Bitcoin Forum

The Devs of XZC decided not to cooperate anymore and go their own,  separate ways.

The coin has a 'founders reward'  on every block which is paid to the devs. In poramins new version Gary's address was removed and replaced by a new address, however, there was no official statement or whatever.

Bittrex has the original version (pre-fork)  listed and it is yet undecided what happens after the fork.

Gary's version has poramins founder reward address removed.


Which version of the coin do you want to mine after the fork? Be aware that bittrex has to use the same fork in order to be available for withdrawals of the pool. It might be they simply halt trading at all of the coin and desist it after the fork.


The devs don't comment or communicate on that issue currently and the slack is very toxic, so I couldn't get any info anywhere I simply let the miners decide.


Please vote which version you want to mine.


Also have a look here :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1638450.msg17289355#msg17289355


Pool is at :

https://xzc.suprnova.cc

poramin  obviously  ;D

Looks like Gary voted with both of his BCT accounts.  ;D

Gary Fork
Why everybody says he doesn't anything for the project. Marketing is as hard as development as i know and sometimes it's hardest.

So i vote for Gary

It isn't a hard question to answer which version to follow except u're Gary and his sock puppets (He's famous with his sock puppets trick, google it), or u're super ignorant or getting paid to troll by him.

TL;DR: Gary has no intention to spend his own money to back the project, no talent to code, no manpower (virtually no one supports him) to work on the project.

Marketing ? Show me what he did to promote the coin except a self-insulting interview where he showed his lack of knowledge ?

Well finally something I can build a decision on, let's wait 24-36h and then I'll update the pool accordingly to what will be the winner.

poramin version

Bittrex verson :-).

If you want to have a meaningful vote, you should consider offering both forks in pools and look where's more hash rate.
A forum vote has nothing to do with mining ZCoin, right?

I follow bittrex version.That is original zcoin.

must be poramin

only poramin

Excellent point

Poramin's version or bittrex version .
I have some coins on bittrex exchange.

Only poramin 

 Top 2 posts : ::)

Bittrex version or poramin version.
I'm waiting for the result.

ocminer any news about pool fork change ??

Yes, the result of the poll is clearly, i'll be switching to poramin's fork as well.

Hopefully Bittrex will switch to that fork as well.

No news about Bittrex choice ?

Why not both? I don't think the coin can support another fork (there's already zoin) but I don't
see the need to choose one up front.

Oc, after block 14000 diff will reset to 0?

I'm right when I chose the Poramin's  Version and Now the price is rising highly starting from yesterday . I'm waiting for new price at 0.005btc when it can be available on Polo next month. it will be a hottest coin in this year on the  profit.

Hello ocminer,

I begun to mine this coin this morning, i notice that the pool seems to tell me i got alot of stale share, im using either the high diff or medium diff port, miner says everything is ok, is there an issue with the pool ?

part of the API of the ccminer

ACC=139
REJ=0
STALE=55
DIFF=7.014719

Im using tourgasm ccminer x64 gonna use the x32 djm version to see if something change.

Ok x32 version hashrate is the same, but same as x64 both version get 50% stale share even on low-diff pools. Maybe something to do about coin network instability alot of people claiming having issues... Getting back to other coins.

It seems ccminer is having some issues here, I've noticed that too with ccminer - however cpuminer works fine.

Ah i see :( well i'll wait for a fix then  8) thanks for the info !

Hello ocminer,

ccminer seems to work fine now, i can see the coins being added to account, but there is one problem each credit i have isn't linked to a TX hash, and my wallet nor the block explorer show anything, is there an issue with transfer ?

No reply ? :/

I'll pm you maybe you don't monitor this topic...

EDIT : sorted it out ! weird stuff, but all working well now !

Hey guys,
just started mining on supernova pool.
What difficulty should I choose for 1 GPU 1080 system and  8 x 070 system from below:

GPU-Ports: 1596, 1569 (high diff)
CPU/GPU-Ports: 1598 (low diff)
CPU-Port-Super-Low-Diff: 1599 (very, very slow CPU's)



Also I tried connecting tot he following ports but the do not seem to work:
  APAC Host: xzc-apac.suprnova.cc & xzc-cn.suprnova.cc (same ports)

So for now I am using the main one in US I am guessing.

Regards

Guys,

anyone knows what happened to this pool?

I was getting increasing rejected, and yesterday it stopped working. Plus there is that message about the pool closing at the end of dec...

Anyone knows more?

Thanks