Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: IamNotAnonymous on February 02, 2017, 03:13:34 AM



Title: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: IamNotAnonymous on February 02, 2017, 03:13:34 AM
Recently I have noticed, the Bitcoin Talk Forum speaking about - Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? and why did he hide himself ? Few people saying, may be Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi but many do not believe it. Bitcoin Roundtable is probably planing to bring another new candidate to decorate  the throne of Bitcoin Kingdom but if they choose another Alpacino Makamoto this will become a nonsense drama again. The Bitcoin community leaders know who is the inventor of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. Now if the mystery of Bitcoin invention unfold to the media what can happen ? If another developer try to prove that he is the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology signing a message with public key like Dr. Craig Wright with a big hope that he might get a Nobel Prize in economic science;  he will become another laughingstock. This types of nonsense is no longer interesting. Therefore the Bitcoin community leaders must pay attention to wisdom. There is no real excitement claiming inventory right of some one else' invention. That will be catagorised as stealing by the legal court of justice. If any one want to sit on the throne of true inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology he must know that it will only damage the reputation of Bitcoin community. No one or any group of developers can falsely claim the Bitcoin and Blockchain invention because the Chancellor knows who is Satoshi Nakamoto. Do you know who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?  Some of you may not want to know him because they already know him but for the fear of unknown they do not want to say that they know him. Fear not.  Tell the truth. It will end all the speculations and conspiracy theories. Extra ordinary claim does require a genuine proof with concrete evidence. if you want to be the next candidate of Bitcoinman you must bring your full evidence otherwise you will become another laughingstock. If any one really want to play the role better than Dr. Craig Wright you can contact me for assistance.

I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?



Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Vaskiy on February 02, 2017, 03:38:54 AM
I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread. Simply described about few of the developers relating them with Satoshi. Finally have raised a question Am I anonymous?, it doesn't make any sense. Be clear with what you need to express.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Patatas on February 02, 2017, 03:46:12 AM
I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread.
Maybe don't bother posting then ?

@OP : How did the Criag Wright drama end ? He ended up making a fool out of himself.By now ,the community is aware of the "Bitcoinman" trolls.Recently I heard an unborn featus claiming they invented bitcoin.Should that really affect the price of bitcoin ? lol
You mentioned about conspiracy theories? Who? Where ? That is blown out of proportions.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: danherbias07 on February 02, 2017, 03:57:23 AM
Why bother posting it here? Is that person that you are targeting here? Why use a newbie rank to post it?
It got me thinking somehow. Why are many of the threads here are made by newbies then they will be lost forever? Is this just for some troll or just to make users be enemies.
I really dont care who is satoshi anymore. He gave us a gift then we should just use it for now. Thinking about who he is will just make you crazy. Just like what happened to OP. Too much digging to the endless pit and forgot about being himself.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: pooya87 on February 02, 2017, 05:02:14 AM
facts:
  • we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is Satoshi
  • we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi
  • he has been acting too shady and lied about many things, such as the signature he provided and the promise to move the coins but never did.

in other words any discussion about him being Satoshi or not is just pointless and wasting time. and it is mostly done by click-bait news sites and trolls wanting to waste time and possibly spread some FUD in the middle.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Kakmakr on February 02, 2017, 05:45:17 AM
I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread. Simply described about few of the developers relating them with Satoshi. Finally have raised a question Am I anonymous?, it doesn't make any sense. Be clear with what you need to express.

What he is trying to say with a massive wall of text, is this : If you cannot bring concrete proof that you are Satoshi Nakamoto, just stop trying, to save yourself from the embarrassment. The community will scrutinize every claim you make, and if there is only 1 hole in your claim, they will discard the whole thing.

CW had many holes in his theory, and they ripped him a new poophole. ^smile^   

--== We are all, Satoshi Nakamoto ==--


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: mobnepal on February 02, 2017, 07:26:44 AM
This guy is creating lots of threads with long posts which looks like an article rather than a post. Also in every post he is asking others to contact him personally  ::)  ;D

Craig wright is old news this days and nobody gonna believe him as satoshi nakamoto.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: megynacuna on February 02, 2017, 07:52:30 AM
This guy is creating lots of threads with long posts which looks like an article rather than a post. Also in every post he is asking others to contact him personally  ::)  ;D

Craig wright is old news this days and nobody gonna believe him as satoshi nakamoto.

