Bitcoin Forum

Politicians are constantly trying to restrict access to weapons. I propose in this thread to lay out the cases when the weapon helps people to preserve their life, health and property. Let people know why it is important to have the right to arms. https://youtu.be/KeNPnHAyRyw

In winter haven, Florida, at the family home of the singing burst uninvited guest. When he went to the door, he noticed someone from the family and fulfilled a warning shot.
But it's not vastrakala offender – he moved to the kitchen. There it was waited already by the owners of the house – father, mother and son, and each of them had a weapon in his hands.
Because the offender refused to leave, they had to open fire, as a result, he died at the scene from his injuries. https://youtu.be/Ql1XtOs9VbE

As coming from a country that do not have these laws, I am also quite curious why Americans love their guns. I've read somewhere that it was because of their frontier origins making guns necessary for survival.

Bold statements. Not true without facts.

What country are you from? I believe your statement may only be true in the UK.

In the US Politicians aren't constantly trying to restrict access to weapons. But they are (the Dems at least) trying to lower murders and school shootings and restrict access to weapons by people with mental illness. Do you know how easy it is to get a gun in the US? Anyone who things it's restrictive is either under the legal age of driving or naive of reality. Go to a gun show, they'll sell you a gun for cash...no questions asked.

Last time I went to a gun show there was a booth with about 12 tables each with a customer filling out the form for the government background check.  They'd get the approval (or not) and then go back to whichever table the vendor they were dealing with was at.

So you are repeating liberal misinformation?

Even though the government will restrict the use of weapons to civilians but the syndicates, gangs and other forces of evil in the society will still have access to firearms and loose weapons in the black market. As long as the government cannot fully protect the individuals gun restriction must be carefully studied before implemented. If the government will restrict or ban weapons to the public then they must increase police manpower.

UK beeing influenced from the continent, and their own experience. You know from London Metropolitan Police those Bobby Whistles?
Maybe initially those just had been budget cuts, not handing out guns but just a whistle instead. Think Noisy Cricket weapon from Men in Black, just without any punch.

The statistics in the end round are speaking a clear language. There is no way back for the Unites States into a more peacefull statistical bottomline. The weapons are floating around out there. UK made that differenting experience and might wanna think twice.

Why would i feel safe when some sub 60 iq people can legally own guns? :/

@spendulus
Where was that gun show? Laws differ from state to state.
And was it a private selling or from a gun business?
Because the latter doesnt need to do a background check for sure.

I think this explains the problem very well
If there is something wrong please point it out:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jan/07/politifact-sheet-3-things-know-about-gun-show-loop/

Was it not government that allows people to have access to guns in the first place And if they think its time to restrict that access, then there is nothing wrong about that. Times have change where people needs to have a gun in other to feel safe and even now, its doing more harm than good and innocent lives have been lost as a result of that so if restricting it will reduce such then I see nothing wrong with that.

I think its high time the government restrict some people from getting access to weapons especially military grade weaponry. The government shouldnt have let civilians access to this kind of weaponry in the first place. there should be strict rules that prevents some people from getting access to weapons at all.