Bitcoin Forum

If you have a coin NO TOKENS you think is good that has no active development, has been abandoned by the developers, has a broken chain , outdated source code or just needs s fresh breath of life. PM me with the details and i can try and help.

Basics

Coin must have an active following
Be listed on at least two exchanges
Must be a coin, i cannot help with tokens (lol, i cannot save ICOs)

It would be a plus if the coin has some differentiating tech that would be worth saving.

Why

Many coins, maybe about 1-2% of the deluge of shit coins since 2011 actually had tech that was interesting and may be worth saving. Keeping the chains alive , updating the code and maintaining them keeps the tech alive and open to forking. I've seen interesting concepts like demmurrage, proof of burn and mini blockchains implemented in some coins only for them to fade into the dark. Coins with actual ideas, tech and even just large followings are worth keeping alive IMO.

Who

Anyone can approach me, though i prefer current maintaniners or team members. If no maintainer and/or team exists I'll still look at it, though you may need to coodinate with other existing community members.

No, not really, you know if a coin is dead, then there are good reasons, you will find hundreds of coins dead in the altcoin announcement section, start from the page 6~9 to the end.
Or, you can pick one from some exchange and try to find the coin with the most stuck volume,with 0 buy, i am sure a lot of people will join you there.

ETH still running with smoothly and I think I don't wanna anything, but seems like it was happening with ETC.
ETC!!!!!!! He was dying in this time, entirely their price was never resolving into over .0015  :D  And what the reason for that, because a lot of the ETC bagholder was trolling caused by their coin was getting dying.  ;D

Even if you is a real blockchain mechanic, all these damn coins that is daid, they should stay daid!

There way too many of them cloggin up the pipeline, an' it startin' to stank.  Jist let 'em die!

Neucoin is a good project. They just dissolved billions of foundation coins and it is linked to Jango.com. Has resurrection potential.

Fantom users say blockchain is stucked

old thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219043.0

new thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1302322.0

What ever happened to Anoncoin?

Just curious,why are you asking can you help it revive,these are some of my list,they are not actually dead some of them were left by their devs,some of them still had a working nodes ..
Bigup,songcoin,icobid

if the coin is dead and don't have fans or people is not interested to buy, why we want to revive? who will be behind the coins after it revived? because i don't think it is a good idea, the dead coin is history and there are always many new coins for replacing the dead one.

I'll just quote you and use this to respond to the question everyone is asking. In no particular order :-

1)  I have great interest in coins, their ups and downs
2) I am accumulating knowledge and experience in unique coins to help solve some of the fundamental problems with a currency i will propose next year, i may even apply those concepts to an existing coin. The technical paper is done, the alpha works-ish but damned if i can make it regular and/or keep consensus. Forked/Dead/Dying coins will show me in how many ways things can possibly go wrong .
3) it's December, i have a lot of time on my hands.
4) maybe some communities would like a stand in dev at times who just keeps their chain moving.
5) The occasional tip

Thank you all for your suggestions, i will look into them, keep them coming please !!!

There are hundreds, have a look at staketoken for example, the dev left the coin and leaved the blockchain.

I dont like to revive those dead coins since those alts are just useless thats why they are dead and people dont have any interest on it and why we should bother to revive if no one uses it? I would not choose since i dont like those coins which are considered as dead.

Sometimes the projects are great (like 8bit) but had been just screwed by the dev, 8bit is currently under active reviving, it was one of the top 10 coins with a higher value than eth, it uses darksend and masternode, and the team is great.

Agree there are some coins could possibly be revived and some are really messed up by developers same as you mentioned. One thing i want to revive is RAI (Raiblocks) i just see this coins had the potential but it easily died and run only for a month because the dev left it without any announcements of the development of the coin and later on he said that he didnt able to continue because of some personal reasons.

dying
ANC anoncoin
QTL ... polo listed
XPY ... at rock bottom, clean code, notorious history
opal ... stuck chain needs stakers
FLT ... POS hybrid it works, just needs some POS stake pools
ARCH ... great brand, shit but long history

DEAD
Liberty ... just needs some nodes, the client is pretty and works
Cache ... just needs nodes, the client works
Heavy .... POW needs but 2-3 old laptops to keep the chain moving, nice github project
 

Currently working on QTL , things are going fairly well. I was received in a friendly manner. I've already brought the code base forward by almost 4 years and am now adding new material.