Say that again, I just don't know what the heck is going on and people need to stop trying to be Satoshi and let's concentrate on making Bitcoin better. Fame kills, people! so don't rush for what you don't know.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Jet Cash on February 02, 2017, 08:08:48 AM
I don't know why you guys don't accept that Satoshi is not a person, it is a dominant family of computers. Bitcoin is part of their attempt to take over the world.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: NorrisK on February 02, 2017, 08:12:40 AM
facts:
  • we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is Satoshi
  • we don't have any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi
  • he has been acting too shady and lied about many things, such as the signature he provided and the promise to move the coins but never did.

in other words any discussion about him being Satoshi or not is just pointless and wasting time. and it is mostly done by click-bait news sites and trolls wanting to waste time and possibly spread some FUD in the middle.

The way he went about proofing that he was Satoshi was fishy from the start. That should've raised many more red flags in the bitcoin community.

I guess people simply need a leader to follow and were therefore blinded by the potential uprising.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: SONG GEET on February 02, 2017, 10:10:06 AM
I don't know why you guys don't accept that Satoshi is not a person, it is a dominant family of computers. Bitcoin is part of their attempt to take over the world.
Quite an extraordinary claim, to take over the world really  ::)

Satoshi may be a name of a group that have started working on bitcoin project as a test. But after they release bitcoin to public, investors and developers quickly get into bitcoin with high speculation. Than this group decide to remain anonymous to not make any panic among bitcoin investors.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: gredisgold88 on February 02, 2017, 10:20:53 AM
Recently I have noticed, the Bitcoin Talk Forum speaking about - Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? and why did he hide himself ? Few people saying, may be Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi but many do not believe it. Bitcoin Roundtable is probably planing to bring another new candidate to decorate  the throne of Bitcoin Kingdom but if they choose another Alpacino Makamoto this will become a nonsense drama again. The Bitcoin community leaders know who is the inventor of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. Now if the mystery of Bitcoin invention unfold to the media what can happen ? If another developer try to prove that he is the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology signing a message with public key like Dr. Craig Wright with a big hope that he might get a Nobel Prize in economic science;  he will become another laughingstock. This types of nonsense is no longer interesting. Therefore the Bitcoin community leaders must pay attention to wisdom. There is no real excitement claiming inventory right of some one else' invention. That will be catagorised as stealing by the legal court of justice. If any one want to sit on the throne of true inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology he must know that it will only damage the reputation of Bitcoin community. No one or any group of developers can falsely claim the Bitcoin and Blockchain invention because the Chancellor knows who is Satoshi Nakamoto. Do you know who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?  Some of you may not want to know him because they already know him but for the fear of unknown they do not want to say that they know him. Fear not.  Tell the truth. It will end all the speculations and conspiracy theories. Extra ordinary claim does require a genuine proof with concrete evidence. if you want to be the next candidate of Bitcoinman you must bring your full evidence otherwise you will become another laughingstock. If any one really want to play the role better than Dr. Craig Wright you can contact me for assistance.

I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?


This is very funny, no anounymous in bitcoin, but in blockchain anounymous owned transactions, may I still ask you, why do you make this thread


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Xester on February 02, 2017, 10:23:46 AM
In my opinion Satoshi Nakamoto is not a single individual but a group of persons who are into blockchain technology. They are not just an ordindary group but a group of programmers. Nobody can claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto and it will never happen. Keeping the mystery behind Nakamoto is not the right issue that bitcoin must face. THe community must focus on strengthening bitcoin and increasing the blocksize.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: requester on February 02, 2017, 10:27:13 AM
It's not clear what you are actually planning to mention in this post. And i am tired of hearing about fake Satoshi many a times. So can you people please stop acting role of Satoshi. He is anonymous and he wont come with pen paper and other evidence. If he wanted to show off himself then he might have long back but hr had kept himself hiddenb from the world. May be we have seen him but we font know that he is satoshi.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on February 02, 2017, 11:51:10 AM
If I was wright, the last thing I would want is to have to be dancing about in the face of the press.

He hash staff. He has law firms and this means he is spending money.

That oz company was paid out of administration cleanly without anyone knowing.

