Bitcoin Forum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob9xcX_OhIU

Iranian scientist Alaeddin Qassemi unveiled his new invention, a car that he says is powered by water, in Karaj, Sunday.
The car can reportedly run on 60 litres (15 gallons) of water and is able to travel up to 900 kilometres (559 miles) in 10 hours.
 The power is generated after H2O is split into hydrogen and oxygen which react chemically to produce energy.

Care to tell us about the power it takes to split the H20 up?

No idea, but the car seems be real and the alone standing structure seems working.

In that way this could be a great day.
I hope, that this dude will be not killed fast and the documentation will not disappear.

The most funny stuff is that seems he is talking in arab, this is a hard trolling of someone.

The font of video is 100% serious news agency.

None of that matters at all.

All that matters is that the energy to electrolize water to h2 and o2 is much too high to make this practical.

For this reason he is a inventor.
I hope we will have more info about this process.

No, giving someone a title such as "inventor" does not change the fact we are discussing basic high school chemistry.  Sorry, that's the way it is.

There is nothing here.  Nothing.

Do You presume a fake?

In a normal way this dude will have in shortest time a patent, how he split H2O,
and some commercialization of the engines and power stations.
I think there are many things to do with this.

The theory have to count energy in the known effects. If this inventor have find a trick or catalysator for splitting H2O, there is nothing fantastic.

(How are the Oil and Gas Companies quotations on the Market?  ;D )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSHKt9kWRGg

A new version from Press TV with English Subtitles

Another scam. It takes far more electricity to split water to Hydrogen and Oxygen, than using it on an electric car. Electric cars consume electricity at a rate of around 0.25 KWh per km (Tesla Model S gives a mileage of 6.25 km per KWh). On the other hand, around 10 KWh per km will be required for these Hydrogen-powered cars.

This is good investion because oil price is getting high. So we need an alternative to save some money through this investion. Hope this kind of invention spreads all over the world so no one will buy oil specialy to those country with high prices of oil. Philippines has the expensive oil selling and i think this could be the solution.

Why don't you ask dmitry.vastov he knows all about scams.

No. The crude oil price has declined by more than 50% during the past two years.


Do you want to pay $1 for every 10 to 15 km of travel (using a gasoline-run car), or do you want to pay $10 to $15 for every 1 km of travel (using this hydrogen-run vehicle)?

if i use to remember a Filipino inventor also claimed that he already invented same thing a water  to run a car so i did search from the internet
Daniel Dingel from his claimed he said that the car can be run using only water here's the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a3t94I75xA

Well he's explanation is quite reasonable. Actually I'm not good in mechanical but if water can power a car, it was invented by now. Water can be use in a car as 1 of the tool to power a car, not water alone.

I do not presume a fake, fake is certain.

When you talk about trick or catalyzer, you do not understand chemical bonds.

Energy released when chemical bond breaks is also the energy required to make those bonds.  This is not complicated, it is first semester chemistry in high school.

There will be no patent, no commercialization, nothing. 

They are talked about British patent.
Probably now they have this patent.

We have no info about how it work, and if there is no fake, this will be reproduced and must working.

This Scam has long been circulated on the Internet. Empirically it has been proved that it is not possible to produce gas in the required quantity. You had money challenged!!!

Guys.. read the commentaries. Seek knowledge and not base your assumptions just on titles and memes. You make human zoos out of yourself. You cant unbond the oxygen out of the particles very easily. What is easy is oxidize aka burn stuff. You cannot unburn what you have burned, and water is just burned hydrogen. Running stuff on water is like burning your chimney with ashes. Total absurd.

The more stuff, the easier it is to believe people. In Russia many videos in YouTube showing the installation. Only it's all lies. The followers of count Cagliostro.

The Japanese have long lead development in this area. Japan is very dependent on energy and has not yet moved in this direction. Anyone who offers such technologies charlatans!

Japan "science" is in most cases a laughing stock. Its an oxymoron Japan and science. People have wrong impression about Japaneese people as being creative. Like most of the things people believe the truth is totally opposite.

Yes there are some good Japaneese engineers, but most of their ideas was, and are just improvements on german or american technologies.

Lol, you still do not get it.

It does not matter what they talk about.

There is no "probably" they now have this patent.

There is no need for gueswork how it work or if it fake.

Basic laws of chemistry and physics RULE.

