Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Altcoin Discussion => Topic started by: Come-from-Beyond on April 04, 2013, 04:38:43 PM



Title: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: Come-from-Beyond on April 04, 2013, 04:38:43 PM
Bitcoin was a revolution. Bytecoin is its evolution:

Bitcoin has very few early adopters who hoarded most part of coins. Bytecoin was born when much more people were cryptocoin aware, so bytecoins will be dispersed with much higher degree. It seems to be more fair.


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: AmDD on April 04, 2013, 04:55:15 PM
I think the biggest problem is that everyone will hoard it, trying to become rich. The only way an economy can function is if people spend the 'money'. If EVERYONE hoards then it will fail.

i really think its a pretty dumb idea and have/want no parts of it unless there is more to it than I have seen thus far.


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: SlickMcFavorite on April 04, 2013, 05:03:44 PM
Alternate cryptocurrencies that do no depart from the BTC model in any significant way are a plague.

I'm being a bit of a hypocrite, since I own/mine some LTC...but hey, a guy's gotta eat. Still, I know that bytecoin, terracoin, litecoin, etc are not good steps. They are copycat currencies made and propagated by people who want a get rich quick ticket (I know, I have the same mentality in regards to LTC).

Ultimately, the argument that a currency is more fair falls flat. Adoption and reliability are the only two real measures of a currency's value.

TL;DR
Bytecoin is not better than Bitcoin. You MIGHT make money by mining it, you WILL hurt the cryptocurrency ecosystem.


I will say that my limited understanding of the cryptocurrencies has led me to believe that PPCoin may be the only one that is different from BTC in a meaningful way.


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: John (John K.) on April 04, 2013, 05:06:10 PM
I'm preparing to release JohnCoins when I have time. It'll be even more fair than Bytecoin or Bitcoin as it's released later than both, thus allowing more people that were cryptocoin aware come on the boat.


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: SlickMcFavorite on April 05, 2013, 12:01:36 AM
strunberg,

I agree that evolving and improving the coins is necessary -- I do NOT, however, think that cloning bitcoin for the sake of trying to make a buck is good idea. I guess drawing the line between a useful addition and a useless clone is tricky (kind of like drug companies tweeking their drug and then re-patenting it)


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: Limie on April 05, 2013, 06:03:48 PM
I think the biggest problem is that everyone will hoard it, trying to become rich. The only way an economy can function is if people spend the 'money'. If EVERYONE hoards then it will fail.

i really think its a pretty dumb idea and have/want no parts of it unless there is more to it than I have seen thus far.

You are spot on.. its called "Paradox of thrift"


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: VforVictory on April 05, 2013, 06:06:22 PM
Why mine Bytecoin when you have Freicoin? XD


Title: Re: Fiat -> Bitcoin -> Bytecoin
Post by: btbrae on April 05, 2013, 06:11:57 PM
Alternate cryptocurrencies that do no depart from the BTC model in any significant way are a plague.

I'm being a bit of a hypocrite, since I own/mine some LTC...but hey, a guy's gotta eat. Still, I know that bytecoin, terracoin, litecoin, etc are not good steps. They are copycat currencies made and propagated by people who want a get rich quick ticket (I know, I have the same mentality in regards to LTC).

Ultimately, the argument that a currency is more fair falls flat. Adoption and reliability are the only two real measures of a currency's value.

TL;DR
Bytecoin is not better than Bitcoin. You MIGHT make money by mining it, you WILL hurt the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

I will say that my limited understanding of the cryptocurrencies has led me to believe that PPCoin may be the only one that is different from BTC in a meaningful way.

This point is moot. Gold and silver were traded side by side for thousands of years by all manner of civilizations for the same uses. Fiat currencies are essentially the same and yet competition is healthier (case in point, the EURO) than a single world currency would be.

That being said Bytecoin had a gravy boat in the first 24 hours before the difficulty started jumping up quickly and if you took part in mining during that period then you're sitting on tens of thousands of them. It is no fairer than the other crypto's.

Infact I would argue that during the early days of Bitcoin, very few were aware of the significant value it would have one day (ie. the pizza thread). Owners of new crypto currencies are very shy at parting with them because of the potential value as opposed to real value, which has been seen in a real-world relation that is the $150 price tag of Bitcoin. If you want a "fairer" currency than Bitcoin then you're not going to get it the way that currencies like Bytecoin are being rolled out. The first adopters (ie. within 24 hours) of these new currencies will hold onto them much longer than the first adopters of Bitcoin did, and you're going to have problems later on because of that.