Title: will you speculate at $100? Post by: kingcrimson on March 21, 2013, 04:56:16 PM $100 appears to be a strong psychological number that will trigger sells. anyone going to risk at that price?
Title: Re: will you speculate at $100? Post by: mccorvic on March 21, 2013, 04:56:35 PM $100 appears to be a strong psychological number that will trigger sells. anyone going to risk at that price? I'll be holding. Title: Re: will you speculate at $100? Post by: BTC Books on March 21, 2013, 05:05:09 PM $100 appears to be a strong psychological number that will trigger sells. anyone going to risk at that price? I'll be holding. I'll be holding too. But I'm still very interested in what happens around $75. I think that's a more important point than $100. Title: Re: will you speculate at $100? Post by: Ozymandias on March 21, 2013, 07:08:26 PM I'll be holding too. But I'm still very interested in what happens around $75. I think that's a more important point than $100. Could you please explain why? It seems to me like a triple digit fiat valuation would be more of a psychological barrier than 75. Title: Re: will you speculate at $100? Post by: RodeoX on March 21, 2013, 07:10:30 PM No.I will just continue using bitcoin as currency, no matter the price.
Title: Re: will you speculate at $100? Post by: DeathAndTaxes on March 21, 2013, 07:15:53 PM will you speculate at $100? No all my orders are at $99 or $101. Title: Re: will you speculate at $100? Post by: BTC Books on March 21, 2013, 07:25:34 PM I'll be holding too. But I'm still very interested in what happens around $75. I think that's a more important point than $100. Could you please explain why? It seems to me like a triple digit fiat valuation would be more of a psychological barrier than 75. Generally put, we rough-count by ones, up to ten; by tens up to fifty; and by quarters (the first one being 75) after fifty. It's an important barrier - and I note that we bounced off $75 an hour or two ago... After 150, we count by fifties up to 250, and by 250s to a thousand. YMMV. It's just something I've found to be frequently the case. I'm sure that there are many other takes on counting - it's such a basic thing that all the post-docs just live to complicate it, no doubt. |