Bitcoin Forum

Other => Off-topic => Topic started by: vite on April 08, 2013, 01:59:50 PM



Title: Meanwhile at BFL
Post by: vite on April 08, 2013, 01:59:50 PM
Database error
The database has encountered a problem.
Please try the following:

    Load the page again by clicking the Refresh button in your web browser.
    Open the forums.butterflylabs.com home page, then try to open another page.
    Click the Back button to try another link.

The forums.butterflylabs.com forum technical staff have been notified of the error, though you may contact them if the problem persists.
 
We apologise for any inconvenience.


Title: Re: Meanwhile at BFL
Post by: jackjack on April 08, 2013, 02:10:23 PM
Lol


Title: Re: Meanwhile at BFL
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on April 08, 2013, 04:36:55 PM
It's up now, but I can't get any of the sections to open up, yet it states it has viewers.


Title: Re: Meanwhile at BFL
Post by: Minor Miner on April 08, 2013, 04:39:34 PM
The true believers and shills in the shoutbox take this as a sign that a HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT is pending and likely that BFL will ship this week..    "please josh, throw us a crumb".  They are debating whether BFL will instantly ship 400 per day and how long it will take to ramp up to 800 per day.
I am sure friedcat is shaking as his market share of hashing would be obliterated by this BFL manufacturing forte.


Title: Re: Meanwhile at BFL
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on April 08, 2013, 04:50:50 PM
The true believers and shills in the shoutbox take this as a sign that a HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT is pending and likely that BFL will ship this week..    "please josh, throw us a crumb".  They are debating whether BFL will instantly ship 400 per day and how long it will take to ramp up to 800 per day.
I am sure friedcat is shaking as his market share of hashing would be obliterated by this BFL manufacturing forte.

That is excellent news! Too bad that as of last Friday the FCC still doesn't have a single Single or any other product from their facility to test.

I searched the site for Wyoming, Kansas and Missouri, along with BF Labs and Butterfly Labs, and just Butterfly. The states were the easiest to search, for you just put the list in alphabetical order and read down, checking any entity that may fit their criteria. Honestly, they would have no choice but to use their Inc. name and only one of these three states.

If they ship without an FCC label on their products, they will be fined.