Bitcoin Forum

im in need of 0.2 BTC for three weeks friends

i can repay 0.215

sorry for asking but I really need right now. INcass you think I am a free loader check my thread I gave away over $7000 thank you

Since you haven't been active for more than 2 years now, it will be better to prove that your account was not hacked.
Can you sign a message from an old address?

No Collateral - No Loan.
No Sign Message - No Loan.

Please, try and read some stickies before you make a Loan Request Thread... ::)

Even if this isn't a hacked account,  it still could be a bought account with private keys also bought.  I wouldn't give this loan without the standard 120% collateral.   Seems way too fishy to me.

Edited to add:  LOL, I didn't even look at his feedback!  SCAMMER!!!!!!!!!

Op, i think that you trying only to get your hands to some one's BTC...
I dought that you want seriously to get a loan here.

No Collateral means No Loan, read this and maybe you got a chance : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577765.0

Btw, your trust rating are very high, are you..."cooking" it? ??? ::)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

Well the green trust doesnt mean nothing these days, reputable members are active as well provide valid colateral, how to trust into op without a signed message, and worse as stated above this account might get sold with the keys, soo becarful.

Your last 3 feedbacks say you ran with their money... So why should we trust you? Especially since that was in 2014?! One exchange you (or someone else controlling this account in the past) did with Monbux doesn't mean you're now trustworthy. There have been a lot of old accounts with a little bit of green trust asking for loans lately and every single one of them was a scam.

Please sign a message from an old address.

Assuming you offer your account as collateral (and you can sign the message to show you didn't just hack this account) I could lend you 0.05BTC

Please sign a message from this address: 149oa5cnbcu8apj77PW8MVsfaWv6GtchK6 since you've sent funds from it in the past.

Sorry but can you explain to me what does it mean "...with private keys also bought."?
The BTCTalk accounts have a private key? ???
If they do, where did you find them?

I am a noob after all... ::) :P                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

He means the private keys of the staked address on the account can be sold as part of the deal.
Bitcointalk accounts doesn't have private keys but they have staked addresses which has a private key.

Any address you posted in the past is a staked address.

I can see where you have given away some BTC, however, that does not give you enough of a reputation to ask for a .2 loan with no collateral.  Unless you have collateral which is valued at lest 120% of the loan you are asking for, you might as well lock this thread, for no one is going to loan to you.

Since we are experience of DDOS attack last few days  i think better to give some sign message first before lenders can give you loan.
Sign message can be a proof that you are the owner..

Did you even read the thread. (reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1609071.msg16158909#msg16158909)). Themes clearly stated:
Anyway, yes a signed message is needed, but you doesn't have to point that out. The first post was a from panju1 asking if he could sign a message. 3 people did it after him and @OP doesn't show any interest in this thread anymore.

Edit: And no, signed message doesn't proof that you are the owner. It has already been discussed in the tread.

A signed message wont proof he is the first owner as could be sold, already stated above, but its more a security thing wich who lend bitcoins ask. I do believe this account will need some trusted members from default to give the feedback as the op, isnt bothering to show a proof and he has a green status, if no one act this user can scam someone.

You are carrying a green trust so i might given you loan without the collateral if you have requested pretty small amount.
But 0.2btc is a big amount and without collateral its pretty hard that you get loan even if you carrying a good trust.Are you using this account as collateral.

I think that Op's Trust rating is fake and in somehow, cooked.
From the start of this thread, Op didnt show up or answer to anyone here.
Some DT have to red this Op's attemt to take a "loan".
Or to be more specific, this is an attemt to scam... >:(                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

About OP's trust, i think that's valid (it's an old trust rating thought). But just checked about last history of his account, it's a bit weird because he didn't active around 2 years (his last post was on 2014)