/AjFag/PkPOTCIgivV4OidDD XGgaiLxi0wRVDi9A/ZsN/Eq7ZTPPI/4V3ufq52kwk/Gs6p+zjImPi32MGmFflma4 TB9ajSQwbowycKRC/caJVFQHFEvL5kltVIemJw/KqmlAVPfVCw7y2ZkNOxzJrsAO mddj0HF149aXGfrqhTaK3AIbsAZO8vMtD1e/Kx2+x93XGF9aVZNrPaOaFpmut52j 00htbeTqG1YybQ2RMUWTHmM+o3jeSnGxMPUWg0zlxfqqlekBp9wf5euHOzAVW1v3 cHX2PT0sY2GKSdk20k2XskSkXr2oZ9IPUwqOpeTgDu17ZN7rzUtSomjD4yrJEBTS KEruVAMWL6qHouQRmVIYu2mQh5S04T1bH+fBlP1ksLmQFIm+WSTWWM0xhgPgj6Q6 817DgxS1ow5H9WHzUKv/1xyFI9oGrvfD5gLVZ+6iZ0u6Wyi+IQ/nDNl5pU5u1fQc 7mcMEPdapcd278wqA0AZxJQdkUP+RQLXYe5HjM2AdhZQBn+6ZGBqXUE1hSmHtGP0 Fsqg3+4pIBF/+y/dBsHrdX9BHwFkHdleNgyeUj3/pJEQ6gZJiyZUi18DJH4tvoov jF2k31zjAowZjIOHn1fkolfI7Lhh5gvbPmGu8B/UySmb7BkK+Tn/chkSMAFoAiGU 3znWB8ZJF/DXZgG0td7P =UqeJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Lutpin on June 26, 2016, 01:40:11 AM And what pgp key would that message be signed from? Is it even a signed message at all?
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: shyliar on June 26, 2016, 01:42:00 AM To bad you guys didn't bother auditing the DAO before you added it to your exchange. Might have been helpful ::)
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: americanpegasus on June 26, 2016, 02:03:38 AM Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: tokeweed on June 26, 2016, 02:12:59 AM I doubt that's true. Poloniex has never made any public statement on why they decided not to list a coin/token. And I don't think that will change. Out of respect and a proper way to handle things, Poloniex would let this remain behind the scenes and would not have issued a public statement that would risk debasing any platform or project. That's just bad for business overall.
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: iamnotback on June 26, 2016, 02:59:08 AM The crypto ecosystem is potentially becoming a criminal enterprise. I am not making any accusations. Be aware of the following speculation.
Someone implied that WAVES insiders could be making these posts to try to drive the price down on purpose: ...They are also using 1K of ICO funds to buy back even more coins. Interesting how the market appears to be suppressed now... Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: vuduchyld on June 26, 2016, 03:10:21 AM To bad you guys didn't bother auditing the DAO before you added it to your exchange. Might have been helpful ::) Nooooo shit. Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Spoetnik on June 26, 2016, 03:10:52 AM I doubt that's true. Poloniex has never made any public statement on why they decided not to list a coin/token. And I don't think that will change. Out of respect and a proper way to handle things, Poloniex would let this remain behind the scenes and would not have issued a public statement that would risk debasing any platform or project. That's just bad for business overall. You are wrong and i am right as always ..and don't you dare forget it ;D One word.. Supercoin. Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0) Posted by.. busoni (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139578) June 14, 2014, 01:20:32 PM So.. next time check your facts before opening your mouth or contact me to vette your "opinion" son. 8) There is my opinion and the wrong one.. PS: @OP Cool story bro and i wish it was true.. Waves is an ICO and they are all scams. (so it should not be added regardless) I also am not impressed with Poloniex's track record & wish they would get their shit together. I lost a lot of respect for them watching them like eager-beavers running to add BlockNET way back. And hella great point.. where were they with the scam ICO DAO or ICO scam Ethereum for that matter ? Seems to me they just sort of add any scammy ass ICO bullshit ..as long as they get paid. Classy ::) I am highly suspicious this news is true though. Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Spoetnik on June 26, 2016, 03:35:46 AM The crypto ecosystem is potentially becoming a criminal enterprise. I am not make any accusations. Be aware of the following speculation. Someone implied that WAVES insiders could be making these posts to try the price down on purpose: ...They are also using 1K of ICO funds to buy back even more coins. Interesting how the market appears to be suppressed now... Uhhh yeah duh man.. did you not see Tech news sites posting about *NEW* Ransomware daily ? ..for years one end now ? Where have you been ? And as you like to quote.. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one... so uhhh yeah no fucking shit man ROFL Ya bruh.. You got Occam'd 8) December 2013 = Crime pays very well: Cryptolocker grosses up to $30 million in ransom (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2082204/crime-pays-very-well-cryptolocker-grosses-up-to-30-million-in-ransom.html) Welcome to Crypto NOOB hahahhahaa I have faaaaaaaaar larger stats than that too. Bitcoin's market is saturated with Ransomware profits being moved around.. Sadly all of you are too fucking stupid to recognize the dangers of these or how relevant it is. You will never see it brought up.. i did a few times over the years.. But when i do the mouthy cuntcicle loser dregs here flip out & mouth me off. ..then go on & on saying if i post a warning here then i am advertising them etc etc. Which is of course fucking retarded beyond comprehension yet par of the course with 'The Talk BlowTard's ::) [NEWS] Ransomware (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1359542.0) By Spoetnik February 10, 2016, 05:15:40 AM Read the link and see "smart guys" like Franky lip me off for posting a warning. Apparently to him with his infinitely wise logic.. If i warned about a rapist on the loose ? That would mean i am adverting for rape and helping make it easier to rape people. LOL Idiots ::) ALT's ? YES ..i have seen a pile of virus in wallets that had keyloggers etc posted in this forum section too ! PS: There you have it.. my opinion (The Correct One) So lets all not loiter around and pretend you know "things". So pipe done Mensa Investards, I am the smart one here ! PPS: I think we need more Canadians here or something.. maybe that explains the intelligence level problem here. Too many silly Americans struttin' around jigglin' their mighty grandiose Dick-Holsters around ? Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: RussianMiner on June 26, 2016, 05:45:37 AM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The time has come for a statement of Poloniex, Wilmington, DE, USA, concerning the “Waves Platform”. I am a high-ranking employee of the exchange and wish to remain anonymous. We have been contacted by Alexander Ivanov, founder of Coinomat and Wavesplatform. Mr. Ivanov has asked us repeatedly to list a WAVE/BTC trading pair and sent us the full node code that is required for integration. After an extensive audit we have decided not to add Waves to our exchange. The code contains malicious functions that allow the Waves developers to execute arbitrary commands. Additionally, we have discovered that the code sends statistics to the Russian government. Poloniex will not cooperate with the Waves platform. LOL!!!! Fake message from an account with 1 post :) Statistic to Russian government)))) They forget about a copy to CIA)))) Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: X-ray on June 26, 2016, 07:11:46 AM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Yay, my predict is true, waves are not have a good future. and waves price always drops. Sell all of your waves and move to another currency can give you a better future.Hash: SHA256 The time has come for a statement of Poloniex, Wilmington, DE, USA, concerning the “Waves Platform”. I am a high-ranking employee of the exchange and wish to remain anonymous. We have been contacted by Alexander Ivanov, founder of Coinomat and Wavesplatform. Mr. Ivanov has asked us repeatedly to list a WAVE/BTC trading pair and sent us the full node code that is required for integration. After an extensive audit we have decided not to add Waves to our exchange. The code contains malicious functions that allow the Waves developers to execute arbitrary commands. Additionally, we have discovered that the code sends statistics to the Russian government. Poloniex will not cooperate with the Waves platform. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXbzEcAAoJEOK6co7Be6Gkk+YP/AjFag/PkPOTCIgivV4OidDD XGgaiLxi0wRVDi9A/ZsN/Eq7ZTPPI/4V3ufq52kwk/Gs6p+zjImPi32MGmFflma4 TB9ajSQwbowycKRC/caJVFQHFEvL5kltVIemJw/KqmlAVPfVCw7y2ZkNOxzJrsAO mddj0HF149aXGfrqhTaK3AIbsAZO8vMtD1e/Kx2+x93XGF9aVZNrPaOaFpmut52j 00htbeTqG1YybQ2RMUWTHmM+o3jeSnGxMPUWg0zlxfqqlekBp9wf5euHOzAVW1v3 cHX2PT0sY2GKSdk20k2XskSkXr2oZ9IPUwqOpeTgDu17ZN7rzUtSomjD4yrJEBTS KEruVAMWL6qHouQRmVIYu2mQh5S04T1bH+fBlP1ksLmQFIm+WSTWWM0xhgPgj6Q6 817DgxS1ow5H9WHzUKv/1xyFI9oGrvfD5gLVZ+6iZ0u6Wyi+IQ/nDNl5pU5u1fQc 7mcMEPdapcd278wqA0AZxJQdkUP+RQLXYe5HjM2AdhZQBn+6ZGBqXUE1hSmHtGP0 Fsqg3+4pIBF/+y/dBsHrdX9BHwFkHdleNgyeUj3/pJEQ6gZJiyZUi18DJH4tvoov jF2k31zjAowZjIOHn1fkolfI7Lhh5gvbPmGu8B/UySmb7BkK+Tn/chkSMAFoAiGU 3znWB8ZJF/DXZgG0td7P =UqeJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Outlander on June 26, 2016, 07:34:42 AM Some one is spreading rumours and fuel the price crash. They might step in the bottom.