So, what scam. The only scam I see is managing to vanish - that looks to me as something he wanted.

from what I have heard, he has at least 50 staff. They are paid well enough to not talk. 50 people is 20 plus million a year

the patents are filed from one of the top firms in the UK from the little that is there. These are guys who do not get out of bed for less than a 6 figure sum
You cannot patent the blockchain, it has to be new - that is novel ideas

he has moved his companies (those he left) into a trust structure and has no easy links to them any more but the singapore one is audited annually and has a holding of just over 100,000 BTC. that is itself interesting
yet he is a fraud, so we just stoip looking?

wright did not recieve the money from the oz tax ppl - it was claimed as an offset, but he withdrew leaving it
the interesting part of this is that if he withdraws without the tax offset, he escapes australian capital gains.

when he left, btc was 300, now it is 1000
that means he managed to run with 70million gain and NO tax

wanting to be not considered satoshi means no capitral gains

he had 50 staff in oz
the records show that he paid 100 cents in the dollar.

this is all up over 100 million in staff costs alone
not from government
not from disgruntaled investors
PAID!

the biggest magic trick here is that we do not believe he did any of this, yet there are MANY ex staffers in oz and it is known there are many in the UK

the only silly thing here is how wright is just being left to do what he wants
I really do not think he gives a shit


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on February 02, 2017, 12:00:22 PM
that author mentions Calvin Ayre

Ayre is a gambling and casino BILLIONAIRE

Casinos have a porblem
that is US players coming in and out and being paid.

Bitcoin is the PERFECT solution

wright has made himseklf look a joke publically.
What nobdy knows is that wright LIKES privacy

Wght designs online games
Poker.
Casinos.

Wright was doing this in the 90s

Wright was the one that managed the systems and security for Lasseters - the FIRST online casino

the trick with magic is to have people look away from where you want them to

The US puts people into jail for gambling operations

wright can still develop underground poker systems
payment systems in bitcoin
casinos
gambling

EVEN if the world thinks he is a fraud

because the ONLY part of the world HE cares about know what he does.

If you move money for casinos
if you code casinos that have US citizens using bitcoin

WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE IN THE MEDIA
or would you make yourself a public fool to be rich and powerful BEHIND the curtain....,


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: zahra4577 on February 02, 2017, 12:00:58 PM
I think if Satoshi has to ever come out in public and expose himself, the first thing he would do is use his Account here on bitcointalk and declare it here before going to make it public.
Once he prove himself here that he is the real Satoshi,it wouldn't be difficult to convince others.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on February 02, 2017, 12:14:18 PM
who in their right mind would want to come out if they have money AND can get away with it.

i still think it a game to vanish.

wright used to design and code payment systems that avoided the US and poker lobbies and casinos....

what better way to kill off rumors

Poker - jail.
Wright would never have signed. he used to travel to vegas all the time
Travel to the US as he buddy arye cannot would be a result



Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on February 02, 2017, 12:20:47 PM
why the fuk would satoshi CARE about what those on our lsts thinK

Really!!!

if satoshi does a coupe - it is a war.
if wright is satoshi and he wants to out core, the LAST think will be to sign and have them know he is coming

add that toi his background and it is nonsense.

Wright is Ayre's IT guru

Ayre is a BILLIONARE casino mogil thta has escaped the US

wright does NOT want to be known!!!!!
wright STILL codes for the gaming and p[ayment industry!

NOBODY in the casino world who knows wright gave a crap about his media bs as it was over so fast

NOW nobdoy is looking into poker and casinos at ALL!

wright was suceessful - he beat you all!


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: sir.humus on February 02, 2017, 12:25:28 PM
I think if Satoshi has to ever come out in public and expose himself, the first thing he would do is use his Account here on bitcointalk and declare it here before going to make it public.
Once he prove himself here that he is the real Satoshi,it wouldn't be difficult to convince others.