If you have any coins, post now and i will take a look at them !

I nominate NMC, XPM, XCN, BBR, and VIA.

LIGHTCOIN ltc BABY

I aleready heard about this coin, can you please provide a link to the thread ?

What can you do about it little newblet ? The coins died for a reason,just like Jesus,for betterment of the humanity.Let's focus more on the projects with potential.Oh for the answer,please resurrect Z-Cash.It's on the verge of becoming extinct.

for dying coin, decred and xcn, i like the mini blockchain idea in cryptonite(xcn) coin, and decred for the good new innovative pos system, for dead coins i don't know but if they are died it's because they were really bad project

Ehh not many of them to be honest. Most coins are absolute trash and bring nothing new to the table, and those that bring something new are actually nonsensical gimmicks.

I would like to have a strong Litecoin. It's always a cool idea to have a "silver" of crypto, and cobble seems like a guy that has common sense, he is going to adopt segwit soon in Litecoin, I would like to see that play out.

I remember Grandcoin from 2013-2014 and I still hold some. :)

Whoever said Litecoin is dead?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=655793.0

No new thread yet.

Definitely Bitshares (BTS). So good system, so low price.

LTBC coin...

very undervalued..only 50 sats

If brought up to life, can see over 5000 sats

DigitalCoin
Feathercoin Scrypt PoW

Hobonickels
Opalcoin

I liked some coins that I want to revived because
i invested in that coins but nothing happen. So,
its cube, bigup. Thats the coins I wish to be in
exchange until now.

I think the OP doesn't talk about coins dead on exchanges. You need whales to revive price and volume of coins, not a mechanic lol

2nd

all fair projects

(XCN a little obscure / but had competitive mining)

I am uploading new Quatloo code to github today for user assessment, i will give them a few days to look through the code. meanwhile, i will investigate all suggested coins, and pick which ones i can work on. I will update later today on which one(s) i will do this coming week.

Decred looks like it is alive and has active development unless I'm wrong. Not familiar with Cryptonite coins, but i think i can do it, will study the source code.

I came across two coin that looks dead but still worth to revive,Bioscryptos and chesscoin,this coin has potential,there were slight movement in volume but there's a need for a big pump for these coins for investors to notice this coin again.

Will take a look. Check their threads for updates, or here. I have made a post in DGC thread, will see if there is a response, i will also post in threads of other suggested coins, which ever ones give positive responses will be worked on, first come first serve.

Please remember to post links to coins that you want me to consider, thank you.

Now checking the threads.

nemgun, In the upper right corner there are a search function. Input there QTL and press button. voila.  ;D   Or be lazy and follow my link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=655793.1720

Hopefully those coins i still have like deur, xmo, pulse, bac, rubbies.. This are some of the coins i think is dead/dying.... Hopefully those whales would have a look at this coins, you might wan't to pump it...lol

Doge coin would be nice to see come back alive.

I don't want to see these come back but they don't get much shittier than Panda and Flappy. That is if you're looking for a real challenge.

I actually agree with you. Dead coins is dead, but the sure one is everyday a new coin will born and replace the dead one with better strategy and many else. I won't revived the dead one though.

I bought " TAM " which is altcoin and its price is not going up .
I made purchase of this altcoin about one week ago but still it's price is constant , no movement at all , So I want sell this back at the Same amount of price at which I bought it , but probably I can't do it .

Over the next week I will be taking a look at DGC,OPAL and XCN, if i can do it in less than a week, i may add another.

For those talking about exchange prices, there is little i can do except maybe introduce new features and upload code. The marketing and hype are community issues.

If you take a look at my chosen code base, I am basing everything on Bitcoin 0.12 with experimental branches for 0.13. This is because i am not yet completely sold on segwit. So i leave it to communities to choose what they want. IMO, let segwit run a couple months on Bitcoin, then if there are truly no catastrophic problems in that time, update. Its just a cherry pick when you are starting from 0.12 after all.

edit: As always, it will be up to the communities to accept my work and/or use it.

