Bitcoin Forum

Hello

scammer profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=307195
scammer thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1654267.msg16765646#msg16765646

---

I have order 2 coins for 0.34BTC, but crunck ignore me...
Proof of payment
Some of proof (screenshots)

https://s13.postimg.org/67mvakizb/2_Capture.png

Moust important proof https://s17.postimg.org/iracy6g7z/5_Capture.png

---

Note:
Please give this scammer neg. rep  ;)

I have notified him of this thread, be patient.

I have no 1 year to wait him. I am waiting him 2 weeks now ???

He has not logged in since Nov. 16.

No problem here, and i apologise!
I have been pulled out of country, and will address this when i am back home, im staging through Malta at present , I appreciate someone has lost out here but there are bigger things ;)

Refund his BTC and call it a day. Win win.

I think crunck needs to reply on this accusation, at least refund the btc, or deliver the coins.

He's been online long enough to leave me a Negative with a garbage reason and a fake amount.  There is no excuse not to have solved this issue.

With all due respect, you are just a random internet guy whom no one here knows personally.  No one cares about what "bigger things" are happening with you.  And the 'I'm traveling,  so I can't pay you' stall tactic has been used ad nauseam.   So just suck it the fuck up and finish the deal.

Crunck is online as I'm posting this. He had the time to write 5 posts today (see 3 of them below), but he didn't had the time to reply here:

https://i.imgur.com/2ot86XB.png

I'm gonna paint him in red too if he does not clarify things in 48 hrs.

P.S. My current local time is 8 pm, so his last post was 1 hour ago.

You can all paint me as red as you like, and take the word of the OP no problem

Cracks me up how you lot seem to think you are the forum police, how about I name the 8 coins this clown has released and is at present scamming your community with, why not get your detective badges on and go figure that out!

Oh and he has his coins, not that you lot give a shit :


Info:
Name: romecoin
Tickr: rome
PoW/PoS
Algo: X13
Time blocks: 360 sec.
Block reward: 900
Halving rate : 1000000
Premine: 15% 315 000 000
Total coins: 2,100,000,000
PoS: Yearly Interest 70 %
Min.Coin age: 1 days
Max age: 10 days


Info:
Name: rootcoin
Tickr: root
PoW/PoS
Algo: sha256
Time blocks: 180 sec.
Block reward: 888
Halving rate : 1000000
Premine: 15% 306900000
Total coins: 2,046,000,000
PoS: Yearly Interest 50 %
Min.Coin age: 2 days
Max age: 8 days

No refund for op?

So what are you trying to say now? That the OP is bitsta (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155823)? I know about his (bitsta) scams very well and I can connect the dots if I wanted to, but what's this has to do with your problem here? And FUCK that "forum police" definition! A lot more must be done in order to prevent such scams. If you are a real man, then you are going to answer for your actions!

I am sick of this scammers like crunck!

Quoting this for my personal reference.

https://i.imgflip.com/1fsrnp.jpg (https://imgflip.com/i/1fsrnp)via Imgflip Meme Generator (https://imgflip.com/memegenerator)

Sorry for upping this moderately old thread... but I think I needed to do that.

I was researching crunck's recent history (just to understand whether he will return to development of one of the coins he started and abandoned...)., and I found this thread.

First of all, I would like to tell that I am not happy with how crunck does what he does. He starts coins then abandons them, make coins for people who are repeat scammers (I got such impression from this thread particularly), but one thing is pretty much clear - the accusation in this thread is practically not valid (at least it is not valid anymore).

I make that conclusion based on few factors:
1. The OP has disappeared right after opening this thread (on Nov 28)
2. crunck told above (on December 09) he actually delivered the coins ordered after some time - those were coins named "rootcoin (x13)" and "romecoin (sha 256)". OP did not intervene and did not tell that's not true, so either OP is agree with this, or he just run away from forum.
3. If you look carefully into the picture quoted in OP (https://s13.postimg.org/67mvakizb/2_Capture.png (https://s13.postimg.org/67mvakizb/2_Capture.png)), you will see the name of one of the coins is "ROME" (they tried to wipe it), so it proves what crunck posted
4. Another link in OP shows a picture where it is written that one of coins was x13, another was sha256/ So this fits too.

Of course, this doesn't prove 100% crunck actually delivered the coins, but at least crunck side of story looks self-consistent, and the OP did not oppose. So this case doesn't seem to be valid.

---

Well, I don't know why I spent all this time writing this :-\. Knowing the nervous atmosphere here in BCT, I know posting here is risky and I am probably putting myself under fire doing that, but... this case reminded me of "Dreyfus affair", so I felt I need to tell something.

Then again, I want to point once more, I am a no fan of crunck, who is actually guilty in other unrelated things (trusting him and following one of his coins costed me almost half a btc.. :( Never again!... >:(), but I just really dislike when people are blamed (and even get a lot of neg feedback!) for something they are not guilty in.