It's not running on water. It's running on Oxygen and Hydrogen, producing water as an end product. That's what's called a fuel cell, which has been invented more than 100 years ago. I can't see anything special about it.

Fuel cells have been in the talks as potentially green technology for car engines since decades. However today, vehicles with battery storage seem to be the norm. However fuel cell are not dead, these are attractive because vehicles could be tanked with liquid gas instead of carrying a heavy battery all the time.

We need the independent confermation, if there is no fake.
They claim the fact of presentation of this car in this year in some exibition.
But i see no pictures about it.

This has been here for ages. I think there is a conspiracy going here brought about by people profiting from oil and gasoline. They are preventing the technology to advance because it will hurt their business.

This is hydrogen fuel cells. :D
There are buses that run on this for the past 5 years.
Nothing really new here. :P

In this car is nothing similar, that are in such buses (http://www.sunline.org/pub/images/FC3_product_locations.jpg).

Even if it is run on hydrogen. Is anyone wondering how expensive is hydrogen? Guys Ive wrote how it works. It cant and never will run on water! Water is just an element of making engine run more efficient. Do you guys read the posts above? Making a water into hydrogen and oxygen is possible but it requires energy not giving energy.

Basically it comes down to

Charge a load of batteries to provide electricity to convert water into hydrogen & oxygen.  Hydrogen is then used as fuel for the car.

Question is why not just use the electricity to power electric motors from the start and skip the whole water conversion process altogether.

Another scam.

US Navy turns seawater into jet fuel - This is REAL Genius - YouTube
Video for usa ship that runs on water▶ 3:21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcc-cTCVY6

The sports car that runs on SALTWATER: Vehicle goes from 0 to ...
Video for us ship that runs on seawater▶ 1:42
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../The-sports-car-runs-SALT...
1 Sep 2014


LiveLeak.com - U.S. NAVY TURNS SEAWATER INTO JET FUEL ...
Video for us ship that runs on seawater▶
www.liveleak.com/view?i=78a_1471388558
16 Aug 2016


Nuclear Power no longer needed due to liquid hydrocarbon fuel ...
Video for us ship that runs on seawater▶ 1:22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWs90UJwlKQ
9 Apr 2014 - Uploaded by Adept Yogi

Creating Fuel from Seawater - YouTube
Video for us ship that runs on seawater▶ 1:54
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iavz7AnKI8I
7 Apr 2014 - Uploaded by USNRL
Navy researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Materials Science and Technology Division .

You presume this video a fake?
I have no idea how he split H2O, and there is no comments about this.
He tank with water and not with hydrogen, and this is why the car is called water-powered.

I presume someone had named the video wrong. Ill quote one more time the proper understanding of the movie


You can say its hybrid car that runs on water as well as non water.

1. This video is from RUPTLY news agency. There are other links to Iranian fonts.

2. The car in question split the water with unknown process.
I hope, if this is not a fake, we will have more details.

Believe what you want. You people just try to invent a world a new. Its impossible to burn water mmmk? Its just non burnable because it was made by burning. Like an ash from a wood or coal. How to tell that more clearly - ITS IMPOSSIBLE!

What this dude putting in a tank of this car?
There is visible - water, he is drinking it.
From the describtion we have the notice, that the H2O goes to split on the place.

In this mode this car is not a "hydrogen car", such is produced by Toyota.

Didnt you thought he might have 2 tanks ffs? And Toyota car is basicly a hoax. Its electrical car basicly that if you are rich you can drive it more expensively by using more electrical energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen. Thats how you produce hydrogen by electrifying a water.

Hydrogen is very explosive so I wouldnt advice anyone to drive a car that runs purely on hydrogen.

Stan Meyer's water powered car demonstrated 1986 Channel 6 News ...
Video for stan meyers water powered car▶ 6:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcNFgDuEYUg

MURDER of STAN Meyers for his Water Powered CAR - YouTube
Video for stan meyers water powered car▶ 3:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEp6ckvRtj0
2 Dec 2010 - Uploaded by William WAGENER

TIN FOIL time ;D..The money they make from oil would you want to give up your gold mine..
WATER POWER ..Remember a television was hard to swallow..Especially if you try and eat one..

Plenty of inventions that have not been shown to the public YET ;D..

This car is around from March 2016.
It was on some exibition and there it was probably examined.
At least this car is running with water in tank and smell not with benzene.

