Bitcoin Forum

WTF? What is this?   ???

Few days ago:

http://clip2net.com/clip/m224751/96a66-clip-386kb.jpg

.... and NOW:

http://clip2net.com/clip/m224751/c8f6c-clip-26kb.png

After what was seen, I have bases to suspect Synereo of an ill practice. Who knows how many bonuses they distributed to those who participated in this sale hidden from the public!

You in general understand?! DEVELOPERS SELL COINS SECRETLY! They have sold secretly for the sum of 1519 BTC. These are a little more than 8127767 AMP(On Poloniex only 3225772 AMP is now traded) at the prices 18k sat and they sold to them at this price (I am sure, they distributed to them also bonuses!)!  It it wasn't announced anywhere. You understand that they lie to us. And now they speak to simple users to purchase from them twice more expensively at the prices 33k? This fraud!

Dumped this shit around 37k-40k when the price was ATH, I feel so happy.  :D :D  

I dumped before the 2nd ico news released, i was so lucky to dump before they raped us.   >:( >:(

I tweeted to their official account. Let us see what will be their response.

https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/771011205909647360

So where the scam is supposed to be?

Btw, Dor Konforty (goes with the nickname Elokane) has return like $80k worth of Agora earlier this year, but forgot what was the case. I'm not sure if he is a scammer.

7th time answering similar answer
Goto

https://blog.synereo.com/2016/08/29/synereos-second-fundraising-campaign-coming/

Find similar text

"AMP Sale
All AMPs to be sold during this campaign are pre-existing AMPs, created in advance and held by Synereo for this purpose. No new AMPs will be created for this sale. As Synereo is committed to utter and complete transparency in all its dealings, all AMP transactions carried out by the company can be viewed here."

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r1G-ROS4vgHK84qfn1CBIxuXZQCCvIicCTQSxW1T_mo/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=1156984041

Yep - a few days ago.  Same time we already answered your questions, not to mention the many times the same answers were publicly posted all around.

Here's the link to the latest one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=995987.msg16101402#msg16101402

So why would someone start a new post, using libel & slander masquerading as an "accusation"?  You know this is false info, and you're just repeating it anyway.

The link was private, and somebody broke that confidence.  There are legal procedures that have to be followed so information is given for all disclosures, etc.  So I guess they made a new link, so that legal process can continue securely.  The fundraising for equity, and the AMP sale are two, very different things, that are done differently.

The pre-sale process is still open for anyone who wants.

Doesn't an "accusation" actually have to logically claim something?

Could you please refrain from promoting libel & slander without doing the basic due diligence of finding out if the accuser is not acting out of personal interest, spreading FUD for their imagined gain?

Distributed ledger transactions that are then doubly communicated to publicly visible spreadsheets are in no way "secret".

The opportunity for this was announced numerous times, in numerous places.

As I thought, no SCAM at all. Thanks for closing this thread.

I'm not a detective you know. I just wanted to make sure that Synereo team will see the thread... nothing more. I think that there is nothing wrong in my action?

I don't always have secrets, when when I do I keep them nice and safe from prying eyes by putting them on a public website that anyone can view.

If people understood my coin distribution string then everything would be clear and easily understood.
https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/771011205909647360



Using my coin distribution string... that only I understand ;) LOL

@Synereo is a 1CO?COPX?COP2CO
The ?COP is the problem.

You read this string

- 1st coin offering public
- unknown private sales
- Exchange listing
- unknown private sales
- 2nd coin offering public

That's not exactly how this coin is distributed but close. I think there may have been other coins in the mix for bounties prior to the 1CO and after it. People keep inventing new ways to distribute coins which messes up my model.

A more transparent distribution model that people would be more happy with would be 1COX2CO without the private sales.

No there is nothing wrong with your action. But it might be better to investigate more before making public tweets implying that someone is doing something wrong. Since it is public we have to be extra careful not to send out the wrong information.

LOL get ready for your lawsuit hahahhaha  :o

ICO = Scam.

..what more did you need to know people ?

It was a question. You can see that I used question mark in the tweet!


So this forum is not public? What is that I was implying?

To all:

https://i.imgur.com/eA71nOj.png

These are all the Synereo tweets made by the FailCommunity. I feel no need to justify myself to nobody!!! Synereo community answered to the "attack" and I think that case is closed, but if you think that jumping on me is a good idea, then you can all suck my balls!

Not all icos are scams, ethereum, nxt, xem, stratis, lisk are all profitable coins, not scam. But amp has many rounds of ico, which i consider it as a scam

Do I think you need a medical treatment?

I said I found nothing wrong with what you did. My point was to be safe and to avoid any confrontation it would be better to read more and research first than to be impulsive in making statements online because they are public. The people on the other side might take it the wrong way. To be honest I really find it odd that the Synereo rep person is being so defensive.

I am always trying to be open and transparent, and no bananas or oranges can change that. My tweet wasn't a statement, it was something like a notice to the Synereo team and looks like they responded (though I'm not sure if SynereoCommunity is one of their official btctalk accounts, but I'm not gonna check it). I'm not sure why someone could take this the wrong way since it is "public" (like the banana and you said) and everyone can check by himself.

And I'm laughing at the defensive & researching parts. I am here with my real name and picture, but all of the sudden some anonymous bananas started jumping on me because of 1 tweet. I'm not the one who should make researches here. Have you all seen the screenshot I gave you? You see something wrong in the tweets? One of the goals of the FailCommunity's twitter account is to be informative and that is why we are listed in thousands of Bitcoin/fintech/cryptocurrency related lists. If I was the one with the scam accusation, you will read more than just a few words. Feel free to check (i.e. research) if I'm talking BS.

/thread

Cheers,
Spartak   

If it is hidden from the public how come you find the information on a public website.

hahaha.

Ok. I get your point. I also said there was nothing wrong with your action. But please let me ask, do you think there is something fishy with the way the Synereo development team have handled this presale?

Afaik, I don't think overly so, as compared to any other ICO. Note someone wrote an expose at Steemit about this (https://steemit.com/synereo/@stellabelle/2-problems-plaguing-steemit-that-synereo-has-already-solved#@joseph/re-stellabelle-2-problems-plaguing-steemit-that-synereo-has-already-solved-20160828t210149964z):


But Scenario's communication has been spread out over numerous 1+ hour Google Hangouts that can bore the shit of the viewer and no one has the time to watch all that. And their white paper doesn't teach the process calculus, so it is difficult for anyone but perhaps a few experts in the world to know what the hell they are actually attempting to do.

It is sort of feels like they been figuring it out as they go along to some extent; to some extent it may or may not be technobabble BS (which they may truly believe in, I dunno).

And the entire concept seems to be economically and marketing non-viable to me, as I have detailed in other posts (mostly in the Steem pyramid thread lately).

The onboarding problem that every crypto has is the same. They can't get many users until they have many users.

Afaik, Synereo has no viable plan to solve that onboarding problem. People buying AMPs to promote content to users, doesn't work until you have many users. It is always the chicken or egg dilemma. Steem has showed how to onboard cryptogeeks, @dollarvigilante followers, and their gfs. But afaics (and stats agree (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558366.msg16123755#msg16123755)) hasn't figured out how to onboard the masses.

I am interested to see what happens with Synereo. I am mostly biting my tongue lately about Synereo (although I commented freely in the recent Steemit.com blog about it (https://steemit.com/synereo/@stellabelle/2-problems-plaguing-steemit-that-synereo-has-already-solved)), but I offer this summary above of my opinion.