Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Economics => Topic started by: aes1 on March 21, 2013, 12:36:08 AM



Title: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: aes1 on March 21, 2013, 12:36:08 AM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: bubblesort on March 21, 2013, 01:13:59 AM
Speaking of anonymity, I hate it when Radio Shack doesn't want to deal with me anonymously.  I'm waving cash at them and they don't want it.  Last time I was there they literally refused my cash because I wouldn't give them my cell phone number.  No skin off my back, I just ordered the parts I needed on line at a fraction of the price at Radio Shack.  I just had to wait a few days for shipping.

As far as gold goes:  Gold is fiat.  It has low use value, it's value comes from people telling you it has value, same as USD or Euros or Pesos.

I agree with you on the land thing.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Mike Christ on March 21, 2013, 01:27:23 AM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)


On that note, wasn't Japan trying to build man-made islands?  Maybe it's not too late to be a land owner ;D


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Richy_T on March 21, 2013, 03:44:30 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_%28archipelago%29

Get digging :D


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Melbustus on March 21, 2013, 07:13:23 PM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)



You guys might want to check out Cypherdoc's thread (last page of it (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.4500)).



Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: jago25_98 on March 31, 2013, 01:18:03 AM
What about the religious point of view - that growth is not a good thing. That gold is good because it is stable and does not grow like Bitcoin?

Just sayin' ;)


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Mike Christ on March 31, 2013, 01:20:59 AM
What about the religious point of view - that growth is not a good thing. That gold is good because it is stable and does not grow like Bitcoin?

Just sayin' ;)

The Church of Satoshi would like to have a word with you.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: notme on March 31, 2013, 06:47:02 AM
What about the religious point of view - that growth is not a good thing. That gold is good because it is stable and does not grow like Bitcoin?

Just sayin' ;)

Gold is "stable" because it is old.  Bitcoin grows because it is still very new.  I put stable in quotes because compared to most assets, gold is very volatile.  If bitcoin makes it to the size of the gold market, it should be much more stable.

Just sayin' ;)


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: iamnotback on October 30, 2016, 07:43:11 AM
I think they are they are happy if you overpay $2 over spot for the oversupply of silver in the world. There is all the silver you want in 1000oz bars. How much do you need? I'll tell you were you can buy it.

Don't buy 18,000 oz of silver like I did. You'll end up bankrupt like I am.

If your goal is to actually make money, you would be buying before there's a physical shortage in 1000oz bars, not after (be first, be smart, or cheat).  I also hear even the big players are buying 1 oz silver eagles and NOT huge bars.

The problem is that physical silver coin is not ever going to be used as currency ever again, no matter what happens. Period.

1. We are in a digital age and no one is going backwards, no matter what happens. Period.

2. When global collapses ensues such that you think you might be able to use metal coinage, what actually happens is as follows.

  • As Fernando “FerFAL” Aguirre points out (http://ferfal.blogspot.com/2010/11/cash-and-precious-metals-their-role.html), only the currency that can be exchanged external to the crisis area has value. People are not bartering silver dimes, rather if you had German DMarks in Bosnia or USA dollars in Argentina, then these were accepted and liquid. Gold coins were much more difficult to liquidate because there is a funnel of few dealers that can't actually exchange them for the externally liquid currencies of USA dollars.
  • As Dmitry Orlov points out (http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2014/12/are-americans-prepared-for-soviet-style.html), everyone's priority is on food, security, and transportation. Direct trade of these is more valued than some metal which can't be traded for these needs, because these metals are not liquid.
  • Armstrong has also explained that gold and silver only have a value for as long as the collapse is not total and there is still an external market. During Dark Ages such as in Japan or fall of Rome, the gold and silver become entirely illiquid (is buried in the ground) and only food, guns, fuel, and alcohol+cigarettes become money.

See the link below to the description of the war in Bosnia:

You apparently lack appreciation of the significance of both marginal prices in economics, and also the non-linear effects of chaos.