I hope we will have more news about it.

To be honest i was just showing you how far behind Arabs are in there thinking ;)..

HHO Mythbusters Explained - YouTube
Video for HHO Mythbusters Explained▶ 4:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkrQojFCUAs
8 Sep 2009 - Uploaded by HHOSportTrac

We west are way ahead  ;)..

Maybe west is ahead but the ones that doesnt know even the basics of chemistry are waaaaaay backward.

Yer i agree ;D.. Do you know the basics?..Well if you do build me a space ship and fly me to the MOON  :-*..

Yes many people do know basic chemistry and that's why people use it to invent..

Point is we thought of the ARAB WATER IDEA way before Arabs did..

1980s idea ::)..Boring..WARP SPEED forget light speed to slow ;)..Not run by water warp speed..
Yes i am a dreamer but dreams get made into reality..The power we westerners have..
The power to dream and make it so ;)..So yes basic chemistry sure does help?..

That was an irony. Let me guess. You are an American. But yes its more to do with physics that says - that you cant take energy out of nothing. Either a thing has calories or oktanes, or intake energy from outside. If those magicians you call scientists would say more on the subject, than the know fact of water electrolysis, then its just a hoax on a "dreamers". Electrolysis is very inefficient energy wise - you need a lot more energy to produce dense enough hydrogen. Basic rules of physics says you cant undo the chemical reaction not wasting the energy in the process - and thats what basicly you say they do. They make one reaction makes the opposite by burning and rince and repeat. Laws of termodynamics oppose such a claim for a very logical reason, energy is wasted in form, for example, a heat you dont use in the process.

Its like perpetum mobile paradox that you describe and only USA citizens have such a downgraded education that they dont understand the paradox.

Lol, as far as water powered cars go, anyone who does not know the basics of chemistry just needs to Shut The Fuck Up.

It doesn't matter what desert or jungle they may be in.

It doesn't even need the basics of chemistry. Having an IQ of 40 or above is enough to understand that these "water-powered vehicles" are a scam. I wonder why the media is giving so much attention.

Yes i agree that's what i been saying about you with your 8th grade science..
Buildings don't blow up with FIRE ;)..So shut the fuck up ;D..

And as for the jungle i have every right to call the fillipinos my great gran dad was full fillipino
i have there blood..So shut the fuck up..Killing children poor children >:(..

Plus you moan enough about muslims and have the cheek to say desert or jungle making me out to be a raciest..GO AND TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT YOURSELF..

OH we are the jews everyone picking on us :'( :'( :'(..CRY ME A FUCKING RIVER :D..
Same old fucking story..Your just greedy BASTARDS END OF ;)..

Now we know we need to put more energy in so we can get hydrogen gas?..
BUT you can get hydrogen gas without electricity?..

But the point is We westerners thought of the idea way before the ARABS ;D..

The process splits water into hydrogen and oxygen but, while the first part can be done quite efficiently, the latter was more difficult and lots of energy is lost.
With this in mind the team designed a catalyst - a substance that alters the speed of the chemical reaction - to improve the efficiency.
‘Oxygen is the most difficult bit,’ Dr Hintermair explained.

Their catalyst, placed on an electrode used in the production of hydrogen, is much more efficient - and although Dr Hintermair didn’t have an exact figure, he said the energy loss using it is ‘almost non-existent’.
The major benefit from this breakthrough is that hydrogen could now be used more easily as a way to store energy from renewable sources like wind and solar.
‘We can make electricity out of sunlight and wind, low carbon renewable sources, but we can’t store it very well,’ Dr Hintermair continued.
‘We can put it in a battery but you can’t, for example, fly an airplane on a battery yet.
‘So we need to convert it into a chemical fuel, and for that water electrolysis is a key technology because we can take any renewable technology, connect it to an electrolyster and store it in hydrogen, which is a fantastic fuel.’
This, for example, would make hydrogen fuel cells for cars much more economical.

The team are in discussions with a number of energy companies about utilising this technology on a large scale and hope the breakthrough marks the start of contributing to providing the world with more sustainable fuels.
‘In theory it could be used on all systems, but it depends on cost and scale,’ said Dr Hintermair.
As regulations tighten on the use of fossil fuels and their emissions, there is a growing focus on the need for cost effective and efficient ways of creating energy carriers from renewable sources.
Solar power is thought to be able to provide up to four per cent of the UK's electricity by the end of the decade.
However, while the price of photovoltaic technology has dramatically decreased in recent years as demand has risen, solar energy is problematic as it is intermittent, meaning electricity is only created when it is light.
One use of the newly developed catalyst could be to store the energy produced by solar power by using the electricity to produce hydrogen which can then be used on demand, regardless of the time of day.

