Title: Core Verses Unlimited Post by: kiklo on March 26, 2017, 06:35:54 AM Time of a Hard Fork Fast Approaching.
In Your Opinions 1. Who will triggered the Hard Fork First? (Core or Unlimited) 2. Which Will you Support? (BTCC or BTU) 3. In your Best Estimate, Price per Coin After they Split. BTCC = $ ? BTU = $ ? 8) FYI: BTCC= BIT-CORE COIN BTU = BIT-UNLIMITED Title: Re: Core Verses Unlimited Post by: Amph on March 26, 2017, 06:53:23 AM i'm supporting core no matter what, but unlimited look like will trigger the hard fork first, btw there is no hard fork with core...
i highly doubt the value will fall below $600-700 or even remainign at current level Title: Re: Core Verses Unlimited Post by: franky1 on March 26, 2017, 07:19:40 AM i'm supporting core no matter what, but unlimited look like will trigger the hard fork first, btw there is no hard fork with core... i highly doubt the value will fall below $600-700 or even remainign at current level hard=node and pool vote soft =only pool vote.. what you dont realise is soft can also cause splits. and hard can also keep the chain united. for clarity soft and hard is simply: soft: pool only vote hard: nodes and pools vote below these umbrella terms is what could happen.. in both hard and soft it can either continue as one chain. or bilateral split softfork: consensus - >94% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: small 5% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced and dead softfork: controversial - >50% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: long big% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced and dead softfork: bilateral split - intentionally ignoring/banning opposing rules and not including them. result: 2 chains hardfork: consensus - >94% nodes, then >94% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: 5% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced / dead hardfork: controversial - >50% nodes, then >50% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: big% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced / dead hardfork: bilateral split - intentionally ignoring/banning opposing rules and not including them. result: 2 chains go check out cores bip9 orphaning blocks and node to get their 95%=100%.. oh and they can lower the trigger below 95%. go check out cores UASF orphaning blocks and node to get their 100%.. oh and they can lower the trigger at any level ^ such basic understanding that has been known for over a year and it seems even now some cant grasp it Title: Re: Core Verses Unlimited Post by: quake313 on March 26, 2017, 07:20:22 AM If you look at current statistics there will not be a hardfork any time soon.
Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1842756.0 Title: Re: Core Verses Unlimited Post by: Lauda on March 26, 2017, 07:26:58 AM FYI: Nope. The economic majority has agreed to divide them as follows:BTCC= BIT-CORE COIN BTU = BIT-UNLIMITED BTC - current Bitcoin. BTU - Bitcoin Unlimited altcoin. 1. Who will triggered the Hard Fork First? There is nothing in Core that may trigger a HF.(Core or Unlimited) 2. Which Will you Support? BTU has literally no support from the economy. (BTCC or BTU) https://i.imgur.com/TMqlmoL.png If this is what you're voting for, you are a disgrace to everything that Satoshi built. 'Member: https://i.redditmedia.com/jGkQ4jIf37fJMPFFogB94Bu4uHLrS0nchdtG8nsjalA.jpg?w=1024&s=41b0fbd171ee5af4d8d8c18572f44e60 |