1. With marginal prices in Economics 101, the price you pay is set by the most expensive producer. It is not a useful model to think of a 3/4 reduction in food production causing causing a 400% increase in prices, because when you take away 3/4 of the lowest cost producers, the new supply is highest cost producers. So as was the case in Bosnia, where the cost of food was driven by the highest cost producers, a tin can of Spam was $30 to $40, i.e. roughly a 1000% increase. You need to visualize this as disruption of economies-of-scale not only in farming, but also in terms of distribution economies-of-scale, security of farming and distribution economies-of-scale.

2. When the population has become dependent on high economies-of-scale in farming, distribution, credit, government, corporations, etc., and that is taken away by mother nature and or widespread war/pestilence (-4.5 F average temperature reduction in cold climates, with great aggregate effects such as flooding, droughts, etc), then the F.U.B.A.R. human effects are quite non-linear as described in that link bigtimespaghetti provided on surviving the war in Bosnia (http://www.naturalnews.com/040249_bosnia_preppers_survival_strategies.html) (which I had read long ago when it was first published). This can further exacerbate application of solutions and thus drive prices another 1000% higher.

Adaptation was essential as explained below, but the following adaptation can't be done if you are surrounded by humans who are suddenly thrust into a situation for which they are not prepared because they will hunt you instead of adapting:





Makes sense because the purpose of a currency is standardized, interchangeable units of measure, and bullion bars do not fit the bill.  They're only useful for industrial applications, which is why many places in Europe charge VAT on bars and not coins.  Also easier to avoid counterfeits with coins than bullion bars.

Actually doesn't make sense at all. You want to be buying bullion that can be liquidated if the collapse doesn't go extreme. Otherwise you don't want to be buying precious metals at all.

This is why crypto-currency is going to kick ass.

I would have maybe some 1 oz gold coins for a desperation situation, knowing full well that anyone that takes them in payment is only going to give me 1/10 their "official value" (or original value) in an apocalyptic collapse scenario.

Must better I have dollar bills and even better some crypto-currency, especially some that I am able to use anonymously if needed.

I am not betting on the apocalyptic collapse scenario, because if we go there then what I really need is to be self-sufficient. No amount of monetary currency savings can help me. I would need guns, fellow community, and ability to survive off the land.

Please stop talking nonsense about silver coins as an investment. It is stupidest thing I have ever once thought was true until I woke up from being a dumb ass tinfoil hat.

As for the future, both Hillary and Trump have talked about massive, expensive, public works projects, plus Trump has even talked about defaulting on the debt.  Tons of govt spending that won't be paid for is pretty bullish on anything that's not connected to USD debt markets.  We also reached peak oil in 2004, so extraction of anything from the earth is inherently more expensive after that date.  The markets have just not caught up to the fact yet since markets are manipulated and distorted.

So buy gold bullion.

We also reached peak oil in 2004, so extraction of anything from the earth is inherently more expensive after that date.  The markets have just not caught up to the fact yet since markets are manipulated and distorted.

Peak oil is propaganda lie that Rothschilds has been funding same as the Man-made global warming lie (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/tag/global-warming/).

It is not true. You'd only need the flow of oil out of the ground of a medium size river, to supply the entire world's support of oil. The USA has risen to the #1 global producer over the past decade due to the discovery of fracking.

Besides we are moving away from carbon-based fuels and generation via nuclear energy, solar, hydroelectric, and geothermal. New technological breakthroughs in these areas plus battery technology will obsolete carbon fuels. Also we are moving towards living in high-density cities with mass transportation instead of one human per vehicle. Our vehicles can also improve efficiency by 100 - 200%. The technological innovation whirlwind is underway.

There is no strong case for silver. It is more volatile than gold, less liquid, and there is no supply crunch problem. The precious metal promoters are fooling you with lies and propaganda.

In the end though, you will always have tyranny without metals circulated as currency in native form.  A "gold backed" currency is useless, they have to be circulated.  Bitcoin does not solve any of those issues because Bitcoin is inherently a technoracy, which is what I told Theymos in the following thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1654457.msg16663846#msg16663846

There is no solution to the inviolable (insoluble) tyranny of the power-law distribution1 and the Iron Law of Political Economics (http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984) power vacuum.

Sorry just accept the fate of the human race.