XCN
FIBRE
OPAL
VIOR
HBN
TEK
FLORIN
QUAZAR
MOUNT

What to do with dying or dead coins. Many people associate bad experience with dead coins. I think it's better to start a new project.

I get that , but many working coins with large followings, is never a bad thing. I am making a project out of existing projects.

Eg, HBN, OPAL and XCN have seen a few mentions so far in this thread, meaning that there is demand for them to be active.

You got scammed by that tam dev. He's a con and a noob developer. I dont know what's worse though. You buying TAM in the first place or the fact that you're still holding them.  ;D

Greetings Mr Mechanic!   :D

Coins that definitely need some help include:

NET https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745323.new#new (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745323.new#new)

NOBLE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402667.new#new (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402667.new#new)

HORIZON https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=823785.new#new (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=823785.new#new)

CRYPTONITE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713538.new#new (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713538.new#new)

OPAL https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=778720.new#new (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=778720.new#new)

Let's see what you can do!!  ;D

Opal has been mentioned many times so far. It's definitely in the works.

XCN, i am still studying.

doge have no real use or utility, it's worthless pump and dump, better to have it dead, it was nice at first because attracted "much newbie"(in doge terms), but it is done now, also was bad because it promoted another row of coins like it, you have panda, flappybird, darkdoge etc...all trash, that were only useful for scamming little unexperienced traders

+1 XCN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713538.0

XCN gas a lot of votes, i am carefully studying the source code.

So many crap coins with no novelty the best way is let them die, no point to revive.

Yes, the vast majority have no innovation and should die. But some eg XCN have interesting ideas. I don't just work on any and all coins, i first study them and then decide. Some coins have large followings, that sometimes can be enough cause for revival.

You may look at this dying coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641064.0

XGR / Goldreserve

They die and it was becoming an earmark if they were the worst coin and no need to be revived again. But seems like Factom is the different example in this case.  Although if the coin was getting overtake by a new dev and i think i can give it once chance again.

I am willing to give you the old GB wallet if you decide to revive.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740744.2480 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740744.2480)

How dare you put Noble in that list of dog shit. Noble is fine.

A dead coin is a dead coin for a reason!

SFR: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=586320.4640

One of my first fun coins ( yet before Dogecoin ) I remember was Flappycoin  ;D

It was fun to talk about, the community was good and the offical Bitcointalk thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464743) had more than 230 pages what shows how popular the coin was for some time. I do not really know why it died.

Probably you could revive it with some more serious goals for the coin.

hehe, noble is one of the first I mined. I still have it... and it's worth nothing.

Well, I'd like to know whats going on with XVC. Not so long ago it was trading at 50K Satoshi and now its sitting around 4K satoshi.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1690299.0

please revived chunk , only 500K coin , and no any problems  at present

I like the idea of the coins that supported and shared among the whole community for free i wish that VAL can satisfy this need but the dev was only a scammer want to run even with less than 1 btc at that time so the project fail , community did nothing but hope .

Ethereum! :P

Can I add fedoracoin !!!

I have left XCN to the dev, he decided to "let people know he was alive"

I have also shelved work on DGC, there is a war over there and i will not participate.

So, any other coins are now on the table. After the XCN and DGC fiasco, i am going to mod the way i operate a little. I'll post the guidelines in the OP.

Meanwhile, for those who like shiny new toys : Blockchain AI (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1727125.0)

That's what i have been working on.

Are you still  working on OPAL?

I haven't looked at OPAL in a while. I managed to update PoS to match Bitcoin 0.12.x , but beyond that i have been paying more attention to Oracle.

if i get some spare time, i will try making the necessary modifications and attempt to sync. I looked into file sharing for it and found a rather interesting solution, but all this will have to wait while i finish up whats on my plate at the moment.

Sorry

CloakCoin, I don't know if it's getting any development these days but I do know that it has pretty much potential to be the one having good value.

Gamecoin - was quiet intresting coin. ::)

VPNcoin, chinese based, was top 10 coin early 2016, dev abandoned,  many interesting features

Thanks for the response; no apology necessary!!