I AM TELLING YOU ONE DAY WE WILL PUT LESS IN AND GET MORE OUT ;)..
Like i said we make dreams come true ;D..

Buildings blow up with fire :D :D..Now your talking to an expert when it comes to BUILDING ;)..
So it looks like your worse at science than me :D :D..8th grade science :D :D..
Must still be in the 8th grade :D..

there are cars converted to such in our town actually. this is a breakthrough development yet business sectors may not support it. how disappointing this could be to the oil companies..

I am sure that such vehicles have no chance to exist and mass production. Powerful engineering organizations simply will not allow them to market.

Just add 500 pounds to a car because you get free petrol..
Plus governments could charge free energy tax..Like tv licence..

So governments and companies can still charge more because less fuel used..
Just your oil companies will loose out big time..
But this is the problem with the world oil and banks ;)..

So if governments want to be free from companies telling a nation what to do then free energy breaks away from these greedy bastards ;D..No more holding a country to ransom ;D ;D..

Going back about a decade ago, the car that powered by H20 was introudced by a filipino inventor.

I remember, it was put in the news and many people was amazed. However, I don't know thy it was launched. Maybe some oil companies blocked him as for them prevent to sink their business at stake. However, I do believed that it would be used in the future.

It is true that the Saudi-funded groups have been a major roadblock in the development of electric cars. That said, I don't think that they will be bothered with this "invention". The simple reason is that this is a scam.

Yes, it is possible, just what will be the price for water fuel. Ordinary fuel is much, much cheaper. Hydrogen technology is very expensive, hydrogen cars are not for public use - it is just experimental technology.

http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/ll_a_u/thumbs/2016/Nov/28/77fc8ab0a5ac_sf_1.jpg

This car need a independent recension.
Where is registered?

Just curious, what will be next move of this Iranian trolling.

"Water fuel" costs less than $0.01 per gallon, but the electricity needed to convert this water to hydrogen will be very expensive. Also, the vehicle might need batteries and invertors to store the electric energy.

How can this be, that water is cheap, and its production is expensive? In its cost should be included on the production costs

I am sure there is a way to have a 100% water-powered car, but the oil companies will stop making money.

No, you are being conned on this.  Catalysts don't reverse the energy hill.  Molecules like co2 and h20 are low energy, h2 and o2 are high energy.  The nature of fire, combustion is to move things from high to low energy, energy being released in the process.

2o2 + 2h2 --> 2h2o + o2 + energy  (combustion)

h2o + ???? --->

This is literally 8th grade science and you and others are being mocked and laughed at by those who would scam you.

BREAKING NEWS: Revolutionary new type of furnace burns ash by turning it into wood; what the logging industry doesn't want you to know!

^ Everyone who thinks water-powered cars are real and the oil industry is covering it up, this is how stupid you look. ::)

Are you sure? And will you be sure?.... Without fact checking? Nice.

There is a polish scifi writer, inventor and propagator of science S. Lem who said "I wouldnt know there are so many idiots in the world if I wouldnt had an internet". Btw its the guy that had wrote Solaris.

And another quote of scammers and marketing stuffers "You cant overvalue people lack of inteligence in doing buisness" Its infinite.

Read my post again. I said that water is inexpensive (desalinated water costs around $0.5 for 1,000 liters) and electricity is expensive. The production of "Hydrogen" requires a lot of electricity, and that makes this method very unsustainable.

https://ssl.toyota.com/mirai/

Still waiting on next video of iranian trolling.

its a great invention for the future generation .u cant expect more than this .with this kind of technology there will be no pollution at all an the whole world would run on renewable sources of energy  .wont it be great if a small wind mill can be installed that it  can power the whole car in a new level .

ALMOST the same, certainly an analogy that might make sense to those who are somewhat chemically challenged.

 In a perfect world, that should have ended the debate ;)
Quick!  Lock the thread!!

No, people like this iranian trolling.

There is one and one reason only we aren't all driving round in water powered cars.

They don't work.

But hey don't take my word for it, talk to the laws of thermodynamics about it yourselves.