That unfortunate fact won't make gold and silver viable again, just because Bitcoin isn't a panacea. There will never be a panacea. Give up.

1 A. Dragulescu and V. Yakovenko. Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: funkenstein on November 02, 2016, 03:08:23 PM
Iamnotback makes some very good points about currency above, but then suddenly chooses to say


Peak oil is propaganda lie that Rothschilds has been funding same as the Man-made global warming lie.

It is not true. You'd only need the flow of oil out of the ground of a medium size river, to supply the entire world's support of oil. The USA has risen to the #1 global producer over the past decade due to the discovery of fracking.


i.e.
"oh and by the way, please ignore everything i say".

Why?  Just make your points without also saying "and the sun rises in the west".  


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: danherbias07 on November 02, 2016, 03:57:14 PM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)


The bad side of bitcoin is it is limited also. But there is good in it if you are the first owners. Imagine populating the bitcoin community with each one having a good amount of bitcoin and just stacking it up. Where would other ones who want it will get some?
It is like the same with gold mined and being sold. We wait for the miners to sell theirs.

I will agree with the land buying first. But it is just too difficult to get some because of its price.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Aamir1 on November 02, 2016, 04:11:34 PM
Though gold is something that cannot be produced like money or fiat but it is not really limited like bitcoin, because there is still a lot of gold inside the land that has to be taken out later on, so the amount of gold can grow with the time but bitcoins would remain the same as it has a limited amount.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: bitdumper on November 02, 2016, 05:47:45 PM
if i have to say what is bitcoin according to this topic then i will simply say cash+gold=bitcoin(bit-digital coin-money). the main diffremce on these three mode of payments are amount of total coin like in bitcoin there are only 21million bitcoin but in case of gold its unknown but still its fixed.but money can be generated more and more


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: crairezx20 on November 02, 2016, 05:56:28 PM
I think you don't need to compare cash since its already use by people fiat or money or cash. gold maybe we can compare it in bitcoins .. but its more good to invest in bitcoin because i already experience of gaining profit just to hold because of fast price increase unlike gold that it takes a long time before you can see your profit. .


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: funkenstein on November 02, 2016, 06:09:38 PM

Gold and cash are not hackable. And in today's world it's a big plus.


That depends on what you mean by hackable.  There are those that print out billions of new dollars worth of cash at almost no cost.  You could consider that a hack. 


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: boybugs18 on November 02, 2016, 06:18:37 PM
If ever we will have a war again , gold will surely replace cash for trading items you want because cash is only a paper that some country putting some value to it but gold has it value even on early days .


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: babo on November 02, 2016, 06:24:56 PM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)


But gold is best commodities anyway.. no one is good like gold

- diamonds isnt good (and value is bigger)
- bitcoin isnt good (because is volatile)
- other materials, silver, copper, is low ...

another one comparable is platinum, but gold is gold


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Bitcoinsummoner on November 02, 2016, 06:33:40 PM

Gold and cash are not hackable. And in today's world it's a big plus.


That depends on what you mean by hackable.  There are those that print out billions of new dollars worth of cash at almost no cost.  You could consider that a hack. 
I think cash can be still hackable because some atm cash can be hackable.. bruteforcing or they are using a atm fake card just like a heard news that there is a device from thieves using this atm card they can be fake from their victim and cashout the money..
Gold yeah its not hackable and i think bitcoin too is not hackable .. just make sure that we can increase our security..


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: just_Alice on November 02, 2016, 06:48:59 PM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Xester on November 18, 2016, 08:00:34 AM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D

Cash can buy anything, no limit at all, while bitcoins have. the disadvantage of bitcoins was if there is no connection, how can you access your wallet? unlike if it is already converted into cash, you can. when it comes to Gold. Gold prices also fluctuates, its price was depends on the exchange rate of dollars. Gold can be use to pawn or sell at higher price. I still want to invest on bitcoins than gold.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Mastsetad on November 18, 2016, 08:23:13 AM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D

Gold ofcourse does not have a limited amount, there can still be a lot of gold inside the earth or in the sea which are not discovered yet, while bitcoin has a limited amount because it is something that cannot be generated anymore nor there are any more bitcoins to be discovered.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Bugor2 on November 18, 2016, 08:29:36 AM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D

Cash can buy anything, no limit at all, while bitcoins have. the disadvantage of bitcoins was if there is no connection, how can you access your wallet? unlike if it is already converted into cash, you can. when it comes to Gold. Gold prices also fluctuates, its price was depends on the exchange rate of dollars. Gold can be use to pawn or sell at higher price. I still want to invest on bitcoins than gold.