Footy Cash was a good idea, but bad execution.  Fantasy sports is big.  Would be a good takeover with some fresh ideas.

gamecoin was a good coin, i'll give my +1 to that

Ahmed

Fedoracoin already has a dev team. i recently did an upgrade for them about a month or 2 ago

Ahmed

When Money coin was launched I bought around 10000 of them on yobit and was expecting its price to shoot up as they were promoting it heavily on this forum.But to my shocked,the coin died sooner than I was expecting it and I lost my btc.Luckily it wasn;t a big amount but if somehow Money could comeback just for an hour,I would like to sell it and get my btc back  ;D

Why do you do such things? To help humster or what? To be honest I don't understand your motivation  :-\
You just lost your money. Or, maybe it's another cunning way to take money from humsters and noobs? Answer please, i'll be very glad bacause i'm very interest in it.


P.S: maybe you just activate blockchain of dead coin. Its seem logically.

Have you given up on all those three coins?

why to revive garbage? create a better coin if you have time and energy!

Willing to pay to get zoom coin chain started.We spoke before you were going to look at it

Just dropping a note here. I am the last remaining person on the Opal team. I still maintain the website, a couple nodes, and pay for the explorer. I would be interested in chatting with people to get our codebase updated.

PM me or come to #opalcoin on freenode. Make sure you ping me on irc and actually stay in the channel. I will respond.

Thanks,

CoolCash

Hello,

    This is an interesting project.  I'd imagine "revival" includes rebasing the legacy code against the more current versions of the repository from which they were originally forked and cloned.
    When rebasing older coins onto the updated versions of their parent repositories, there are sometimes hard forks in the parent project which are undesirable to introduce into the legacy coin's code.

    For example, suppose some "dead coin" actually still has a swarm of 2 or more full nodes and the blockchain has been running "okay" despite the coin being functionally dead for new users -- implying no DNS Seeds or other problems related to pool hopping and the retarget window.

    It would be a bad idea to release new wallets which fork the Main chain, since those remaining nodes have been "the most stable" and there aren't any guarantees they would update their wallets during a community takeover.

    In thinking about how these revivals would be implemented practically, I figure there needs to be two releases.
    The first release would essentially be a new build of the existing code which included a new checkpoint and updated DNS Seed and pnSeed array addresses.

    This first release would essentially bootstrap the revival, giving new and existing users a chance to have a wallet linked against the non-vulnerable OpenSSL libraries and would include the ability to find the swarm of the Main chain without resorting to addnode entries in the configuration file.

    Then, the second release could address whatever might have been fundamentally flawed in the original code.  Suppose there was some problem related to the propensity for the difficulty to be driven sky high and then a miner abandoning the chain until the difficulty falls back to ground level -- well, "fixing" the retarget window and difficulty adjustment could be discussed on the forum and eventually released.  At the same time, since there would be renewed interest; the community could go through all of the things like logo contests and updating the in-wallet graphics which would be integrated into the second release.

    This gives time for cool things to happen.  After the first release, people can get onboard immediately -- new faucets could be put out there and block explorers could be put up by community members who had otherwise abandoned hope.  Since the first release shows goodwill, it would promote interest in furthering efforts to remedy the dead coin for the near future.  The buzz around logo contests, faucets and other promotions would help create the larger audience needed for the successful second release where hopefully "things will be fundamentally repaired."

    There are other things to consider in general for potential third releases, which might bring the old coin's codebase closer in line with the parent repository -- but that is for discussion later in the thread.

Best Regards,
-Chicago

   

nascoin,because the bet game is very interesting.

there are a bunch of coins that i want to revive, one is hypercoin, but i would add pow phase this time and leave the experience you cna have with game like csgo and other as a side way to earn this coin, another one is minerals, because i like the concept of limiting the node to avoid big farm raping the hashrate

The only dead coin I have now is chain coin, the coin remain static, the coin is just there.

Do you know why coins stay static?
It is happens when all those people who invested in it is just holding it with the expectation of the raise. Normally the coin doesn't want to grow in this case. I believe there is a big list of such coins. You simply can open an exchanger and look a history of some coin to see it's progress.