 Listen.  They work.
You use the energy in the battery to break apart the water molecules and recombine them inside the internal combustion engine with little to no modification.  The car moves - not very far on one charged battery mind you but it moves.  Energy is converted and conserved throughout the process. Rest easy; no thermodynamic laws have been compromised. 

 

Oh god... this is the craziest post I've ever read in Bitcointalk. There are 2 billion cars in the world right now. You want to install 2 billion windmills to provide electricity for all these vehicles? Do you think that there is enough space for all of them?

Everybody can make a water car. You need only to spray water on a high voltage low current electric arc.

Hydrogen Vehicle - YouTube
Video for Hydrogen Vehicle▶ 10:07
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AXU2wqQe00

Oh i am this big know all scientist and water powered cars cannot be done BULLSHIT :D..

Hydrogen Refueling Explained | Toyota Mirai | Toyota - YouTube
Video for mirai hydrogen▶ 4:50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vgIIs0CGqw

Hydrogen cars are finally here but what are they, how do they work and should you buy one?

Local authorities, health trusts, police forces, fire brigades and private companies can now bid for £2 million worth of Government funding to add hydrogen-powered vehicles to their fleets.

The money will cover up to 75 per cent of the costs of new vehicles bought by April 2017, as well as the cost of running them for up to 3 years. Support will also be available for the leasing or renting of cars, insurance, hydrogen fuel and servicing.

The fund, launched by the Government’s Office for Low Emission Vehicles, could bring up to 100 more hydrogen fuel cell cars and vans onto UK roads by next spring – the equivalent of tripling the number of vehicles currently in use.

Transport minister Andrew Jones said: "We are always looking at new ways to make the vehicles of the future cleaner, and hydrogen fuel cells are an important part of our vision for almost all cars and vans to be zero-emission by 2050.

Solar electrolysis could be done..Wind electrolysis ;D..

Filling stations making it on site..Just like a petrol station you fill up but with hydrogen ;)..

If the government gets involved it will be done ;D..
We in ENGLAND BADLY BADLY need to produce clean free ish ::) energy..
We cannot be held to ransom by other countries over fuel ;)..

And we will accomplish our goal.. EARTH BLOOD WILL BE GONE SOON ;D..

Now it's funny people say it cannot be done BUT big car companies are spending lots and lots of money into this technology..Well they must be crazy  ::)..NO it's because they know it will be accomplished very soon..

Solar electrolysis stations or wind electrolysis station making it on site 8)..

So those people who say we cannot I say BUZZ OFF it will be done ;D..
We can do anything we are humans we have the power..
YOU GOT TO BELIEVE ;)..

1 try it cannot be done arr well lets forget about it..
NO WE ARE HUMANS..We try and try and try..

I mean look at religion 5000 years they been waiting for a god to come..
And they still wont give up..

Same with hydrogen we will not give up..And unlike religion we are getting close ;)..

even if it was able to be running with water for basically nothing, do you really thing that the multi billion oil industry would allow that? I don't think so.

It's a matter of time until these dying billionaire jew old farts get him killed.

Water(=h2o) != hydrogen(=h)

Popcorn1 the future of the UK bahhahaha :D

The same "multi-billion" oil industry could no nothing when the American frackers increased the output, and crashed the crude oil prices. Just admit it. They are not as powerful as they were a few years ago. The end of the OPEC oil cartel is very near.

And BTW... Iran is a member of the OPEC.

You are totaly wrong.
Reality is that frackers got owned by sauds. They increased output to drop prices under the profit margin of frackers (40-60$) from 140+$

Btw fracking is oil industry too.

Worst posters election: sithara, bryant and deisik :D

Actually it might be the case that sithara and bryant are the same person haha

We will move away from oil and use sun light wind and hydrogen if our government helps
then we will accomplish our goals..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I2-14y6-jM

Unless technology improves quite a bit, that will remain as a dream. The solar panels are very expensive, and they need constant maintenance. Wind power can't be generated everywhere. It is viable only in select locations. And with the current technology, the production of hydrogen is an extremely expensive process.

