|
Title: Recent Problems with Big ISP's using 10.0.0.x Instead of 192.'s Post by: paramind22 on November 05, 2016, 09:19:21 PM Turns out the new Cisco router/modem all in one I recently received uses only 10.0.0.X addresses and so all the 192 addresses of the antminers will not work. I have to turn the bridge mode off, get another router to put into the back of the Cisco, which will then only function as a modem, and use that to access the machine. I just bought a new router, a Netgear N300, but not even sure if I can do it with it, or if it will be hardwired for the 10.0.0.x's.
Does anyone know how common this problem is, and if it's a new situation which may only get worse. I am currently using Comcast, and wondering if the DSL with Centurylink might be a better solution. Title: Re: Recent Problems with Big ISP's using 10.0.0.x Instead of 192.'s Post by: paramind22 on November 05, 2016, 11:00:47 PM Was finally able to get my antminer up a great long saga. Nice to see some real hashing. It's possible to overcome these problems
easily with a cheap Netgear router. Title: Re: Recent Problems with Big ISP's using 10.0.0.x Instead of 192.'s Post by: leowonderful on November 06, 2016, 12:52:01 AM Was finally able to get my antminer up a great long saga. Nice to see some real hashing. It's possible to overcome these problems Pretty much all routers can be configurated To 192.168.x, glad to see you've fixed your problem. I've had 10.0 routers for a very long time and I've found no real fix for that sort of issue except by changing 10 to 192. I'd suggest you lock this thread as the issue is resolved.easily with a cheap Netgear router. |