Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Announcements (Altcoins) => Topic started by: cochranizer666 on December 31, 2016, 04:50:53 AM



Title: Cochran Beta
Post by: cochranizer666 on December 31, 2016, 04:50:53 AM
Hello again, Bitcoiners!

I just stopped by WalletBuilders and created a new Altcoin called Cochran (COCH), just for the fun of it. Currently it is in Beta stage, so it has no logo as of right now, also it's a "free" wallet. Anyone wanting to give it a try?

Here is the link to my page:

https://www.walletbuilders.com/mycoin?coin=f873a597db106cf0237d841df918f46854bdb78cb195f349dc

Algorithm: Scrypt
Type: PoW
Coin name: Cochran
Coin abbreviation: COCH
Address letter: C
RPC port: 9976
P2P port: 9975
Block reward: 10000 coins
Block halving: 840000 blocks
Total coin supply: 16800000000 coins
Coinbase maturity: 1 blocks
Target spacing: 1 minutes
Target timespan: 100000 minutes
Transaction confirmations: 1 blocks

Remember to type "setgenerate true -1" to start mining!


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: Romiraz362 on December 31, 2016, 05:06:32 AM
Wallet not connected


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: cengsuwuei on December 31, 2016, 05:09:33 AM
if you create coin use walletbuilder is not good coin
is very bad if you use free service in walletbuilder


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: soniclord on December 31, 2016, 05:11:16 AM
any node?


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: cochranizer666 on December 31, 2016, 05:15:47 AM
It's supposed to connect, I have the wallet running right now, I don't know what's wrong.


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: fudster on December 31, 2016, 05:23:31 AM
pfff gazillion supply of coins! :o


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: CjMapope on December 31, 2016, 05:24:18 AM
ya sadly walletbuilder coins are full of holes and exploits so sadly i cannot take part, not really a point, but wish you the best! :) (holy crap that supply)

remember: if you can build a community behind the coin, you can always get someone to fork another coin for rebuild, or make a custom wallet yourself in the future for this :)

Good Luck! :)


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: douche on December 31, 2016, 05:42:37 AM
whats with the coins with billions in total coins.  Might want to think a lot smaller to have your coins have some staying power.  When these coins with little value go too low they are no longer traded.  Stop launching coins with Billions of supply please.  Waste of time.  You have been served.  peace


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: cochranizer666 on December 31, 2016, 06:11:32 AM
Wow, you really are a douche  :D


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: fortunecrypto on December 31, 2016, 07:07:21 AM
Wow, you really are a douche  :D

So you this is just a try out and you are going to create your own coin so you cna launch a ico to fund your pocket?nice idea be sure it's attractive to all of us so we can fund your pocket for entertaining us .. :P


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: octavarium on December 31, 2016, 09:02:04 AM
stoped mining , just for fun


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: aioc on January 01, 2017, 04:00:56 PM
This will probably be my last comment in this thread,I don't believe dev has a plan on this coin,first it's a free plan he might make it a paid one but without a roadmap and usage,I don't know where will this coin going to go..


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: ArdiPrabowo on January 01, 2017, 06:21:27 PM
i will wait your detail explain your coin
detail pool to mining
and so is the first i will wait bounty, social media campaign


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: ostrogoto2012 on January 01, 2017, 06:34:00 PM
dev do you plans any airdrop?


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: hollandvan on January 01, 2017, 06:45:42 PM
This coin looks not serious, and no bounty, no marketing, it won't succeed for sure unless op will do more serious development


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: NabilaM on January 18, 2017, 01:41:32 PM
get up!


Title: Re: Cochran Beta
Post by: tippytoes on January 18, 2017, 02:41:08 PM
This coin looks not serious, and no bounty, no marketing, it won't succeed for sure unless op will do more serious development


well, i think you nailed it as up until now no movement whatsoever with this thread...

the dev should be more aggressive if he wants this proj not to fade in existence in the cryptoworld!