 Technology will improve as it has been for quite some time.  This isn't a dream, it's a reality-in-progress.  Coal, oil and natural gas can't be extracted everywhere,  it is also expensive - not only to obtain but in long term damage to our environment.  I'm talking about the immediate, perceivable effects: pollution, smog and oil spills; damage to natural water tables through tracking for natural gas.  Nevermind wether global warming exist or not, one simply need look at Beijing with its legendary smog problem to realize we can't continue on this same tack.
 I'm off topic... Hydrogen cars now!  There ;)

 

There are only concept cars. Japan has long leads development in this direction, but have not yet achieved much success. Expensive technology. That is what is written in this post technology fraud.

I think it is very possible and I hope they can refine the HHO Technology that is already there.They can come up with very comprehensive process to extract hydrogen in water which is very important with this technology.

I think that soon Tesla will come up with a battery which quickly charges and holds a charge, what will come up available the technology of extracting hydrogen from water.

The first part is a possibility. But I don't think that the second will be realized anytime soon. According to the laws of physics, the amount of energy required to break water in to hydrogen and oxygen is much more than what we get from burning them.

BTW.... Tesla is pumping in billions of USD in to research. Let's hope that they will get the breakthrough soon enough.

I hope so too. I am afraid that in fact such development has for a long time, they're just hidden. The oil lobby doesn't want to change the order in the world. And Tesla has to reinvent the wheel.

"quickly charges and holds a charge" well if you think of it, batteries as a concept are the ones that are getting developed the slowest. Ther isn'y any more efficient way to store energy than todays battery  without increasing it's size.

Look up superconductors.

Pretty sure a water-powered car is just called a "boat".
 ;) :D ;D 8)

I ask the same question. Already had many charlatans who came in the media to lie.

In 2015 had a Brazilian who claimed to have invented a water-powered car, but later It was discovered that it was a lie when he was asked if he knew that Engine spends much more energy to separate hydrogen atoms than the energy it can generate. he did not answer.

If its true that is a great invention and i do have my doubts here. has he designed an engine too to run on water .i am all confused here on how the combustion happens

do you understand the words "H2O is split into hydrogen and oxygen"?

I heard that about 4-5 years ago, American students have invented a way as to increase the velocity of the electrons in the battery and achieved a full charging for the mobile phone for 10 seconds. Where is the invention?

I heard that invented the technology of printing solar cells on an inkjet printer. While the production cost is minimal and allows them to do on any surface. And where are these technologies?

LOL... The boat still needs a power source (either electrical or petroleum) to move. A diesel-powered boat is just like a car. It is converting one form of the energy to another. Water is not used as a fuel here.

In the early 90s in Ukraine in the city Zaporozhye, a team of scientists invented the technology very cheap heating using water of high pressure pump. Then on the same principle they were created by the car. I even saw how it went. No one wanted to do it and they emigrated to the United States. It seems Americans don't want to do it.

I agree. Existing technology does not allow to reduce the cost of energy. I think that the increase in recent years, the interest of Americans to the development of resources on the moon suggests that again there was a question about cheaper energy costs.

Now the world stands at the crossroads. Either oil-producing countries greatly throw off the price of oil that it was not profitable to invest in funding the development of alternative energy, or do they risk to lose the market of oil and gas.

Yes maybe you are right, the first person to patent the use of water as fuel to run a car is an american, the second is a Filipino and the third is what the authors posted. They will both suffer the same fate. Oil industry leaders who has big connections on government leaders around the globe will not allow such inventions that is a threat to their business. Such as the faith of the american inventor, also the Filipino inventor from the philippines who sold his water powered car invention to Japan because the government whose being influenced by America did not support his invention. Oil industry will hinder alternative power sources for cars.

In any case, in the modern world is the Internet and I think at desire it is possible to promote your working model. So far all I see online is a lie and fraud. I hope someday I will see a real working invention.

The crude oil is still over-priced. It is estimated that in Russia and Saudi Arabia, it costs less than $3 to produce a barrel of crude oil. Even if you add the transportation costs and other charges, the total will be a small fraction of the current price.

so how many wind turbines or solar panels needed to make hydrogen.


So all we need to do is find the most powerful solar panels most powerful wind turbines and do the math and work out what energy is needed and if it can be done..
Then we know if it's possible..
Example..It takes 2 turbines producing so many kilo watts to produce so many litres of hydrogen..
I not worked it out YET but some bright spark might be able to do it faster..

Specs below..

Electrolyser: 1 WFuel cell: 500 mWGas storage: 30 cm3 H2;30 cm3 O2Solar module: 2.0V / 350 mAFan: 10 mWH x W x D: 100 x 300 x 150 mmWeight: 6

Sources:h-tec Education

Electricity needed to power up electrolyzer to produce hydrogen.