Is anyone developing chain coin would not mind taking it over if not.I thought it a good coin with prospects

Numerai looks dead to me, there aren't much volume. It looks like the investors are all gone. Only the data scientist are playing with it now. Just hope the owner could also help the crypto investor by providing more updates, news and engaging model, e.g. for others to stake on other models. Anything like that could kick off the market again.

HCC, kinda dead and hopefully revived when the chinese regulations are fixed.

Well, nostalgia. Everyone that gets into the crypto space will inevitably invest in a coin that dies shortly after. It's nice to think that the coin might come back one day, so our mistakes can be slightly less silly.

On a more related note, it would be interesting to see Digibytes come back, just for the meme potential.

How about ammo rewards? Lots of people got pinched on that ICO pump and dump. Would be great to see the community take this coin in and develop. Already has a DPOS system in place, which is better than POS in some

ways.

I dropped this in favour for a more all inclusive solution that i am still working out the kinks on.

I just found your thread, and like what i see..

There is a coin i created that needs help with revival Flurbo:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2218539.0

Why is this coin dead
I rushed updates, without actually testing, the coin is still on two exchanges, but not currently able to transfer any coins due to no nodes syncing.

The problem/s
1. The network won't sync
 - Although at-least one user managed to sync with lpool.name who happened to still mine new blocks but not syncd with the main network, and had shared the latest blocks with us
2. Wish to change algo
 - Have thought about changing algo, but am unsure if there's a way to have a new algo and still use the old blocks
 - Might have to revive the coin in its POW state, and then fork to a new algo
3. Probably some others can't think of right now.

Who's 'potentially' helping currently
There is currently a team (boxyteam) in talks with me now about possibly helping revive / maintain,
And also a developer that is aiding Unobtanium with development, may in the future possibly help out as well although nothing set in stone.


If you'd be interest in helping revive this project would be great to hear from you !!
Thanks in advance.

feel free to join boxy discord:
https://discord.gg/6DSvyNV

or flurbo discord channel:
https://discord.gg/Af2J525

I had millions of PANDA coins back in 2014, but the coin died after 2 weeks after Wolong the cheater dumped premine.  Would be nice to see it resurrecting.

Why would you want to revive dead coins?
They are dead because they have no purpose or were not accepted by investors. Why not spend the time and energy on a new coin/token?

Two coins I wish were revived but I don't have my wallet.dats anymore for these coins but they were fun and we had a big community behind both the coins. ONE WAS FUCKBANKSCOIN and the other one was PLANKTCON COIN. We really thought these were going to be the big coins but the developers both ran away form the projects, which really scuked big time as I had like millions of each one lol and had paid decent money to get them.  ;D When they died, so did my investment in them lol.

Bump , this service is still ongoing !!!

Just completed a blockchain swap for Bitcointalkcoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169923.0

I've become selective in my criteria for coins but i can still take on projects. Currently I use the very latest code base, both PoW and PoS coins I work on will be at par with bitcoin on 0.18.0 and selected coins get the added bonus of additional tech and functionality added.

Huge advantage of the process i've worked out is that maintenance of the source becomes super easy, they all share a common source so updates are easily applied and shared tech sucj as cross blockchain messaging and possibly coin transfer is possible. 

PM me with your coins that need devs/maintainers and if it works out , we can get it done.

There are so many coins that at the point of vanishing with the way their price is going down everyday. Some of them are  Alt, Ect, Xyo, Spn, just to mention a few. Although, majority of these coins kept on emphasizing in their various social media group that they are working on the product development and that very soon their shall be light at the end of the tunnel. Some even promised to burn some of their tokens so that there will be increase in price volume.I hope they will all keep their promises.  I also desire that ETH should boom much this year than last year.

you can look at them and pick which one you want revived. I'll need to also assess it and make a decision .

Thus my offer to help where i can and where it makes sense.

Me too. Once the trust or faith is gone in that project, it's hard to revive it again. You can make its blockchain work but the point here is that it is just going to be useless because it is not going to attract many buyers and get a decent amount of volume. It's an utter waste of time and people move on to a new project that is better.

I can't help but think that it is precisely that kind of thinking that induced a deluge of useless clones, However i am more interested in tech not market, maybe at a ratio of 8:2 . Some coins introduced new ideas, but were eventually abandoned , i'd like to preserve coins that actually did more than change the name from bitcoin.

