Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Service Discussion => Topic started by: 13umble13ee on January 21, 2017, 02:55:10 AM



Title: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: 13umble13ee on January 21, 2017, 02:55:10 AM
Hi guys,

i read below from a very small mixer site:

QUICK LAUNDER

QuickLaunder is basically the system used by most Bitcoin laundry services. We scramble your bitcoins with the coins of other users. The longer you leave your coins in your BitLaunder wallet, the more randomized they will become. QuickLaunder withdrawals are automated and processed quickly, usually requiring less than 2 hrs for confirmation. However, QuickLaunder will only slow down - not stop - a motivated investigator from backtracing your bitcoin. So you should use this option when you want to remain anonymous but the consequences of detection are not catastrophic.

SECURE LAUNDER

Secure Launder renders your bitcoins completely untraceable, even to the most persistent forensic investigator. You deposit bitcoins into your BitLaunder wallet, where we scramble them with coins of other users. When you withdraw your coins, however, we send them from a completely different wallet, a wallet located in untraceable 'onionland' where there is no history whatsoever of your coins. In fact, it is logically impossible to trace your coins if you use the Secure Launder method. Secure Launder is not automatic, and can take up to 24hrs to process your bitcoins, as all withdrawals are handled manually


they support SECURE LAUNDER, its a way to enhance anonymity,  but unfortunatly, they are too small volume to use,   

what about the popular ones , like bitmixer ,  [banned mixer] ,  Bitblender.io 
are they currently using the tech like SECURE LAUNDER ? or its just as same as QUICK LAUNDER ?



Title: Re: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: MadGamer on January 21, 2017, 07:02:04 AM
I have my own doubts about the service you mentioned as I heard a few bad things about them. I personally tend to use Bitmixer.io as Its the most known and still advertise their services for years now , I also don't think Its a good idea for mixers to provide us with details about the mixing process otherwise this could compromise users privacy.
Its always possible to protect yourself anyway , using different addresses and depositing them into exchange and withdrawing after a period of time could be considered as a free mixing service too.


Title: Re: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: Kevin77 on January 21, 2017, 09:49:47 AM
If possible please share links for those quick launder and secure launder.
I believe all established services are following different secured algorithms just to make the coins untraceable. The taint analysis is the simple procedure to find out how depth we got our coins untraceable after getting our coins mixed with them.


Title: Re: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: Patatas on January 21, 2017, 11:46:21 AM
The other two sites mentioned in your comparison looks all scammy to me.
My Question is : Why you want to use those shitty services when reputed services do exist ? Use BitMixer or CryptoMixer.


Title: Re: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: mainpmf on January 21, 2017, 01:28:20 PM
Mixers are a good way to keep anonymity. That's why they still exist ^^

Of course there is nothing that leaves 0 traces.
For example, justice could impose to mixers to reveal their loggs.

That's a bit like a VPN, it's not a total annonimity, but it helps a lot! Unless you sell drugs of course :3


Title: Re: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: Patatas on January 21, 2017, 01:31:05 PM
Mixers are a good way to keep anonymity. That's why they still exist ^^
Not really.They don't make the transactions disappear.If I'am not wrong,a few tools are available to trace the origin address of an transaction.

Of course there is nothing that leaves 0 traces.
For example, justice could impose to mixers to reveal their loggs.
They don't do that.However,they can if they want to.I mean obviously if Legal Authorities are involved.]

That's a bit like a VPN, it's not a total annonimity, but it helps a lot! Unless you sell drugs of course :3
Why else do you think wanna use mixers ?  ;D


Title: Re: mixer service anonymity comparasion
Post by: zend7 on January 21, 2017, 02:31:45 PM
Mixers are a good way to keep anonymity. That's why they still exist ^^
Not really.They don't make the transactions disappear.If I'am not wrong,a few tools are available to trace the origin address of an transaction.

Of course there is nothing that leaves 0 traces.
For example, justice could impose to mixers to reveal their loggs.
They don't do that.However,they can if they want to.I mean obviously if Legal Authorities are involved.]

That's a bit like a VPN, it's not a total annonimity, but it helps a lot! Unless you sell drugs of course :3
Why else do you think wanna use mixers ?  ;D

Anyone who still cares for his/her privacy. Drug users use TOR nowadays together with a VPN . A VPN will always keep track or at least logs of the people who use them just in case something happens after.