Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: tvbcof on September 12, 2016, 05:26:08 AM



Title: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: tvbcof on September 12, 2016, 05:26:08 AM

I've been saying for half a year that Hillary will drop out if she has to face Trump.  With her 'health episode' today it looks like we won't have much longer to wait.

Of course the DNC says that it's ridiculous alt-right stuff and that they are not having emergency meetings.  I take this as meaning that that is exactly what is going on.  In fact I'll bet that such meetings have been going on for a while.

So, what do they do?

Sanders?  LOL!  That's a good one.  Watch his sorry old ass decline in a mock offering (and some more bruises on his face if necessary.)

Warren?  I don't think so.  She was being courted earlier but mysteriously 'buried the hatchet' and got off the 'war path.'  Probably the stench of Clinton corruption got to great even for her...after she nicely destroyed herself.  Besides, the banks would never allow it.

Kaine?  The 'vibe' says nope.  He remains VP.

Biden?  I thought so for a long time, but after I saw him trying to feel up every little girl that gets within grabbing distance, I don't think so.  We don't need a Creeper-in-Chief?  It's bad enough that he possesses a penis in the first place after all, and he doesn't have time to have it surgically removed which would qualify him in the eyes of the modern regressive Left.

Pelosi?  That would be my guess.  Half of Hillary's current support are women who admit to voting Hillary on the sole basis that she is also XX chromosome-wise.  Pelosi seems like the most logical choice in my off-hand brain-storming mostly because she can make some claim to having experience.  The people voting for Trump generally detest Pelosi, but they are not going to vote for any Dem anyway.

---

Another possibility I just thought of would be for the DNC to run Hillary's corpse with the promise that Bill Clinton would step in.  That would send the party faithful into multiple orgasms of pure ecstasy.  I guess there is some precedent for installing a candidate's spouse here in lower offices.  I guess it is fair to say that one of my Left-tard informants mentioned it a few days ago but I shrugged it off until just now.  Thinking back, I often understand the Left's projects through finding out what sort of programming has been mysteriously (to them) downloaded into their noodle.  So, maybe this is the way the DNC are going to try to play things.



Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: yengyuenshe on September 12, 2016, 09:08:00 AM
i think if hilary clinton not run to president election
donald trump can win


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: Daniel91 on September 12, 2016, 05:11:34 PM
It's really hypothetical question.
What if...?
She still didn't become US President.
If she becomes US president and can't work as president because of health issues, vice president will replace her.
If something happen with her now and she give up, i guess that democratic party will replace her with some other candidate, probably Saunders.
Any way, it's still to early to ask such questions, let's wait and see what happens.



Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: European Central Bank on September 12, 2016, 06:36:56 PM
it was crazy to put her up for the job in the first place. someone with that much track record and yet another political zombie was never gonna feel like something fresh for the voters. there's an appetite all around the world to fuck shit up at the ballot box.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: tvbcof on September 12, 2016, 06:49:42 PM
it was crazy to put her up for the job in the first place. someone with that much track record and yet another political zombie was never gonna feel like something fresh for the voters. there's an appetite all around the world to fuck shit up at the ballot box.

I'd be cautions about this.  Alas, there are a fair number of 'party line' Dems who would hold their nose and vote for Hillary but don't like her at all.  A fair fraction of my own family I'm disappointed to report.  A 'fresh face' could actually invigorate them somewhat.  At least enough to drag their asses down to the polling station.

Operationally it could work out OK to let the Populist side go ahead and shoot their wad on Clinton then put someone else up without enough time for the opposition to re-group.  To me this is actually one of the more compelling reasons why the Dems would run a hopelessly corrupt semi-corpse.



Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: saddampbuh on September 12, 2016, 07:19:01 PM
hopefully nobody. her staying in is trump's best chance of winning the presidency.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: BADecker on September 13, 2016, 11:12:45 AM
Nobody can replace Hillary. I mean, literally, Nobody!

8)


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: RealityTruth on September 13, 2016, 01:10:40 PM
Nobody can replace Hillary. I mean, literally, Nobody!

8)

Obama's 3rd term can.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: virtualx on September 13, 2016, 01:20:28 PM
Nobody can replace Hillary. I mean, literally, Nobody!

8)

Obama's 3rd term can.
A US president can no longer have many terms in a row by law. They can maximally have two terms because one president was so popular he had up to 4 terms. They did not want to have one president for life so he introduced a law that limits the number of terms a president can run for.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: tvbcof on September 13, 2016, 04:44:56 PM

A few other options I've seen pop up:

Kerry:  whatever.

Michelle Obama:  That's an interesting one!  That could work, and it could explain the attention paid to her speech at the convention.  It would get the X chromosome count where it needs to be to adhere to 'the plan.'  It would also mitigate Obama's 'black deficit' conferred on the guy by his mother.  Certainly this is responsible for the appalling results that the black community has realized under the guy you know.  Beyond that, if the rumor than Michelle is tranny  turns out to be true, it will put a checkmark by the third box in the 'black -> woman -> gay(ish)' plan cooked up at the DNC.



Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: RealityTruth on September 13, 2016, 06:17:48 PM
Nobody can replace Hillary. I mean, literally, Nobody!

8)

Obama's 3rd term can.
A US president can no longer have many terms in a row by law. They can maximally have two terms because one president was so popular he had up to 4 terms. They did not want to have one president for life so he introduced a law that limits the number of terms a president can run for.

It can be changed quickly


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: BADecker on September 13, 2016, 06:47:42 PM
Nobody can replace Hillary. I mean, literally, Nobody!

8)

Obama's 3rd term can.
A US president can no longer have many terms in a row by law. They can maximally have two terms because one president was so popular he had up to 4 terms. They did not want to have one president for life so he introduced a law that limits the number of terms a president can run for.

It can be changed quickly

And it's all essentially irrelevant. Watch the Karl Lentz looooooog video ...

Karl Lentz at Johnson City Tennessee - April 16th 2016
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qN3MI70PFBw/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=246&h=138&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=u8ZCuqf0HHVRqVrjrLxHII-8Zcg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3MI70PFBw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3MI70PFBw)


8)


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: Racey on September 13, 2016, 07:16:18 PM
Trying to think who, but after some deliberation, not one person can I think of who would support the people, they all seem so corrupt.
Donors it seems only donate for a return of investments, thats called
corruption, and has become rampant (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/corrupt-american-government.html) no President can overcome something this big, they become a very big part of it, just a speaker for those that pay the presidents wages.

It's such a smack in the face to every decent person in the world, to put up with all the corrupt people, they bend the rules to suit themselves, would think nothing of killing you for your opposition to them.

Once upon a time I would say status of being President would have been a great thing, but as the years have passed we have learned not to trust any of them, even your local mayor/congressman is on the same books taking orders from the above corrupt, see link its mind boggling.

No way can I see a free America when all this is going on, we as normal people are victims to terrible crimes, and without much rebellion we continue to let it fly right by, like nothing is happening.

What goes down in the US, affects all people across the globe, such shit on us all.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: xht on September 13, 2016, 07:28:16 PM
She has already won elections ?? so i think this is a very strange question, replace her in what.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: virtualx on September 14, 2016, 12:51:49 AM
Once upon a time I would say status of being President would have been a great thing, but as the years have passed we have learned not to trust any of them, even your local mayor/congressman is on the same books taking orders from the above corrupt, see link its mind boggling.
Many jobs are directly dedicated to the enslavement of others, politician is no exception that rule. Given this ethical framework, why did it come as a surprise that many politicians are corrupt?

No way can I see a free America when all this is going on,
In the far future you can move to Mars, but you'd be an illegal alien   :D


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: BADecker on September 14, 2016, 12:57:52 AM
Once upon a time I would say status of being President would have been a great thing, but as the years have passed we have learned not to trust any of them, even your local mayor/congressman is on the same books taking orders from the above corrupt, see link its mind boggling.
Many jobs are directly dedicated to the enslavement of others, politician is no exception that rule. Given this ethical framework, why did it come as a surprise that many politicians are corrupt?

No way can I see a free America when all this is going on,
In the far future you can move to Mars, but you'd be an illegal alien   :D

Nobody but a handful of people alive today will ever get to Mars, and maybe not even the handful.

8)


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: Spendulus on September 14, 2016, 02:18:16 AM
Trying to think who, ...
Jeb Bush?


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: Xester on September 14, 2016, 03:06:17 AM
I do not know but are they allowed to change or put another person in replacement to her?  It would really be clear that Trump could win this thing since people will have second thoughts on voting Hillary since she is in the bad shape.  I doubt that her husband would take the office if ever she continue to run and then eventually wins.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: 2girls on September 14, 2016, 04:04:35 AM
The election will come and go, having some effect on the price, one way or another, but whatever change that is will balance back out less than a week after that. 


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: 2girls on September 14, 2016, 04:05:10 AM
Also, Then the economy and the world will sit for a second and realize that they have nothing to talk about with the election gone.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: BADecker on September 14, 2016, 09:10:58 PM

A few other options I've seen pop up:

Kerry:  whatever.

Michelle Obama:  That's an interesting one!  That could work, and it could explain the attention paid to her speech at the convention.  It would get the X chromosome count where it needs to be to adhere to 'the plan.'  It would also mitigate Obama's 'black deficit' conferred on the guy by his mother.  Certainly this is responsible for the appalling results that the black community has realized under the guy you know.  Beyond that, if the rumor than Michelle is tranny  turns out to be true, it will put a checkmark by the third box in the 'black -> woman -> gay(ish)' plan cooked up at the DNC.


Michelle Obama Is A MAN!!(PROOF) PT.2/2
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7B418vtkQsY/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=2Zs3cF6gOeCspvje9-nSKsiK6Q8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B418vtkQsY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B418vtkQsY)


8)


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: groll on September 15, 2016, 02:30:28 PM
No one.  I think she will continue to pursue her dreams of becoming the leader of USA.  She will do everything with the support of her husband Bill to continue with this journey.  Maybe she was just too tired of doing all the preparation and campaigning.  I think she is aware of that and doin something which we do not know like taking medications.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: Xester on September 15, 2016, 02:57:31 PM
No one.  I think she will continue to pursue her dreams of becoming the leader of USA.  She will do everything with the support of her husband Bill to continue with this journey.  Maybe she was just too tired of doing all the preparation and campaigning.  I think she is aware of that and doin something which we do not know like taking medications.