When stored as a gas at a pressure of 20MPa:

1 liter contains 0.53kWhEnergy efficiency of electrolysis - roughly 50%. 1.06kWh of electricity to produce 1 liter hydrogen.

When stored as a gas at 24.8MPa1.28kWh = 1 liter hydrogen

When stored as a gas at 30MPa1.50kWh = 1 liter hydrogen

When stored as a liquid at 20K4.72kWh = 1 liter hydrogen

When stored as a metal hydride6.36kWh = 1 liter hydrogen

Source/s:hypertextbook

The amount of energy stored in 1 kilogram of hydrogen.

One gallon of gasoline has about the same energy as one kilogram (1000 grams, which is about 2.2 lbs.) of hydrogen gas. 33.4 kilowatt hours of electricity is equivalent (in energy) to one gallon of gasoline (114,000 BTU); this means 33.4 kilowatt hours is also equivalent (in energy) to one kilogram of hydrogen gas.

After doing my sums you would just use the solar instead of wasting the energy trying to make the hydrogen gas ::)..YER i am good at math  :D..BUT what about this below?..

Nov 2016

RESEARCHERS at Princeton University, US, have developed a new way to break down ammonia to make hydrogen, which could lead to the use of ammonia as a hydrogen fuel source.
Ammonia is a low-cost, common material. Research leader and Princeton chemistry professor Paul Chirik explained to The Chemical Engineer that ammonia has a high volumetric energy density and is relatively easy to store, unlike hydrogen. The N-H bond within ammonia is extremely strong, so ammonia has not been widely explored as a potential carrier of hydrogen. Chirik’s team’s new catalyst, however, can break that bond under relatively mild conditions.
Ammonia-metal complexes have been known for more than 100 years, but Chirik says that this is the first time that the physical properties of the bond-weakening that occurs when this happens has been understood. The researchers use a terpyridine bis(phosphine) molybdenum(I) cation, which binds to ammonia. This weakens the N-H bond to the extent that it becomes thermodynamically favourable for one of the H atoms to break away and bind to another H atom, forming H2 gas. The reaction takes place at around 60˚C.
The reaction leaves behind a molybdenum-amido complex – [Mo]-NH2. Chirik says that the complex can be converted back into the original molybdenum-amido complex – [Mo]-NH3 – using strong acids and reductants, for reuse.
“It is a demonstration of a fundamental concept in chemistry and allows chemists to realise after a century of progress, there is much to be learned about ammonia coordination and our understanding of the chemical bond,” said Chirik, adding that any applications are likely to be more in the long-term as the method is a new approach for activating the typically inert N-H bond.
He and the team are currently working on a way to alter the thermodynamics of the reaction to liberate the second and third hydrogen atoms from ammonia. At present, the N-H bond strength of NH2 is too high for that to happen

it has something to do with logistics and infrastructure.

you dont build solar cells on cars (atleast not today). you build eletric cars with batteries.
Batteries from today are very expensive and not enviroment friendly and have up to 400 km range.

Hydrogen doesnt need batteries or an electric motor (no need to change the car design) - but you need a lot of energy to split h20 to h.

I agree..Only because i worked it out with my great math :D..

Very knowledgeable post. Bravo. Only with any rule there are exceptions. To help make a difference in your calculations, for example maybe some sort of catalyst. But so far have not found. In any case, I think that people will go the other way.

Well, I'd like to share a Filipino inventor who already made a water fueled motor engine five years ago.It was a break through in modern technology and filipinos were on a hype to have these technology that costs 0 but the invention was bought by some company and all of his research was sold. So that's it.

 Well it was longer ago than that.  Daniel Dingle (who passed away 6 years ago at age 84) "invented" the technology in 1968 but never revealed details to anyone; seems he just scammed potential buyers for money.


Philippine Daily Inquirer
 First Posted 03:11:00 12/20/2008

Filed Under: Crime, Automotive Equipment
 MANILA, Philippines-Daniel Dingel, 82-year-old inventor of a “water-powered car,” has been convicted of “estafa” [swindling] and sentenced to a maximum of 20 years imprisonment by the Paranaque City Regional Trial Court.