How hard it might be to brake a user password in this forum?
If Satoshi will write her a message there will be someone to claim that it's not really him but somebody who take over his account.
I don't think anyone can prove that he's Satoshi, and IMO it doesn't really matter.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: ipanks on February 02, 2017, 12:31:49 PM
if you asked I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ? i will be answer that no, you are not anonymous but at least you will cover your true identity from the public. but as i read in your thread, i am not sure that i can understand what you're mean.

i think i am no problem who is satoshi, is he is one person or group community, i only thinking about bitcoin and i think he don't want to show himself. so lets we think, what will satoshi show himself in here? is there any affect for bitcoin if he reveal his identity? everyone can say that i am satoshi and i am creator of bitcoin, but after that, what next?

i think, it is better to fix the blockchain transaction first so bitcoin user is not waiting too long for complete confirming of the transaction. this is the important thing that we should think rather than we only focus with satoshi that maybe still hidden in somewhere places and he laugh for reading this. it just my opinion and i am sorry if i make mistake.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on February 02, 2017, 12:41:17 PM
This is why wright is tring to hide from being Satoshi
https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/src/uibase.cpp

Search the old code - look for POKER!

Wright is a casino operator.

Bitcoin was a way to move US funds!

Wright did the worlds first licensed casino, lasseters in australia.

His best buddy is Calvin Ayre - gambling BILLIONAIRE.

He wants you NOT to believe!



Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on February 02, 2017, 12:47:43 PM
This is what the ozzie tax ppl are investigating

He does NOT want to be Satoshi
He wants nobody to believe

HE IS A FUKING GAMBLING BILLIONARIRE with ties to fuking Bodog and Bovegas and the LAST thing wright wants is for you to beleive!

His other buddy - Stefan Mathews was the CTO of Centrebet

Wright consulkted to playboy gaming
To sporting bet

They are NOT investigation bitcoin and his satoshi links -0 that is the false flag

he is a casino operator - he WRITES CASINO CODE


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: buwaytress on February 02, 2017, 01:01:23 PM
I don't know why you guys don't accept that Satoshi is not a person, it is a dominant family of computers. Bitcoin is part of their attempt to take over the world.

Indeed, why are people so fixated on evidencing the humanity of Satoshi when it is nigh time to integrate with the true Nakamoto that shall one day inherit this earth?  If you want to come together and become Nakamoto with us, please message me personally and I/we will offer assistance.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Fireblade on February 02, 2017, 02:43:17 PM
I think if Satoshi has to ever come out in public and expose himself, the first thing he would do is use his Account here on bitcointalk and declare it here before going to make it public.
Once he prove himself here that he is the real Satoshi,it wouldn't be difficult to convince others.
First no one know that who i s satosi, either it is the name of a person or a group or just a fake name, and secondly i think he do not need to disclose his identity here. and think he will never like to disclose his identity, bitcoin has the property of being anonymous and he will like to continue it as such anonymous therefore he is not going to disclose his identity.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: hv_ on March 03, 2017, 06:53:06 PM
that author mentions Calvin Ayre

Ayre is a gambling and casino BILLIONAIRE

Casinos have a porblem
that is US players coming in and out and being paid.

Bitcoin is the PERFECT solution

wright has made himseklf look a joke publically.
What nobdy knows is that wright LIKES privacy

Wght designs online games
Poker.
Casinos.

Wright was doing this in the 90s

Wright was the one that managed the systems and security for Lasseters - the FIRST online casino

the trick with magic is to have people look away from where you want them to

The US puts people into jail for gambling operations

wright can still develop underground poker systems
payment systems in bitcoin
casinos
gambling

EVEN if the world thinks he is a fraud

because the ONLY part of the world HE cares about know what he does.

If you move money for casinos
if you code casinos that have US citizens using bitcoin

WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE IN THE MEDIA
or would you make yourself a public fool to be rich and powerful BEHIND the curtain....,

He must be really pissed now, since cost of moving grows exponetial...not as planned?


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: kidoseagle0312 on March 03, 2017, 10:55:48 PM
Recently I have noticed, the Bitcoin Talk Forum speaking about - Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? and why did he hide himself ? Few people saying, may be Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi but many do not believe it. Bitcoin Roundtable is probably planing to bring another new candidate to decorate  the throne of Bitcoin Kingdom but if they choose another Alpacino Makamoto this will become a nonsense drama again. The Bitcoin community leaders know who is the inventor of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. Now if the mystery of Bitcoin invention unfold to the media what can happen ? If another developer try to prove that he is the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology signing a message with public key like Dr. Craig Wright with a big hope that he might get a Nobel Prize in economic science;  he will become another laughingstock. This types of nonsense is no longer interesting. Therefore the Bitcoin community leaders must pay attention to wisdom. There is no real excitement claiming inventory right of some one else' invention. That will be catagorised as stealing by the legal court of justice. If any one want to sit on the throne of true inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology he must know that it will only damage the reputation of Bitcoin community. No one or any group of developers can falsely claim the Bitcoin and Blockchain invention because the Chancellor knows who is Satoshi Nakamoto. Do you know who is Satoshi Nakamoto ?  Some of you may not want to know him because they already know him but for the fear of unknown they do not want to say that they know him. Fear not.  Tell the truth. It will end all the speculations and conspiracy theories. Extra ordinary claim does require a genuine proof with concrete evidence. if you want to be the next candidate of Bitcoinman you must bring your full evidence otherwise you will become another laughingstock. If any one really want to play the role better than Dr. Craig Wright you can contact me for assistance.

