Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Gambling => Topic started by: bitcoinsforall on December 06, 2016, 01:59:11 PM



Title: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: bitcoinsforall on December 06, 2016, 01:59:11 PM
Hi,

I have my new casino setup here,its from betbase.io...

You can feel free to check it out..

http://betbase.bitcoinsforall.website/


Let me know your comments/suggestions..

Its a real dice where you can deposit/withdraw with provably fair system


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: panjul07 on December 06, 2016, 09:38:24 PM
It is the 3rd dice sites using betbase API/script. I think it is gonna be like when many people tried to use untitled dice script on Moneypot. All of them were failed and I think this one has no chance to compete with the other older dice sites. You need more than just free script to build a gambling site, otherwise no one will play on your site. But good luck for yours..


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: Vikingr on December 06, 2016, 09:39:27 PM
can I know why is it on a sub domain? is not it good to have a unique domain for it? do you have this domain permanently or you have set the dice up there only for testing it?

By the way I have checked it and everything is fine for me. I hope you will get the success for it.


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: AcoinL.L.C on December 06, 2016, 11:55:45 PM
It is the 3rd dice sites using betbase API/script. I think it is gonna be like when many people tried to use untitled dice script on Moneypot. All of them were failed and I think this one has no chance to compete with the other older dice sites. You need more than just free script to build a gambling site, otherwise no one will play on your site. But good luck for yours..


As panjul07 said, people that just blatantly copy untitled dice on MoneyPot and do nothing to improve it do not succeed.


Also: Going to be very hard to get any serious volume/anything other than dust players with a max bet that tiny.


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: Bitcoin Marketing on December 07, 2016, 12:18:58 AM


Software - YES
Design, funnels, UI\UX, Traffic, NGR - NO

Doesn't look like a business
 


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: DarkStar_ on December 07, 2016, 01:17:14 AM
We all know that Moneypot Untitled Dice clones won't be popular, what makes you think the free dice script provided by BetBase will be? The premade script even looks better than your "changed one", which is really stupid. The only reason someone should use these scripts are for low house edge gambling (for personal use), or as the start of an app and start improving it with more features, better design, e.t.c.


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: cakravothy on December 07, 2016, 01:28:17 AM
i think not good if you develop gambling site use subdomain, not use top level domain
and the best platform bankroll gambling site is moneypot
trusted reputable and much client use moneypot


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: Blitzboy on December 07, 2016, 10:17:37 AM
The domain and the script are not good because there are many people currently use this script to build gambling site. I do not like the domain at all. Using Subdomain to develop a gambling site is not a great idea. Users will stay away from these domains. If you want your site to be unique, you need to buy other scripts and domain.


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: mobnepal on December 07, 2016, 01:57:37 PM
It is the 3rd dice sites using betbase API/script.
I think there are already more than 3 plain dice site out there using betbase API.

OP if you can't redesign whole platform you will not get any attention, you need to have something different than other dice sites using betbase script. Good luck, hope (wager*house_edge*0.5) commission will be enough for you to keep your site online.


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: SparkedDev on December 10, 2016, 09:07:30 PM
What method are you using for provably fair?


Title: Re: BTC BetBase Casino
Post by: fiscorcle on December 20, 2016, 06:18:39 AM
What method are you using for provably fair?

Presumably BetBase's, no?