Absolutely.  Those people were so greedy with power.  They will not give it to someone or give someone a chance to take the opportunity that is almost upon their grasp.  You will see how people are so obsessed with power that even if it will affect their health.  Just show a big intention to have an authority.


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: tvbcof on September 15, 2016, 03:11:46 PM

No one.  I think she will continue to pursue her dreams of becoming the leader of USA.  She will do everything with the support of her husband Bill to continue with this journey.  Maybe she was just too tired of doing all the preparation and campaigning.  I think she is aware of that and doin something which we do not know like taking medications.

It doesn't make much sense to run if one is sure to lose, or 'win' with elections which are such an obvious sham that make it crystal clear to everyone that Democracy is dead.  Clinton is so incredibly unlikable and corrupt that one of these two outcomes is certain.  When Trump pulls in tens of thousands to his rallys while Clinton gets a few hundred, the 'will of the people' is fairly clear.

The funny thing is that the hundreds that Clinton does get to 'show up' at her rallys are, in a lot of cases, those who stuck around after an event that people actually wanted to see.  Truly pathetic.  If Clinton's 'basket of deplorables' was not as big as the typical eugenicist it's surely getting that way fast.

What would make a great 'fictional' story would be a totally corrupt and sick candidate who died on the campaign trial.  Then a body-double actor filled in for a week or two for phone interviews and long cam shots while a lap-dog media and other propagandists erected and pumped up a sinister straw-man.  Say, for instance, an 'alt-right' cartoon frog on the Kremlin pay-roll...if one is writing a comedy piece...  Then the body double gets 'assassinated' by said villain.  Or more likely, one of the villain's minions leaving no choice but to crack down on this group (generic enemies), their means (memes) and their communications network (the internet).  And thereby usher in a utopic new world order.



Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: BADecker on September 15, 2016, 03:42:54 PM
Trump has been replacing Hillary for a long time now.    8)


Title: Re: Who replaces Hillary?
Post by: Spendulus on September 16, 2016, 03:09:55 AM
....
What would make a great 'fictional' story would be a totally corrupt and sick candidate who died on the campaign trial.  Then a body-double actor filled in for a week or two for phone interviews and long cam shots while a lap-dog media and other propagandists erected and pumped up a sinister straw-man.  Say, for instance, an 'alt-right' cartoon frog on the Kremlin pay-roll...if one is writing a comedy piece...  Then the body double gets 'assassinated' by said villain.  Or more likely, one of the villain's minions leaving no choice but to crack down on this group (generic enemies), their means (memes) and their communications network (the internet).  And thereby usher in a utopic new world order.



The assassinations came quick and heavy in the first few weeks after Prez Pompus Erodat collapsed in the Yellow House.  Several of the kitchen closets had been commandeered by the various factions warring for control of the Unfree world, each had a body double in wait.   On several ocassions, there were pitched battles in the Yellow House kitchen, as warring body doubles killed each other until the last manwoman standing limped over to take the place of the Dead Prez.  

Eventually a truce between the warring factions of the world, each whom had through long and careful espionage gained control of a kitchen closet and tunneled from it back to their embassy.  The truce was declared in a meeting on the neutral ground of the worse mole in an armpit nation of the world.  Liberland.  

The seven leading nations with body double potus level capability would each get it's body double for one day of each week.   

No agreement could be reached between these as to which day, however the wise Leaders of Liberland, having drugged their drink, set the ballots based on random stray crypto from a piece of paper in a wastebasket which detailed bitcoin payments for live porn actresses.  When these negotiators woke up the next morning they found that they had indeed reached a consensus of the few the night before. 

Of course, the murders did not stop, because otherwise what would the many murderers do?  They had families to support.   They were people too.  

Soon there was projected to be a world wide shortage of acceptable body doubles for the important job of continuing to impersonate the Yellow House Prez Pompus Erodat.  Robotics companies, smelling business, not only ramped up BD production but secretly paid unemployed assassins to work jobs world wide.  Why should BD work be limited to the States?  There was Asia, and Europe.  Business was good.  

Unknown to the political plotters and snakes of the courts, BDs were talking between themselves, angrily muttering about the low pay and the terrible on the job life expectancy, which ranged between 1 minute and three days for the first 1,423 body doubles.  Robot BDs were of course becoming self aware and yearning for a better life with the 99.997 percent of their mental capacity that was not taken up with playing the role of an idiot politician.  

Within a month the Body and Robot Double Union was formed.  BARDU.  

However, world leaders would not pay reasonable wages or insure healthy working conditions for these important covert assets.  That was because the world leaders, being true to their nature of being complete assholes, were being complete assholes.

Within six months BARDU ruled the world.