I agree, the cash right now mm single use anywhere. A Bitcoin - this alternative currency. Everyone chooses himself than it is convenient to use


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: X-ray on November 18, 2016, 08:38:46 AM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D

Cash can buy anything, no limit at all, while bitcoins have. the disadvantage of bitcoins was if there is no connection, how can you access your wallet? unlike if it is already converted into cash, you can. when it comes to Gold. Gold prices also fluctuates, its price was depends on the exchange rate of dollars. Gold can be use to pawn or sell at higher price. I still want to invest on bitcoins than gold.
if that so,even bitcoin have the disadvantages but bitcoin will be suited well to be an alternative currency,and if it was an alternative currency in the digital world it do be a perfect option,cash can't be spent on digital world but bitcoin can,both have disadvantages but also have an advantages which beneficial for both


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Oilacris on November 18, 2016, 01:32:38 PM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D

Gold ofcourse does not have a limited amount, there can still be a lot of gold inside the earth or in the sea which are not discovered yet, while bitcoin has a limited amount because it is something that cannot be generated anymore nor there are any more bitcoins to be discovered.

I agree with this regarding  on the  amount   of  each which  they  do really differ  hence  a digital currency and a  natural  mineral  can be found   on  earth  do really  have  differences.  Bitcoin  is  limited and  gold  is  unlimited  even  they have differences  they still have  smilarities  like   increasing price  and  also  a  good  investments.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: xdrpx on November 18, 2016, 01:54:13 PM
The risk that Bitcoin could be worth nothing tomorrow is little. There's has been a period in which the price of Bitcoins has fallen from USD 600 to USD 120 and this could happen again too if unforeseen circumstances exists, but this could happen with stocks of large businesses and currencies of different nations as well. Also, Bitcoins value can never drop dead to USD 0, so it'll always have some value but can get invaluable if it drops below some amount, during which many people would sell, few brave ones would purchase in the hopes of future increase in price..etc.

Also, gold has less liquidity compared to Bitcoins, but it's a tangible asset that anyone can hold and wear as ornaments. It has an appeal for the rich and higher middle class, but Bitcoins shouldn't be catered just for such people, it's focused on remittances for the poor and the poor people who have less access to technology and banks are far from reach.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: machinek20 on November 18, 2016, 01:58:15 PM
I totally agree with op about the land, land is a good investment, but the procedure to obtain potential land its very difficult, and it cost a lot, so for a medium economic person bitcoin and gold will be more reasonable investment, but for now i more suggested to save bitcoin as investment


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Dudeperfect on November 18, 2016, 02:19:39 PM
I live in a country where bitcoin is not yet much popular and thus there are almost near to zero offline merchants (at least in my town) so keeping my funds in bitcoin is not wise idea for me unless I am investing in it. Investing in gold sounds good but still, I see it as a dead investment (because you have to rely on price increase as there are no returns once invested). Now, Cash is only option for day to day transactions so I conclude that,

Cash is good for day to day transactions (including digital wallets funds).
Gold is good for keeping funds secure (any price increase is bonus).
Bitcoin is good for long term investment (also we can earn interest, use it as cash etc).