Also , many takeovers were done successfully, why tie your hopes to a dev instead of the idea/technology ? Some guys are good at talking up a good game, and others are better at actually getting it done.

I believe if you are only understand if that will be so difficult to build its reputation again but that looks so different than me and i just take doge coin as an example about how even a coin that already get off from its developer can still depends its demand and reputation but the fact not all of dying coins are so bad.
I have the opposite opinion with you dude as long as the reputation of the project was not destroyed caused by the scam team and im fine with it.

I once participated in a lot of ICOs and I have a large number of tokens in my wallet that are worthless. I would like to revive them all, but this is something from the realm of fantasy.

What's the purpose of reviving a dead coin, and how can you revive it, you did not give us full details on ow are you going to do that, what if the coin is on Ethereum platform, but it has no volume and it's not in the market, how can you revive a coin that has no support and no investors interested to buy, let us just leave dead coin dead.

Some coins are meant to be dead. We did not realize that in the first instance. All the scam coins are slowly vanishing. Nothing to be revived in my opinion. Its all for good.

I'm sure WPP is one of them. WPP is currently only trading at Digifinex and they have been submitted by Coinbene and Huobi Korea and are still applying at Huobi Global.
They are doing very well on the route and on the right track. This Q4 they will re-develop the token and turn it into stablecoin.
This is a great opportunity to buy cheaply.

Yes, ideas can outlive the initial developers.

I can only help with coins at the moment , tokens especially ethereum ones are uninteresting. If you have/know a coin that is struggling without a dev , i could help out.

Some coins are *dead* in that there is no active development, they were abandoned by initial devs and noone has taken over etc. On such projects people just wait for pumps. In such a case, if the coin has interesting ideas, actual code i would be interested to look at it and if there is a possibility of expanding, upgrading or extending the technology, i would help do that. Others are dead in that they got an intial large following and the developers failed to deliver on the tech, in such a situation i can look at the proposed tech and see if it is actually feasible, if so i can just keep the chain alive and try during my spare moments to build the tech. There are coins that have large followings but use outdated codebase and do not take advantage of advances in crypto that were made after their creation, such coins could benefit from a source code update. There are way too many reasons to help coins along, hell in some cases people just want to swap to a fresh chain to make syncing faster. A new chain can sync in seconds whereas some coins with an excess of 3 million blocks could take a whole week to sync.

i do not consider ethereum tokens as coins , they are not seperate from ethereum from a tech point of view.

Yes true, some coins , especially 1:1 clones are hard to justify keeping alive. Scams will always come in one form or another. First there were basic clones, then people got wise and added a bit of tech , then later they made tokens, then ICOs now dare i say IEOs.

If they are dying off then it is their own fault. If they are not able to keep the interest of investors to their coin and the trading volume, nothing would really help to revive those coins. Moreover, those coins will free some space for more perspective competitors, which is great for the industry in general.

Wondering when this thread turned into an opinion thread.  ::)

My offer is to do so when asked. If you feel that there is no point, while i fully respect that opinion, kindly start your own thread and head down that rabbit hole. If you have no interest in older coins and only want the latest stuff, this ain't the place.

90% of coins are useless, have no tech etc. That is well known and i'd rather not keep re-hashing this, or the pro and cons of revivals. Please scroll up and read previous posts.

916 pages of ANNs  :P of which maybe 900 pages are dead coins. I am not offering to revive every shit coin ever made. In fact let m echange the title.

i also think like that, why revive a coin that is dying or dead.
a coin that is dead is difficult to come back to life, if it is alive, the coin will again disappear and die.
this will make more people suffer losses.

so i agree with your opinion not to revive a dying or dead project.

Please read the original post.

I dont want any dying coin to be revived,they are dying because they arent good enough in the first place and reviving them might be a total mistake because im sure no one will want to reconsider such project and invest money on it

Read the original post.

Bitwhite is a coin that showed much promise in 2017 and listed early 2018. I don't know what happened within their team but the project has been abandoned ever since. A coin worth close to a dollar at its all time high now is now basically worthless. Although I hear they are planning to revive it. Happy to see how that pans out

I'll take a look.

And the technology side ?