I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?



I'm sorry, but I really don't exactly understand what your trying to emphasize in your story. Are you asking who is Satoshi Nakamoto, or are you saying that any person who will stand and declare about themselves that they're the real one in the end it will become a laughingstock or what etc.  My point is direct to something that you wanna know unlike this one its so many blah,blah, blah.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: voise on March 04, 2017, 01:58:56 PM
One thing is clear, Craig Wright is not Satoshi. He lied multiple times and never provided actual proof that would be very easy to do if he was Nakamoto.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: szpalata on March 04, 2017, 04:53:56 PM
One thing is clear, Craig Wright is not Satoshi. He lied multiple times and never provided actual proof that would be very easy to do if he was Nakamoto.

I agree with you on my his 100%, he's no Satoshi Nakamoto but I'm surprised everyone seem to be giving attention to these fame whores who will just do anything for fame. Satoshi; whoever he's must prove himself beyond the talking in the media to be accepted credible enough as Satoshi Nakamoto.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Shiroslullaby on March 04, 2017, 04:57:41 PM
The comments by panopotty are very interesting. I would not be surprised if this was all true.

Would definitely make sense why tax investigators are interested in him. Just owning some Bitcoins doesn't seem like enough for authorities to get involved,
unless they had some kind of proof that you sold millions in Bitcoin and didn't pay taxes, of course.


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: Kprawn on March 04, 2017, 05:39:34 PM
The comments by panopotty are very interesting. I would not be surprised if this was all true.

Would definitely make sense why tax investigators are interested in him. Just owning some Bitcoins doesn't seem like enough for authorities to get involved,
unless they had some kind of proof that you sold millions in Bitcoin and didn't pay taxes, of course.

What tax does Satoshi owe the government? The millions of bitcoins are still unused, so no monetary gain was received from these coins. Yes,

once he sell some of these coins, it will be a whole other story and he will have to pay capital gains on that. There are no legal way for Satoshi

to use these coins and still stay anonymous. If I was him, I would create my own mixer services and push the coins through that, and once it has

gone through that mixer service, I will close it down and destroy the information.  ;D


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: doomistake on March 04, 2017, 06:16:10 PM
I can't get what you're planning to mention in this thread. Simply described about few of the developers relating them with Satoshi. Finally have raised a question Am I anonymous?, it doesn't make any sense. Be clear with what you need to express.

OP said a lot about this developers of bitcoin and trying to know who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, and just ended in one question saying I am not anonymous, Am I? wow, just wow. You can just simply ask it without saying that long, it is nonsense because it is complete unrelated for what you have said OP, and I know that you are going to complain to our replies in your post, that we should give you a better answer, but how can we give you one, if in the first place you are talking about Two things which is confusing because they are not really related at all, in some ways, yeah, but Satoshi Nakamoto, to I am not anonymous?  ??? ???

And to answer your question, No, you are completely anonymous on using bitcoin unless you are going to say who you really are. :)


Title: Re: I-Am-Not-Anonymous; Am I ?
Post by: panopotty on March 05, 2017, 02:27:48 PM

What tax does Satoshi owe the government? The millions of bitcoins are still unused, so no monetary gain was received from these coins. Yes,


wright moved os

there are capital gains when you leave a country

so - wright owes taxes IF he is Satoshi

that it s the point :P

Wright proves and wright has to pay tax - fukin simple

that is why he tried to make you all think the phd was fake
why he hides
he did this well as you do not even check.

his fukin thesis is in the csu library and you still think it is not real!