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Spoetnik on June 26, 2016, 08:20:02 AM Some one is spreading rumours and fuel the price crash. They might step in the bottom. If the value of your crypto-currency is derived solely from Bitcointalk FUD or.. hype / spam etc. Then i'd say we got a problem :D Just imagine if these coins did not have this forum to post on.. Then what ? Where would Ethereum or Waves be ? Crying FUD for bucks $ is the reality here. Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: KoinMaster on June 26, 2016, 08:59:57 AM "high ranking employee" with a newbie bitcointalk account... Give me a break.... If you believe that then you deserve not to make any money with Waves....
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: RussianMiner on June 26, 2016, 10:16:24 AM "high ranking employee" with a newbie bitcointalk account... Give me a break.... If you believe that then you deserve not to make any money with Waves.... This post in not the only one Someone spreading FUD about WAVES from new accounts in many threads! For me as WAVES holder it's a good sign :) Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: KoinMaster on June 26, 2016, 12:58:45 PM "high ranking employee" with a newbie bitcointalk account... Give me a break.... If you believe that then you deserve not to make any money with Waves.... This post in not the only one Someone spreading FUD about WAVES from new accounts in many threads! For me as WAVES holder it's a good sign :) I am sorry that 0.00021 happened at 3:00 AM European time today because I would have loaded up some extra Waves at this dirt cheap price! ;) Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: RussianMiner on June 27, 2016, 12:04:28 PM I am sorry that 0.00021 happened at 3:00 AM European time today because I would have loaded up some extra Waves at this dirt cheap price! ;) Lucky you!!! I bought at 27 =( Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: BDCoinMiner on June 27, 2016, 07:55:47 PM LOL!!!! Fake message from an account with 1 post :) Statistic to Russian government)))) They forget about a copy to CIA)))) Uh! You got it wrong! CRYPTO is field of NSA, not CIA ....... :)) Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: BDCoinMiner on June 27, 2016, 08:03:12 PM I doubt that's true. Poloniex has never made any public statement on why they decided not to list a coin/token. And I don't think that will change. Out of respect and a proper way to handle things, Poloniex would let this remain behind the scenes and would not have issued a public statement that would risk debasing any platform or project. That's just bad for business overall. You are wrong and i am right as always ..and don't you dare forget it ;D One word.. Supercoin. Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0) Posted by.. busoni (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139578) June 14, 2014, 01:20:32 PM So.. next time check your facts before opening your mouth or contact me to vette your "opinion" son. 8) There is my opinion and the wrong one.. PS: @OP Cool story bro and i wish it was true.. Waves is an ICO and they are all scams. (so it should not be added regardless) I also am not impressed with Poloniex's track record & wish they would get their shit together. I lost a lot of respect for them watching them like eager-beavers running to add BlockNET way back. And hella great point.. where were they with the scam ICO DAO or ICO scam Ethereum for that matter ? Seems to me they just sort of add any scammy ass ICO bullshit ..as long as they get paid. Classy ::) I am highly suspicious this news is true though. Posted by.. busoni (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139578) Vs. Someone claiming "high-ranking employee of the exchange" with 'Newborn baby' status on forum is too childish to consider ..... Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: WayToGo on July 01, 2016, 03:11:51 AM I think polo is waiting for the node release and possibly a code audit, as its written in a completely new framework.
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Stormspirit on July 01, 2016, 06:53:07 PM ok nice now ill dump all this shit and buy fct and go vacation
Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Legasean on July 03, 2016, 01:20:30 PM I think polo is waiting for the node release and possibly a code audit, as its written in a completely new framework. When they mentioned that the statistics were sent to the Russian government, I knew this was some bogus statement. I am not a holder but this is ludacris, hope nobody felt for it. Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: Spoetnik on June 11, 2017, 04:25:11 AM I doubt that's true. Poloniex has never made any public statement on why they decided not to list a coin/token. And I don't think that will change. Out of respect and a proper way to handle things, Poloniex would let this remain behind the scenes and would not have issued a public statement that would risk debasing any platform or project. That's just bad for business overall. Try Google then post comments. :D https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0 Title: Re: Waves Poloniex Statement Post by: codehtcmail on June 11, 2017, 10:45:21 AM No way this is a real thing, it's not logical to say they send stats to the Russian government, and to what purpose ?
So this is a spycoin ? |