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: zombie007 on November 18, 2016, 02:26:46 PM
I disagree that only a limited amount of gold exists and that that's why it is protected from inflation. Who knows how many places which are still unexplored could contain gold. Cash is out of the question in that regard. So Bitcoin is the best like you said.  :D
yes that is fact that no one know that how much gold still can be explore, and no one know the present amount of gold that how much gold is present int this world, as gold is too much stable and there is a little fluctuation in the price of bitcoin, where cash is limited and centralize currency, therefore to me the best option is bitcoin which is decentralize a universal currency which can be use equally in all over the world. but the user of bitcoin are still very low still hope that a time will come when all the people of the world will be using bitcoin.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: J Gambler on November 18, 2016, 02:32:27 PM
Cash is good all the time we can use it to deal in every day use like we are using it in every day buying foods and needs so that we can live with cash in gold is good investment too when you have golds to get and invest it to get money and bitcoin i use this in daily trading i can really make profit here.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: 20kevin20 on November 18, 2016, 02:34:21 PM
I totally agree with op about the land, land is a good investment, but the procedure to obtain potential land its very difficult, and it cost a lot, so for a medium economic person bitcoin and gold will be more reasonable investment, but for now i more suggested to save bitcoin as investment

Nobody started with empires but with small lands. You just start off with a small land and you will then find out how to do business with it and how to 'multiply' your land. I think cash should be on the last place, and Bitcoin is right in the middle. Why? Because cash is not anonymous and will become worthless in case of a crisis, while Bitcoin is anonymous and the price will rise during a crisis (see India today). Gold instead is the only currency that can NOT become worthless whatever happens, its price will only keep rising and is the safest option to rely on. Because it's heavy, there is not even needed much space to hold millions (probably a bag of gold for a few million bucks).


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: jondeen707 on November 18, 2016, 03:24:32 PM
The risk that Bitcoin could be worth nothing tomorrow is little. There's has been a period in which the price of Bitcoins has fallen from USD 600 to USD 120 and this could happen again too if unforeseen circumstances exists, but this could happen with stocks of large businesses and currencies of different nations as well. Also, Bitcoins value can never drop dead to USD 0, so it'll always have some value but can get invaluable if it drops below some amount, during which many people would sell, few brave ones would purchase in the hopes of future increase in price..etc.

Also, gold has less liquidity compared to Bitcoins, but it's a tangible asset that anyone can hold and wear as ornaments. It has an appeal for the rich and higher middle class, but Bitcoins shouldn't be catered just for such people, it's focused on remittances for the poor and the poor people who have less access to technology and banks are far from reach.

I agree that the value of Bitcoin won't go down to zero, this is next to impossible under any circumstances. It has already been adopted and for good reason - it's incorruptible and fully decentralized. In theory, gold is very similar in those aspects, but it is different in the volume of its supply as compared to bitcoin's as we know that it's supply is totally final.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: passwordnow on November 19, 2016, 06:06:31 AM
Cash is good all the time we can use it to deal in every day use like we are using it in every day buying foods and needs so that we can live with cash in gold is good investment too when you have golds to get and invest it to get money and bitcoin i use this in daily trading i can really make profit here.

I would say that cash is the best, because you will convert gold into cash, you will convert bitcoin into cash. And everything that we are transacting are always with the use of cash. Because those merchants who are accepting bitcoins are still few in the cycle and as well as the people who are accepting payments with the use of gold.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Aamir1 on November 19, 2016, 06:11:23 AM
I totally agree with op about the land, land is a good investment, but the procedure to obtain potential land its very difficult, and it cost a lot, so for a medium economic person bitcoin and gold will be more reasonable investment, but for now i more suggested to save bitcoin as investment

It is not important to buy an empire in order to start real estate business, you can start off with small and good to be bought lands at first, and with the time you can increase the limits of what you are doing, surely you wont be able to buy big lands as you may do not have the capital required.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: susila_bai on November 19, 2016, 06:44:43 AM
Cash is good all the time we can use it to deal in every day use like we are using it in every day buying foods and needs so that we can live with cash in gold is good investment too when you have golds to get and invest it to get money and bitcoin i use this in daily trading i can really make profit here.

I would say that cash is the best, because you will convert gold into cash, you will convert bitcoin into cash. And everything that we are transacting are always with the use of cash. Because those merchants who are accepting bitcoins are still few in the cycle and as well as the people who are accepting payments with the use of gold.