 Daniel Dingel Water Powered Car Inventor gets 20 years for ‘swindling’
Posted by keelynet on December 20, 2008

The technology is NOT invalidated by this court action.

“Daniel Dingel, 82-year-old inventor of a “water-powered car,” has been convicted of “estafa” [swindling] and sentenced to a maximum of 20 years imprisonment by the Paranaque City Regional Trial Court. The court also ordered him to pay $380,000 in actual damages. Dingel, who has never revealed the secret to his invention, which he began in 1969, questioned the verdict but said he did not mind going to jail at his age. As of late Friday, he remained at large. Dingel was found guilty of taking $410,000 from Dr. John Ding Young of Formosa Plastics Group, a Taiwanese company, which gave it to him as research and development funds. The decision, written by Judge Rolando How of the court’s Branch 257 and released on Dec. 9, said Dingel defrauded Young when the inventor failed to fulfill his obligation of developing his “hydrogen reactor” and creating experimental cars in 2000. The unique device – a “hydrogen reactor” resembling a 12-volt battery – impressed the Taiwanese when Dingel demonstrated how it powered and fueled the car’s engine. They were also told that fuel from water had clean emissions as it did not produce carbon the way gasoline did. After receiving the money ($300,000) by wire transfer, Dingel avoided replying to his emails on the progress of the project and instead sent copies of letters from other foreign investors offering Dingel larger sums of money. Young said he kept his end of the bargain by sending another $60,000 in additional funds for R&D as stated in the joint venture agreement. He said it was then that Dingel began ignoring his communications. He said he sent demand letters for the return of $410,000 were but Dingel did not give the amount back. Instead of returning the money, Dingel withdrew $375,603.89 from his bank account and left only $500. “He admitted withdrawing the money after learning that a suit had been filed against him,” it said. “His act of immediately withdrawing the money indicated bad faith on his part.” – Source

really? can send the link to me ????
but how can there can transfer to the power to let the car move?????

This is a fairly old story. Is proven that it is not possible to build the engine on this technology. The amount of energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen exceeds the energy which in this case stands out. All the videos on the Internet is fake order to lure unsuspecting citizens money.

I hope in the future, this will turn to reality. With a vehicle powered by water is the best solution to air pollution. It is eco friendly and people will save a lot of bucks. I think big oil companies will go on bankrupt when people started to use water powered vehicles. Billionaires should invest to this kind of technology that way we can prolong and rehabilitate our Mother Earth's life.

No one will invest in such technology. From the point of view of science proved that it is not possible. It's all the tricks of swindlers.

It's possible and proven. However, it didn't succeed since huge car company blocked this project since they are the number one who will be affected if it happen so.

This sounds pretty cool

Sound very interesting. The interesting thing is how we could make this happen, and not provide hoax video

Well this is one interesting invention but in reality what would be the use of gas if the car is powered by water its not really that hard but the gasoline is one of the most important thing in these days it will be no value if cars is powered by water. But i really think that water can move the car but its not like gas it can be process fast and the water cannot.

I've seen this car already on movies where they using h2o to start the engine of the car this is what the technology did to our world also thanks to those inventor who always finding ways to make our life more easier to live if this happen to all cars then we can 100% pollution free in ways hoping that will implements to all cars all over the world

If this is real then this is a welcome development, maybe before 2023 it will be in the market. Scientists has done this world good by not resting on their daily research on nature and it laws. A water power car will resolve the high cost of energy we are experienced now.

Because Japanese are not that really interested in cars and stuffs, they are more focused on how will people be comfortable in their life as long as they live, they don't improve much cars with their specs, but their appearance.
Japan has high technology and I think they are really contented with their transports.

there had been few cars in my country running powered by water actually. i've always seen this on the news years ago. and yes its true the principle works like its said, h2o is being exacted to separate hydrogen and oxygen. hydrogen is highly explosive which can serve as the air fuel mixture to power the shaft. its very efficient that an engine needs no constant change of oil.

The engine which works by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen is not possible with the current technology. The amount of energy you spend more than you get. In addition, the oxygen reacts with the oil. It is a fake.

I think this has never been proven? Saw it before and did some research previously..

I am sure the Iranian Government will capture this man and stick him into a hole, With a country who's main source of income is Oil, this is going to hurt the revenues of the country, Most Oil producing countries will pay to have this invention stolen and hidden all because of money.

I've heard similar news, and all ended with fraud. This news will be greater if it were real