What you are telling is true for daily users but if you have bitcoin then the price is also increase and when ever you want to convert it to fiat currency you will get more then buying price, so i will prefer for bitcoin as when ever i am in need of fiat currency i can easily convert and enjoy my life


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: The_prodigy on November 19, 2016, 06:47:17 AM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)

Cash is always exists all the time and we need cash for our physical needs and everytime we need in daily living if we don't have cash then work for another cryptop like bitcoin im a student and i can really say now that i am earning from this currency and gold i have gold too but i don't invest it i just hold it and sell it for the right time.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: mirakal on November 19, 2016, 08:07:40 AM
I will go with bitcoin because always wanted to invest and it is only here where I have experience success. I have cash but only up for my daily expenses and expected expenses but most of my savings are in investment and big portion of it are in bitcoin.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: deadsilent on November 19, 2016, 08:31:36 AM
Im more of a gold. Gold is one of the precious metals on earth. It is safer now to have gold than bitcoin and cash. Because of economic crisis, cash are unstable as well as bitcoin. Gold is more stable than other two. Bitcoin for me is good for investment and cash for buying. For long term for me is gold.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: kryptqnick on November 19, 2016, 09:14:20 AM
So, gold and cash have some good and some bad properties.

Gold:

good - only a limited amount exists, hence protection from inflation
good - has intrinsic value (at least to some degree)
bad - difficult to transfer, divide, verify that it's authentic, hence higher transaction costs

Cash:

good - you can give it to anyone anonymously. It just works. i.e. the definition of "currency". Near-zero transaction costs
bad - loses its value due to inflation

In a sense, bitcoin is the ultimate combination of the good parts of gold and cash. It has the intrinsic value of gold (nobody can create more of it, so the value is permanent) combined with the intrinsic value of cash (near-instantly transferable to whomever in any amount you wish - as an extra bonus, it works worldwide!).

Of course, there is the risk that bitcoin is worth nothing tomorrow. But how big is it?

I'm going with Twain: "Buy land. They're not making it anymore." At least by the year 2140... (Imagine if you got in when they were making the first patches of land)

Yes, gold is indeed harder to work with than cash. And yet it passed the test ot time, which is a big plus. As for cash, another bad thing about it is that you can just accidentally burn it or spoil in some other way, because the material is thin. And you are also not aware who else has touched it, so there is a hygiene problem there as well.
As for Bitcoin, than you can't spoil it accidentally and are not very likely to lose it. And yet it is not very stable and the transaction costs are between gold and cash.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: amacar2 on November 19, 2016, 10:49:11 AM
Just watched few episodes of money vs currency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyV0OfU3-FU

According to which money is store of value where as currency is just worthless papers whose purchasing power keep decreasing.

Money = gold, silver and bitcoin (however in documentry bitcoin wasn't discussed)
Currency = cash (fiats)

Better to store Gold and Bitcoin rather than saving retirement fund for future in cash.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: error08 on November 19, 2016, 10:51:02 AM
I think you don't need to compare cash since its already use by people fiat or money or cash. gold maybe we can compare it in bitcoins .. but its more good to invest in bitcoin because i already experience of gaining profit just to hold because of fast price increase unlike gold that it takes a long time before you can see your profit. .
Gold come first as medium of exchange, so no doubt of how precious it is.
Bitcoin consider as digital gold and have higher price and still increasing.
Cash, we use it in daily basis and can't separated with our life yet.
So, it's better to have all of them as each has it own advantages.


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: xuan87 on November 19, 2016, 12:34:58 PM
I prefer to save my investment in gold and bitcoin, for shorter term i will save bitcoin, for longer term i will save gold, actually bitcoin is a good investment but for a longer term i afraid there will be a problem like banning, so it is safer fro me to keep my investment in gold, because there is no way gold being banned


Title: Re: Bitcoin vs Gold vs Cash
Post by: Positid on November 19, 2016, 12:54:49 PM
I prefer to save my investment in gold and bitcoin, for shorter term i will save bitcoin, for longer term i will save gold, actually bitcoin is a good investment but for a longer term i afraid there will be a problem like banning, so it is safer fro me to keep my investment in gold, because there is no way gold being banned
Gold and bitcoin are both investment so you can have that for long term if you have the capacity to do it, meaning you have the capital to ensure you can buy gold and at the same time to secure it, I do not have that capacity actually but I am willing to invest with bitcoin as it does not require much investment.